Reasons for the Emergence, Change and Termination of Corporate Legal Relations

Author(s):  
Yurii Zhornokui ◽  
Sviatoslav Slipchenko

Corporate relations are developing quite quickly, thus becoming more complicated and, accordingly, in need of proper settlement. Therefore, the main purpose of the work is to determine the range of grounds for the emergence, change and termination of corporate relations. Methodologically, the study of legal facts in the mechanism of legal regulation of corporate relations is conditionally divided into three parts: law-generating, enforcing and terminating grounds. The legal structure is singled out. The deduction method was chosen as the main method. The paper draws attention to the fact that recent changes in law and jurisprudence, as well as the doctrines of law, leave unanswered a number of questions, one of which is to define the circle of grounds for the emergence, change and termination of corporate legal relations. It is proved that such bases in the activities of corporations in their composition and quality can be simple and complex. The first are the grounds giving rise to legal consequences only in the presence of one legal fact, while the second is the basis on which there are several interrelated legal facts, and, accordingly, legal facts having multiple legal directions. Legal facts in the mechanism of legal regulation of corporate legal relations have all the signs of the traditional specific differentiation of legal facts that exist in the current legal doctrine and applicable law of civil law. At the same time, they have their own peculiarities, which are characteristic only of corporate legal relations. The conducted analysis is of theoretical importance for further research of the mechanism of legal regulation of corporate relations, as it allows to expand with the help of deductive method the idea of the grounds for the emergence, change and termination of corporate legal relations. This, in turn, will facilitate the formation of clear and consistent case law.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Extra-C) ◽  
pp. 276-281
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Nikolaevich Shpagonov ◽  
Pavel Zenovievich Ivanishin ◽  
Olga Mikhailovna Rodionova ◽  
Gregory Vyacheslavovich Kolodub

The proposed article provides a comprehensive examination of such a scientific concept of civil law as a "legal fact”. The science of civil law has a quite stable idea about legal facts, their structure, and types. At the same time, it should be stipulated that some of the circumstances determined by law do not become independent legal acts but act as their integral part, such as, for example, voting by an authorized person in the framework of a decision by a collective body of a legal entity, an offer and an acceptance concluding a contract, etc. Similar considerations have already been expressed but remained unaccepted in science, as they do not correspond to the understanding of a legal fact as an integral circumstance that entails the emergence, change or termination of civil rights and obligations. Independent legal facts can entail legal consequences both in themselves and in conjunction with other circumstances, forming a legal structure. The law also mentions such events and actions that give rise to rights and obligations exclusively in conjunction with other circumstances.    


Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-177

The research shows that one of the legal relations in civil matters is the family relationship, having an extensive content. It includes Family Law and the actual family relationships. While there are factual elements in the family relationships, only marriage registration gives rise to the property and personal rights between spouses since marriage is a legal fact of law. However, it has been stated correctly in the legal literature that the actual co-existence of partners is such a family relationship, in which couples enter into marriage without registration. The inner world of unmarried couples is significantly free from legal regulation. Family relationships, by their characteristics, are inconceivable without the personal and intimate aspects contained in certain factual foundations and found in family relationships.


Author(s):  
A. A. Suslov

The paper provides systematization of inadmissible refusals in civil law enshrined in civil legislation and clarification of court practice. The author analyzes the reasons for fixing the inadmissibility of refusal through civil law cases, which include situations of protection of the weaker party in civil law relations. A specific characteristic of inadmissible refusals according to the way of their expression is proposed: with the presence or absence of legal consequences of inadmissible refusals. The “doctrine of the nullity of refusal” prevailing in modern Russian science and court practice is criticized as contradicting the fundamental principles of civil law (in particular, the principles of freedom of contract, inadmissibility of arbitrary interference in private affairs, etc.) and generally acceptable type of legal regulation peculiar to civil law. Some ways to overcome it are proposed. It is concluded that the resolution of the issue of recognizing a refusal as valid or invalid should be based on the correct qualification of the relevant norms, which fix certain legal opportunities for participants in civil law relations as imperative or dispositive.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Sergeevna Fedotova

