scholarly journals CORRELATION OF THE DERIVATIVES WITH COMPOSITES, DEVELOPING THE FEATURE OF SIMILARITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 6(72) (1) ◽  
pp. 137-160
Author(s):  
А. V. Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Semantic Structure ◽  
Single Root ◽  
Compatibility Analysis ◽  
Internet Resources ◽  
The Russian Language

The article examines the semantic structure of simple adjectives with the suffix -at- (-ат-) in their relationship with single-root composites visible, —vidnij, -obraznij, podobnij (-видный, -образный, подобный) developing the meaning of similarity. The card file of linguistic facts was compiled on the basis of the «Reverse Dictionary of the Russian Language», «The Dictionary of the Russian Language» in 4 volumes and the internet resources. Mono- and polysemic adjectives were selected with the suffix —at— (-ат-), which is combined with 28 bases. Derivation paradigms are formed, which include adjectives with the suffix -at- (-ат-) and single-root composites with suffixes of -vidnij, -obraznij, podobnij (-видный, -образный, подобный), integrable by one or another basis. Derivatives with the suffix —at— (-ат-) comprise seven fourmembered paradigms with composites. Based on internet resources, in each derivational paradigm, compatible series of adjectives were formed, in which the number of adjective actors varies. The maximum number of lexical distributors was recorded in a paradigm with the basics of tarelk— (тарелк-) and shishk— (шишк-). Name distributors are included in various thematic groups. The compatibility analysis of single-root lexical units is intended to reveal certain semantic nuances in the transmission of the attribute of an object and answer the question of whether adjective composites with a similarity value are doublets. Thus, the leading study is the valency analysis.

scholarly journals DESCRIPTIVE VERBAL-NOMINAL CONSTRUCTIONS WITH CAUSATIVE SEMANTICS IN MODERN RUSSIAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Evgenia N. Laguzova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
Semantic Structure ◽  
Semantic Features ◽  
Formal Expression ◽  
Causative Constructions ◽  
Main Components ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Modern Russian

The article discusses descriptive verbal-nominal constructions with causative verbal components. The relevance of the study is due to the attention of modern linguistics to the problem of analyticism in the Russian language grammar, the lack of study of the structural and semantic features of analytical constructions with causatives. The novelty of the work consists in identifying the features of the semantic structure of sentences with causative verbal components. A feature of causative DVNC is recognized as dismembered semantics. Two varieties of causative constructions formed by descriptive verbal-nominal constructions are distinguished – sentences with arbitrary and automatic causation. The description of statements draws attention to the main semantic components – causative and causable subjects, methods of their formal expression. Differences in the semantic structure of sentences with spontaneous and automatic causation are shown. The purposefulness of causative action in sentences with spontaneous causation and indirectness of influence in sentences with automatic causation are due to the semantic features of the main components of causative statements with DVNC – the causative and causable subject. Constructions with spontaneous causation form polysubject monopropositive, DVNC with automatic causation form polysubject polypropositive structures. The peculiarity of the semantic structure of additional statements of DVNC unpretentious forms – participal – with causative semantics was noted. In sentences with DVNC unpretentious forms, the incentive is mitigated. Additional statements with DVNC form polypropositive constructions. The development of verbal-nominal constructions with causatives is associated with a tendency to analyticism, characteristic of the modern Russian language grammar. The materials of the article will be used in lexicographic practice – when compiling a dictionary of descriptive verbal-nominal constructions, in teaching special courses on the problem of nomination.

Metaphorical expressives in Tuvan lexicography

2021 ◽  
pp. 252-264
Author(s):  
E. K. Annai ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
Semantic Structure ◽  
Differentiation Process ◽  
Emotional Pain ◽  
Head Pain ◽  
Colloquial Speech ◽  
Language Influence ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
New Formation

