scholarly journals PEMBUKTIAN DALAM SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-357
Author(s):  
Johansyah Johansyah
Keyword(s):  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trial Process ◽  
State Administration ◽  
General Explanation

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the evidentiary process at the trial in a State Administration dispute involving evidence, the burden of proof and evaluation of the evidence carried out in the State Administrative Court. This type of research is normative legal research. Proof is a procedure for establishing evidence of a fact in a State Administration case to be used as a basis for consideration in passing a decision. In general explanation of Law Number. 5 of 1986 stated that the teaching of proof used in the State Administrative Court is the teaching of free proof, in the State Administrative Court, the judge plays a more active role in the trial process to obtain material truth. An administrative suit does not in essence delay the implementation of the disputed State Administration Decree. The judge has the authority to provide an assessment of the results of evidence in examining, deciding, and resolving State Administration Disputes based on Article 107 of Law Number 5 of 1986.

scholarly journals Penerapan Asas Hakim Aktif (Dominus Litis) dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan No.1/G/2017/PTUN.DPS.)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Dewi Novita Indriyani Weda ◽  
I Made Arjaya ◽  
I Putu Gede Seputra
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Trial Process ◽  
State Administration

In the judiciary the Judicial State Administration plays a more active role in the trial process in order to obtain material truth. The activist of the judge is intended to compensate for the unequal position of the parties, namely the Defendant is an entity or official of the State administration and the Plaintiff is an individual or civil legal entity. In this research there are two main problems, namely (1) how is the Procedure for Making a Gathering in the State Administrative Court? (2) How is the application of the principle of active judge (dominus litis) in the stage of proof at the trial? The research method used is normative legal research with a legal approach.

scholarly journals PEMBEBANAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PERDATA KEPADA KEPALA DAERAH AKIBAT WANPRESTASI OLEH KEPALA DINAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Bachtiar Bachtiar ◽  
Tono Sumarna
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
State Administration

ABSTRAKWanprestasi dalam perjanjian konstruksi kerap ditemui dalam praktik, baik yang dilakukan oleh pemberi pekerjaan, maupun pihak pelaksana pekerjaan. Konsekuensinya, pihak yang melakukan wanprestasi dibebankan memulihkan kerugian yang timbul dari pelaksanaan perjanjian. Hal demikian tercermin dalam Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TGR, di mana Kepala Dinas Kesehatan Kota Tangerang Selatan selaku pihak pemberi pekerjaan proyek terbukti melakukan wanprestasi. Menarik untuk dicermati, majelis hakim dalam putusannya justru membebankan Walikota Tangerang Selatan untuk bertanggung jawab secara keperdataan. Isu hukum yang hendak dijawab dalam tulisan ini, terkait apakah penafsiran hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TNG tentang pembebanan tanggung jawab perdata kepada kepala daerah akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh kepala dinas telah sesuai dengan ajaran hukum administrasi negara, dan ajaran hukum perdata. Untuk menjawab isu hukum tersebut, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan bersandar pada data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim telah keliru dalam menafsirkan konsep pertanggungjawaban kepala daerah. Menurut ajaran hukum administrasi negara, walikota selaku kepala daerah tidak dapat dimintai tanggung jawab secara perdata akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan kepala dinas. Demikian pula dari perspektif Pasal 1340 KUHPerdata, walikota bukanlah merupakan pihak dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian yang dibuat oleh kepala dinas, sehingga tidak dapat dibebani tanggung jawab secara keperdataan.Kata kunci: tanggung jawab perdata, kepala daerah, wanprestasi. ABSTRACT Breach of contract in construction agreements is often found in practice, whether carried out by the employer, or the implementing party. As a consequence, the defaulting party is charged to recover losses arising from the implementation of the agreement. This was reflected in Court Decision Number 72/PDT.G/2014/ PN.TGR, which is the Head of South Tangerang City Health Office, as the project employer, has been proven in breach of contract. It is interesting to note that the panel of judges in its decision actually charged the Mayor of South Tangerang with a contractual liability. The legal issue in this paper is whether the interpretation of judges in Court Decision Number 72/PDT.G/2014/ PN.TNG concerning the imposition of civil liability to the regional head due to default committed by the head  of office is in accordance with the teachings of the law of state administration and civil law. To answer these issues, the author uses normative legal research methods based on secondary data obtained through literature studies. The results of the analysis show that the panel of judges has erred in interpreting the concept of regional head accountability. According to the teachings of the state administration law, the mayor as the head of the region cannot be privately liable for the default committed by the head of office. Likewise, from the perspective of Article 1340 of the Civil Code, the mayor is not a party to the implementation of the agreement made by the head of office, therefore civil liability cannot be burdened to him. Keywords: civil liability, regional head, default.

scholarly journals KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT DAN RELATIF PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1986 Jo. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 2004.

