scholarly journals Peculiarities of legal regulation of waste management of individual protection means in a pandemic condition

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Yelyzaveta STROHA ◽  
Vladyslava KRAKOVA

The paper is devoted to the problem of medical waste disposal, namely personal protective equipment. The authors point out that the spread of acute respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV–2 is not only a direct threat to human life and health, but also indirectly affects the environment of Ukraine. The paper notes that the disposal of personal protective equipment attracted attention only after the beginning of the pandemic, because their use by humans began in too large quantities. The paper also states that as a result of such use, a significant amount of hazardous waste is generated, which is not properly disposed of by companies that have the appropriate license and special equipment. The authors emphasize that there are gaps in the legal regulation of the treatment of personal protective equipment, as clear regulations are available only for PPE used by medical institutions. As for the protective equipment used by infected people in the home and referred by the legislator to the group of ordinary solid household waste, there are provisions for them only of a recommendatory nature. Therefore, their implementation will be provided only by conscious citizens, but we know that there are fewer of them in our country. The paper states that despite the established legal responsibility for health care institutions and licensees for non-compliance with regulations, which are clearly regulated by the legislation of Ukraine, the state does not adopt any effective mechanisms of influence to avoid their negative manifestations. The authors also note that in Ukraine, due to the lack of legal regulation of the treatment of PPE in everyday life, as a result, all of them are not disposed of properly and sent to regular landfills. Therefore, we propose ways to solve this problem, namely: to amend the Law “On Waste” and adopt a new bylaw to implement this law; create special containers to be used outside healthcare facilities.

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
Nikolay I. Kuznetsov ◽  
Elena S. Romanova

The lecture is devoted to non-specific prevention of coronavirus infection. Various measures are described to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to both the public and healthcare providers. The characteristic of various measures for the disinfection of medical and household waste is given. A detailed description of various personal protection methods with a description of the rules for their use is given. Attention is drawn to the rules for the use of personal protective equipment during a pandemic. Attention is drawn to common errors encountered when using personal protective equipment. The importance of their use in order to prevent the spread of infection outside medical institutions is emphasized.


Author(s):  
Anne Weissenstein

We present an update on infection prevention and control for COVID-19 in healthcare settings. This update focuses on measures to be applied in settings with increasing community transmission, growing demand for concern about COVID-19 patients, and subsequent staffing issues in the event of shortages of personal protective equipment for healthcare facilities worldwide. The comfort and emotional resilience of health care workers are key components in maintaining essential health care services during the COVID-19 virus (coronavirus) outbreak.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175717742110127
Author(s):  
Salma Abbas ◽  
Faisal Sultan

Background: Patient and staff safety at healthcare facilities during outbreaks hinges on a prompt infection prevention and control response. Physicians leading these programmes have encountered numerous obstacles during the pandemic. Aim/objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate infection prevention and control practices and explore the challenges in Pakistan during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and administered a survey to physicians leading infection prevention and control programmes at 18 hospitals in Pakistan. Results: All participants implemented universal masking, limited the intake of patients and designated separate triage areas, wards and intensive care units for coronavirus disease 2019 patients at their hospitals. Eleven (61%) physicians reported personal protective equipment shortages. Staff at three (17%) hospitals worked without the appropriate personal protective equipment due to limited supplies. All participants felt overworked and 17 (94%) reported stress. Physicians identified the lack of negative pressure rooms, fear and anxiety among hospital staff, rapidly evolving guidelines, personal protective equipment shortages and opposition from hospital staff regarding the choice of recommended personal protective equipment as major challenges during the pandemic. Discussion: The results of this study highlight the challenges faced by physicians leading infection prevention and control programmes in Pakistan. It is essential to support infection prevention and control personnel and bridge the identified gaps to ensure patient and staff safety at healthcare facilities.


Author(s):  
Darlington E Obaseki ◽  
Iriagbonse I Osaigbovo ◽  
Esohe O Ogboghodo ◽  
Omokhoa Adeleye ◽  
Obehi A Akoria ◽  
...  

Abstract Africa was the last continent to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of the discourse on Africa's response captured in scientific journals revolves around nations, public health agencies and organizations, but little is documented about how individual healthcare facilities have fared. This article reports the challenges faced in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria, including space constraints, diagnostic challenges, shortages in personal protective equipment and health worker infections. The opportunities and strengths that aided the response are also highlighted. The lessons learned will be useful to similar facilities. More information about health facility response at various levels is needed to comprehensively assess Africa's response to the pandemic.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 153-158
Author(s):  
Yogie Prasethya Al Hakim ◽  
Mokhamad Arifin