Fixation and assignment of labels to specific semantic derivation cases, namely metaphorical expressives (expressive lexical units) in Tuvan dictionaries, are considered and compared with their Russian equivalents. The Russian language influence on the semantic structure of the Tuvan lexemes is observed. Metaphorical expressives are lexemes formed by metaphorical derivation resulting in new (figurative) meanings without changing the form. The number of such units in the colloquial speech was found to increase under the Russian language influence in recent decades. New formation models non-typical for Tuvan but common in Russian have appeared. Also, the calques of Russian expressives based on models absent in Tuvan were found: bash aaryy (lit.: head pain) → “person or problem causing emotional pain or frustration to the speaker” from Russian golovnaya bol’ with the same meaning. The analysis showed Tuvan dictionaries not to reflect this phenomenon sufficiently, i.e., word figurative meanings, namely metaphorical expressives, are not represented there broadly enough. It may be because the labels marking certain words’ usage areas, particularly the label razg. (colloquial speech) is used rather liberally since the stylistic differentiation process is still ongoing in standard Tuvan. While actively used in oral colloquial speech, most expressive meanings of polysemantic words revealed in the study are not found in Tuvan dictionaries. In Russian, there are special colloquial dictionaries, as well as regional dictionaries with stylistic labels. There are no such dictionaries in Tuvan, mostly due to its vague stylistic differentiation. However, the Tuvan language is still evolving, with dictionaries updated accordingly.

scholarly journals Reflection of Social and Cultural Features in the Names of Stones and Minerals in Bazhov’s Tales

2021 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 05008
Author(s):  
L.I. Stepanova ◽  
D.A. Shchukina
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Corpus Linguistics ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Semantic Structure ◽  
Theory Theory ◽  
Semantic Field ◽  
Semantic Fields ◽  
Natural Objects ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Cultural Features

The aim of the articleis to study peculiarities of nominations of minerals in Russian and in its regional version, in the socio-lexicon of the Ural mining workers. For this purpose, a methodological procedure was developed based on the methods of corpus linguistics and an exemplary analysis of the semantic field mineral (minerals) in Russian was performed. The theoretical and methodological procedure is based on the semantic field theory,theory of divergence andthelexical approachproposed by Kevechs. As the material of the study were used the tales (skazy) of Pavel Bazhov .The tales (narrations) of Bazhov are a bright representation of the Ural folklore, regional perception of natural objects, their metaphorical reinterpretation , enrichment of semantic fields associated with the occupation of the inhabitants of the region, with additional semantic meanings. The results of the study reflect the presence of significant differences in the semantic structure of lexemes-nominations of minerals in the Russian language and its regional variant.

scholarly journals SILA ASSOCIATIVE FIELD: EVOLUTION OF CONTENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115
Author(s):  
T.M. Nizamutinova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Native Speakers ◽  
Far East ◽  
European Part ◽  
Value Orientations ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Semantic Structure ◽  
Young Generation ◽  
The Far East ◽  
The Russian Language

The article is devoted to the analysis of changes in the content of the linguistic consciousness of the young generation of Russian native speakers in the period from 1988 to 2018 on the material of the SILA (force / power / strength) associative field according to associative dictionaries of the Russian language. In the process of analysis, differences are revealed in the semantic structure of the field and the value orientations of young people at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st centuries. The study was carried out by analyzing the reactions of the SILA associative field in the Russian Associative Dictionary (RAS), the Russian Regional Dictionary of the European Part (EURAS), the Russian Regional Associative Database (Siberia and the Far East) (SIBAS). As a result, differences in the value orientations of Russian young people have been revealed for the late 20th and early 21st centuries.

scholarly journals The role of the internet in the proliferation of new acronyms in the Russian language

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-387
Author(s):  
Thomas Bruns ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Communication ◽  
Digital Communication ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Maximum Range ◽  
Full Form ◽  
Technical Features ◽  
E Mail ◽  
The Russian Language

This paper focuses on a special form of English borrowing: the use of acronyms with phraseological meaning. The Russian computer language, more precisely the Russian computer slang, is unthinkable without the influence of English. This influence is manifested at various language levels and in a variety of forms (borrowings, calques and half-calques, univerbats, reverse derivatives, alphabetic and alphanumeric abbreviations, “distorted forms” of both full names and acronyms). Based on the English abbreviations, first the meaning of the respective full form is explained in English and then its fate is illustrated in the Russian host language. Comparison with German, which also borrowed a large number of such abbreviations, shows similarities and differences in the processing of these phraseological units. The term “digital communication” here refers not only to communication on the Internet in a narrower sense (chats, forums, e-mail, etc.), but also to such channels as SMS, Twitter, WhatsApp, and others. The Internet plays a double role in the development of the modern Russian language: firstly, as a means of mass communication that provides an opportunity to popularize new linguistic phenomena in the shortest possible time and with maximum range, and secondly, as a generator of new linguistic forms that would be impossible without the Internet itself. One part of these neologisms refers to the technical features of digital communication and the tools necessary for it, while the other part refers to the implementation of a new communicative style that is clearly different from analogue communication in its oral and written forms.

