scholarly journals Comparison of the Feasibility, Efficiency, and Safety of Genome Editing Technologies

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10355
Author(s):  
Nicolás González González Castro ◽  
Jan Bjelic ◽  
Gunya Malhotra ◽  
Cong Huang ◽  
Salman Hasan Alsaffar
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Entire Genome ◽  
Rational Decision Making ◽  
Programmable Nucleases ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Detection Strategies ◽  
Selection Of

Recent advances in programmable nucleases including meganucleases (MNs), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-Cas (CRISPR-Cas) have propelled genome editing from explorative research to clinical and industrial settings. Each technology, however, features distinct modes of action that unevenly impact their applicability across the entire genome and are often tested under significantly different conditions. While CRISPR-Cas is currently leading the field due to its versatility, quick adoption, and high degree of support, it is not without limitations. Currently, no technology can be regarded as ideal or even applicable to every case as the context dictates the best approach for genetic modification within a target organism. In this review, we implement a four-pillar framework (context, feasibility, efficiency, and safety) to assess the main genome editing platforms, as a basis for rational decision-making by an expanding base of users, regulators, and consumers. Beyond carefully considering their specific use case with the assessment framework proposed here, we urge stakeholders interested in genome editing to independently validate the parameters of their chosen platform prior to commitment. Furthermore, safety across all applications, particularly in clinical settings, is a paramount consideration and comprehensive off-target detection strategies should be incorporated within workflows to address this. Often neglected aspects such as immunogenicity and the inadvertent selection of mutants deficient for DNA repair pathways must also be considered.

Concepts of Molecular Plant Breeding and Genome Editing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Keyword(s):  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genome Editing ◽  
Genetic Linkage ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Crop Improvement ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Induced Mutations ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Targeted Gene Editing ◽  
Breeding Techniques

Traditional plant breeding depends on spontaneous and induced mutations available in the crop plants. Such mutations are rare and occur randomly. By contrast, molecular breeding and genome editing are advanced breeding techniques that can enhance the selection process and produce precisely targeted modifications in any crop. Identification of molecular markers, based on SSRs and SNPs, and the availability of high-throughput (HTP) genotyping platforms have accelerated the process of generating dense genetic linkage maps and thereby enhanced application of marker-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Advanced molecular biology techniques that facilitate precise, efficient, and targeted modifications at genomic loci are termed as “genome editing.” The genome editing tools include “zinc-finger nucleases (ZNFs),” “transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs),” oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (ODM), and “clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPER/Cas) system,” which can be used for targeted gene editing. Concepts of molecular plant breeding and genome editing systems are presented in this chapter.

Therapeutic genome editing with engineered nucleases

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Haas ◽  
Viviane Dettmer ◽  
Toni Cathomen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Genome Editing ◽  
Genetic Disorders ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
New Era ◽  
Engineered Nucleases ◽  
Genetic Interventions ◽  
Type Gene ◽  
Programmable Nucleases ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapies

SummaryTargeted genome editing with designer nucleases, such as zinc finger nucleases, TALE nucleases, and CRISPR-Cas nucleases, has heralded a new era in gene therapy. Genetic disorders, which have not been amenable to conventional gene-addition-type gene therapy approaches, such as disorders with dominant inheritance or diseases caused by mutations in tightly regulated genes, can now be treated by precise genome surgery. Moreover, engineered nucleases enable novel genetic interventions to fight infectious diseases or to improve cancer immunotherapies. Here, we review the development of the different classes of programmable nucleases, discuss the challenges and improvements in translating gene editing into clinical use, and give an outlook on what applications can expect to enter the clinic in the near future.

TALEN-mediated genome editing: prospects and perspectives

2014 ◽  
Vol 462 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Wright ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Bing Yang ◽  
Martin H. Spalding
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Natural Processes ◽  
Current State ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

Genome editing is the practice of making predetermined and precise changes to a genome by controlling the location of DNA DSBs (double-strand breaks) and manipulating the cell's repair mechanisms. This technology results from harnessing natural processes that have taken decades and multiple lines of inquiry to understand. Through many false starts and iterative technology advances, the goal of genome editing is just now falling under the control of human hands as a routine and broadly applicable method. The present review attempts to define the technique and capture the discovery process while following its evolution from meganucleases and zinc finger nucleases to the current state of the art: TALEN (transcription-activator-like effector nuclease) technology. We also discuss factors that influence success, technical challenges and future prospects of this quickly evolving area of study and application.

scholarly journals Update of Regulatory Options of New Breeding Techniques and Biosafety Approaches among Selected Countries: A Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 18-35
Author(s):  
Silas Obukosia ◽  
Olalekan Akinbo ◽  
Woldeyesus Sinebo ◽  
Moussa Savadogo ◽  
Samuel Timpo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Genetically Modified Organisms ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Intermediate Step ◽  
Homing Endonucleases ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Genomic Editing ◽  
New Breeding Techniques ◽  
Breeding Techniques

