scholarly journals Challenges and Opportunities of University and Industry Nexus in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-111
Author(s):  
Abaineh Degaga ◽  
M Senapathy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Policy Issue ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Knowledge Generation ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
The Government ◽  
Two Sectors

University and Industry Linkage [UIL] has been practised, with differing magnitude, as universities have long been recognised as rich sources of knowledge generation, innovation, and technological advancements. Strengthening the nexus between these two sectors and amassing the benefits arising has become a hot policy issue. Nevertheless, the progress of functional links between the two actors has been curtailed by many impediments. In the Ethiopian context, there is a paucity of researches that address the issue of UIL in general and those delineating the major challenges and opportunities about that in particular. Accordingly, this systematic review was conducted to pinpoint the main challenges that have been deterring the progress of the desired level of UIL and identifying the opportunities that can be seized to enhance the progress of the link. The study employed a systematic review method to collate all relevant evidence that meets prespecified eligibility criteria to achieve a given research objective or answer a specific research question. This systematic review was based on document analysis made on highly relevant and carefully selected documents, including journal articles, policies, strategies, plans, proclamations and books. The study revealed that despite the attempts of the government to strengthen and sustain a fruitful interconnection between the two sectors, UIL is at its infant stage, and numerous backlogs are waiting to be accomplished. The major challenges hindering the growth of UIL in Ethiopia include the presence of limited budget to research universities; mismatch between graduates’ knowledge and skills and industries’ demand; lack of sufficient skills and knowledge on the part of the staff of both sectors; absence of sound policy implementation strategies and plans; lack of ownership on the part of officials to implement policies, strategies and plans and cultural divide between the two parties.On the other hand, the main opportunities identified include a supportive policy environment, the proliferation of industries, issuance of intellectual property right protection laws, growing economy, the establishment of science and technology universities, construction of industrial parks, and relative improvements in infrastructure. Concerted government, universities, industries and other pertinent stakeholders need to be implemented to overcome the challenges mentioned above and reinvigorate UIL. Moreover, emerging opportunities delineated above need to be capitalised on, and creating an enabling environment for UIL to flourish ought to be  reinforced with greater momentum

scholarly journals Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 469-478
Author(s):  
Madeleine Dodd ◽  
Rebecca Ivers ◽  
Anthony B Zwi ◽  
Aminur Rahman ◽  
Jagnoor Jagnoor
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Civil Society Organizations ◽  
Policy Framework ◽  
Policy Network ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health Policymaking

Abstract Over the last four decades, Bangladesh has made considerable improvements in population health, this is in part due to the use of evidence to inform policymaking. This systematic review aims to better understand critical factors that have facilitated the diffusion of scientific evidence into multiple phases of health policymaking in Bangladesh. To do this an existing policy framework designed by Shiffman and Smith in 2007, was used to extract and synthesize data from selected policy analyses. This framework was used to ensure the content, context and actors involved with evidence-informed policymaking were considered in each case where research had helped shape a health policy. The ‘PRISMA Checklist’ was employed to design pre-specified eligibility criteria for the selection of information sources, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and process of data extraction and synthesis. Through our systematic search conducted from February to May 2017, we initially identified 1859 articles; after removal of duplicates, followed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full-texts, 24 articles were included in the analysis. Health policy issues included the following topics: maternal and child health, tobacco control, reproductive health, infectious disease control and the impact and sustainability of knowledge translation platforms. Findings suggested that research evidence that could be used to meet key targets associated with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were more likely to be considered as a political (and therefore policy) priority. Furthermore, avenues of engagement between research organizations and the government as well as collective action from civil-society organizations were important for the diffusion of evidence into policies. Through this article, it is apparent that the interface between evidence and policy formulation occurs when evidence is, disseminated by a cohesive policy-network with strong leadership and framed to deliver solutions for problems on both the domestic and global development agenda.

scholarly journals Barriers to and facilitators of implementation of the integration of oncology and palliative care in daily practice: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Uneno ◽  
Yoshiki Horie ◽  
Yuki Kataoka ◽  
Masanori Mori ◽  
Mami Hirakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Educational Opportunities ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Care Delivery Model ◽  
The Government