AbstractThe COVID-19 virus is very easy to spread, especially through droplets from infected people to others. This makes health workers vulnerable to infection. To overcome this problem. it is necessary to use personal protective equipment (PPE) which aims to protect health workers from the COVID-19 virus. To describe the compliance level of health workers with the personal protective equipment (PPE) in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A research literature review of 5 articles accessed from online databases such as Google Scholar and PubMed published from 2020-2021. The research used the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The results of this literature review showed that, from a total of 1496 respondents, 1158 respondents (77.4%) had a good level of compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) usage. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the health workers have a good level of compliance with the PPE usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. This literature review research is expected to be new knowledge, insight, and reference for health workers regarding the compliance with the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Keywords: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), COVIID-19, Adherence, Health Workers'. AbstrakVirus COVID-19 sangat mudah menyebar terutama melalui droplet dari orang yang terinfeksi kepada orang lain. Hal ini mengakibatkan petugas kesehatan rawan untuk terinfeksi. Untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut maka diperlukan penggunaaan alat pelindung diri (APD) yang bertujuan untuk melindungi petugas kesehatan dari virus COVID-19. Untuk mengetahui bagaimana tingkat kepatuhan penggunaan alat pelindung diri (APD) tenaga kesehatan di rumah sakit pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian literature review dari 5 artikel mengakses database online seperti Google Scholar dan PubMed yang di publikasi dari tahun 2020-2021. Instrumen telaah kritis yang digunakan yaitu instrument PRISMA checklist. Hasil penelitian literature review ini menunjukan diketahui dari total responden sebanyak 1496 orang, sebanyak 1158 responden dengan presentase (77,4%) memiliki kepatuhan yang baik dalam penggunaan alat pelindung diri (APD). Pada penelitian literature review kali ini didapatkan hasil berupa tingkat kepatuhan penggunaan APD yang baik oleh petugas kesehatan di masa pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian literature review ini diharapkan dapat menjadi pengetahuan, wawasan dan referensi baru untuk tenaga kesehatan terkait kepatuhan penggunaan alat pelindung diri (APD) terutama pada masa pandemi COVID-19.Kata kunci: Alat Pelindung Diri (APD), COVID-19, Kepatuhan, Tenaga Kesehatan.


Prosthesis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Fiorillo ◽  
Teresa Leanza

The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus has placed national health systems of different countries in difficulty, and has demonstrated the need for many types of personal protective equipment (PPE). Thanks to the advent of new three-dimensional printing technologies, it was possible to share print files (using stereolithography (stl)) quickly and easily, improve them cooperatively, and allow anyone who possessed the materials, a suitable 3D printer and these files, to print. The possibility of being able to print three-dimensional supports, or complete personal protective equipment has been of incredible help in the management of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019). The times and the relatively low costs have allowed a wide diffusion of these devices, especially for the structures that needed them, mainly healthcare facilities. 3D printing, now includes different fields of application, and represents, thanks to the evolution of methods and printers, an important step towards the “digital world”.


Author(s):  
Darcy M. Anderson ◽  
Ryan Cronk ◽  
Donald Fejfar ◽  
Emily Pak ◽  
Michelle Cawley ◽  
...  

A hygienic environment is essential to provide quality patient care and prevent healthcare-acquired infections. Understanding costs is important to budget for service delivery, but costs evidence for environmental health services (EHS) in healthcare facilities (HCFs) is lacking. We present the first systematic review to evaluate the costs of establishing, operating, and maintaining EHS in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We systematically searched for studies costing water, sanitation, hygiene, cleaning, waste management, personal protective equipment, vector control, laundry, and lighting in LMICs. Our search yielded 36 studies that reported costs for 51 EHS. There were 3 studies that reported costs for water, 3 for sanitation, 4 for hygiene, 13 for waste management, 16 for cleaning, 2 for personal protective equipment, 10 for laundry, and none for lighting or vector control. Quality of evidence was low. Reported costs were rarely representative of the total costs of EHS provision. Unit costs were infrequently reported. This review identifies opportunities to improve costing research through efforts to categorize and disaggregate EHS costs, greater dissemination of existing unpublished data, improvements to indicators to monitor EHS demand and quality necessary to contextualize costs, and development of frameworks to define EHS needs and essential inputs to guide future costing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wakgari Deressa ◽  
Alemayehu Worku ◽  
Workeabeba Abebe ◽  
Muluken Gizaw ◽  
Wondwossen Amogne

Abstract Background Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are at the frontline in the fight against COVID-19 and are at an increased risk of becoming infected with coronavirus. Risk of infection can be minimized by use of proper personal protective equipment (PPE). The aim of this study was to assess the availability and use of PPE, and satisfaction of HCPs with PPE in six public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1134 HCPs in June 2020. A systematic random sampling and consecutive sampling techniques were used to select the study participants. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data and Chi-square test was used to assess the association between the groups. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with satisfaction of healthcare workers. Results The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 30.26 ± 6.43 year and 52.6% were females. Nurses constituted about 40% of the overall sample, followed by physicians (22.2%), interns (10.8%), midwives (10.3%) and others (16.7%). The majority (77%) of the HCPs reported that their hospital did not have adequate PPE. A critical shortage of N95 respirators was particularly reported, it only increased from 13 to 24% before and during COVID-19, respectively. The use of N95 increased from 9 to 21% before and during COVID-19, respectively. Almost 72% of the respondents were dissatisfied with the availability and use of PPE in their hospital. The independent predictors of the respondents’ satisfaction level about PPE were healthcare workers who reported that PPE was adequately available in the hospital (adjusted OR = 7.65, 95% CI:5.09–11.51), and preparedness to provide care to COVID-19 cases (adjusted OR = 2.07, 95% CI:1.42–3.03). Conclusions A critical shortage of appropriate PPE and high level of dissatisfaction with the availability and use of PPE were identified. Therefore, urgent efforts are needed to adequately supply the healthcare facilities with appropriate PPE to alleviate the challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document