The article considers the possibility of drawing a passenger carriage contract based on the model of beneficiary contracts. In the case of the conclusion by organizations of carriage contracts for organized groups of passengers, a specific contractual structure in favor of a third party may be applied. Minor children can be considered third parties in whose favor a passenger carriage contract is concluded. The contradictions of the current civil legislation regarding the consideration of minor children as passengers have been revealed. The methodological basis of the study includes the following methods. A systematic approach is used to identify the role and place of the passenger carriage contract in the system of civil law contracts, as well as contradictions in civil law. Comparison is actively used to identify similarities and differences in the legal regulation of the passenger carriage contract under the legislation of various countries. Legal modeling is used in the analysis of specific contractual structures, which are legal models, and in modeling the structure of the passenger carriage contract. Methods of formal and dialectic logic are used as well. The contribution to the study of the issue is associated with the scientific justification of the need to improve the legal structure of the passenger carriage contract according to the contract model in favor of a third party.


Author(s):  
Liudmyla Yakovlieva

The article focuses on the important role of the contract as a regulator of relations for the management of an apartment building.It is established that the value of the contract of the management of apartment building as a transaction is that its conclusion by a singlewill of the parties, first, indicates the onset of legal consequences in the form of a simultaneous legal relationship between its parties,and secondly, expresses the focus of joint action of the parties to achieve the desired results and, as a consequence, giving the partiesto the contract mutual rights and obligations in the field of apartment building management.During considering the concept of the contract of the management of apartment building, we should not only proceed from itslegal nature, which reveals the essence of the contract as a legal fact that generates certain legal consequences, but also take into accountits essence as an obligation due to the conclusion of this contract. Accordingly, the specifics of the subject of legal relations from thecontract of management of an apartment building is primarily that one of the parties to the contract is a specialized subject of civil law –an individual-entrepreneur or legal entity-entrepreneur, which under the agreement with co-owners provides proper maintenance andrepair of common property of an apartment building and adjacent territory and proper living conditions and household needs.In the context of the study of the contract of the management of apartment building regarding the object of obligatory legal relationsmediated by it, it is established in view of its legal name that its object is apartment building management services. The subjectof the contract of the management of apartment building is proposed to be understood as a set of legal and factual actions that shouldbe taken to achieve the purpose of the contract. It follows that the subject of the contract under study is the activities of the manager toprovide services for the management of an apartment building (or in general – the management of an apartment building); in this case,the apartment building, including indoor premises and adjacent territory, should be perceived as a material object of the contract understudy and the subject composition.Separately within the limits of the article the basic characteristic features of the contract of management of the apartment houseare allocated, among which: 1) civil-law nature of relations on management of the apartment building; 2) the specificity of the subjectcomposition of the contract; 3) the dual legal and material nature of the object of binding legal relations; 4) a special subject of the stu -died contract.


Author(s):  
Laura Kadile ◽  

To any uninvolved reader, word combinations like “understand the meaning of one’s action” and “ability to control one’s action” can be confusing. Would the legislator have deliberately created such a broad-ranging combination of philosophical concepts in the text of a legal norm that each factual circumstance could be covered under these concepts and render applicable the legal consequences specified in the legal norm, or, after all, does the legal doctrine and case law already envisage a clear model, according to which the respective legal norm is applied? In the absence of a uniform filling of a legal norm with substance, might such an interpretation permit a purely subjective assessment? For a uniform interpretation and application of legal norms to exist in practice, the interpretation must be based on new fundamental principles and a common legal doctrine, abstaining from the case law and understanding of legal norms that existed before the reform of civil procedure capacity.


Teisė ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 45-61
Author(s):  
Marta Andhov ◽  
Deividas Soloveičik

The article conducts a comprehensive scholarly analysis of framework agreements – a public procurement technique often used across different European jurisdictions. Besides examining the general legal framework of the EU and Lithuanian law on framework agreements, the article also examines the newest EU case law. The authors analyse the relationship between the initial tender procedure establishing the framework agreement and the subsequent mini-competition that follows under the former to award the public contract. In contrast to the Lithuanian legal regulation and related case law, the authors argue that these two stages are interconnected and must be viewed as a unified part of the same procurement process in line with European legal doctrine. Finally, the article highlights the differences between framework agreements and public contracts.


