scholarly journals Problematika Fungsi Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Tinjauan Studi Socio-Legal

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
H Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP ◽  
Chessa Ario Jani Purnomo
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Control Functions ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Institutional Model ◽  
Pattern Of Implementation ◽  
And Control

In this study, the author considers 3 (three) reasons that are considered important such as philosophical aspects, aspects of criminal law theory, and political aspects of national criminal procedural law after describing 5 (five) previous legal scientific studies related to the implementation of supervisory judges and observers in the criminal justice system. This study aims to reflect on the legal principles of the kimwasmat institution and build models and patterns of implementing the kimwasmat institution. This research intends to answer 2 (two) legal issues: firstly, what are the legal principles contained in Article 280 of the KUHAP. Secondly, what is the model and pattern of implementation of the supervisory and observer judge institutions based on Article 280 of the KUHAP. This legal research uses the socio-legal research method, the materials of which are the results of interviews of judges in deliberate district courts, study of court official documents, relevant laws and regulations to legal issues, legal theory and social science theories. This study found, firstly, the function of kimsmat based on the principle of legal certainty and the principle of benefit which seeks to be married into the principle of certainty which is useful based on Pancasila. Finally, the classical bureaucratic model and the institutional model as well as the aspects of state administration to explain the management and control functions of the authority of the kimwasmat become the basis for the court to carry out criminal objectives.

scholarly journals Pengaturan Alat Peraga Kampanye Dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Choirul Anam
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Completion Time ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The People ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Control Campaign

This study aims to explain the mechanism for electing governors and deputy governors, regents and deputy regents as well as mayors and deputy mayors who are directly elected by the people, through what we are familiar with direct regional head elections and to find out the authority of the general election commission (KPU ) in conducting the procure- ment, distribution and installation of campaign props (APK.) The method used in this research is legal research which is to find the rule of law, legal principles, and legal doc- trines in order to answer the legal issues encountered. In this study shows that given the authority of political parties or candidate pairs to hold campaign props a number of prob- lems arise, including the difficulty for the KPU to control or control campaign props held by political parties or candidate pairs starting from the number, completion time, until the design

scholarly journals Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Phising Menurut UU ITE

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2525
Author(s):  
Vikran Fasyadhiyaksa Putra Y
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Modus Operandi ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Law

AbstractPhishing is an act to commit fraud by tricking the target with the intention of stealing the target's account, by spreading broadcasts which are often carried out through fake emails with fake information that directs the target to a fake page to trap the target so that the perpetrator gets access to the victim's account. Phishing still has some obscurity, especially in the modus operandi of the perpetrator. Therefore, this research aims to analyze and explain the modus operandi of the criminal act of phishing according to the ITE Law. This research is a normative legal research. Because the writing of this research in seeking the truth in order to answer legal issues raised by the author uses secondary data to find legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines, and tends to image law as a perspective discipline, which means that only see the law from the point of view of the norms only, which of course is prescriptive. This approach uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.Keywords: Phishing Crime; Cyber; Operandi Mode.AbstrakPhising adalah suatu perbuatan untuk melakukan penipuan dengan mengelabui target dengan maksud untuk mencuri akun target, dengan cara menyebarkan broadcast yang seringkali dilakukan melalui email palsu dengan muatan informasi palsu yang mengarahkan target ke halaman palsu untuk menjebak target sehingga pelaku mendapatkan akses terhadap akun korban, Secara ringkas Perbuatan phising masih memiliki beberapa kekaburan terutama pada modus operandi pelaku. Oleh karena itulah penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan terkait modus operandi Tindak pidana Phising menurut UU ITE. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Karena penelitian ini dalam mencari kebenaran guna menjawab isu hukum yang diangkat penulis menggunakan data sekunder untuk menemukan suatu aturan-aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun doktrin-doktrin hukum, dan cenderung mencitrakan hukum sebagai disiplin prespektif, yang berarti hanya melihat hukum dari sudut pandang norma-normanya saja, yang tentunya bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana Phising; Siber; Modus Operandi.

scholarly journals Legal Remedies for Judicial Review for Investigators of Pretrial Decisions Regarding the Invalidity of the Order to Terminate the Investigation in the Perspective of Law Enforcement with Certainty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Eko Wiyono ◽  
I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Prija Djatmika ◽  
Bambang Sugiri
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Future

