scholarly journals Cognitive Ability of High School Students in Level of Thinking based on Bloom’s Taxonomy Viewed from Intrapersonal Intelligence

Author(s):  
Sutama Sutama ◽  
Harun Prayitno ◽  
Sabar Narimo ◽  
Diana Sari
2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilat Brill ◽  
Anat Yarden

Question-asking is a basic skill, required for the development of scientific thinking. However, the way in which science lessons are conducted does not usually stimulate question-asking by students. To make students more familiar with the scientific inquiry process, we developed a curriculum in developmental biology based on research papers suitable for high-school students. Since a scientific paper poses a research question, demonstrates the events that led to the answer, and poses new questions, we attempted to examine the effect of studying through research papers on students' ability to pose questions. Students were asked before, during, and after instruction what they found interesting to know about embryonic development. In addition, we monitored students' questions, which were asked orally during the lessons. Questions were scored according to three categories: properties, comparisons, and causal relationships. We found that before learning through research papers, students tend to ask only questions of the properties category. In contrast, students tend to pose questions that reveal a higher level of thinking and uniqueness during or following instruction with research papers. This change was not observed during or following instruction with a textbook. We suggest that learning through research papers may be one way to provide a stimulus for question-asking by high-school students and results in higher thinking levels and uniqueness.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlinda Indah Eka Budiarti

This study aims to explore and describe the process of problem solving geometry reach the level of visualization, analysis and informal deduction based on the Van Hiele theory. This type of research is descriptive explorative and qualitative approach. Subject of the study was obtained from the high school students who were tested on the level of Van Hiele geometry. Each level of visualization, analysis and informal deduction taken two learners who can communicate well. The results of this study indicate that solving problems in geometry learners who attained think visualization is to identify problems and set goals using the language question. Troubleshooting on the geometry of learners who attained think theanalysis is through fifth troubleshooting step IDEAL using their own language, but less systematic. Troubleshooting on the geometry of students who reach a level of thinking is through the informal deduction fifth troubleshooting step IDEAL by systematically using their own language.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aftoni Aftoni ◽  
I Wayan Susila ◽  
Any Sutiadiningsih ◽  
Muhammad Kris Yuan Hidayatulloh

When computers take over routine tasks at work, a number of employees engage in tasks that require independent problem solving . Current learning systems should encourage students to move beyond the level of thinking that is lower in order to become personally self-sufficient . The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the Plan-Do-Review-Share-Happy (Plandoresh) strategy stages as an effort to develop independent learning for vocational school students. This study used a descriptive method with the aim of obtaining the validity of the Plandoresh strategy stages with a random sample of 78 respondents. The results showed that: 1) the Plan stage is valid with r count > r table of 0.849 > 0.227, 2) the Do stage is valid with r count > r table of 0.873, 3) the Review stage is valid with r count > r tabel 0,856, 4) Tahap Share valid dengan r hitung> r tabel 0,868, 5) Tahap Happy valid dengan r hitung > r tabel 0,929. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa tahapan strategi Plandores berlaku untuk diterapkan dalam upaya untuk mengembangkan belajar mandiri untuk kejuruan sekolah siswa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeri Araiku

Based on the merit, the uncertainty of the results, and the lack of depth of existing researches in connecting gender and cognitive level, hence, the purpose of this research is to analyze the difference of students’ mathematics ability in bloom’s taxonomy domain based on gender. This research is quantitative research with 156 students taken as sample, consisted of 81 male and 75 female students. Two-way anova employed in this study, with LSD (Least Significant Difference) and HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) as post hoc test. The results show that all assumption tests for variance analysis are fulfilled. From two-way anova test, obtained the result that Fcount > Ftable at α = 0.05 (Fcount = 10.57 dan Ftable = 2.22) which means that there is interaction between gender and students’ cognitive level. LSD test shows that at level C1, male students perform better than female groups. However, there is no difference between both groups for overall performance. HSD test also reveals that there is significant different on students’ performance in C1, C2, and C3, but not in C4, C5, and C6.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
M.E.B Indah

This study aims to explore and describe the process of problem solving geometry reach the level of visualization, analysis and informal deduction based on the Van Hiele theory. This type of research is descriptive explorative and qualitative approach. Subject of the study was obtained from the high school students who were tested on the level of Van Hiele geometry. Each level of visualization, analysis and informal deduction taken two learners who can communicate well. The results of this study indicate that solving problems in geometry learners who attained think visualization is to identify problems and set goals using the language question. Troubleshooting on the geometry of learners who attained think the analysis is through fifth troubleshooting step IDEAL using their own language, but less systematic. Troubleshooting on the geometry of students who reach a level of thinking is through the informal deduction fifth troubleshooting step IDEAL by systematically using their own language.


Author(s):  
Şenol Orakcı

The aim of this study is to give information about layered curriculum in detail and cover the importance of it in the learning-teaching process. Layered curriculum is composed of three layers that entail students to work step-by-step and use higher-level thinking skills. As an educator and author, Nunley developed this approach as a result of her classroom experiences with high school students. In layered curriculum, a learner is in charge of his/her own learning. In addition, students perform their learning by using different learning styles based on their own interests and needs. Layered curriculum offers tasks that provide learners the opportunity to choose activities from simple to complex, easy to difficult, centered on Bloom's taxonomy. In this study, “General Features of Layered Curriculum Evaluation in Layered Curriculum,” “Six Simple Steps for Layered Curriculum,” “Implementation of Layered Curriculum in Classroom Environment,” “Layered Curriculum and Bloom's Taxonomy,” and “Benefits of Using the Layered Curriculum in Teaching” were covered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document