Author(s):  
M. Bondareva ◽  
S. Rabovska

The article examines the role and functional importance of the lawyer's involvement in the notarial process, discusses the peculiarities of the lawyer's procedural activity in committing certain groups of notarial proceedings. Based on the analysis of judicial and notarial practice, the authors consider the issues of registration of the powers of the lawyer who provides representation in the notarial process. The article concludes that it is necessary to eliminate ambiguous understanding of documentary confirmation of the representative's powers. The specifics of participation in the notarial process and the peculiarities of legal regulation for such participation are determined by the nature of procedural formalities in the sphere of the notarial process. The necessity of determining the lawyer's powers in the notarial process on the basis of a power of attorney issubstantiated. The specifics of the lawyer's activity in the notarial process are proposed to be determined on the basis of two significant aspects: the legal status of the person represented by the lawyer and the nature, complexity, subjectivity of the notarial proceedings. Since the notarial procedure involves the search for the most favorable, acceptable to the parties options for solving their legal situation, the use of various instruments of legal technique, the negative effects of the lawyer's participation in the dynamics of notarial proceedings areanalyzed. Particular attention is paid to the functional component of the lawyer's participation in the notarial proceedings in terms of the stage of the notarial process. Based on the analysis of the case law and the practice of notary decrees on the refusal to perform a notarial act, it is concluded that most of the refusals were made on the grounds that could be eliminated or corrected by the applicant. The paper also stipulates the expediency of the lawyer's involvement in the notarial process for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of such a process. The efficiency of the lawyer's participation in the stage of preparation for the execution of the notary proceedings is determined in order to ensure the legal analysis of the documents as should be provided by the applicant for confirmation of one or another legal fact; legal analysis of the grounds for refusal of a notary in committing notarial proceedings; ways of adjusting the course of the notarial process, offering alternatives to solving the legal situation of theperson. The article highlights the problematic aspects of the personal participation of a person on behalf of and in the name of whom the notarial proceedings are committed. Cases where such participation is mandatory are demonstrated. Based on the research, the authors of the article offer independent conclusions and judgments on the analyzed topics.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azamat Omarov ◽  
Asylbek Kultasov ◽  
Kanat Abdilov

The article discusses the features of civil law in different countries. The authors studied the origins of the modern tradition of civil law, comparing the legal systems of two European countries. One of the traditional classifications of duties in civil law is analyzed, the conclusion is made about the inappropriateness of the allocation of personal and universal duties. In comparative law, there are many situations where the same legal term has different meanings, or where different legal terms have same legal effect. This confusion most often occurs when civil lawyers have to deal with common law, or vice versa, when common law lawyers deal with civil law issues. While there are many issues which are dealt with in the same way by the civil law and common law systems, there remain also significant differences between these two legal systems related to legal structure, classification, fundamental concepts, terminology, etc. As lawyers know, legal systems in countries around the world generally fall into one of two main categories: common law systems and civil law systems. There are roughly 150 countries that have what can be described as primarily civil law systems, whereas there are about 80 common law countries. The main difference between the two systems is that in common law countries, case law – in the form of published judicial opinions – is of primary importance, whereas in civil law systems, codified statutes predominate.


Author(s):  
Artemii Shleinov

The subject of this research is the examination of such civil law institution of the Russian Federation as the “no-fault liability”. Since the question of strict liability in the current doctrine of civil law is quite critical, the author views this problem through the prism of one of the paramount means of protection of the subjective civil law, namely through the prism of responsibility for inflicted moral distress, tracing its evolution throughout the entire history and considering the legislation and case law. The novelty consists in indicating the possibility of bringing to strict civil legal liability for inflicting moral distress. The author demonstrates the presence of strict legal liability within the civil law of the Russian Federation on the example of current Russian legislation. The article provides the doctrinal and legislative examples that prove this point of view. The novelty also consists in determination of presence of the principle of “strict liability: in the Russian civil law, as well as modeling of situations that this principle could be implemented in. The research results are valuable for future development of the Russian legal doctrine and case law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document