scholarly journals Pengendalian Biaya Tenaga Kerja Langsung dalam Peningkatan Efisiensi Biaya Produksi

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-113
Author(s):  
Diah Wahyuningsih ◽  
M Rifki Maulidiono
Keyword(s):  
Cost Control ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Labor Cost ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Standard Procedures ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Real Costs

Costs planning is a basic common issue faced by manufacturing companies where prior planned costs are being irrelevant with the actual costs, this especially happens with the case of labor costs. Companies must control costs effectively. Cost control can be measured by level of efficiency of previously budgeted cost and the real costs. Level of cost efficiency can be measured by comparing real costs with upcoming standard costs. This study aims to knowing how companies control its direct labor cost in order to increase production costs. The method applied in this study is qualitative descriptive analysis. The results show that when the company controls labor costs using methods such as finger print attendance to avoid cheating workers, standard procedures for operating machines, and faster production work standard of 51 days, we can conclude that the faster production the more efficient the costs spent by the company for the production process against the overhead costs consisted of water and electrical bills. On the other hand, we can also say that company’s policy towards the level of efficiency is 5%, mean while the actual level of efficiency is 0.43% for one unit production. This means that the cost control of direct labor costs run company still cannot achieve the expected level of efficiency.

scholarly journals Analisis Perhitungan Dan Penentuan Harga Pokok Produksi Pada PT. Mutifa Medan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
John Fisher Gulo ◽  
Kamil Mustafa ◽  
Ninny Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Production Cost ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Total Production ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Average Production ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Cost

<p>The cost of production is needed to determine the cost of production of a product. Costs incurred to produce the product must be clear, so that the determination of the cost of production would be appropriate. Imprecision in calculating the cost of production will be misleading in making management decisions. Data collection methods used in this study include: Documentation, Interview, Observation. This study analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis comparing the theory with actual results of the company. PT MUTIFA in determining the cost of production using the full costing method. PT MUTIFA in determining the cost of production, all costs incurred are treated as production costs, both the cost of major raw materials, cost of auxiliary materials, packaging materials costs and production overhead. Classification of production costs in accordance with the theory that exists is composed of material costs, labor costs and production overhead costs. Total production cost per month of each element calculation the average monthly cost is Rp. 73.111.118,260,- and the average number of finished products Paracetamol tablet 500 mg tablet is as much 566,666.67 per month. Based on data on average production costs in 2009, then the production cost per tablet is .Rp. 129,019.</p>

scholarly journals Peranan Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Pendekatan Full Costing Dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Dengan Metode Cost Plus Pricing

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Evi Noviasari ◽  
Richad Alamsyah
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Main Element ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
The Cost

The purpose of this study were to know the role of calculation cost of goods manufactured and  determination of the selling price of shoes in the Heriyanto’s shoes MSME. To knowing the extent of differences in determination the cost of goods manufactured by using the company method and the full costing approach and compare the selling price according to the company's method with using the Cost Plus Pricing. The type of research used is qualitative research. The analytical method used in this study is qualitative descriptive analysis. The data used in this study are primary data. Data were obtained directly through observation and interviews with the Heriyanto’s shoes MSME and data in the form of information on production costs such as raw material costs, labor costs, and factory overhead costs MSME during December 2018. While for secondary data. Data were obtained from intermediary media such as books or literature, journals related to the title of the research, and can also be via the internet. The results of the study it can be concluded that the cost of goods manufactured calculation according Heriyanto’s MSME is lower than the cost of  goods manufactured calculation using the full costing method. The cost of goods manufactured according heriyanto’s MSME is Rp. 15.675/pair or Rp. 313.492/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 14.600/pair or Rp. 291.992/score (Kavaro Material). While the cost of goods manufactured used the full costing method, which is Rp. 16.310/pair or Rp. 326.201/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 15.235/pair or Rp. 304.701/score (Kavaro Material). This is caused  factory overhead costs that are not calculate by Heriyanto’s MSME such as electricity costs, gas costs, maintenance costs for machinery and factory vehicles, and depreciation costs.             Determination of selling price must be appropriately because the determination of selling prices that are too high will result in difficulty competition with similar products while the determination of selling prices too low will result in reduced income generated by Heriyanto’s MSME. The difference in determination the cost of good manufactured will affect the Heriyanto’s MSME in determining the selling price, because the cost of goods manufactured is the main element in determination selling price. Calculation of selling prices according Heriyanto’s MSME is Rp. 18.026/pair or Rp. 360.516/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 16.790/pair or Rp. 335.791/score (Kavaro material). While the selling price used the Cost Plus Pricing method which is Rp. 18.814/pair or Rp. 376.281/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 17.578/pair or Rp. 351.556/score (Kavaro material). Keywords : Cost of Goods manufactured, Selling Price, Full Costing, Cost Plus Pricing