Arrangements regarding legal remedies that can be submitted by investigators against the judge's decision regarding investigative actions in the form of terminating the investigation with the issuance of an Investigation Termination Order (SP3) in pretrial cases. Law No. 8/1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code was not expressly enforced. This article aims to identify legal remedies against pretrial decisions regarding the invalidity of the Termination of Investigation Order (SP3) in the future. This paper is normative legal research, namely the process of finding legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines to address legal issues at hand. The result of this study is the arrangements regarding extraordinary legal remedies in the form of a judicial review of criminal decisions that have permanent legal force and are not acquitted or released from all previous legal claims before the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code that have been regulated can also be submitted by interested parties. Necessary to reconstruct the regulation of legal remedies against pretrial decisions, especially extraordinary legal remedies in the form of reconsideration, especially by investigators as parties who are very interested in the action.

scholarly journals REORIENTATION TOWARDS THE NATURE OF JURISPRUDENCE IN LEGAL RESEARCH

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Danang Hardianto
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Empirical Science ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Practice ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Scholarship

This article is used to distinguish a deepest understanding between normative and empirical legal research. The jurisprudence is characteristically sui generis or ‘be on one’s own’, it contents norms and its scope, namely legal dogmatic, legal theory, and philosophy of law, is used to solve legal issues or problems.Otherwise the empirical science armed with its methodology,especially in connection with the sociology of law and called with the socio-legal research, describes merely the legal phenomena. Therefore, this article chiefly criticize the failing of the sociology of law to solve legal issues or problems for legal practice or legal scholarship. Artikel ini digunakan untuk membedakan sebuah pemahaman yang mendalam diantara penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Ilmu hukum bersifat sui generis atau hanya untuk jenisnya sendiri. Ilmu hukum mengandung  norma  dan  ruang  lingkupnya,  yaitu  dogmatik  hukum,  teori  hukum,  dan  filsafat  hukum, digunakan untuk memecahkan isu atau masalah hukum. Sebaliknya ilmu sosial, terkait dengan sosiologi hukum dan disebut dengan penelitian socio-legalhanya menggambarkan gejala-gejala hukum. Oleh karena itu, secara tegas artikel ini mengkritisi kegagalan sosiologi hukum untuk memecahkan isu atau masalah hukum baik untuk kebutuhan praktik maupun akademisi.

scholarly journals Desain Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-435
Author(s):  
Gunawan A Tauda
Keyword(s):  
Colonial Period ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Historical Continuity ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
And Control ◽  
Control Designs

Abstract This study aims to know the design of asymmetric decentralization in the state administration system of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used in the research is legal research that uses a conceptual approach. The results show that asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia is a historical continuity that has been started from the colonial period and confirmed to date in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. As a reality of the practice of regional government, the constitutional juridical legitimacy of asymmetric decentralization can be referred to in Article 18A paragraph ( 1), and Article 18B paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as the supreme law of the land. Asymmetric decentralization concerns fundamental matters related to the pattern of relations between the center and the regions regarding different authority, institutional, financial and control designs. Keywords: Asymmetric Decentralization, State Administration System, Indonesian Government Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan utnuk menegtahui desain Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah penelitian hukung yang menggunakan pendekatan kosnep (conceptual approac). Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa Desentralisasi asimetris di Indonesia merupakan sebuah keberlanjutan sejarah yang telah dimulai dari masa kolonial dan ditegaskan hingga saat ini dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Sebagai sebuah realitas praktik pemerintahan daerah, legitimasi yuridis konstitusional dari desentralisasi asimetris tersebut dapat dirujuk dalam Pasal 18A ayat (1), dan Pasal 18B ayat (1) Konstitusi Republik Indonesia sebagai hukum tertinggi negara (the supreme law of the land). Desentralisasi asimetris menyangkut urusan yang fundamental terkait pola hubungan pusat dan daerah menyangkut desain kewenangan, kelembagaan, finansial dan kontrol yang berbeda. Kata Kunci: Desentralisasi Asimetris, Sistem Ketatanegaraan, Permerintah Indonesia

scholarly journals Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1399
Author(s):  
Guntur Aris Prabowo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law

