scholarly journals Speech Act Analysis of the Dialogues in Henshaw’s This Is Our Chance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Samaila Yakubu

Speech act analysis is an act of investigating how utterances not only disseminate information but perform actions as well.  Dialogues in Henshaw’s This Is Our Chance are not only employed to exchange information about animosity between the people of Koloro Village and the people of Udura Village but to take actions on matters that involved the two neighbouring villages.  The present paper seeks to explore the dialogues in the above mentioned text to see how they have been used.  The paper adopts speech act theory of J. L. Austin which was later developed by J. R. Searle.  The data for the study were analysed based on speech act theory. Components of directive speech act such as commands and questions are used extensively in the text while those like requests, advice, directives and warnings are used insignificantly; constituents of representative speech act, namely, statements and reports run throughout the text; elements of expressive speech act such as complaints and appreciations are found in the text; declaration speech acts, and constituent of commissive speech act such as promise are used scantly in the text.  The study concludes that speech act theory is the most appropriate instrument for handling civil conflict.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Bestman Esegbuyiota Odeh ◽  
Augustina Ngozi Eze ◽  
Bridget, O. Dioka ◽  
Chinaza Loveline Ugochukwu

This research work is centered on the speech act analysis of Dame Patience Jonathan. The main objectives of the work are to identify the types of speech acts in the selected Dame Patience’s speeches as well as to discover its effects on the citizens of the country. The theoretical framework adopted for data analysis is Searle’s speech act theory. For the analysis, only three speeches of Dame Patience Jonathan will be used. The speeches includes: Chibok girls speech, campaign speeches at Umuahia and Calabar. The study finds out that the speeches could have caused chauvinism and rivalry as well as proving that the then government is inept in solving the problem at hand. The findings also reveal different types of speech acts used by Dame Patience Jonathan using Searle’s speech act classification. The work identifies Declarative Speech act, Representative Speech act, Commisive speech acts and Directive speech act. The work also discovers how politicians such as Dame Patience Jonathan used language in such a way to manipulate the listeners/citizens. Furthermore, the work discusses the effect of Dame Patience Jonathan’s speeches on the people and how the people/citizens reacted to the speeches. The study recommended that if political figure wants to make a speech or address the citizens, s/he should weigh the speech and its consequence.


Metahumaniora ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Erlina Zulkifli Mahmud

AbstrakArtikel ini membahas satu jenis strategi penerjemahan yang berfokus pada penerjemahan pada level kata yang bersifat non-equivalent menurut Mona Baker. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan jenis strategi penerjemahan apa saja dalam taksonomi tersebut  yang diaplikasikan pada penerjemahan kata-kata non-equivalent yang ditemukan pada novel-novel Indonesia sebagai bahasa sumber ke dalam bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa sasaran; dan juga untuk mengidentifikasi apakah pesan yang terdapat pada kata-kata bersifat non-equivalent pada bahasa sumber tersampaikan sama pada bahasa sasaran. Metode yang digunakan untuk membahas aplikasi strategi penerjemahan ini adalah metode kualitatif-komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kata-kata yang bersifat non-equivalent diterjemahkan dengan menggunakan 7 dari 8 strategi penerjemahan yang ada dan secara keseluruhan strategi penerjemahan untuk kata non-equivalent mampu menyampaikan pesan yang terdapat pada kata-kata non-equivalent tersebut meskipun tidak semua secara detil.Kata kunci: strategi penerjemahan, kata non-equivalent, strategi penerjemahan Mona Baker AbstractSpeech act is the activity of uttering speech with a specific purpose. Research on speech acts has been done by many researchers before, but the number is still limited that reviewed the speech acts during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study discussed the types of speech acts on Instagram social media during the Covid-19 period. This study used a pragmatic approach with Searle's speech act theory (1979). The method used is descriptive qualitative. Based on the results of data analysis, researcher found that 3 types of speech acts, namely 1) Directive speech acts with the implicature of persuading and encouraging; 2) Representative speech acts with the implicature of commanding and challenging; 3) Expressive speech acts with the implicature of encouraging.Keywords: Covid-19, Pragmatic, Speech act         


Metahumaniora ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Irzam Sarif S ◽  
Nani Darmayanti

