scholarly journals Nutrizione enterale a bolo vs. nutrizione enterale continua nel paziente adulto: una revisione sistematica e metanalisi

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Di Matteo ◽  
T. Bolgeo ◽  
M. Bertolotti ◽  
D. Gatti ◽  
A. Roveta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Review Manager

Introduzione. L'alimentazione a bolo e continua sono strategie di somministrazione della nutrizione enterale comunemente utilizzate. Attualmente non vi sono dati sufficienti per definire quale sia il metodo più efficace per ridurre le complicanze gastrointestinali nei pazienti adulti. Obiettivo. Valutare l’impatto della nutrizione enterale a bolo rispetto a quella continua negli outcomes aspirazione, aumento del residuo gastrico, diarrea, distensione addominale, vomito, indice glicemico sul paziente adulto con indicazione alla nutrizione enterale prepilorica in ambito ospedaliero. Materiali e metodi. La ricerca bibliografica è stata effettuata sui database Pubmed, Embase, Cinhal e Cochrane. La meta-analisi è stata eseguita attraverso l’utilizzo del Review Manager V.5.3. Risultati. Cinque studi hanno mostrato che il tasso di diarrea era più alto nel gruppo di alimentazione a bolo (RR= 2.50, IC 95% = 1.17– 5.34, P = 0,02). Cinque studi hanno mostrato che il tasso di aspirazione era più alto nel gruppo di alimentazione continua (RR = 0.55 IC 95% 0.35,0.87 P= 0.01). Nessuna differenza significativa per gli altri outcome. Conclusioni. L'alimentazione intermittente potrebbe ridurre l'incidenza di aspirazione, tuttavia sembra associarsi a maggiore rischio di diarrea.

scholarly journals Risk of colectomy after conservative treatment of diverticulitis of the left hemicolon complicated by abdominal or pelvic abscess: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e042350
Author(s):  
Maximilian Sohn ◽  
Ayman Agha ◽  
Igors Iesalnieks ◽  
Anna Tiefes ◽  
Alfred Hochrein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Pelvic Abscess ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Review Manager

IntroductionAcute diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is increasingly treated by a non-operative approach. The need for colectomy after recovery from a flare of acute diverticulitis of the left colon, complicated diverticular abscess is still controversial. The primary aim of this study is to assess the risk of interval emergency surgery by systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods and analysisThe systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE will be screened for the predefined searching term: (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum) AND (Abscess OR pelvic abscess OR pericolic abscess OR intraabdominal abscess) AND (surgery OR operation OR sigmoidectomy OR drainage OR percutaneous drainage OR conservative therapy OR watchful waiting). All studies published in an English or German-speaking peer-reviewed journal will be suitable for this analysis. Case reports, case series of less than five patients, studies without follow-up information, systematic and non-systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be excluded. Primary endpoint is the rate of interval emergency surgery. Using the Review Manager Software (Review Manager/RevMan, V.5.3, Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012) meta-analysis will be pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool will be used to assess methodological quality of non-randomised studies. Risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool.Ethics and disseminationAs no new data are being collected, ethical approval is exempt for this study. This systematic review is to provide a new insight on the need for surgical treatment after a first attack of acute diverticulitis, complicated by intra-abdominal or pelvic abscesses. The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020164813.

scholarly journals Association between CYP3A5 Polymorphism and Statin-Induced Adverse Events: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 677
Author(s):  
Jeong Yee ◽  
Hamin Kim ◽  
Yunhee Heo ◽  
Ha-Young Yoon ◽  
Gonjin Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Event Risk ◽  
Total Data ◽  
Lipophilic Statin ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Review Manager

