scholarly journals El custionable amparo de la jurisdicción social al clientelismo y la arbitrariedad en el acceso al empleo en las sociedades públicas.

2019 ◽  
pp. 104-129
Author(s):  
Jorge FONDEVILA ANTOLÍN
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Public Employees ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
The Public ◽  
Spanish Constitution ◽  
The Supreme Court

Laburpena: Auzitegi Gorenaren (Lan Arloko Sala) 2019ko urtarrilaren 24ko 1067/2019 Epaiaren oinarri juridikoetan ageri diren hutsuneak eta hutsaltasunak aztertzen ditu lan honek. Izan ere, epai horren arabera, ez dago zertan Espainiako Konstituzioan eta Enplegatu Publikoaren Oinarrizko Estatutuan aurreikusitakoa bete, sozietate publikoetan enplegua eskuratzeko konstituzio-bermeari eta -kontrolari dagokienez. Horrek atzerapauso handia eragiten du berme juridikoetan, eta bide ematen die klientelismoari eta arbitrariotasunari. Resumen: Este trabajo examina las inconsistencias y deficiencias de la fundamentación jurídica del Auto 1067/2019, de 24 de enero de 2019 del Tribunal Supremo (Sala de lo Social), cuyo contenido supone una quiebra a la configuración de un empleo público profesional y objetivo, en un ámbito tan importante con el Sector público del conjunto de las administraciones públicas, que tiene una gran importancia en términos económicos y de número de efectivos personales en el conjunto de los servicios públicos. Así, al amparo del citado Auto, se declara la exención de sometimiento a las previsiones de la Constitución Española y del Estatuto Básico del empleado público con relación al control y garantías constitucionales en el acceso al empleo en las sociedades públicas, lo que supone un claro retroceso en las garantías jurídicas y una apertura al clientelismo y arbitrariedad, en detrimento de los derechos de los ciudadanos al acceso al empleo público, en condiciones de igualdad, mérito y capacidad. Abstract: This paper examines the inconsistencies and deficiencies of the legal basis of Order 1067/2019, of January 24, 2019 of the Supreme Court (Social Chamber), whose content implies a breakdown of the configuration of a professional and objective public employment, in such an important area with the public sector of all public administrations, which is of great importance in economic terms and given the number of staff in all public services. Thus, under the aforementioned Order, the exemption from subjection to the provisions of the Spanish Constitution and the Basic Statute of public employees is declared in relation to the control and constitutional guarantees in the access to employment in public societies, which is a clear setback in legal guarantees and an openness to clientelism and arbitrariness, to the detriment of the rights of citizens to access public employment, under conditions of equality, merit and capacity.

The Public Employment Relationship and the Supreme Court in the 1980S

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Rosenbloom
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Public Employees ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
The Public ◽  
Supreme Court Decisions

During the 1980s, Supreme Court decisions on the public employment relationship tended to constitutionalize public personnel administration further and to promote adjudicatory processes within it. The Court has been highly divided on issues involving the public employment relationship and, for the most part, has not developed broad general doctrines that comprehensively define the scope of public employees' constitutional rights. Rather, it has opted frequently for balancing approaches that promote a case-by-case jurisprudence that may fail to afford public personnelists adequate guidance. This article reviews Supreme Court decisions in the areas of public employees' substantive constitutional rights, their constitutional rights to procedural due process and equal protection, and their qualified immunity/liability for breaches of others' constitutional and/or federally protected statutory civil rights.

scholarly journals KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI DI PERADILAN DALAM RANGKA IMPLEMENTASI INTEGRITAS DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Ridwan Mansyur
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Information Transparency ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court

As a public institution in the field of justice, the Supreme Court is required to commit to apply the disclosure of information. Nowadays, transparency of information disclosure in the context of justice for the Supreme Court is not only the public needs but also the needs of all residents of the judiciary. With the judicial transparency, will slowly happen to strengthen accountability and professionalism and integrity of the judiciary residents. Commitment to provide disclosure of both the process and the end result is a concrete manifestation of public services as access to justice (access to justice) given by the Court at the lowest levels up to the Supreme Court.  Quality of excellent public services through the transparency of the judicial information disclosure is the estuary of execution Reform of Bureaucracy.Keywords : Information transparency, Judicial, Integrity and Legal Certainty