scholarly journals Прагматика второго лица

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (XXII) ◽  
pp. 5-30
Author(s):  
Aleksander Kiklewicz
Keyword(s):  
Speech Acts ◽  
Cultural Factor ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Second Person ◽  
Functional Linguistics ◽  
The Russian Language

The author considers the correlation between grammar and pragmatics as a problem of functional linguistics. The discussion focuses on pragmatic restrictions concerning the use of grammatical forms, i.e., the extent to which the grammatical meaning corresponds to the characteristics of speech acts. In this respect, the author analyzes Russian imperfective verbs in the second person of indicative. The analysis of the material collected from the Internet corpus of the Russian language demonstrates that the verbs in the 2nd person form are rarely used to implement the representative (assertive) speech acts. However, the use of verbs of the 2nd person in the general-personal, indefinite-personal and in the meaning of the 1st person is very common. The author concludes that the pragmatic-cultural factor is decisive in limiting the use of the verbs in the 2nd person form.

scholarly journals «Library as a territory of the Russian language existence and promotion»: a scientific library special project

Bibliosphere ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
L. A. Pronina
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Problem Analysis ◽  
Classical Literature ◽  
Special Project ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
Language Quality ◽  
Social Partnerships ◽  
The Russian Language

The problem analysis dealing with the Russian language preservation and promotion, including the Internet space, has shown the necessity to develop a special project «Library as a territory of the Russian language existence and promotion» on the basis of a system-integrated approach. Seven basic tasks were singled out involving all structural units of the library: to expand using the standard Russian literary language, to improve the quality of teaching Russian regardless of people’s residence, to support activities in the field of the Russian language study, to promote the Russian language throughout the world including by the Internet, to develop a set of measures to revive the interest in reading, to expand the availability of Russian classical literature works, to support literary creativity. The project objective is to improve the Russian language quality within the society different categories, and to raise the Russian language presence in the information space. The approach implemented within the project allows developing the library activity system determining the structural unit functions with identification of the most effective techniques, technologies, forms and methods of work for a specific target audience. Each problem is solved by a set of forms, methods, techniques, new formats, that allows optimizing the library multifunctional activity and making it effective and qualitative. The library monitors implementation of the project each aspects, develops social partnerships, and strengthens the library image.

scholarly journals Ecological Properties of Speech in the Communicative Field of Russian As a Foreign Language: New Extension

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Vorontsova
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Ecological Approach ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Ecological Aspect ◽  
The Past ◽  
Language Styles ◽  
Active Processes ◽  
The Russian Language

The author presents an endevour to comprehend the culture of Russian as a foreign language on the ecological angle - as an integral part of the surrounding polylingual speech environment. An ecological approach to the culture of the verbal multimodal sphere of communication implies commitment to national linguistic traditions, fostering an effective love for the past, present and future of the Russian language.The article actualizes the topic of linguistic ecology, in which a culture of thinking and communicative speech behavior in a polylingual environment arises, fostering a linguistic taste, protecting, enriching and improving the literary language and speech aesthetics. Studying modern active processes leading to democratization and liberalization of the Russian language, the author highlights the influence of the Internet and media language styles as key trendsetters of modern rhetorical trends, foreign borrowings and the expanding detabooing of abusive language patterns. Concluding that bridging communication gaps is the responsibility of linguistic ecologists, the author gives a brief thesaurus of linguo-ecological terms that show the creative nature of communication. The article also accentuates that the ecology of language and the ecology of culture are becoming the advanced and central national challenges of our time. Keywords: ecological aspect, polylingual speech environment, linguistic ecology, communication gaps, linguistic taste, speech aesthetics, state mission of our time

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document