Efektivitas Mediasi sebagai Alternative Dispute Resolution Terhadap Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Pematangsiantar

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of meditation on divorce cases in the Pematangsiantar Religious Court. The problem in this research is focused on how to implement Mediation in divorce cases at the Pematangsintar Religious Court. The research method in this research is empirical normative legal research, namely by analyzing the related regulations by summarizing them with the results of data obtained directly from the Pematangsianta Religious Court, then the data is analyzed qualitatively. This study concludes that mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is seen as an effective and fair way of dispute resolution. Mediation outside the court is regulated in Article 6 of Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Mediation as a decision-making mechanism or a peace agreement is the main authority of the disputing parties and maintains good relations. Mediation must be carried out first in divorce cases before the judge decides in the divorce case, because every judge's decision that does not go through mediation is considered. null and void. The Mediator Judge as much as possible carries out a mediation process with the parties in the case so that the marriage is maintained. However, the success of mediation lies in the good faith of both parties in following and compliance with the mediation process.

Download Full-text

Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek

Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jph.1.2.2343.67-71 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 67-71

Author(s):

I Gede Mahendra Juliana Adiputra ◽

Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽

Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Research Method ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Geographical Indications ◽

Legal Research ◽

The Law ◽

The Right ◽

Mutual Agreement

The existence of competition causes the original brand owner to feel disadvantaged because the sales result has decreased. It is permissible for someone to use another party's mark as long as they ask permission from the trademark owner first. The owner can give trademark rights to other people as agreed in an agreement. The formulation of the problem in this research is as follows: how is the legal protection of trademark rights and how to resolve violations of trademark rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the discussion in this study are as follows: Legal protection of the right to a trademark has been regulated by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, in the provisions of the Law it is expressly stated that if it has been registered in the law that the right to a trademark has been protected. The sanction imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of trademark rights is a fine of Rp. 20,000,000, - (twenty million rupiah) on condition that if the fine is not paid, he will be subject to imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Settlement of trademark cases can be carried out through institutions that can be used to resolve trademark disputes, including: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration and Courts. Alternative dispute resolution wants the disputing parties to resolve their own dispute with the aim of obtaining a mutual agreement, if the agreement fails, can take arbitration, namely the disputing parties to be able to resolve the dispute to the arbitration institution based on the agreement, furthermore, if the arbitration is successful the last action is through the court, namely the commercial court which has the authority to adjudicate trademark disputes.

Download Full-text

EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA JAWA TENGAH

Al-Ahkam ◽

10.21580/ahkam.2015.25.2.601 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 25 (2) ◽

pp. 181

Author(s):

Muhammad Saifullah

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Problem Solution ◽

Court System ◽

Peace Agreement ◽

Public Response ◽

Divorce Mediation ◽

Central Java ◽

The Supreme Court

Mediation as one of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is seen as a way dispute resolution humane and just. Humanist because the mechanism decision-making (the peace agreement) become the authority of the parties dispute and maintain good relations. Fair because each party negotiate to option a problem solution from his problem and outputs a win-win solution. Therefore, dispute resolution with litigation is becoming obsolete and people turn to mediation. Through the Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 In 2008, mediation has been integrated into the proceedings in the court system. Every civil matters must completed first by way of mediation. Each judge's decision not by way of mediation first, the decision shall be considered null and void. This paper discusses the effectiveness of mediation in the settlement of divorce cases in the Religious Court Central Java, because of a divorce case is a matter of the highest ranks in the Religious Court. The focus of the study is the implementation of divorce mediation cases, mediation success standard divorce cases and the litigants public response to the peace efforts through mediation procedures

Download Full-text

New legislative accents in the mediation procedure and legal principles of alternative dispute resolution

Sociology and Law ◽

10.35854/2219-6242-2021-4-85-91 ◽

2022 ◽

pp. 85-91

Author(s):

V. V. Borodin ◽

T. G. Furman

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Mediation Process ◽

Legal Principles ◽

Federal Laws ◽

Mediation Agreement ◽

Independent Decision

The article analyzes the latest versions of federal laws that made changes to the mediation procedure — allowed judges to resign to perform the procedure of professional mediation; provided an opportunity to notarize a mediation agreement, giving force to an enforcement document; the procedure of «judicial reconciliation» appeared. It is proved that mediation in its essence is not the «activity» of professional intermediaries, mediators, but a «procedure», namely, a structured process that is an alternative dispute resolution technology. The legal principles of the mediation process are disclosed: voluntariness, confidentiality, neutrality, passionlessness and independence of the mediator, independent decision-making by the parties, equality of the parties.