Purpose: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) is involved in the metabolism of statins; CYP3A5 is the main enzyme responsible for lipophilic statin metabolism. However, the evidence of the association between CYP3A5*3 polymorphism and the risk of statin-induced adverse events remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism and the risk of statin-induced adverse events. Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for qualified studies published until August 2020. Observational studies that included the association between statin-induced adverse events and the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism were reviewed. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated to assess the strength of the relationship. The Mantel–Haenszel method was used to provide the pooled ORs. Heterogeneity was estimated with I2 statistics and publication bias was determined by Begg’s and Egger’s test of the funnel plot. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.4) and R Studio (version 3.6). Results: In total, data from 8 studies involving 1614 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The CYP3A5*3 polymorphism was found to be associated with the risk of statin-induced adverse events (*3/*3 vs. *1/*1 + *1/*3: OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.08–1.82). For myopathy, the pooled OR was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.96–1.75). The subgroup analysis of statin-induced myopathy revealed a trend, which did not achieve statistical significance. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism affected statin-induced adverse event risk. Therefore, CYP3A5 genotyping may be useful to predict statin toxicity.

scholarly journals Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingduo Kong ◽  
Hongyi Wei ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yilin Li ◽  
Yongjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

scholarly journals Evaluation of alpha-l-fucosidase for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Xi ◽  
Chunqing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Review Manager

AbstractObjectivesThe main aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of alpha-l-fucosidase (AFU) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsStudies that explored the diagnostic value of AFU in HCC were searched in EMBASE, SCI, and PUBMED. The sensitivity, specificity, and DOR about the accuracy of serum AFU in the diagnosis of HCC were pooled. The methodological quality of each article was evaluated with QUADAS-2 (quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy 2). Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted by using Review Manager 5 and Open Meta-analyst.ResultsEighteen studies were selected in this study. The pooled estimates for AFU vs. α-fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC in 18 studies were as follows: sensitivity of 0.7352 (0.6827, 0.7818) vs. 0.7501 (0.6725, 0.8144), and specificity of 0.7681 (0.6946, 0.8283) vs. 0.8208 (0.7586, 0.8697), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 7.974(5.302, 11.993) vs. 13.401 (8.359, 21.483), area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7968 vs. 0.8451, respectively.ConclusionsAFU is comparable to AFP for the diagnosis of HCC.

Effects of Early Hypertension Control after Ischaemic Stroke on the Outcome: A Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 270-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuping Liu ◽  
Chengyan Li ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Jing Xiong ◽  
Xueqing Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Hypertension Control ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Haemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Review Manager

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that high blood pressure (BP) increases the risk of cerebral oedema and haemorrhagic transformation of the ischaemic stroke (IS), and that low BP in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is associated with a poor prognosis. The best possible management of hypertension after AIS is still uncertain. Materials and Methods: English databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of early BP lowering (started within the first 48 h) after IS on outcome from January 1990 to August 2015. We set strict inclusion criteria and used the Review Manager 5.2 software from Cochrane Collaboration to calculate the combined risk ratio (RR). Result: Eight studies met our criteria. Early BP lowering after AIS did not significantly affect the risk of early and long-term death (RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.69-2.16 and RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.62-1.71), early and long-term dependency (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.10 and RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.84-1.36), early and long-term death or dependency (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.19 and RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.95-1.05), long-term stroke recurrence (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.49-1.11), long-term myocardial infarction (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.27-3.61), and long-term vascular events (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.72-1.31). Conclusion: Our results revealed neither support nor opposition to early BP lowering (started within 48 h) after AIS; individualized BP management based on the patients' condition may be a good choice.

scholarly journals The effectiveness and safety of LMWH for preventing thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ze Lin ◽  
Yun Sun ◽  
Hang Xue ◽  
Lang Chen ◽  
Chenchen Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Evident Difference

