Rituximab Therapy for Systemic Rheumatoid Vasculitis: Indications, Outcomes, and Adverse Events

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitrin M. Coffey ◽  
Michael D. Richter ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson ◽  
Matthew J. Koster ◽  
Kenneth J. Warrington ◽  
...  

Objective.To characterize the indication, outcomes, and adverse effects of rituximab (RTX) treatment in a large single-center cohort of patients with systemic rheumatoid vasculitis (RV).Methods.We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 17 patients treated with RTX for systemic RV from 2000 to 2017. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and adverse effects were analyzed.Results.At RV diagnosis, mean age was 59 years, 59% were female, 94% were white, and 82% had positive rheumatoid factor. At the time of initiating RTX, median Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for rheumatoid arthritis was 4.0 (interquartile range 2.0–7.5). RV presented in the skin in 8 patients (47%), as mononeuritis multiplex in 2 (12%), inflammatory ocular disease in 2 (12%), and affected multiple organ systems in 5 (29%). RTX was used for induction therapy in 8 patients (47%), relapsing RV in 4 (24%), second-line therapy in 2 (12%), and salvage therapy or in combination with another agent in 3 (18%). At 3 months, 2 (13%) of 15 patients with available followup information achieved complete remission (CR), and 10 (67%) achieved partial response (PR). At 6 months, 6 patients (40%) achieved CR, 8 (53%) achieved PR, and one had no response. At 12 months, 8 of 13 patients with available records (62%) had CR and 5 patients (38%) had PR.Conclusion.Systemic RV is difficult to treat effectively. CR of RV was achieved in 62% and PR in 38% of patients within 12 months of RTX use. Further evidence is needed to inform treatment for patients with RV.

Author(s):  
Hongxu Li ◽  
Jie Gao ◽  
Shuijun Zhang

The cell adhesion molecule CADM1, which participates in cell adhesion and signal transduction, has a regulatory effect on the development of tumors. CADM1 is often involved in malignant tumors of multiple organ systems, such as the respiratory and digestive systems. Upregulated CADM1 promotes tumor cell apoptosis and inhibits malignant proliferation. Along with cell cycle-related proteins, it participates in regulating signaling pathways, such as EMT, STAT3, and AKT, and plays an important role in inhibiting invasion and migration. Considering clinical characteristics, low CADM1 expression is associated with aggressive tumors and poor prognosis. In addition, some long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) or miRNAs directly or indirectly act on CADM1 to regulate tumor growth and motility. Interestingly, CADM1 function differs in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), and NF-κB is thought to be involved in this process. Taken together, CADM1 could be a potential biomarker for early diagnosis and a target for cancer treatment in future clinical practices.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 616-616
Author(s):  
Daniel Fontes Santos De Teive E Argolo ◽  
Lillian Mary Smyth ◽  
Neil M. Iyengar ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Larry Norton ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4915-4915
Author(s):  
Troy Z Horvat ◽  
Joshua J Pecoraro ◽  
Ryan J Daley ◽  
Larry W Buie ◽  
Dan Douer

Abstract Introduction: Severe pegaspargase hypersensitivity during first-line therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurs in 1.8-5.9% of patients (Oncaspar [package insert]; Douer D, et al. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:905-911). Erwinia asparaginase is the preferred therapeutic alternative as it retains excellent activity in patients with Escherichia coli asparaginase or pegaspargase antibodies (Willer A, et al. Blood 2011;118:5774-82; Plourde PV, et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:1232-38; Salzer WL, et al. Blood 2013;122:507-14; Zalewska-Szewczyk B, et al. Clin Exp Med 2009;9:113-16). Furthermore, pegaspargase desensitization may not prevent recurrence of severe allergy (Sahiner UM, et al. Pediatr Int 2013;55:531-33). The risk for allergy and other common asparaginase-related adverse effects exists with Erwinia asparaginase, however most data is from pediatric reports. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of using Erwinia asparaginase in adult ALL patients with previous pegaspargase hypersensitivity or intolerance. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of eight adult ALL patients who received Erwinia asparaginase after intolerance to pegaspargase between November 2011 and July 2015. Toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Investigational Review Board granted an exemption from IRB review. Results: The eight patients received a total of 29 cycles (median 3 cycles each, range 1-6) as part of various pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens. Each cycle consisted of Erwinia asparaginase 25,000 units/m2 intramuscularly every 48 hours (either including or excluding weekends). Corticosteroid premedication was given with 52 of 170 total Erwinia asparaginase doses. The median age was 33 years (range 23-72), 7 (87.5%) were males, 75% had B-cell ALL, and 25% had T-cell ALL. Seven patients received Erwinia asparaginase while in first complete remission (CR1) and only one as part of second-line therapy. Patients received a median of 2 prior doses of pegaspargase (range 1-4) before switching to Erwinia asparaginase for either grade 3/4 anaphylaxis (n=6), urticaria/pruritus (n=1), or grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (n=1). Six patients received all intended cycles, 1 patient was lost to follow up after 1 cycle, and 1 patient was still receiving treatment at the time of analysis. No hypersensitivity reactions occurred and no patient developed arterial or venous thrombosis. Laboratory adverse effects are reported in table 1. One patient died from disease (the 1 patient that received Erwinia asparaginase as part of second-line therapy), 1 patient died in a motor vehicle accident while in first remission, and six patients are still alive and in first remission at 7.5-29.6 months from diagnosis. No morphologic relapses have occurred in patients in first remission (n=7) at a follow up of 4.9-26.4 months after switching to Erwinia asparaginase. Conclusions: Replacing pegaspargase with Erwinia asparaginase after hypersensitivity allowed all patients to continue asparaginase therapy without hypersensitivity. Adverse effects with Erwinia asparaginase were limited to laboratory abnormalities of minimal clinical consequence. In contrast to the known high rate of hepatoxicity in adults treated with pegaspargase, no high grade liver toxicity was seen. In light of the critical role of asparaginase in ALL therapy, our preliminary observations suggest that asparagine depletion with Erwinia asparaginase can proceed as scheduled despite pegaspargase intolerance. Within our small cohort undergoing first-line therapy, relapse did not occur after transitioning to this therapeutic alternative. Table 1. Laboratory abnormalities by grade Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 AST 7 0 0 0 ALT 7 2 0 0 TBILI 1 0 0 0 Amylase 2 0 0 0 Lipase 1 1 0 0 Triglycerides 3 4 3 1 Fibrinogen 2 6 1 0 Total 23 13 4 1 *Laboratory abnormalities were counted per event, not per patient Disclosures Douer: Gilead: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed S. Al Askar ◽  
Naila A. Shaheen ◽  
Mohsen Al Zahrani ◽  
Mohammed G. Al Otaibi ◽  
Bader S. Al Qahtani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document