Download Full-text

KEDUDUKAN AKTA NOTARIS DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGHAPUSAN MEREK DI LUAR PENGADILAN [THE POSITION OF NOTARIAL DEED IN AN OUT OF COURT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT OF NON-USE TRADEMARK CANCELLATION]

Notary Journal ◽

10.19166/nj.v1i1.2974 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 49

Author(s):

Bella Nova Iskandar

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

Peace Treaty ◽

Alternative Mechanism ◽

Legal Research ◽

Peace Agreement ◽

Settlement Agreement ◽

Bahasa Indonesia ◽

Made In

Recently, various types of disputes can arise in the community. In resolving these disputes, the disputing parties are given the freedom to choose the dispute resolution forum according to their wishes. Non-court dispute resolution schemes are strengthened by Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Juridically, the mechanism of brand dispute resolution can be done through litigation in the Commercial Court, as well as non-litigation by using an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution, either through arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, or other ways agreed upon by both parties of the dispute. The final result of the parties' dispute settlement agreement is resolution which is poured into a form of peace treaty made before a Notary. To see the position of the notarial deed in resolving disputes over brand deletions outside court, especially in the dispute over the "X" trademark between PT CPS and the inheritors of HK’s trademark, research is needed on the certainty of the enforceability and power to bind a peace agreement made before a Notary. In this study, the type of research used is normative legal research with law and case approach. From the result of this study, it can be concluded that the peace agreement between the parties was made in the form of a deed of peace before the Notary and binds the parties as a law for the parties and has perfect proof power. BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: Dewasa ini berbagai macam sengketa dapat timbul dalam masyarakat. Dalam menyelesaikan sengketa, para pihak yang bersengketa diberi kebebasan untuk memilih forum penyelesaian sengketa sesuai dengan keinginannya. Skema penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan diperkuat oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Secara yuridis, mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa merek dapat dilakukan melalui litigasi di Pengadilan Niaga atau non litigasi dengan menggunakan mekanisme alternatif penyelesaian sengketa, baik melalui arbitrase, negosiasi, mediasi, konsiliasi, maupun cara-cara lain yang dipilih oleh para pihak yang bersengketa. Hasil akhir dari kesepakatan penyelesaian sengketa para pihak adalah perdamaian yang dituangkan ke dalam bentuk akta perdamaian yang dibuat di hadapan Notaris. Untuk melihat kedudukan akta Notaris dalam penyelesaian sengketa penghapusan merek di luar pengadilan, khususnya dalam sengketa merek “X” antara PT CPS dan ahli waris almarhum HK, diperlukan penelitian mengenai kepastian keberlakuan dan kekuatan mengikat perjanjian perdamaian yang dibuat di hadapan Notaris. Dalam penelitian ini, jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan kasus. Dari hasil penelitian tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perjanjian perdamaian di antara para pihak dibuat dalam bentuk akta perdamaian di hadapan Notaris mengikat para pihak seperti layaknya undang-undang bagi para pihak dan memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna.

Download Full-text

REPUDIASI DALAM PEMENUHAN PRESTASI KONTRAK PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH

JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA ◽

10.35334/ay.v5i2.1911 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 98

Author(s):

Chrestella Chrestella

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Research Method ◽

Good Faith ◽

Breach Of Contract ◽

The Law ◽

The Government ◽

Service Procurement

Abstract Government goods/services is never free from contracts. The contract is the basis of every action / achievement carried out both by the Government as the user of the goods / services and the Provider as the provider of the goods / services. In the process of running a contract is very prone to conflict / dispute between the parties. On average, contract conflicts up to contract disputes take place after the contract expires so that they can be carried out through courts or alternative dispute resolution institutions stipulated in the law. However, teh main point is this study is the contract conflict that has not been a contract dispute because the contract has not ended (the periode of contract execution) or the contract has not started (pre-contract). Can it be called a default if the contract has not been completed and there are parties who want to cancel the contract? Do the principles of goodfaith and balance apply to contracts where one of the parties is the government?Based on this, the following matters will be examined: 1) The principle of good faith in the government through contract repudiation to prevent breach of contract; 2) The principle of balance in the implementation of contract repudiation of government goods/service procurement. The research method used a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. From the results of the study, it was concluded that in the case of the Government with the principle of good faith and proportional balance of contracts through Repudiation efforts trying to prevent harmful things such as defaults when the Government considers that the contract cannot be continued. The value of good faith as the most fundamental basis coupled with balance values in accordance with its portion or the so-called proportional principle must really be the most serious concern in making contracts not only to safeguard the rights and obligations of the parties but more importantly to achieve the purpose of the contract that is the fulfillment of government goods / services. Keywords : Repudiation, governement, contract, good faith, proportional.