AbstractThe title of this research is “Elektonic State Administration Dispute Settlement Arrangements” provides an explanation of the legal issues discussed by the author about 1) Comparison of procedural law ini State Administrative Courts which is carried out coventionally and electronically; and 2) Constraints to the application of Electronic Court in the State Administrative Court. Rapid technological advances make it easy for humans in all area, one of which is in the law. Legal breakthroughs carried out by the Supreme Court can be seen in the existence of Electronic Court. The State Administrative Court, which is an institution under the Supreme Court, implements electronic court. The State Administrative Court has a function to protect the public against government actions and policies.Keywords: The State Administrative Court; Electronic Court; Conventional Court.AbstrakPenelitian ini yang berjudul “Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik” memberikan penjelasan pada rumusan masalah yang dibahas oleh penulis tentang 1) Perbandingan hukum acara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang dilakukan secara konvensional dengan elektronik; dan 2) Kendala penerapan Peradilan Elektronik di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kemajuan teknologi yang sangat pesat memberikan kemudahan bagi manusia di segala bidang, salah satunya adalah di bidang hukum. Terobosan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dapat dilihat dengan adanya Peradilan Elektronik. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang merupakan lembaga yang berada di bawah Mahkamah Agung menerapkan peradilan elektronik. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara memiliki fungsi untuk melindungi masyarakat terhadap tindakan dan kebijakan pemerintah.Kata Kunci: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara; Peradilan Elektronik; Peradilan Konvensional.

scholarly journals The Legitimacy of Circular Letter in Handling COVID-19 Pandemic

Rechtsidee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Discretionary Power ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Critical Studies ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Legal Legitimacy

The purpose of this legal research is to analyze the relevance of the discretion of government officials during the COVID-19 pandemic with the concepts and legislation related to legal issues; as well as analyzing the existence of a Circular to legitimize the handling of COVID-19 with statutory regulations. This legal research is carried out by making an inventory of various primary and secondary legal materials, so as to obtain relevant and critical studies of the legal issues discussed. The results of this legal research are that the discretion made by government officials can be justified legally if it is relevant to several provisions contained in legislation for the realization of good emergency governance; and the existence of a circular letter is legally valid if it is in accordance with the laws and regulations and the General Principles of Good Governance, by understanding that a circular is not a product of rules that are in the order of national legislation. Thus, a circular does not have strong and binding legal legitimacy. Therefore, the researcher recommends the criteria and classification of the parameters of discretion in the form of a circular as outlined in the form of a Supreme Court Regulation. This should be done so that there is no abuse of authority in implementing discretionary power by government officials and general legal principles.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Atas Perbedaan Luas Faktual Dengan Surat Ukur Pada Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atindriya Hastungkara
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Logic Of Science

This journal is entitled Legal Protection of Actual Land Differences With Land Rights Certificate. This journal examines the function of the letters in the registration of land rights and how the legal safeguards for the holders of land rights in terms of factual land differences with the letters on the land certificate. The type of research used is normative legal research, which is a process to find the rule of law, legal principles, and legal doctrines to answer the legal issues faced in accordance with the characteristics of prescriptions of jurisprudence. This normative legal research is a procedure and way of scientific research to find the truth based on the logic of science in terms of normatifnya. So that it can answer the legal issues posed. Further said in doing research law. Approach to the problem of statutory approach (Statute Approach) based on the Act, conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach) based on theories and concepts, and the case approach (Case approach).Keywords: Legal Protection of Land Rights Holder, Land Certificate, Land Factual Difference With Measure Letters.

scholarly journals Upaya Paksa terhadap Pejabat yang Tidak Melakukan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Denpasar

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-149
Author(s):  
I Wayan Dedy Cahya Pratama ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The discussion in the writing of this thesis is a problem related to forced efforts as regulated in article 116 where in this article forced efforts (Dwangsom) are regulated. The purpose of implementing compulsory measures so that the decisions issued are carried out by those concerned. This study aims to determine the mechanism of forced attempts to officials who do not carry out the TUN Judicial Decision and to find out the obstacles to forced attempts against the TUN Judicial Decision. Normative legal research is used as a research method, which is a stage to find legal regulations, legal principles in order to answer the contents of the law in this thesis with a statutory approach, legal theory and a conceptual approach. Primary and secondary sources of legal materials are then analyzed to obtain conclusions and suggestions. The results showed that the efforts to force the decision, namely Dwangsom and administrative sanctions at the PTUN which had been incracht could not be implemented optimally. The obstacle in forced efforts related to the execution of the PTUN Decision is that there is no special agency tasked with implementing the decision, therefore the government has revised the PTUN Law and provisions relating to Forced Efforts issued by the Supreme Court so that it can be applied by the PTUN judge so that it can be applied and implemented optimally.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document