scholarly journals Illegal crossing of the State Border of Ukraine: some aspects of elements of crime

1970 ◽  
pp. 315-320
Author(s):  
Yurii Kuryliuk
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Precise Determination ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public

The article analyzes elements of the crime covered by the Article 332-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, establishing criminal liability for illegal crossing of the State Border of Ukraine, and also discloses peculiarities of the criminal legal qualification of this action. It is determined that as the patrimonial object of the crime under the Article 332-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine should be considered homogeneous social relations, covering a certain sphere of the public life that is the border security of Ukraine, violation of which causes socially dangerous harm to the components of this sphere that is defense of the State and its border protection, sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability. The direct object of this crime is the public relations, which provide for the normatively established and regulated procedure for crossing the State Border of Ukraine. It has been established that the procedure for crossing the State Border of Ukraine may manifest itself in several forms: 1) by any means (by foot, by auto transport, by swimming etc.) outside the checkpoints across the State Border of Ukraine; 2) by any means (whether hidden or breaking through, or not) at checkpoints across the State Border of Ukraine without the relevant documents; 3) by any means (whether hidden or breaking through, or not) at checkpoints across the State Border of Ukraine with the documents, containing inaccurate information. Should not be underestimated the blanket nature of the disposition of the mentioned article that requires precise determination of the relevant regulatory acts, determining the list of documents that are necessary for crossing the State Border of Ukraine by a certain category of people, and also confirm the fact of opening a specific checkpoint across the State Border of Ukraine. The disposition of the Article 332-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine defines several groups of subjects, in particular: 1) a person who is prohibited from entering the territory of Ukraine; 2) a representative of a unit of the armed forces or other law enforcement agencies of the State who is an aggressor; 3) a person with the aim to illegally cross the State Border of Ukraine for harming the interests of the State. Moreover, it was established that the aim for “harming the interests of the State” is not necessary for the illegal crossing of the State Border of Ukraine by persons who are prohibited from entering the territory of Ukraine, or by representatives of a unit of the armed forces or other law enforcement agencies of the State who is an aggressor. The criminalization of the illegal crossing of the State Border of Ukraine is an important aspect of creating conditions for the proper protection of the vital interests of an individual, the society and the State from real and potential external and internal threats in the border space of Ukraine.

scholarly journals Protection of public relations in the field of amber mining in Ukraine: legal aspect

2021 ◽  
pp. 124-128
Author(s):  
Y.A Kholod ◽  
I.M Pogrebnoy ◽  
K.O Chyshko ◽  
D.S Heta ◽  
O.P Shaituro
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Structural Method ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
Legal Concepts

Purpose. Defining legal means of protection of public relations in the field of amber mining in Ukraine, providing scientific and practical interpretation of protection legislation in this area and scientifically sound recommendations for its improvement. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is a system of general and special methods of cognition: the dialectical method was used to learn the essence of such a phenomenon as the protection of public relations in the field of amber mining in Ukraine; the system-structural method in the analysis of forms of socially dangerous acts of crimes under Art. Art. 240, 240-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; the logical-dogmatic method when interpreting certain terms used in the sciences of geology, administrative and criminal law, contained in the provisions of current legislation, as well as in formulating definitions of legal concepts and developing recommendations for improving legal norms; the comparative law method in the study on the ratio of socially dangerous acts under Art. Art. 201-1, 240, 240-1, 305 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; general methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction, generalization) in the study on scientific and regulatory sources. Findings. As a result of the study, the inconsistency of certain norms of criminal, administrative and customs legislation was established, which form the components of offenses in the field of illegal amber mining in Ukraine and establish the types and extent of responsibility for their commission, in particular: competition of certain norms, their inefficiency, disproportionate severity violation of the degree of their social danger. The scientific and practical interpretation is given of the forms of socially dangerous act provided by Art. 240-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, a comparative analysis is conducted of criminal, administrative and customs offenses in this area and proposals are provided to improve criminal, administrative and customs legislation, the rules of which protect public relations in the field of amber mining in Ukraine. Originality. It is proposed: 1) to supplement the Criminal Code of Ukraine, Art. 240-2, which provides for criminal liability for amber smuggling; 2) to supplement Chapter 68 of the Customs Code of Ukraine with Article 483-1, which provides for administrative liability for smuggling of amber in small amounts; 3) to supplement the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses with Article 58-2, which provides for administrative liability for illegal extraction of amber, its sale, purchase, storage, transfer, shipment, transportation, processing in small amounts. Practical value. Proposals to improve the current criminal, administrative and customs legislation are aimed at improving the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies against illegal amber mining in Ukraine.