Implementasi Direct Costing Method Sebagai Alat Untuk Menghitung harga pokok produksi perusahaan Manufacture (Studi Kasus Industri Flores VCO Nangaba Kabupaten Ende)

Analisis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Yasintha Gowa ◽  
Sabra B. Wahab Thalib ◽  
Yulita Londa
Keyword(s):  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Production Volume ◽  
Business World ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
The Cost

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) is a form of community small business and is one of the home industry businesses that has experienced rapid development. Most SMEs still use simple or conventional cost accounting methods in calculating the cost of production while the business world is currently experiencing increasingly rapid development so it must require a current report that is quite accurate and reliable. Direct costing is a method of determining the cost of production that only takes into account variable production costs or which directly affects production volume. Direct costing is often called variable costing and marginal costing. This study aims to determine the implementation of the direct costing method in Nangaba VCO SMEs in addition to knowing the classification of costs in calculating the cost of production using the direct costing method. This type of research is qualitative. Analysis of the data used is a qualitative descriptive analysis which is an analysis that describes or provides an overview of how to determine the cost of goods using variable costing or direct costing in the Nangaba Ende VCO industry. The results of this study indicate that there are differences in the calculation of the cost of production and the net profit made by the company much lower when compared to using the calculation by the direct costing method.

SELISIH BIAYA PRODUKSI SEBAGAI ALAT PENGENDALIAN MANAJEMEN PT INDO PUSAKA BERAU

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
SAFITRI NURHIDAYATI ◽  
RIZKI AMELYA SYAM
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Material Costs ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to analyze whether the difference that occurs in the cost of raw materials, direct labor, and factory overhead costs between the standard costs and the actual costs in PLTU LATI is a difference that is favorable or unfavorable. Data collection techniques with field research and library research. The analytical tool used is the analysis of the difference in raw material costs, the difference in direct labor costs and the difference in factory overhead costs. The hypothesis in this study is that the difference allegedly occurs in the cost of raw materials, direct labor costs, and factory overhead costs at PT Indo Pusaka Berau Tanjung Redeb is a favorable difference. The results showed that the difference in the cost of producing MWh electricity at PT Indo Pusaka Berau Tanjung Redeb in 2018, namely the difference in the price of raw material costs Rp. 548,029.80, - is favorable, the difference in quantity of raw materials is Rp. 957,216,602, - is (favorable) , the difference in direct labor costs Rp 2,602,642,084, - is (unfavorable), and the difference in factory overhead costs Rp 8,807,051,422, - is (favorable) This shows that the difference in the overall production cost budget is favorable or profitable. This beneficial difference shows that the company is really able to reduce production costs optimally in 2018.  

scholarly journals Cost Control and Profitability of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-33
Author(s):  
Godwin Emmanuel Oyedokun ◽  
Amos Olafusi TOMOMEWO ◽  
Sunday Ajao OWOLABI
Keyword(s):  
Cost Control ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact

Profitability in manufacturing companies in Nigeria depends on the ability of the companies to grow their earnings and tame their cost profile through cost control techniques. Many manufacturing companies seem not to understand these costs and the impact they have on profitability. This study examined the effect of cost control on the profitability of selected manufacturing companies in Nigeria. The population of the study was the 78 manufacturing companies listed on the Nigeria Stock Exchange as at 31st December 2017. A sample frame of 23 companies listed on the consumer goods sector was selected out of which five companies were considered for a period of 10 years (2005 – 2017). The study adopted a judgmental sampling technique. Data were obtained from the audited financial statement, and the accounts have already validated by regulatory authorities. The study took descriptive and inferential (regression) statistics. It was found that there is a significant negative relationship between the cost of raw materials (CoRM) and profit before tax of manufacturing companies in Nigeria. The study concluded that cost control has a significant positive effect on the profitability of manufacturing companies in Nigeria for the period under review. Therefore, it is recommended adequate management and alternative sourcing of raw materials.

scholarly journals CALCULATION OF PRODUCTION COST IN UD. USAHA BARU WITH FULL COSTING METHOD