Abstract Background Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are commonly used for preventing venous thrombosis of the lower extremity in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Although, LMWH is the most commonly used drug, it has yet to be established whether it is more effective and safer than UFH. Further, a comparison of the effectiveness of LMWH in preventing thrombosis at different locations and different degrees of spinal cord injury has also not been clearly defined. Materials and methods Cohort studies comparing the use of LMWH and UFH in the prevention of lower limb venous thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury were identified using PubMed. The risk of bias and clinical relevance of the included studies were assessed using forest plots. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The main results of the study were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results A total of five studies were included in this meta-analysis. Four studies compared the effectiveness and safety of LMWH and UFH in preventing thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury. No significant differences were found between the therapeutic effects of the two drugs, and the summary RR was 1.33 (95% CI 0.42–4.16; P = 0.63). There was also no significant difference in the risk of bleeding between the two medications, and the aggregate RR was 0.78 (95% CI 0.55–1.12; P = 0.18). When comparing the efficacy of LMWH in preventing thrombosis in different segments and different degrees of spinal cord injury, no significant differences were found. Conclusions The results of this analysis show that compared with UFH, LMWH has no obvious advantages in efficacy nor risk prevention, and there is no evident difference in the prevention of thrombosis for patients with injuries at different spinal cord segments.

The effect of 0.01% atropine on ocular axial elongation for myopia children: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Yu ◽  
Jiasu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Axial Elongation ◽  
Funnel Plots ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Q Statistic ◽  
Regression Tests ◽  
Review Manager

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to identify the therapeutic effect of 0.01% atropine with on ocular axial elongation for myopia children. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases from inception to July 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA version 14.0 and Review Manager version 5.3 softwares. We calculated the weighted mean differences(WMD) to analyze the change of ocular axial length (AL) between orthokeratology combined with 0.01% atropine (OKA) and orthokeratology (OA) alone. The Cochran's Q-statistic and I2 test were used to evaluate potential heterogeneity between studies. To evaluate the influence of single studies on the overall estimate, a sensitivity analysis was performed. We also performed sub group and meta-regression analyses to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. We conducted Begger's funnel plots and Egger's linear regression tests to investigate publication bias. Results: Nine studies that met all inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 191 children in OKA group and 196 children in OK group were assessed. The pooled summary WMD of AL change was -0.90(95%CI=-1.25~-0.55) with statistical significance(t=-5.03, p<0.01), which indicated there was obvious difference between OKA and OK in myopic children. Subgroup analysis also showed that OKA treatment resulted in significantly less axial elongation compared to OK treatment alone according to SER. We found no evidence for publication bias. Conclusions:  Our meta-analysis indicates 0.01% atropine atropine is effective in slowing axial elongation in myopia children with orthokeratology.

Relative Efficacy of Probiotics Compared with Standard Therapy for Diarrhea Treatment in Children Under Five Years of Age: A Meta-Analysis Evidence from Developing Countries

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurul Aini Suria Saputri ◽  
◽  
Tri Nugraha Susilawati ◽  
Vitri Widyaningsih ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Acute Diarrhea ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastrointestinal Diseases ◽  
Relative Efficacy ◽  
Children Under Five ◽  
Under Five ◽  
Review Manager

ABSTRACT Background: Probiotics have been widely studied in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. There is high-quality evidence that probiotics are effective for acute infectious diarrhea. This study aimed to examine the relative efficacy of probiotics compared with standard therapy for diarrhea treatment in children under five using meta-analysis. Subjects and Method: A meta-analysis was carried out using systematic PRISMA guidelines. The review process begins with searching for articles published between 2009 and 2019 from PubMed, Clinical Key, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases. This study obtained four articles that meet the criteria of the randomized controlled trial (RCT), the study subjects were toddlers and conducted in developing countries. A sample of 995 children was divided into two groups, 518 children received probiotics (intervention) and 477 children received standard therapy (control). The data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) software 5.3 to assess Standardized Mean Difference (SMD). Results: Probiotics administration reduced duration of acute diarrhea in children under five than standard therapy, with pooled estimate= 0.30 (SMD= -0.30; 95% CI= – 0.56 to -0.03). Conclusion: Probiotics administration combined with standard therapy is effective to reduce the duration of acute diarrhea in children under five in developing countries. Keywords: acute diarrhea, probiotic, children under five Correspondence:Nurul Aini Suria Saputri. Midwifery Department, School of Health Polytechnics, Tanjungpinang/ Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Arief Rahman Hakim No.1, Tanjungpinang, Riau Islands. Email: [email protected]. Mobile: +6285743401971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.03.95

scholarly journals Perbandingan Kriteria ACR-1997 dan SLICC-2012 dalam Diagnosis Lupus Eritematosus Sistemik pada Anak