Download Full-text

An Undergraduate Course in Psychology and the Law

Teaching of Psychology ◽

10.1207/s15328023top1404_15 ◽

1987 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

pp. 238-239 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Edith Greene ◽

Edith Greene

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Civil Law ◽

Plea Bargaining ◽

Jury Decision Making ◽

Teaching Aids ◽

The Law ◽

Jury Decision

This article describes a course that bridged the disciplines of clinical and experimental psychology and the law. The course included discussion of issues in criminal law, such as the psychology of policing, the reliability of confessions, victimization, plea bargaining, jury decision making, and alternative dispute resolution, and in civil law, such as civil commitment, predicting dangerousness, and child custody. Course objectives, requirements, and teaching aids are outlined, and some thoughts on integrating these diverse topics are included.

Download Full-text

KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA

Jurnal Privat Law ◽

10.20961/privat.v5i2.19384 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 26

Author(s):

Yuanita Permatasari ◽

Pranoto ,

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

District Court ◽

International Arbitration ◽

Legal Research ◽

Recognition And Enforcement ◽

Materials Used ◽

Legal Substances ◽

Arbitration Award

Abstract This article aims to find out the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration award in Indonesia, as well as the authority of the courts in annulment the international arbitration award in Indonesia. This research is a normative and prescriptive legal research. The type and source of materials used is the source of secondary legal material. The legal substances used in this study are of two kinds, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting legal materials in this study is obtained through assessment of existing libraries, books, law journals, and court awards. Based on the result of the discussion, it can be concluded: Firstly, the international arbitration award can be recognized and enforced if the award is registered and obtain an execution from the Central Jakarta District Court. International arbitration rulings can only be recognized and enforced if they full fil the conditions in Article 66 of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution law. Second, the international arbitration award is final and binding. However, in reality many international arbitration awards are requested for annulment to the Court in Indonesia.Keywords: international arbitration award, annulment of international arbitration award, enforcement of international arbitration awardAbstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia, serta kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, dengan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan: Pertama, agar putusan arbitrase internasional dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan, maka putusan tersebut harus terlebih dahulu didaftarkan dan memperoleh exequatur dari Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan arbitrase internasional hanya dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan apabila memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kedua, putusan arbitrase internasional bersifat final and binding. Sehingga, putusan arbitrase internasional tidak dapat diajukan upaya pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Namun, dalam realitanya banyak putusan arbitrase internasional yang dimintakan pembatalannya kepada Pengadilan di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: putusan arbitrase internasional, pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional, pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional

Download Full-text

Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014

JURNAL MERCATORIA ◽

10.31289/mercatoria.v12i2.2748 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 102

Author(s):

Wisnu Kumala ◽

Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽

Ulfanora Ulfanora

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Consumer Protection ◽

Financial Services ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

Legal Research ◽

Research Results ◽

Consumer Protection Act ◽

Legal Effect ◽

Legal Consequences

There is a tug of authority in resolving insurance disputes outside the court between the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) based on Law Nomor 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection with Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions (LAPS) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014. This encourages the author to conduct legal research in order to determine the authority of BPSK in resolving insurance disputes as well as the legal consequences of the decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014 using the statutory approach. This legal research results in the finding that BPSK is still authorized to settle insurance disputes following the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014, this is based on the provisions of the Lex superior derogat legi inferiori principle. Then there is no legal effect on the BPSK decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. This is because BPSK's decision has been based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, whose position is higher than the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority. So there is no need for BPSK to follow the provisions of the regulations whose hierarchy of legislation is lower than the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore BPSK's decision is "final and binding" as explained in Article 54 paragraph 3 of the Consumer Protection Act.

Download Full-text

DISPUTES SETTLEMENT OF BALI TRADITIONAL INHERITANCE THROUGH PEACE AGREEMENT

NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan ◽

10.22225/jn.6.1.3613.16-26 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 16-26

Author(s):

Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽

I Nyoman Sukandia

Keyword(s):

Civil Code ◽

Good Faith ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Legal Research ◽

Peace Agreement ◽

Peace Agreements ◽

The Law ◽

Made In

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.

Download Full-text

Alternative Dispute Resolution: Use and Abuse of Information and Specialized Knowledge

Alberta Law Review ◽

10.29173/alr664 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 33 (2) ◽

pp. 301

Author(s):

Judith A. Snider ◽

C. Kemm Yates

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Judicial Review ◽

Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽

Specialized Knowledge ◽

Natural Justice ◽

The Subject ◽

The Relationship

The authors examine the subject of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") with a focus on the issue of specialized knowledge and its use in two particular spheres of ADR: regulatory tribunals and arbitration. The authors define "specialized knowledge" and compare it to the concept of evidence in order to determine whether it is evidence which can be relied upon by regulators and arbitrators in the context of their ADR decision-making. The relationship between specialized knowledge and the rules of natural justice is explored — in particular, the audi alteram pattern rule and the rule against bias. The authors conclude by suggesting guidelines to be used by arbitrators and regulatory tribunals in adjudicating on matters before them in order to avoid challenges, by judicial review, to their decisions on the basis of misuse or "abuse" of their specialized knowledge.

Download Full-text