AbstrakTindak tutur adalah aktivitas mengujarkan tuturan dengan maksud tertentu. Penelitian mengenai tindak tutur telah banyak dilakukan oleh peneliti sebelumnya, namun jumlahnya masih terbatas yang mengkaji mengenai tindak tutur di masa pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai jenis-jenis tindak tutur di media sosial Instagram pada masa Covid-19. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan pragmatik dengan teori tindak tutur Searle (1979). Metode yang digunakan berupa deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan dari hasil analisis data, peneliti menemukan 3 jenis tindak tutur, yaitu 1) Tindak tutur direktif dengan implikatur membujuk dan menyemangati; 2) Tindak tutur representatif dengan implikatur memerintah dan memberi tantangan; 3) Tindak tutur ekspresif dengan implikatur menyemangati.Kata Kunci: Covid-19, Pragmatik, Tindak tutur  AbstractSpeech act is the activity of uttering speech with a specific purpose. Research on speech acts has been done by many researchers before, but the number is still limited that reviewed the speech acts during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study discussed the types of speech acts on Instagram social media during the Covid-19 period. This study used a pragmatic approach with Searle's speech act theory (1979). The method used is descriptive qualitative. Based on the results of data analysis, researcher found that 3 types of speech acts, namely 1) Directive speech acts with the implicature of persuading and encouraging; 2) Representative speech acts with the implicature of commanding and challenging; 3) Expressive speech acts with the implicature of encouraging.Keywords: Covid-19, Pragmatic, Speech act       


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Rd. Januar Radhiya ◽  
Asteria Permata Martawijaya

This study investigates speech act strategies used in earthquake mitigation handbooks in Japan, and focuses on finding the type of communicative functions of the speech act strategies used. The government of Japan has provided online and printed handbooks for the people, to reduce risks to a minimum level regarding the disaster so people can prepare beforehand. The data in this study were collected from online leaflet and handbook regarding earthquake mitigation provided by 9 government city’s websites, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, and by collecting actual handbook and leaflets from Indonesian lives in Japan. The data were analysed using descriptive qualitative method. Collected data then categorized into assertive and directive speech acts, negative and positive politeness based on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, and focusing on expression of consideration (hairyo hyougen). This study found that there are 659 statements related to earthquake disaster mitigation collected from the data. Also, the findings showed that there are 179 assertive and 480 directives speech acts, with more of imperative directive speech than prohibition directive speech. Moreover, Japanese government tend to use hairyou hyougen on their leaflet and handbook disaster mitigation to show respect to the reader.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Mardikayah Rusma Noortyani

AbstractSpeech Act of Doctor and Patient in Puskesmas Gambut of Banjar District. Speech actis an act of speech when the speaker issued. In the process of physician services topatients are speech acts. This study discusses the speech act clinicians and patients atthe health center Peat Banjar district by gender and age. This study aims to determinewhat kind of speech act that doctors use when serving patients. The approach used inthis study is a qualitative approach, with descriptive methods. The data in this study inthe form of speech that diujarkan by physicians and patients in the health center. Sourcedata obtained from physicians and patients in the form of speech recordings andinterviews. Research instruments such as observation sheets, questionnaires, and fieldnotes, with tools tape recorder, cassette recorders, mobile phones, and other stationery.Data was collected using observation techniques (see) and interviews (competent). Dataanalysis was performed from data collection, the analysis activities include: 1) datareduction, 2) data presentation, and 3) the verification / inference. The results of thisstudy indicate an action can be delivered using a variety of forms of speech. The formsof speech that exist in substitutions at the health center between doctor and patientrepresentative form of speech, commissive, directive, and expressive. Doctors use morerepresentative speech, commissive, and directive, while patients use more representativeand expressive speech. Representative speech acts used by doctors in the form ofprovision of information, shows, and asserted, while the representative speech spokenby patients of different sex and age in the form of acts of grumbling along with anexplanation to elicit responses from physicians. Directive speech spoken male doctor isdifferent from speech female doctors to patients of different gender and age. Maledoctor at a different rule for patient sex and age, using direct speech and short, whilethe speech of women doctors to patients of different sex and age at the time of directspeech and the rule using the term. Commissive speech spoken male physicians andwomen to different patient sex and age in the form of follow-promise and make suggestionsto the patient. Expressive speech spoken form of patient follow-up thank-you to thedoctor.Keywords: speech acts, physicians, patientsAbstrakTindak Tutur Dokter dan Pasien di Puskesmas Gambut Kabupaten Banjar. Tindaktutur merupakan suatu tindakan ketika penutur mengeluarkan ujaran. Dalam prosespelayanan dokter terhadap pasien terdapat tindak tutur. Penelitian ini membahas tentangtindak tutur dokter dan pasien di Puskesmas Gambut Kabupaten Banjar berdasarkanperbedaan jenis kelamin dan usia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tindak80tutur seperti apa yang digunakan dokter ketika melayani pasien. Pendekatan yangdigunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif, dengan metode deskriptif.Data dalam penelitian ini berupa tuturan yang diujarkan oleh dokter dan pasien diPuskesmas. Sumber data diperoleh dari tuturan dokter dan pasien berupa rekamandan hasil wawancara. Instrumen peneliti berupa lembar observasi, daftar pertanyaan,dan catatan lapangan, dengan alat bantu tape recorder, kaset perekam, handphone,dan alat-alat tulis lainnya. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik observasi(simak) dan wawancara (cakap). Analisis data dilakukan sejak pengumpulan data,dengan aktivitas analisis meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan verifikasi/penyimpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan suatu tindakan dapat disampaikandengan menggunakan berbagai bentuk tuturan. Bentuk-bentuk tuturan yang ada padapertuturan di Puskesmas antara dokter dan pasien berupa tuturan representatif, komisif,direktif, dan ekspresif. Dokter lebih banyak menggunakan tuturan representatif, komisif,dan direktif, sedangkan pasien lebih banyak menggunakan tuturan representatif danekspresif. Tuturan representatif yang digunakan dokter berupa tindak pemberianinformasi, menunjukkan, dan menegaskan, sedangkan tuturan representatif yangdituturkan oleh pasien yang berbeda jenis kelamin dan usia berupa tindak pengeluhanbeserta penjelasan untuk memperoleh respon dari dokter. Tuturan direktif yangdituturkan dokter laki-laki berbeda dengan tuturan dokter perempuan terhadap pasienyang berbeda jenis kelamin dan usia. Dokter laki-laki pada saat memerintah terhadappasien yang berbeda jenis kelamin dan usia, menggunakan tuturan langsung danpendek, sedangkan tuturan dokter perempuan terhadap pasien yang berbeda jeniskelamin dan usia pada saat memerintah menggunakan tuturan langsung dan panjang.Tuturan komisif yang dituturkan dokter laki-laki dan perempuan terhadap pasien yangberbeda jenis kelamin dan usia berupa tindak berjanji dan memberikan usulan terhadappasien. Tuturan ekspresif yang dituturkan pasien berupa tindak ucapan terima kasihterhadap dokter.Kata-kata kunci: tindak tutur, dokter, pasien


GERAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
Rika Ningsih ◽  
Fatmawati ◽  
Wilda Srihastuty Handayani Piliang

This study aims to analyze which illocutionary speech acts of Mama Dedeh are more prominent in the question-and-answer activity with the audience in the Dari Hati To Hati program with Mama Dedeh on Anteve television station in the Nikah Muda episode. This research has contained the dialogues in the session of questions and answers between the ustazah and the audience from the program Dari Hati To Hati Bersama Mama Dedeh. The results showed that Mama Dedeh only used three illocutionary speech acts out of Searle's five speech act classifications: representative, directive, and expressive. Of the three speech acts, the most dominant one used by Mama Dedeh is the representative speech act, which is 66.7%. Meanwhile, directive speech acts are only 22.2%, and expressive speech acts are only 11.1%.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-235
Author(s):  
Thouraya Zheni

Language users may use the standardized forms of speech acts as a strategy to achieve their own purposes, like political agendas. This is the objective of the present study, which focuses on the manipulation of speech acts in Donald Trump’s tweets on the US-Iranian crisis. More specifically, the current research paper sheds light on hegemony in political discourse and how it is embedded in assertive, commissive, directive, declarative and expressive speech acts. The tweets of Donald Trump, delivered between January 2017 and December 2019 and related to the US-Iranian crisis, will be analyzed within the framework of Speech Act Theory. The results of the current research show that Trump’s use of speech acts demystifies his hegemonic tone towards Iranian leaders. His power is mediated explicitly via directives and commissives, while it is exerted implicitly via expressives and assertives. His use of direct and indirect speech acts reveals Trump’s ambivalence and willingness to solve the US-Iranian nuclear crisis via both hegemony and diplomacy.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
NFN Jahdiah

Every utterance produced by the speaker has its own type and function. This study aims to describe the form of the illocution speech act in Bugis language in Tanah Bumbu regency and describe the function of those utterances. The data of this study are utterances uttered by Bugis speakers, Simpang Empat District, Tanah Bumbu Regency. This study uses Searle's theory of speech acts. The method used in this study is qualitative. The data technique used in this study is speaking and listening.  To analyze the data, this study uses descriptive techniques by describing the data in accordance with the formulation of the problem. The problems in this study are (1) what kind of speech act exists in Bugis language, (2) how does the function of each utterance. The result shows that there are five speech acts in Bugis language, they are (1) assertive/representative speech act, (2) commissive speech act, (3) directive speech act, (4) expressive speech act, and (5) declarative speech act. Base on the function of illocution utterance there are four functions, (1) competitive function, (2) favor function, (3) cooperate function, and (4) challenge function.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 609
Author(s):  
Risma Ratri Rahayu ◽  
Ula Nisa El Fauziah