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-42
Author(s):  
Suprianto Suprianto ◽  
Bina Andari ◽  
Yely Sulistyawati
Keyword(s):  
Production Cost ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Material Costs ◽  
Other Information ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to evaluate the calculation of cost of production. The accuracy of the calculation of cost of production is influenced by the suitability in the accumulation and calculation of production costs which includes the cost of raw materials, direct labor costs and other costs (factory overhead costs). This research was conducted at UKM UD. Usaha Baru which aims to determine the calculation of cost of production at UD. Usaha Baru and to find out whether the calculation of cost of production is in accordance with the full costing method. The technique (method) of data analysis used in this study is quantitative analysis. Data collection techniques use interview techniques directly to obtain information from the number of units of monthly production, raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory overhead costs, as well as other information relating to the calculation of cost of production. Based on the evaluation results for the calculation of raw material costs and labor costs are in accordance with the full costing method. However, the calculation of factory overhead costs is not in accordance with the full costing method because there are costs that have not been included in the calculation of production costs.

Improving the Cost Control System of Organizations Based on the Concept of Sustainable Development

Auditor ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 40-45
Author(s):  
Nataliya Kazakova ◽  
Lyudmila Permitina
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Control System ◽  
Production Process ◽  
Cost Control ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Control Optimization ◽  
Control Procedures ◽  
The Cost ◽  
On Farm

The article proposes the author’s two-level methodology of on-farm control based on the concept of sustainable development, which has practical significance and allows solving the problem of control, optimization of costs and production costs both at the pre-production stage and in the production process with an emphasis on control procedures for three types of costs: economic, environmental and social.

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF DAIRY EQUIPMENT*1

1954 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 190-193
Author(s):  
Carl W. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Production Costs ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Major Field ◽  
Economical Analysis ◽  
Time Requirements ◽  
Plant Equipment ◽  
Dairy Equipment ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Work Method

To hold the cost of products sold at a competitive level in face of rising prices, it is necessary that production costs be held to a minimum. The first major field of reduction of production costs is in labor costs. In order to get the most out of dairy equipment labor must be properly used. When the time requirements of a job are reduced by improving the method, the worker must be gainfully employed at some other assignment. There are beneficial changes which provide leisure, add to the comfort of the worker, and reduce the hazards of his work. Changes in plant equipment arrangement may be made even though they are not justified on a purely economical analysis. The paper presents principles, with applications, which can be followed in each plant to improve the work method and decrease time requirements.

Multi-criteria optimization of skidding process on optional fellings

10.12737/1770 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Филичкина ◽  
Maria FilichkinaM ◽  
Абрамов ◽  
Vitaliy Abramov
Keyword(s):  
Production Costs ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Dimensionless Quantity ◽  
Tree Stand ◽  
Direct Production ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Weighting Coefficients

The paper proposes generalized criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of the primary timber transportation, featuring simultaneous consideration of direct production costs, labor costs, and the cost of laying skid trails and the loss on their removal from the process of forest growing, as well as damage to the felling of the tree stand. The technique of leading the criteria in unequal dimensions to the dimensionless quantity for their convolution using a series of weighting coefficients to optimize the logging is shown.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PERHITUNGAN HARGA POKOK PRODUKSI MENGGUNAKAN METODE FULL COSTING DAN VARIABLE COSTING UNTUK MENENTUKAN LABA BERSIH PT. BHASKARA MADYA JAYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 212-218
Author(s):  
Nia Agustin Pratama ◽  
Teguh Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Fixed Costs ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Net Profit ◽  
Operational Activities ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
The Cost

With the addition of profits, the company can pay all costs that are sacrificed, so that the company's operational activities are guaranteed and can run well. The problems examined in this study are intended to find out how the comparison of recording costs using the full costing method and variable costing affects the net profit of PT Bhaskara Madya Jaya. Both of these methods simultaneously involve raw materials, direct labor costs and factory overhead costs. What distinguishes the full costing method using fixed factory overhead loads and variable, if the variable costing only adds to the variable overhead load. Production costs that are not included in the raw material and direct labor costs are the overhead of the manufacturing plant itself. Descriptive method with a quantitative approach is the model of this research. With the use of saturated sampling. Documentation is a data collection technique that researchers use. The results of the study and details obtained by comparing the full costing method and variable costing. In detailing the cost of production, the full costing method produced a greater than the costing variable, this is due to the full costing method adding all the elements of costs, variable costs or fixed costs . Then from the results of the breakdown of net income, using the full costing method, the nominal profit is found to be far less than using the variable costing method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document