E-government – a new concept of public administration

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Slavyana Nikiforova
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Electronic Government ◽  
Electronic Interaction ◽  
The Public ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Digital Democracy ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to issues related to the development of the concept of «e-Government» («e-government») and the concept of e-government as a new approach to public administration. The article analyses the definitions of the concept of «e-Government», which are presented in foreign and domestic literature. all the studied definitions helped to share the concept of e-government in a narrow and broad sense. In the narrow sense, e-government is the use of information and communication technologies in the activities of public authorities or means of communication. In a broad sense, this is a process aimed at changing interactions in the public administration system, the purpose of which is to improve themanagement system, improve the quality of public services and ensure the constitutional rights of citizens. The article defines the main prerequisites for the emergence of the concept of electronic government, presents the principles and directions of its development: (e-Administration) electronic administration, (e-Citizens) electronic interaction with citizens and the provision of services to the public (e-Services), (e-Society) development information society. The e-government development directions have helped to identify their advantages and disadvantages. The article reveals the regulatory framework and development strategies in the Russian Federation of e-government, digital democracy and the information society. The article analyzes the UN comprehensive indicators characterizing the level of development of e-government, digital democracy and the information society in the countries of the world and the place there of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals The use of digital technology in the public administration

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-428
Author(s):  
Sergey E. Channov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Specific Area ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation

Introduction. The article is devoted to the use of digital technologies in the field of public administration using the example of state and municipal information systems. Currently, two types of such systems can be distinguished in the Russian Federation: 1) allowing direct enforcement activities; 2) used to capture certain information. Theoretical analysis. Information systems of the first type acquire the properties of an object of complex legal relations, in which suppliers and consumers of information, government bodies, as well as other persons become participants. This entails the fact that in the implementation of public administration, the source of regulation of public relations to a certain extent becomes the program code of these information systems. Accordingly, any failures and errors in the public information system become facts of legal importance. Empirical analysis. The main risks of using information systems of the second type in public administration relate to the illegal access (or use) of information stored in their databases. The consolidation of databases containing different types of information is a serious threat. In this regard, the creation of the Unified Federal Information Register containing information about the population of the Russian Federation, provided for by the Federal Law No. 168-FZ of 08.06.2020, may lead to a large number of socially negative consequences and comes into obvious conflict with the legislation on personal data. Results. State and municipal information systems themselves can improve public administration, including reducing corruption in the country. At the same time, their reduced discretion in management decisions is not always appropriate. Accordingly, their implementation should be preceded by the analysis of the characteristics of a specific area of management, as well as the proposed use of digital technologies.

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: LEGAL ASPECTS

2021 ◽  
pp. 220-228
Author(s):  
O.L. Alferov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Russian Federation

This review analyzes the experience of Russia and a number of foreign countries in implementing digital technologies in public administration, and describes the main regulatory legal acts adopted at the three stages of the formation of the information society in the Russian Federation. The focus is on the problems of legal regulation of the digitalization of public authorities.

Taxonomy of IT Intangible Assets for Public Administration Based on the Electronic Government Maturity Model in Uruguay

2013 ◽  
pp. 103-122
Author(s):  
Helena Garbarino ◽  
Bruno Delgado ◽  
José Carrillo
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Electronic Government ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
The Public

This chapter presents a taxonomy of IT intangible asset indicators for Public Administration, relating the indicators to the Electronic Government Maturity Model proposed by the Uruguayan Agency for Electronic Government and Information Society. Indicators are categorized according to a consolidated intellectual capital model. The Taxonomy is mapped at the indicator level against the EGMM subareas covering all of the relevant aspects associated with the intangible IT assets of the Public Administration in Uruguay. The main challenges and future lines of work for building a consolidated maturity model of IT intangible assets in Public Administration are also presented.

Preliminary assessment and analysis of public amenities capacity and status in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: Methodological recommendations

10.12737/5363 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Елена Погребова ◽  
Elena Pogrebova
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Service User ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Information Sources ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Preliminary Assessment ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article presents the results of the author’s attempt at developing a complex of methodological recommendations for the preliminary assessment and analysis of the public amenities capacity and status in different constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The recommendations as developed by the author are based on specific examples, and are supported by information sources regarded by the author as necessary to use in the course of the analysis. The author also provides recommendations on the graphic representation of the results of the analysis (spread sheets) as well as recommendations on rating of the regions (ranking and grouping the regions in accordance with the level of public amenities development they demonstrate), a thorough analysis of the system of the public administration of the industry, the competences and authority of the federal executive bodies, regional agencies of State power and the local authorities responsible for the regulation of relations in the sphere of public services, an assessment of the capacity of public service providers, and a comparison of public service user prices as quoted by municipal entities in different constituents of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals LOOKING BACK AS THE FOUNDATION FOR THE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF CONTROLLED SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-137
Author(s):  
Алексей Васильевич Тебекин
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Strategic Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Implementation Of The Strategy