Abstract Background: Palliative care (PC) is widely recognized as an essential part of oncology care, and multiple academic societies have developed strong recommendations regarding the implementation of the integration of oncology and PC (IOP) in daily practice. However, IOP implementation is a slow- evolving process, and its barriers and facilitators have not yet been comprehensively identified. This systematic review aimed to clarify the barriers to and facilitators of IOP in the context of treating patients with advanced cancer.Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature until June 3, 2017. We included original articles, narrative and systematic reviews, guidelines, editorials, commentaries, and letters. After title and abstract screening by two of five independent reviewers, we analyzed the data qualitatively using inductive content analysis and a consolidated framework for implementation research. Results: We obtained 3,304 articles, of which 60 met the predefined eligibility criteria. The numbers and proportions of original and review articles, guidelines, and other article types were 21 (35%), 30 (50%), 3 (5%), and 7 (12%), respectively. Five categories emerged regarding both the barriers to and facilitators of IOP: intervention characteristics, outer settings, inner settings, individual characteristics, and process. The representative barriers were limited availability of and access to PC services, limited educational opportunities for PC providers, insufficient reimbursement and research funding toward PC services, focus on cure rather than care (patients and their caregivers), and insufficient communication between oncology and PC staff (n = 26, 16, 14, 13, and 7, respectively). The representative facilitators were improvement of the availability of and access to PC services, development of an optimal integrated care model, enrichment of educational opportunities regarding PC (healthcare professionals), and initiatives by government and academic societies (n = 24, 18, 25, and 7, respectively).Conclusions: This study clarified the multi-level barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of IOP. Educational and financial support from the government and academic societies appears essential, and further effort to develop and investigate the implementable care delivery model is warranted.Registration: PROSPERO:CRD42018069212

scholarly journals Including the Nordic hamstring exercise in injury prevention programmes halves the rate of hamstring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8459 athletes

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (21) ◽  
pp. 1362-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicol van Dyk ◽  
Fearghal P Behan ◽  
Rod Whiteley
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Hamstring Injuries ◽  
Prevention Programmes

Research questionDoes the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) prevent hamstring injuries when included as part of an injury prevention intervention?DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe considered the population to be any athletes participating in any sporting activity, the intervention to be the NHE, the comparison to be usual training or other prevention programmes, which did not include the NHE, and the outcome to be the incidence or rate of hamstring injuries.AnalysisThe effect of including the NHE in injury prevention programmes compared with controls on hamstring injuries was assessed in 15 studies that reported the incidence across different sports and age groups in both women and men.Data sourcesMEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL via Ebsco, and OpenGrey.ResultsThere is a reduction in the overall injury risk ratio of 0.49 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.74, p=0.0008) in favour of programmes including the NHE. Secondary analyses when pooling the eight randomised control studies demonstrated a small increase in the overall injury risk ratio 0.52 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.85, p=0.0008), still in favour of the NHE. Additionally, when studies with a high risk of bias were removed (n=8), there is an increase of 0.06 in the risk ratio to 0.55 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.89, p=0.006).ConclusionsProgrammes that include the NHE reduce hamstring injuries by up to 51%. The NHE essentially halves the rate of hamstring injuries across multiple sports in different athletes.Trial registration numberPROSPERO CRD42018106150.

scholarly journals Factors influencing the readiness to tackle the burden of ischaemic heart disease in India: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e047464
Author(s):  
Shuvarthi Bhattacharjee ◽  
Nima Yaghmaei ◽  
Cao Tran Le Phuong ◽  
Dinesh Neupane
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ischaemic Heart Disease ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Open Government Data ◽  
The Government

IntroductionIschaemic heart disease (IHD) is one of the leading causes of death and disease burden in India affecting all age groups. To reduce the deaths and tackle the burden of existing IHD, the government approach has been mostly through the National Health Policy (2017) and National Programme for Prevention and Control of Diabetes, Cardiovascular diseases and Stroke. This paper offers a protocol for the systematic review of studies exploring the factors influencing service readiness of the public health system of India to tackle the burden of IHD.Methods and analysisElectronic databases of Embase (Ovid), AMED (Ovid), HMIC (Ovid), BNI (ProQuest), CINAHL (EBSCO), EMCARE (Ovid), PsycINFO (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) will be searched till 2020 for primary studies. Grey literature will be accessed through OpenGrey, TRIP Medical, WHO database, MoHFW website, Open Government Data (OGD) Platform of India and Google Scholar (between 2010 and 2020). Primary studies meeting the eligibility criteria and grey literature published in English between 2010 and 2020 will be included. Data will be analysed through a conceptual framework, and the primary outcome will constitute both quantitative and qualitative data. The quality of included studies will be assessed based on study design. Data will be managed on the COVIDENCE platform. All authors will be involved in data extraction, quality appraisal, data synthesis and formulation of the final draft.Ethics and disseminationThis study, being a systematic review, does not involve any clinical trial, primary data collection or empirical study involving humans or animals. Therefore, no ethical permissions were sought by reviewers.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020219490.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Hemorrhage in The Third Stage of Labor: A Systematic Review Protocol

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria de Lourdes de Souza ◽  
Adalia Edna Fernando Chipindo ◽  
Eneida Patrícia Teixeira ◽  
Anna Carolina Raduenz Huf Souza ◽  
Rita de Cássia Teixeira Rangel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Death ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Stage Of Labor ◽  
Third Stage