scholarly journals Corruption-Related Crime from the Perspective of “Dead-Letter” Articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 51-54
Author(s):  
Aleksandr N. Sukharenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
National Security ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Principle ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation

Despite the measures taken by the state, corruption remains one of the most serious threats to Russia’s national security. In recent years, the legislator has paid increased attention to toughening criminal liability for corruption crimes, the list of which is enshrined at the subordinate (interdepartmental) level. Taking into account the social danger of this problem, we carried out a detailed analysis of the state and dynamics of corruption crime in the country, as well as the geography of its prevalence. In the course of the analysis of law enforcement practice, a number of “dead” articles of the Criminal Code were identified that reduce the effectiveness of anti-corruption activities of law enforcement agencies and neutralize its main principle — the inevitability of liability for crimes.

scholarly journals Understanding Exemption from Criminal Liability through the Prism of Social Justice

2020 ◽  
pp. 320-328
Author(s):  
Valerii ROMANIUK
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Social Transformations ◽  
The Social ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Revolutionary Period

In the article the author investigates features of philosophical and legal preconditions of exemption from criminal liability. The author defines that the problems of criminal liability and exemption from it is one of the central and at the same time the most complex institutions of criminal law. The author argues that the pre-revolutionary period was characterized by a significant number of circumstances that exempted from criminal liability, due to the consequences of political, economic and social transformations in the world, the rise of human will and importance, its capabilities for the state. The author emphasizes that when resorting to the term «criminal liability», the domestic legislator means, first of all, the imposition on the person who committed the crime, the burden of coercive measures of punitive content. The author argues that it is expedient to consider criminal liability in a positive sense, as the obligation of a criminally responsible entity not to commit violations of the prohibitions established by the Criminal Code. That is, criminal liability, in the first place, should serve as a warning aimed at the person who intends to commit the crime. The author argues that if a person did not have the conditions for normal life and development for social reasons, then society and the state have no right to blame him only because they initially undertook to give him such conditions. The author argues that in a state governed by the rule of law, when addressing the implementation of criminal liability, special attention is paid to the intersectoral institution of exemption from criminal liability as a compromise in restoring social justice and encouraging law-abiding behavior. The author states that the unconditional nature of exemption from criminal liability undermines the essence of the institution of criminal liability in general, as exemption from criminal liability is carried out on non-rehabilitative grounds. In this regard, the released person who has committed a crime must, in order to maintain a balance of social justice, feel in some way the influence of the state in order to realize his guilt and really take the path of correction. The author proposes to apply such restrictions to the social balance of such a person as strengthening the supervision of law enforcement agencies, restrictions on certain rights.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability for Provoking Bribery

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (69) ◽  
pp. 492-512
Author(s):  
Oksana Stepanenko ◽  
Andriy Stepanenko ◽  
Maryna Shepotko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
New Challenges ◽  
Quantitative Indicators

In modern conditions of development of public relations complication of activity of law enforcement agencies is observed. This is due to new challenges in the law enforcement system, including the fight against high levels of the organization and the criminal professionalism of corrupt individuals. Because of this, it is challenging for operational units to identify specific facts of illegal actions with the help of operational and investigative measures. At the same time, the fight against crime by establishing high quantitative indicators of disclosure remains one of the principles of law enforcement in Ukraine, including sometimes deviating from those means established by law. Therefore, the problem of provoking bribery is relevant for scholars of the legislator and law enforcement. The object of the study is criminal liability for provoking bribery. The research methodology consists of such methods as the dialectical method, analytical method, historical method, method of analysis of legal documents, articles, and monographs, method of generalization, comparison, synthesis, and modeling method. The authors identified the features of such liability to clarify the problematic issues of qualification of provoking bribery, and to distinguish the distinctive features of prosecution from other types of crimes.

scholarly journals Victim of operational provocation or criminal?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-116
Author(s):  
Viktor Borkov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Physical Property ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Justification ◽  
Legal Understanding