Solusi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budi Aspani
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Management ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
The People ◽  
Constitutional State ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government

ABSTRACT Indonesia is constitutionally constitutional state and requires the government through its apparatus in the field of State Administration to play a positive active role in all aspects of people's lives to achieve the prosperity of their people. Within this framework, it is not uncommon for a dispute to be caused by actions from the government in the form of irregularities, thus violating the human rights of its citizens. Strictly speaking, these deviations constitute government actions that are detrimental to those affected by the decision, in this case the people. The foregoing raises problems namely; whether any decision of the State Administration or Agency that causes harm to a person or legal entity can be submitted and sued as a dispute to the State Administrative Court and administrative efforts in which the decision can be sued again through the State Administrative Court. In this study the authors use the method of normative law research (normative law research) and by using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Normative legal research examines laws that are conceptualized as the norms or principles that apply in society, and become a reference for each person's behavior. Management and analysis of data is done in a qualitative way that is analyzing library data to produce descriptive data. After conducting discussions on the existing problems, it can be concluded, Each decision of the State Administration Agency or officials that causes harm to civil legal persons or entities can be submitted and sued as a dispute to the State Administrative Court. Its relative competency is related to the place of residence or jurisdiction of the court itself, as well as the parties to the dispute. Whereas the absolute competence can be seen from the point of view of the basis of disputes, which is due to the issuance of written provisions by the State Administrative Court or Agency. Administrative efforts in resolving state administrative disputes are known as administrative channels or efforts, whether in the form of administrative appeals or objections. In accordance with the basis of our country's philosophy of Pancasila, then the state administrative disputes should be resolved as far as possible through administrative efforts, which are more deliberative in reaching consensus. But if all available administrative efforts have been used, it turns out that the disputing parties remain unsatisfied, then the matter is raised and sued through the State Administrative Court.

scholarly journals Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim PTUN Terhadap Keputusan tentang Pergantian Antarwaktu Anggota Legislatif (Studi Putusan Nomor 05/G/2011/PTUN.YK)

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-110
Author(s):  
Abdul Jamil ◽  
Sufriadi
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
Initial Process

This study aimed to examine two objectives: first, legal considerations of court decision Number 05/G/2011/PTUN.Yk regarding state administrative decision on intermittent termination and replacement (PAW) a member of the Bantul Regional Representative Council (DPRD), and second, panel of judges rationale concluded that the decision on PAW was not absolute competence of PTUN. This research is classified as normative legal research using  both  primary  data by conducting interviews with PTUN judges and the expert, and secondary data in the form of legal material. The results showed: first, there are three main legal considerations used by judges: 1. the decision on PAW is a decision in the field of politics and constitutionality; 2. the decision on PAW does not fullfil the unilateral will element; 3. the existence of jurisprudence. Second, the judge's judgments rested on the conclusion that the decision did not fulfill the 'state administration' element and was emphasized in the 'initial process' of the PAW stage series, not to the 'final process' in the form of issuing decisions. The judgments put forward the interpretation based on doctrine, while if compared with the provisions of the Law on Administrative Court, the decision on PAW had actually been fulfilled as the KTUN which was the absolute competence of PTUN.

scholarly journals Hak Mantan Narapidana Korupsi sebagai Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah dalam Pemilihan Umum

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-451
Author(s):  
Gede Nofantara Putra ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Scientific Paper ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
State Administration ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Democratic Country

Indonesia is a constitutional democracy which in a democratic country, general elections including regional head elections (Pemilukada) are a way of being a form of people's sovereignty in playing an active role in state administration. The existence of post-conflict local elections is held at all types of political levels either in a democratic, authoritarian or totalitarian system and is recognized by States adhering to the principle of people's sovereignty. As for the formulation of the problem of this scientific paper, namely (1) How are the requirements for the nomination of members of the People's Representative Council and Regional People's Representative Council members in the election (general election)? (2) What are the implications of corruption convicts running for members of the people's representative council and regional people's representative council? This research uses normative legal research methods, statutory and conceptual approaches, primary and secondary legal sources, document studies and literature studies, and analysis of legal interpretations and descriptive analysis. On human rights, a person who has served a sentence as a prisoner has the same rights as other citizens and because the prisoner has already served the consequences of his actions with a sentence.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN KEBIJAKAN DISKRESI DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
Ervien Rizky Aditya
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
The Public ◽  
General Welfare ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Executive Body