A new set of breeding techniques, referred to as New Breeding Techniques developed in the last two decades have potential for enhancing improved productivity in crop and animal breeding globally. These include site directed nucleases based genomic editing procedures-CRISPR and Cas associated proteins, Zinc Finger Nucleases, Meganucleases/Homing Endonucleases and Transcription- Activator Like-Effector Nucleases for genome editing and other technologies including- Oligonucleotide-Directed Mutagenesis, Cisgenesis and intragenesis, RNA-Dependent DNA methylation; Transgrafting, Agroinfiltration, Reverse breeding. There are ongoing global debates on whether the processes of and products emerging from these technologies should be regulated as genetically modified organisms or approved as conventional products. Decisions on whether to regulate as GMOs are based both on understanding of the molecular basis of their development and if the GMO intermediate step was used. For example- cisgenesis, can be developed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens methods of transformation, a process used by GMO but if the selection is properly conducted the intermediate GMO elements will be eliminated and the final product will be identical to the conventionally developed crops. Others like Site Directed Nuclease 3 are regulated as GMOs in countries such as United State of America, Canada, European Union, Argentina, Australia. Progress in genome editing research, testing of genome edited bacterial blight resistant rice, development of Guidelines for regulating new breeding techniques or genome editing in Africa is also covered with special reference to South Africa, Kenya and Nigeria. Science- and evidence-based approach to regulation of new breeding techniques among regulators and policy makers should be strongly supported.

scholarly journals Genome Editing Technologies as Cellular Defense Against Viral Pathogens

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingzi Zhang ◽  
Mo Li
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Genome Editing ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Chronic Infections ◽  
Emerging Viruses ◽  
Novel Therapy ◽  
Viral Pathogens

Viral infectious diseases are significant threats to the welfare of world populations. Besides the widespread acute viral infections (e.g., dengue fever) and chronic infections [e.g., those by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)], emerging viruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), pose great challenges to the world. Genome editing technologies, including clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins, zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), have played essential roles in the study of new treatment for viral infectious diseases in cell lines, animal models, and clinical trials. Genome editing tools have been used to eliminate latent infections and provide resistance to new infections. Increasing evidence has shown that genome editing-based antiviral strategy is simple to design and can be quickly adapted to combat infections by a wide spectrum of viral pathogens, including the emerging coronaviruses. Here we review the development and applications of genome editing technologies for preventing or eliminating infections caused by HIV, HBV, HPV, HSV, and SARS-CoV-2, and discuss how the latest advances could enlighten further development of genome editing into a novel therapy for viral infectious diseases.

scholarly journals Highly efficient generation of bacteria leaf blight resistance and transgene-free rice using genome editing and multiplexed selection system

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Yu ◽  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
Huaping Gui ◽  
Lizhao Geng ◽  
Juan Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Binding ◽  
Genome Editing ◽  
Leaf Blight ◽  
Genomic Research ◽  
Blight Resistance ◽  
Selection System ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Efficient Generation ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Background Rice leaf blight is a worldwide devastating disease caused by bacteria Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae (Xoo). The UPT (up-regulated by transcription activator-like 1 effector) box in promoter region of the rice Xa13 gene played a key role in Xoo pathogenicity. Mutation of key bacterial protein binding site in UPT box of Xa13 to abolish PXO99-induced Xa13 expression is a way to improve rice resistant to bacterial.Highly efficient generation and selection transgene-free, edited plants helpful to shorten and simple the gene editing breeding process. Selective elimination of transgenic pollen of E0 plants can enrich proportion of E1 transgene-free offspring and expression of the color mark gene in seeds makes the selection of E2 plants is very convenient and efficient. In this study, a genome editing and multiplexed selection system was used to generate bacteria leaf blight resistance and transgene-free rice plants.Results We introduced site specific mutations into the UPT box using CRISPR/Cas12a technology to hamper TAL (Transcription-Activator Like effectors) protein binding and gene activation, and generated genome edited rice with improved bacteria blight resistance. Transgenic pollens of E0 plants were eliminated by pollen specific expression of α-amylase gene Zmaa1, the proportion of transgene-free plants were enriched from 25% to 50% in single T-DNA insertion events in E1 generation. Transgenic seeds were visually identified and discarded by specific aleuronic expression of DsRed, which reduced 50% cost and achieved up to 98.64% of accuracy for selection of transgene-free edited plants. Conclusion We demonstrated core nucleotide deletion in the UPT box of Xa13 promoter conferred resistance to rice blight and selection of transgene-free plants were boosted by introducing multiplexed selection. The combination of genome editing and transgene-free selection is an efficient strategy to accelerate functional genomic research and plant breeding.

scholarly journals A Revolution toward Gene-Editing Technology and Its Application to Crop Improvement

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny Ahmar ◽  
Sumbul Saeed ◽  
Muhammad Hafeez Ullah Khan ◽  
Shahid Ullah Khan ◽  
Freddy Mora-Poblete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Gene Editing ◽  
Genomic Structure ◽  
Genetic Locus ◽  
Crop Improvement ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Genetic Traits