The article discusses the urgent, not regulated by the criminal law, problem of qualifying the actions of the person who committed the crime as a result of the provocative actions of law enforcement officials. Attention is drawn to the absence in theory and judicial practice of a consistent scientific and legal justification for the release of persons provoked to a crime from criminal liability. An “encroachment” committed as a result of a “police provocation” is considered taking into account the institutions of complicity, involvement and inducement to commit a crime. The author examines the proposals already made by experts from fixing the provocation of a crime as one of the circumstances excluding criminal liability (Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), to including its arsenal of operationalsearch means to combat crime. According to the constitutional legal understanding of the investigated problem, the assessment of the act of the provoked is influenced by the activities of the persons who incited him to commit a crime, the essence of the disturbed social relations and the nature of the physical, property, organizational or other consequences that have occurred. The question of the criminal legal assessment of the acts of the provoked persons is proposed to be decided differentially, taking into account the reality and the measure of the harm caused by them.

scholarly journals Criminal liability for illegal banking activities in the context of countering criminal money cashing

2020 ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Dmitry Ovchinnikov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Economic Sector ◽  
The Russian Federation

Currently, the economic sector of public relations is characterized by exceptional criminality. One of the main phenomena responsible for this is illegal money cashing. Almost every business entity considers it acceptable and even necessary to resort to various criminal schemes for obtaining unaccounted cash and tax evasion. The very type of this crime has actually become a thriving and profitable business, which consists in providing services for withdrawing funds from legal circulation. While the existing judicial and investigative practice in the issue of countering this phenomenon has not yet developed a clear answer about the need for appropriate qualifications. There are about a dozen articles of the criminal law in which law enforcement officers try to find the correct legal assessment, and at present, article 172 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation “Illegal banking activities” deserves special attention.

scholarly journals Security and defense sector of Ukraine in the mechanism of realization of the defense function of the state

2020 ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
Viacheslav Alexandrov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
National Security ◽  
National Guard ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Civil Defense ◽  
The State ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
Defense Function

The article highlights the aspects of the Security and Defense Sector’s defense function. Based on the analysis of the legislationof Ukraine, the specifics of the normative regulation of the content of the category “defense”, as well as the diversity of doctrinal understandingof this category are highlighted. It is noted that the defense function of the state is realized, in fact, by all elements of the powermechanism. In this way, the state of readiness of the state “defense forces” necessary for the flow of armed aggression is achieved.Along with this, it was noted that within the framework of the state mechanism, it is expedient to single out those structures whosecompetence directly provides for the implementation of the defense function.The structure of the security and defense sector contains four components, which are differentiated according to their functionalpurpose and legal nature. In particular, these are: 1) security forces; 2) defense forces; 3) defense-industrial complex; 4) public associationsthat voluntarily participate in ensuring national security. It is also worth noting that the institutional components of Ukraine’ssecurity and defense sector belong to both the state apparatus and civil society institutions.The content of the categories “security forces” and “defense forces” is distinguished. Security forces are law enforcement andintelligence agencies, state bodies of special purpose with law enforcement functions, civil defense forces, as well as other bodiesentrusted by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine with functions to ensure the national security of Ukraine. In turn, the defense forcesinclude the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as other military formations, law enforcement agencies and intelligence agencies formedin accordance with the laws of Ukraine, as well as special purpose bodies with law enforcement functions, which are assigned by theConstitution and laws of Ukraine. The main institutional element of the Security and Defense Sector is the Armed Forces of Ukraine.It is the Armed Forces that protect the sovereignty of the state and territorial integrity, as well as ensure the inviolability of state borders.Emphasis is placed on the function of the National Guard of Ukraine and the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine as important componentsof the security and defense sector.It is noted that today the subordination of military institutions and law enforcement agencies to various ministries and authoritiesis a factor that may negatively affect their interaction in the process of performing the tasks provided by law. Therefore, we consider itexpedient for the President of Ukraine, as the Head of State and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, toadopt a normative act on cooperation between the Security and Defense Sector in the process of armed defense of Ukraine’s territorialintegrity and state sovereignty.

scholarly journals Criminality in the Armed Forces of Ukraine as an object of criminological research

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 103-114
Author(s):  
Puzyrov M. S. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Criminological Research ◽  
First Case ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Status