Government in carrying out its duties is equipped with the authority of both the attributive and the delegative. With the development of society, there are often certain urgent circumstances, in which Government Officials/Administration Bodies can not use their authority which is bound to take legal action. In realizing the goal as a state with the concept of welfare general (welfare state) then the government must play an active role in interfacing the field of social economic life of the community. The government delegated responsibility bestuurszorg or public service. With this discretionary authority it means that some of the powers held by the legislature are transferred into the administration of the state as the executive body. Because the state administration has solved the problem by not waiting for the amendment of the Law from the legislative field, so the government should not refuse to provide services to the public on the grounds that there is no or no clear rule of law as long as it is still the authority of the government. But the power of government as a discretionary policy maker is always faced with a problem connected with corruption. Pemerintah dalam menjalankan tugasnya dilengkapi dengan kewenangan-kewenangan baik yang bersifat atributif maupun yang bersifat delegatif. Dengan adanya perkembangan masyarakat maka seringkali terdapat keadaan-keadaan tertentu yang sifatnya mendesak, dimana Pejabat/Badan Administrasi pemerintahan tidak dapat menggunakan kewenangannya yang bersifat terikat dalam melakukan tindakan hukum. Dalam mewujudkan tujuan sebagai negara dengan konsep kesejahteraan umum maka pemerintah harus berperan aktif mencampuri bidang kehidupan sosial ekonomi masyarakat. Maka pemerintah dilimpahkan tanggung jawab sebagai pelayan publik atau public service. Dengan adanya kewenangan diskresi ini berarti bahwa sebagian kekuasaan yang dipegang oleh badan pembentuk Undang-Undang dipindahkan ke dalam administrasi negara sebagai badan eksekutif. Karena administrasi negara melakukan penyelesaian masalah dengan tidak menunggu perubahan Undang-Undang dari bidang legislatif, sehingga pemerintah tidak boleh menolak memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat dengan alasan tidak ada atau tidak jelasnya aturan hukum sepanjang masih menjadi kewenangan dari pemerintah. Namun kekuasaan pemerintah sebagai pembuat kebijakan diskresi selalu berhadapan dengan adanya suatu permasalahan yang dihubungkan dengan tindak pidana korupsi.

scholarly journals PEMBAHARUAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERKAIT BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM RANGKA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afrianto Sagita
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Proof Theory ◽  
Policy Reform ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Financial Losses

Abstract This research aims to find out and analyze about how the criminal law policy reform related to the burden of proof theory can be used as the legal instruments in order as a tool to recover the state financial losses. This research has the type of Normative legal research, which has done by examining the library materials or the secondary data. The result for this reserach explain which Presumption Of Guilty is very urgent to be contained on the Eradication Of Corruption Crime Law Policy and it is considered to implement as immediatly. The application of the Presumption Of Guilty theory should be limited only on the evidance step on the trial only. Through the method of reversing the burden of proof, which expected to eliminate the difficulties of Eradication on the Corruption Crime Law Policy which faced during this time. Therefore, it is reasonable if the legislators still desire to contained the reversing of the burden of proof system on the Corruption Crime Law Policy, so it should be able to find out the base of law, which is by making the presumption of guilty to become the foundation or the philosophy which has function as the base of law. Then, level of the principle to be implemented as a norm, so that the policy about the burden of proof can be included on every article clause in the Corruption Crime Law Policy. Legal rules which is in the context of eradicating corruption also should be developed progressively according to the development of times, to reduce the left behind and get lose of current corruption modes nowadays.  Keywords: Criminal Law Policy, Burden of Proof, Corruption

EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN PENCATATAN PERCERAIAN DI KANTOR URUSAN AGAMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Juriyana Megawati Hasibuan Dan Fatahuddin Aziz Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Shipping Costs ◽  
The Status ◽  
Happy Marriage ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Marriage is a sacred bond which is ideally only held once in a lifetime. Both Islamic law and positive law require an eternal happy marriage. To support this the Koran proclaims marriage as mitsaqan galiza. The marriage is then registered in the state administration. In line with this, the laws and regulations are formulated in such a way as to make divorce more difficult. However, when there are acceptable reasons and due to coercive conditions, divorce can be done through a judicial process. The divorce must then be registered by taking certain procedures. The court delivered the notice and sent a copy of the decision to the marriage registrar to file the divorce properly. The implementation of this divorce record was not effective. The separation of the Religious Courts Institution from the Ministry of Religion has become a factor that causes the registration task not to be carried out. The loss of the obligation to submit a copy of the decision on the judge's ruling caused the recording to be constrained. The unavailability of shipping costs also contributed to the failure to register divorce. Even though there is a threat to the Registrar who neglects to deliver a copy of the verdict, unclear sanctions make this ineffective. As a result of the lack of recording of divorce, the status of husband and wife becomes unclear and opens opportunities for abuse of that status.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGEMBALIAN KEWENANGAN ISTIMEWA MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT MELALUI PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Putu Ayu Anastasia Wierdarini
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Material Content ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Strategic Position

The amendment of the Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 positioned the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat no longer as the highest state institution and the highest sovereign of the people. This has implications for the authority of the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat to have a strategic position, namely to UUD 1945, to stipulate GBHN, to elect the president and vice president through amendment of its authority to be very limited and weak. This paper examines jurisdictionally how to restore the privileges possessed by the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat through the amendment of the UUD 1945. A normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach is used to analyze this problem.The results of the study indicate that the MPR's repatriation in the main and vital position in the Indonesian state administration system is very important, namely through amendments to the material content of the UUD 1945 which must be implemented on an ongoing basis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document