Wage Differentials in Malaysia: Public Employment, Gender, and Ethnicity

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Robert L. Clark ◽  
Naohiro Ogawa ◽  
Norma Mansor ◽  
Shigeyuki Abe ◽  
Mohd Uzir Mahidin
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Wage Differentials ◽  
Public Employees ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
Earnings Differentials ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public And Private Sector ◽  
Annual Earnings

Abstract The study examines the earnings differentials between the public and private sector in the Malaysian economy in terms of the moderations of the gender and ethnic wage differences in the public sector. The study uses the annual earnings from the Salaries and Wages Survey for 2011 and 2016. The key findings are that public employees are paid higher wages compared with private sector employees and the overall gender and ethnic wage differentials have declined in recent years. We also find that both gender and ethnic wage differentials are much smaller in the public sector.

scholarly journals Does Public Sector Outsourcing Decrease Public Employment? Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 464-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas Potrafke
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Public Employees ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
Jel Codes ◽  
Full Sample ◽  
The Public

Abstract I examine the extent to which public sector outsourcing relates to public employment in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. I use new panel data on public sector outsourcing. The sample includes 26 countries over the period 2009–2015. Contrary to common expectations, the results do not suggest that public sector outsourcing expenditure was negatively related to public employment in the full sample. The relation between public sector outsourcing and public employment, however, does vary across countries. If anything, the growth in public sector outsourcing in period t − 1 was positively correlated with the growth in public employment in period t. When public sector outsourcing gives rise to regrouping public employees but not reducing public employment, outsourcing may even increase inefficiencies in the public sector. (JEL codes: L33, J45, P16, C23).

scholarly journals Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público

2018 ◽  
pp. 57-95
Author(s):  
Carmen CHINCHILLA MARÍN
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court

LABURPENA: Sektore Publikoaren Araubide Juridikoari buruzko 40/2015 Legeak arau berria sartu du zigorrak preskribitzeko epearen zenbaketaren inguruan, zigorren aurka jarritako gora jotzeko errekurtsoak administrazioaren isiltasunaren bidez ezesten diren kasuetarako. Hala, lege horren 30.3. artikuluan ezarritakoaren arabera, errekurtsoa ustez ezesten bada, errekurtso horren ebazpena emateko legez aurreikusi den epea amaitu eta hurrengo egunetik aurrera hasi behar da zenbatzen zigorra preskribitzeko epea. Preskripzioari buruzko arau berri horrek, zentzuzkoa denez, ondorioak eduki behar ditu zigorrak betearazteko araubidearen gainean, zigorra bete behar izatea baita zigorra preskribatzeko oinarria. Artikulu honetan, bi berritasun horien berri ematen da, eta kontraesan-arazoa aztertzen, Konstituzio Auzitegiak eta Auzitegi Gorenak errekurtso-bideko isiltasunaren eta isiltasun horrek zigorren preskripzioaren eta bete behar izatearen gainean dituen ondorioen —hobeto esanda, «ondorio-ezaren»— inguruan duten jurisprudentziari dagokionez. RESUMEN: la Ley 40/2015, de Régimen jurídico del Sector público, ha introducido una nueva regla sobre el cómputo del plazo de prescripción de las sanciones en los casos en los que el recurso de alzada interpuesto contra las mismas se desestima por silencio administrativo. Así, a tenor de lo establecido en el artículo 30.3 de esta ley, en el caso de desestimación presunta del recurso, el plazo de prescripción de la sanción comenzará a computarse desde el día siguiente a aquel en el que finalice el plazo legalmente previsto para la resolución de dicho recurso. Esta nueva regla sobre la prescripción lógicamente tiene que producir consecuencias sobre el régimen de ejecutividad de las sanciones, pues la ejecutividad de la sanción constituye el presupuesto de la prescripción de la misma. En este artículo se da cuenta de ambas novedades y se analiza el problema de su contradicción respecto de la jurisprudencia —del Tribunal constitucional y del Tribunal Supremo— sobre el silencio en vía de recurso y sus efectos (más bien, sus «no efectos») sobre la prescripción y la ejecutividad de las sanciones. ABSTRACT: The Act 40/2015 of the legal regime of the Public Sector has introduced a new rule on the calculation of the limitation period to be applied to sanctions in cases where hierarchichal appeal filed against them had been rejected by administrative silence. Thus, within the meaning of section 30.3 of this Act, in case of implied rejection of the appeal, the calculation of the limitation period of the sanction shall begin from the day following the deadline legally established to resolve that appeal. This new rule about the limitation period has logically to have consequences over the enforceability of sanctions, since enforceability of the sanction as such is a prerequisite for the limitation period of it. This article deals with both novelties and analyzes the problem of their contradiction with the case law —by the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court— regarding the silence within the appeal and its effects (or rather lack of effects) about the limitation period and enforceability of sanctions.