The article analyzes criminality in the Armed Forces of Ukraine as an object of criminological research. The expediency of studying criminality in the Armed Forces of Ukraine in both broad and narrow senses is found. In the first case, the analyzed type of criminality has its general criminal nature and is represented by a set of criminal offenses, the commission of which is possible both by servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other entities. This is the so-called general criminality represented by such criminal offenses as injuries of varying severity, murders, theft, etc. In a narrow sense, criminality in the Armed Forces of Ukraine is considered as a set of relevant criminal offenses, the commission of which is possible only through the person’s presence in the status of a special entity, which in this context is a serviceman of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In this case, it’s about criminal offenses against the established procedure for military service (military criminal offenses), provided in Section XIX of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The concept of “crime prevention in the Armed Forces of Ukraine” is scientifically substantiated and defines as a set of special organizational, administrative, criminal law, criminal procedural, criminal-executive and operative-search measures of specially authorized units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in cooperation with law enforcement agencies on prevention and cessation of criminal-illegal encroachments regarding the established order of military service, economic, violent, mercenary-violent (etc) orientation in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which are carried out on the basis of constitutional and special-branch norms and principles concerning defined groups or individually defined persons, methods and means provided by the current legislation. Key words: Armed Forces of Ukraine, military servicemen, criminological research, criminality, determinants, prevention.

ACTIVITIES OF THE MILITARY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IN THE CONDITIONS OF CHANGES IN LEGISLATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (32) ◽  
pp. 239-255
Author(s):  
Mukola Turkot
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
National Security ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Military Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agency ◽  
Military Security ◽  
Military Law ◽  
The Military

Тhe purpose of this article is to show the state of the functioning of law enforcement agencies in Ukraine, which are fighting against military crime. In addition, the algorithm for the activities of the military prosecutor’s office is shown after changes are made to the legislation. It was noted that the national security of Ukraine and its military security are protected by the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations. In these military formations serve soldiers, officers and generals. The tasks of each military formation are different. Introduction. The article defines the national security of Ukraine, the military security of Ukraine, and how security is created. The same is said about the subjects of ensuring the security of the state. The same is said about the subjects of ensuring the security of the state. It is separately noted that there is a bill on the State Bureau of Military Justice. This military law enforcement agency should implement the functions of pre-trial investigation against servicemen and others. The research methods are used taking into account the topic of the article, the problems that need to be addressed, and the conclusions to be drawn. Such methods were used: formal-logical, hermeneutical, comparative. Thanks to these methods, it was possible to compare the competence of military formations in Ukraine, to determine the necessary legal possibilities for the future law enforcement agency – the State Bureau of Military Justice. The conclusions contain the author’s statement that the time has come to create, in addition to the military prosecutor’s office, yet another law enforcement body whose competence extended to all military formations. This is due to the fact that in Ukraine at the moment there is no shadow of one military formation, whose competence extends to other military formations. The exception is the military prosecutor’s office.

scholarly journals Responsibility for violations of quarantine and sanitary rules and standards for preventing the spread of coronavirus infection (COVID-19) by law

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kovalova Svitlana ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Current State ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Coronavirus Infection

The article analyzes the current state of legal support of quarantine requirements and sanitary rules and regulations for the prevention of infectious diseases in foreign countries and Ukraine. To achieve this goal, an analysis of the current legislation of some foreign countries and Ukraine on the grounds for establishing liability for violation of quarantine and sanitary norms and rules. It has been established that the COVID-19 pandemic has forced the governments of different states to introduce administrative and criminal liability in case of violation of quarantine and sanitary norms and rules. To ensure these measures, penalties for non-compliance with the quarantine regime have been introduced, with penalties ranging from warning to imprisonment and even the death penalty. It is established that in Ukraine the issues of administrative and criminal liability for violation of quarantine and sanitary rules and regulations for the prevention of infectious diseases are regulated by Articles 42, 44-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses and Article 325 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is determined that one of the problems of ineffective application of Articles 44-3, 42 3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses and Article 325 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is an array of new rules for the prevention of COVID-19, which is constantly changing and introduced by various law enforcement agencies. The study found that despite the adoption of regulations that established liability for violations of statutory rules and regulations introduced by both foreign countries and Ukraine to prevent COVID-19, they have a number of legal conflicts, inconsistencies and gaps. Keywords: quarantine, administrative responsibility, criminal responsibility, infectious diseases, coronavirus, prevention

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document