Genome editing is a relevant, versatile, and preferred tool for crop improvement, as well as for functional genomics. In this review, we summarize the advances in gene-editing techniques, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like (TAL) effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated with the Cas9 and Cpf1 proteins. These tools support great opportunities for the future development of plant science and rapid remodeling of crops. Furthermore, we discuss the brief history of each tool and provide their comparison and different applications. Among the various genome-editing tools, CRISPR has become the most popular; hence, it is discussed in the greatest detail. CRISPR has helped clarify the genomic structure and its role in plants: For example, the transcriptional control of Cas9 and Cpf1, genetic locus monitoring, the mechanism and control of promoter activity, and the alteration and detection of epigenetic behavior between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) investigated based on genetic traits and related genome-wide studies. The present review describes how CRISPR/Cas9 systems can play a valuable role in the characterization of the genomic rearrangement and plant gene functions, as well as the improvement of the important traits of field crops with the greatest precision. In addition, the speed editing strategy of gene-family members was introduced to accelerate the applications of gene-editing systems to crop improvement. For this, the CRISPR technology has a valuable advantage that particularly holds the scientist’s mind, as it allows genome editing in multiple biological systems.

scholarly journals Strategies to Increase On-Target and Reduce Off-Target Effects of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Plants

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 3719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Hajiahmadi ◽  
Ali Movahedi ◽  
Hui Wei ◽  
Dawei Li ◽  
Yasin Orooji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Short Palindromic Repeat ◽  
External Forces ◽  
Time And Energy ◽  
Reduced Time ◽  
Target Effects

The CRISPR/Cas9 system (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated protein 9) is a powerful genome-editing tool in animals, plants, and humans. This system has some advantages, such as a high on-target mutation rate (targeting efficiency), less cost, simplicity, and high-efficiency multiplex loci editing, over conventional genome editing tools, including meganucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs). One of the crucial shortcomings of this system is unwanted mutations at off-target sites. We summarize and discuss different approaches, such as dCas9 and Cas9 paired nickase, to decrease the off-target effects in plants. According to studies, the most effective method to reduce unintended mutations is the use of ligand-dependent ribozymes called aptazymes. The single guide RNA (sgRNA)/ligand-dependent aptazyme strategy has helped researchers avoid unwanted mutations in human cells and can be used in plants as an alternative method to dramatically decrease the frequency of off-target mutations. We hope our concept provides a new, simple, and fast gene transformation and genome-editing approach, with advantages including reduced time and energy consumption, the avoidance of unwanted mutations, increased frequency of on-target changes, and no need for external forces or expensive equipment.

31 PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF GENE KNOCKOUT PIGS USING GENOME EDITING AND SOMATIC CELL CLONING

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
H. Matsunari ◽  
M. Watanabe ◽  
K. Nakano ◽  
A. Uchikura ◽  
Y. Asano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Genome Editing ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
Gene Knockout ◽  
Genetically Modified ◽  
Zinc Finger Nucleases ◽  
International Institute ◽  
Induced Mutations ◽  
Transcription Activator

Genome editing technologies have been used as a powerful strategy for the generation of genetically modified pigs. We previously developed genetically modified clone pigs with organogenesis-disabled phenotypes, as well as pigs exhibiting diseases with similar features to those of humans. Here, we report the production efficiency of various gene knockout cloned pigs from somatic cells that were genetically modified using zinc finger nucleases (ZFN) or transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN). The ZFN- or TALEN-encoding mRNAs, which targeted 7 autosomal or X-linked genes, were introduced into porcine fetal fibroblast cells using electroporation. Clonal cell populations carrying induced mutations were selected after limiting dilution. The targeted portion of the genes was amplified using PCR, followed by sequencing and mutation analysis. Among the collected knockout cell colonies, cells showing good proliferation and morphology were selected and used for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). In vitro-matured oocytes were obtained from porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes cultured in NCSU23-based medium and were used to obtain recipient oocytes for SCNT after enucleation. SCNT was performed as reported previously (Matsunari et al. 2008). The cloned embryos were cultured for 7 days in porcine zygote medium (PZM)-5 to assess their developmental ability. Cloned embryos were transplanted into the oviduct or uterus of oestrus-synchronized recipient gilts to evaluate their competence to develop to fetuses or piglets. Cloned embryos reconstructed with 7 types of knockout cells showed equal development to blastocysts compared with those derived from the wild-type cells (54.5–83.3% v. 60.7%). Our data (Table 1) demonstrated that the reconstructed embryos derived from knockout cells could efficiently give rise to cloned offspring regardless of the type of genome editing methodology (i.e. ZFN or TALEN). Table 1.Production efficiency of gene knockout cloned pigs using genome editing This study was supported by JST, ERATO, the Nakauchi Stem Cell and Organ Regeneration Project, JST, CREST, Meiji University International Institute for Bio-Resource Research (MUIIBR), and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26870630.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document