Abstract BackgroundPostpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the most common form of obstetric hemorrhage. This is the main cause of maternal death around the world: the incidence varies among countries and accounts for 27% (in some countries, more than 50%) of direct obstetric maternal deaths, mainly in the postpartum period. Recognizing risk factors for PPH in prenatal care and during childbirth care is the first stage to prevent maternal death from PPH. The objective this review is: To identify the risk factors for hemorrhage in the third stage of labor described in the literature from 2000 to 2020. MethodsA protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis study was developed, supported by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and, registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The research question for conducting the review was structured according to the PEOS strategy (P — Populations/People/Patient/ Problem, E — Exposure (s), O — Outcome, S — Study design): P — women aged from 10 to 49 years, in labor; E — risk factors for hemorrhage in the third stage of labor; O — women with hemorrhage during birth and postpartum; S — observational studies (case control and cohort). Thus, the defined question was: what are the risk factors for hemorrhage in the third stage of labor described in the literature from 2000 to 2020? As for the planning of electronic searches, databases were consulted by using the platform of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel in Brazil (CAPES, as per its Portuguese acronym). Due to the characteristics of each database, specific search strategies were chosen for each database. After applying the eligibility criteria, the articles that are selected will have the quality of the evidence evaluated by applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), with the online tool GRADEpro GDT.Discussion Prevention and control of hemorrhage must be initiated in the prenatal period, requiring competent professionals to carry out the appropriate clinical evaluation to classify the degree of risk to which the woman is exposed. This systematic review will support the studies of professionals who working in Angola and Brazil.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021219303

scholarly journals Improving the usefulness of evidence concerning the effectiveness of implementation strategies for knowledge products in primary healthcare: Protocol for a series of systematic reviews

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun ◽  
José Massougbodji ◽  
André Bussières ◽  
Aliki Thomas ◽  
Dahlia Kairy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Psychosocial Health ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background: The literature on the implementation of knowledge products is extensive. However, this literature is still difficult to interpret for policymakers and other stakeholders when faced with choosing implementation strategies likely to bring about successful change in their health systems. This work has the particularity to examine the scope of this literature, and to clarify the effectiveness of implementation strategies for different knowledge products. Consequently, we aim to: 1) determine the strengths and weaknesses of existing literature overviews; 2) produce a detailed portrait of the literature on implementation strategies for various knowledge products; and 3) assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies for each knowledge product identified and classify them.Methods: We will use a three-phase approach consisting of a critical analysis of existing literature overviews, a systematic review of systematic reviews, and a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We will follow the Cochrane Methodology for each of three phases. Our eligibility criteria are defined following a PICOS approach: Population, individuals or stakeholders participating in healthcare delivery, specifically, healthcare providers, caregivers, and end users; Intervention, any type of strategy aiming to implement a knowledge product including, but not limited to, a decision support tool, a clinical practice guideline, a policy brief, or a decision-making tool, a one-pager, or a health intervention; Comparison, any comparator will be considered; Outcomes, Phases 1 and 2 – any outcome related to implementation strategies including, but not limited to, the measures of adherence/fidelity to the use of knowledge products, their acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, adaptability, implementation costs, penetration/reach and sustainability; Phase 3 – any additional outcome related to patients (psychosocial, health behavioral, and clinical outcomes) or healthcare professionals (behavioral and performance outcomes); Setting, primary healthcare has to be covered. We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from their inception onwards. For each phase, two reviewers will independently perform the selection of studies, data extraction, and assess their methodological quality. We will analyze extracted data, and perform narrative syntheses, and meta-analyses when possible.Discussion: Our results could inform not only the overviews’ methodology, but also the development of an online platform for the implementation strategies of knowledge products. This platform could be useful for stakeholders in implementation science.Systematic review registration: Protocol registered on Open science Framework, https://osf.io/hqbx8

Do Patients with Extrinsic Black Tooth Stains Have a Lower Dental Caries Experience? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 617-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Silva de Rezende ◽  
Thiago Fonseca-Silva ◽  
Clarissa Lopes Drumond ◽  
Maria Letícia Ramos-Jorge ◽  
Saul Martins Paiva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Caries ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Caries Experience ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Studies have suggested that individuals affected by extrinsic black tooth stains have less dental caries experience in comparison to those without this condition. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether there is scientific evidence demonstrating that extrinsic black stains are a protective factor for the occurrence of dental caries. This systematic review was developed in accordance with the PRISMA statement and the research question was determined using the PECO strategy. Electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Science Direct, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles published up to September 2018. All articles included were submitted to an appraisal of methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the data were extracted for meta-analysis. The search strategy resulted in the retrieval of 9,108 publications. After the application of the eligibility criteria, 18 articles were selected for analysis, 13 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that individuals with extrinsic black stains involving primary (median, MD: –0.78 [–1.09; –0.48]; I2 = 44%) and permanent (MD: –0.50 [–0.93; –0.08]; I2 = 86%) teeth have a lower dental caries experience in comparison to those without this condition. Patients with extrinsic black tooth stains have a lower dental caries experience in cross-sectional studies.

