Ethics of communication in politics is the value of communicating in political events. Political problems are activities in the highest hierarchy of social life. So this study will focus on political communicators, political messages and political channels. Political communicators are the main actors or who initiate the formation of messages up to the use of certain channels addressed to the recipients of political messages (political audiences). Political problems not only occur linearly (one-way), or interactionally limited in the form of action-reaction in the form of feedback (feedback) only, but there is a continuous (transactional). Transactionally materialized in the presence of "crucial talks". Starting from the first stage, which is a small talk in the form of consultation and minimal coordination between two or more political communicators, this atmosphere is because among them still the same in terms of views and interests. The second stage, the talks are in the form of discussions, negotiations or political lobbying between two or more compromises to determine the technical solution, because this stage of the different views but still an important one. The third stage, which is a crucial conversation where there are differences of views and differences of interests. Crucial conversation is a discussion between two or more people when (1) high stakes, (2) different opinions, and (3) High emotions. These conditions are usually resolved by voting or by walkout. In the face of a crucial conversation we can do three things: avoid, face in a good way, and deal with it in a bad way. Facing elections, feud is a necessity, there are differences of view will make the society split into two or several axis of politics. The election result that determines the winning Party that will propose the presidential candidate will be colored by political messages in the form of persuasive or negative (negative and black campaign). So that we can always keep the unity and the unity of the nation we must understand the meaning of politics with the maturity of thinking and empathy in the difference, so hopefully we can be a wise man.