Abstract  This research was to investigate speech acts of Borish Jonshon’s speech concern in the illocutionary act and the use of speech act analysis by Hymes (2014). The speech was held in Prime Minister’s office and Borish Johnson has used a national TV address at 8.30 p.m. The data of this research taken from the script and speech video of the U.K. Prime Minister named Borish Johnson on 23 March 2020 which talked about Covid-19. The research applied descriptive qualitative as a method and hold in Yule’s speech act theory. Based on the analysis, the researcher was found and analyze 222 utterances. Those are consist of, 36% representative, 33% declarative, 16% directive, 9% expressive, and 6% commissive. As the result was representative is the highest use of the illocutionary aspect found in this research. It can be seen that Borish Johnson hoped that his audiences would follow what he said to reduce the coronavirus disease - 19. Keywords:        Pragmatics, Speech Act, Covid-19


Kadera Bahasa ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
NFN Hestiyana

This study discusses the form of investigative speech acts in interrogation cases of domestic violence in Polresta Banjarmasin.This research focusing on the pragmatic domain aims to describe the form of investigative speech acts in interrogatingcases of domestic violence in Polresta Banjarmasin. The method used is descriptive method with a qualitative approachbecause the data obtained in the form of text of the Minutes of Examination (BAP) sourced from the jurisdiction ofPolresta Banjarmasin. The source of this research data is the BAP in the case of domestic violence in the jurisdiction ofPolresta Banjarmasin in December 2016, while the data in this research is in the form of investigator’s speech ininterrogation in the case of domestic violence. The investigators’ texts in the interrogation are contained in the victimwitness BAP, suspect BAP, and witness BAP. Data were collected by using techniques, namely: (1) observation, (2)documentation study, and (3) interview. The result of the research shows that investigation act in interrogation in BAPcase of KDRT in jurisdiction of Polresta Banjarmasin found three forms of speech acts used by investigator, that is: (1)speech act representative, (2) speech act directive, and (3) acts expressive. The categories of functions that emerged in thisstudy were (1) speech act representative function states, reporting function, demanding function, function of giving testimony,recognizing function, and show function; (2) speech acts urgent function directive, suggesting function, and requestingfunction; and (3) expressive speech acts blame function. From the results it is known that the most widely used speechactors are assertive speech acts with six function categories, followed by the use of directive speech acts with three functioncategories, and the least found use of expressive speech acts with one function category. This research may serve as areference for further research on pragmatic and linguistic forensic studies with the aim of developing applied linguisticscience.Keywords: speech AbstrakPenelitian ini membahas bentuk tindak tutur penyidik dalam interogasi kasus Kekerasan Dalam RumahTangga (KDRT) di Polresta Banjarmasin. Penelitian yang memfokuskan pada ranah pragmatik inibertujuan mendeskripsikan bentuk tindak tutur penyidik dalam interogasi kasus KDRT di PolrestaBanjarmasin. Metode yang digunakan yaitu metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif karenadata yang diperoleh berupa teks Berita Acara Pemeriksaan (BAP) yang bersumber dari wilayah hukumPolresta Banjarmasin. Sumber data penelitian ini yaitu BAP pada kasus KDRT di wilayah hukumPolresta Banjarmasin bulan Desember tahun 2016, sedangkan data dalam penelitian ini berupa tuturantuturan penyidik dalam interogasi pada kasus KDRT. Tuturan-tuturan penyidik dalam interogasi tersebutterdapat dalam BAP saksi korban, BAP tersangka, dan BAP saksi. Data dikumpulkan denganmenggunakan teknik, yaitu: (1) observasi, (2) studi dokumentasi, dan (3) wawancara. Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa tindak tutur penyidik dalam interogasi yang terdapat dalam BAP kasus KDRTdi wilayah hukum Polresta Banjarmasin ditemukan tiga bentuk tindak tutur yang digunakan penyidik,yaitu: (1) tindak tutur representatif, (2) tindak tutur direktif, dan (3) tindak tutur ekspresif. Kategorifungsi yang muncul dalam penelitian ini ialah (1) tindak tutur representatif fungsi menyatakan, fungsimelaporkan, fungsi menuntut, fungsi memberikan kesaksian, fungsi mengakui, dan fungsi menunjukkan;(2) tindak tutur direktif fungsi mendesak, fungsi menyarankan, dan fungsi meminta; dan (3) tindaktutur ekspresif fungsi menyalahkan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diketahui bahwa tindak tutur yangpaling banyak digunakan penyidik adalah tindak tutur asertif dengan enam kategori fungsi, diikutioleh penggunaan tindak tutur direktif dengan tiga kategori fungsi, dan yang paling sedikit ditemukanpenggunaan bentuk tindak tutur ekspresif dengan satu kategori fungsi. Penelitian ini dapat menjadiacuan bagi penelitian selanjutnya pada kajian pragmatik dan linguistik forensik dengan tujuanpengembangan keilmuan linguistik terapan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document