scholarly journals Understanding the challenges and opportunities of micro, small, and medium enterprises during covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudarmo Sudarmo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Small Business ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Review Study ◽  
The Government ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Google Search

Through this review, we will discuss the challenges and opportunities for MSMEs during a pandemic in Indonesia. This review examines the two sides of the small business experience, both difficulties, and opportunities. Understand these small business movers' experiences and success stories, a series of data collection; Google search, Google Scholar, ERIC Publications, and other data sources. Then we continue our in-depth analysis with a phenomenological approach until we get valid and reliable data in answering the questions of this systematic review study. Analyzing our data starts with understanding the study problem, coding the data, evaluating the data in-depth, and drawing data conclusions. The procedure and design of this systematic review study followed the guidelines for descriptive qualitative research methods. These findings include that most MSMEs have turned challenges into opportunities in sustaining their businesses after being hit by the Pandemic through the support of many parties, especially the government and experts. Thus the findings of this study are essential inputs to support MSMEs to survive and be sustainable.

scholarly journals Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joey Nicholson ◽  
Aileen McCrillis ◽  
Jeff D. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
General Communication

Objective: While many librarians have been asked to participate in systematic reviews with researchers, often these researchers are not familiar with the systematic review process or the appropriate role for librarians. The purpose of this study was to identify the challenges and barriers that librarians face when collaborating on systematic reviews. To take a wider view of the whole process of collaborating on systematic reviews, the authors deliberately focused on interpersonal and methodological issues other than searching itself.Methods: To characterize the biggest challenges that librarians face while collaborating on systematic review projects, we used a web-based survey. The thirteen-item survey included seventeen challenges grouped into two categories: methodological and interpersonal. Participants were required to indicate the frequency and difficulty of the challenges listed. Open-ended questions allowed survey participants to describe challenges not listed in the survey and to describe strategies used to overcome challenges.Results: Of the 17 challenges listed in the survey, 8 were reported as common by over 40% of respondents. These included methodological issues around having too broad or narrow research questions, lacking eligibility criteria, having unclear research questions, and not following established methods. The remaining challenges were interpersonal, including issues around student-led projects and the size of the research team. Of the top 8 most frequent challenges, 5 were also ranked as most difficult to handle. Open-ended responses underscored many of the challenges included in the survey and revealed several additional challenges.Conclusions: These results suggest that the most frequent and challenging issues relate to development of the research question and general communication with team members. Clear protocols for collaboration on systematic reviews, as well as a culture of mentorship, can help librarians prevent and address these challenges.

scholarly journals Sustainability Recommendations and Practices in School Feeding: A Systematic Review

Foods ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Emanuele Batistela dos Santos ◽  
Dayanne da Costa Maynard ◽  
Renata Puppin Zandonadi ◽  
António Raposo ◽  
Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Nutrition Education ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Education For Sustainability ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Sustainable Food ◽  
School Feeding ◽  
Sustainability Practices

Considering the importance of schools for sustainable food offers and the formation of conscientious citizens on sustainability, this systematic review aimed to verify the recommendations on sustainability in school feeding policies and the sustainability practices adopted in schools. The research question that guided this study is “what are the recommendations on sustainability in school feeding policies and the sustainability practices adopted in schools?”. This systematic review was prepared according to PRISMA, and its checklist was registered in PROSPERO. Specific search strategies for Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed, Lilacs, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global were developed. The included studies’ methodological quality was evaluated using the Meta-Analysis Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument (MASTARI). A total of 134 studies were selected for a full reading. Of these, 50 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Several sustainability practices were described. The most cited are school gardens and education activities for sustainability. However, actions carried out in food services were also mentioned, from the planning of menus and the purchase of raw materials (mainly local and organic foods, vegetarian/vegan menus) to the distribution of meals (reduction of organic and inorganic waste: composting, recycling, donating food, and portion sizes). Recommendations for purchasing sustainable food (organic, local, and seasonal), nutrition education focused on sustainability, and reducing food waste were frequent; this reinforces the need to stimulate managers’ view, in their most varied spheres, for the priority that should be given to this theme, so that education for sustainability is universally part of the curricula. The importance of education in enabling individuals to promote sustainable development is reaffirmed in Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). The development of assessment instruments can help monitor the evolution of sustainable strategies at schools and the main barriers and potentialities related to their implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document