Цель статьи - в интересах обеспечения эффективности формирования и реализации стратегии социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года проанализировать результаты реализации «Стратегии-2020», обсуждение которых не нашло должного отражения как в системе государственного управления, так и в научной среде. В качестве инструмента анализа результатов реализации «Стратегии-2020» в работе использован «взгляд назад» как элемент зрительной системы научной школы предпринимательства Й. Шумпетера. Выбор указанного инструмента обусловлен тем, что именно он дает понимание, на каком фундаменте реализации прошлых стратегий придется строить и реализовывать стратегии будущего развития управляемой социально-экономической системы. Научная новизна заключается в сформулированных на основе комплексного анализа результатов реализации «Стратегии-2020» рекомендациях по формированию «Стратегии-2030» социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации. N the interests of ensuring the effectiveness of the formation and implementation of the strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030, the author has analyzed the results of the implementation of the «Strategy 2020» the discussion of which has not been properly reflected both in the public administration system and in the scientific community. As a tool for analyzing the results of the implementation of «Strategy 2020», the work uses a «look back» as an element of the visual system of the scientific school of entrepreneurship by J. Schumpeter. The choice of this tool is due to the fact that it is he who gives an understanding on what foundation the implementation of past strategies will have to build and implement strategies for the future development of a controlled socio-economic system. On the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the results of the implementation of the «Strategy-2020» recommendations were formulated for the formation of the “Strategy-2030” of the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation.

Electronic Government: New Legislation on E-Government in Iceland

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 462-472
Author(s):  
Kristján Andri Stefánsson ◽  
Gunnar Thór Thórarinsson
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Computer Network ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Electronic Government ◽  
The Public ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Government

Government Policy on Matters of the Information SocietyWhile information technology has for a long time been utilized in public administration in Iceland, co-ordination and policy formulation only started in the mid-nineties. In 1996, the government made arrangements for a comprehensive policy formulation in this field, when the government formulated a specific policy on matters of the information society and established a provisional developmental project for this purpose under the direction of a special working group under the auspices of the Prime Minister's Office. While the project was to be completed within five years, from 1998 to 2002, it was decided at the beginning of this year to extend it to the end of the year 2003 while an appraisal of its implementation was carried out. Among the goals set in the governmental policy was that legislation, rules and the working methods of the public administration should be reviewed with a view to information technology, for the purpose of stimulating technological progress, and to make information accessible to the public irrespective of residence or economic resources. Furthermore, a special emphasis was put on the utilization of information technology in the dissemination of public information, and that all information systems used by government agencies should be structured so that they would provide information on laws, regulations, rights and obligations, and such matters, via a computer network, and also enable the public to go about their business, monitor the progress of important matters, and be provided with all such services which can be provided in this manner.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSIAN EXPERIENCE OF CREATING TERRITORIAL BRANDS

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris M. Eidelman ◽  
Oleg A Bunakov ◽  
Liliya R. Fakhrutdinova ◽  
Niyaz K Gabdrakhmanov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Small Towns ◽  
The Public ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Public Consciousness ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Tourism And Hospitality ◽  
The Many

This paper shows the features of spatial development of branding in various regions of the Russian Federation. The ways of development and promotion of territorial brands both in large and in small towns of Russia were considered. Based on the description of a large number of Russian regional brands, the paper presents a comparative analysis and shows their advantages and disadvantages. Much attention is paid to the formation processes of territorial brands on the example of the Republic of Tatarstan. The paper describes the main objectives of the Visit Tatarstan brand and the features of its visual style. It was shown that the visual style of this brand is based on a modern interpretation of ethnic, historical and traditional Tatar ornaments covering thousands of years. Among the main tasks of the Visit Tatarstan brand is the formation of a clear, uniform and an adequate image of the Republic of Tatarstan in the public consciousness both within and beyond the region. The paper sates that the Visit Tatarstan brand is focused primarily on the development of tourism and hospitality in the region, as well as the formation of an adequate image of the Republic of Tatarstan for the many guests who come to the Republic from around the world. Finally, there is a conclusion that each region of the Russian Federation should have its original brand created, which should complement and develop other city brands.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
L. V. GUSAROVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Financial Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article substantiates the relevance of implementing the principles of financial management in the public sector. Based on the analysis of foreign experience, the mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the quality of financial management of public administration bodies and chief administrators of budget funds are revealed. The expediency of introducing a risk-based methodology in the management of budget resources of the Russian Federation is revealed.

Personnel Policy in the Public Sector of the Russian Federation

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
Гарнов ◽  
Andrey Garnov ◽  
Топчий ◽  
V. Topchiy
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Great Role ◽  
Personnel Policy ◽  
The Public ◽  
Effective System ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Resource Capacity

In the context of globalization, the efficient use of intellectual and human resource capacity takes one of the key positions, as the quality of the performed functions depends on it. The creation of an effective system of public administration is the foundation of dynamic and all-round development of the state. Personnel policy plays a great role in the process of public administration, since it sets a general course on the formation of the requirements to public servants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document