Sari Pediatri ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 386
Author(s):  
Dwi Lestari Pramesti ◽  
Dina Muktiarti
Keyword(s):  
Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Receiver Operating

Latar belakang. Lupus eritematosus sistemik merupakan penyakit autoimun sistemik pada jaringan ikat yang bersifat kronik dan progresif, terutama pada anak. Hingga saat ini belum ada diagnosis baku emas, sehingga untuk menegakkan diagnosis dapat menggunakan kriteria The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) tahun 1997 atau The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) tahun 2012.Tujuan. Mengumpulkan bukti ilmiah perbandingan penggunaan kriteria ACR-1997 dan SLICC-2012 dalam diagnosis lupus eritematosus sistemik pada anak.Metode. Penelusuran literatur secara sistematis secara daring melalui database Pubmed dan Cochrane. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Review Manager dan model hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) pada studi meta-analsiis. Kualitas studi dinilai dengan QUADAS-2.Hasil. Satu artikel telaah sistematis dan meta-analisis dan satu artikel studi longitudinal dilakukan telaah kritis. Kualitas kedua studi dinilai baik. Studi oleh Hartman dkk menunjukkan kriteria ACR-1997 lebih dianjurkan sebagai kriteria klasifikasi LES pada anak karena lebih spesifik (94,1% vs 82%) dan menghindari terjadinya positif palsu. Studi kedua oleh Lythgoe dkk menunjukkan SLICC-2012 lebih sensitif (92,9% vs 84,1%) dan secara lebih dini mengklasifikasi pasien anak dengan LES.Kesimpulan. Kriteria SLICC-2012 memiliki sensitivitas yang lebih tinggi dalam klasifikasi LES pada anak tetapi memiliki spesifisitas yang lebih rendah dibandingkan ACR-1997. Namun, SLICC-2012 dapat mengklasifikasi LES lebih dini secara signifikan dibandingkan ACR-1997.

scholarly journals Two-Way Relationship Between Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Periodontitis: Results from A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Felipe Rodolfo ◽  
Silvania Conceição Furtado ◽  
Alessandro Luiz Araújo Bentes Leal ◽  
Any Carolina Cardoso Guimarães Vasconcelos ◽  
Daniel Fernando Pereira Vasconcelos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Systematic Review ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Statistical Program ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Ci Calculations ◽  
Review Manager

Aim: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and periodontitis have considerable worldwide prevalence once they both present systemic alterations with a possible association between them. Therefore, we have performed this meta-analysis to assess the possible association between H. pylori infection and periodontitis. Material and Methods: A systematic search in the literature was performed for studies published before December 2, 2019 in diverse scientific and educational databases. The data was extracted by two investigators and the statistical analysis was performed by Review Manager statistical program with heterogeneity and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% of Confidence Intervals (CI) calculations as well as a sensitive analysis to assess the accuracy of the results. The value of P<0.05 was considered as significant. In addition, we performed the analysis of the quality of included studies as well as the evaluation for risk of bias. Results: In overall analysis, H. pylori infection was associated with the risk of periodontitis development (OR = 1.72, CI: 1.47, 2.02, P<0.00001) and the periodontitis was considered as a risk factor for H. pylori infection (OR = 3.21, CI: 2.31, 4.47, P<0.00001). Moreover, the evaluation of dental plaque from patients with periodontitis reveled increased risk of H. pylori infection (OR = 3.46, CI: 2.39, 5.01, P<0.00001). Conclusions: This current systematic review and meta-analysis composed by 12 studies in 7,059 participants showed that H. pylori infection increased significantly the risk of the development of periodontitis and the periodontitis may be a risk for this bacterial infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document