scholarly journals El Supremo “alivia” la carga procesal del lesionado y determina el momento de la aparición del daño en la acción de responsabilidad patrimonial contra el legislador

2021 ◽  
pp. 179-208
Author(s):  
Mª Consuelo ALONSO GARCÍA
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Action ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Moment

LABURPENA: Lan honek Auzitegi Gorenaren kasazio-doktrina berria aztertzen du, zeinak Sektore Publikoko Araubide Juridikoaren 40/2015 Legeak ezarritako eskakizun batzuk interpretatu eta egokitzen baititu; hala bada, Estatu Legegilearen ondarezko erantzukizuna ikusten du konstituzio-kontrako legeek (eta Europar Batasuneko Zuzenbidea urratzen duten legeek) eragindako kalteak direla eta. Zehazki, Auzitegiak ofizioz berrikustea onartzen du ustez konstituzioaren aurkakoa den lege-xedapena betearazten duen administrazio-jarduna aurkaratzeko errekurtso egoki gisa, hau da, lege-testu horren 32.4 artikuluan aurreikusitako baldintza betetzat jotzeko; eta ordaina jaso dezaketen kalteak egintzat hartzen diren momentua zehazten du, halaber, araua konstituzioaren aurkakoa dela adierazten duen epaia argitaratu baino lehenagoko bost urteko hasierako epea zenbatzeko. Arau beraren 34.1 artikuluaren bigarren paragrafoak aipatzen du muga hori. ABSTRACT: This work examines the innovative doctrine related to appeals delivered by the Supreme Court that interprets by tempering them some of the requirements established by the Act 40/2015 on the Legal Regime of the Public Sector, in order to determine the patrimonial liability of the legislator State for the damages resulting of unconstitutional legislative acts (and acts that infringe EU Law). Specifically, the Court admits the ex officio review as an adequate action to challenge the administrative action that executes an alledgelly unconstitutional legislative provision to the effects of meeting the conditions of art. 32.4 of the aforementioned legal act, and it defines the moment where damages are to be considered inflicted for the purpose of indemnization so as to estimate the onset moment of the five years limit term previous to the publication of the judgment that concludes its unconstitutionality, a time limitation to which art. 34.1, second paragraph, of the same provision refers. RESUMEN: El presente trabajo examina la novedosa doctrina casacional del Tribunal Supremo que interpreta, atemperándolas, algunas de las exigencias que impone la Ley 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público, para apreciar la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado Legislador por los perjuicios derivados de leyes inconstitucionales (y de leyes que vulneran el Derecho de la Unión Europea). Concretamente, el Tribunal admite la revisión de oficio como recurso oportuno para impugnar la actuación administrativa que ejecuta la disposición legislativa pretendidamente inconstitucionalidad a los efectos de entender cumplida la condición prevista en el artículo 32.4 de dicho texto legal, y define el momento en el que se entienden producidos los daños indemnizables a fin de contabilizar el plazo inicial de los cinco años anteriores a la fecha de la publicación de la sentencia que declare su inconstitucionalidad, limitación a la que se refiere el artículo 34.1, párrafo segundo, de la misma norma.

scholarly journals The DEA Method and its Application Possibilities for Measuring Efficiency in the Public Sector—The Case of Local Public Employment Services

Economies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Ewa Cichowicz ◽  
Ewa Rollnik-Sadowska ◽  
Monika Dędys ◽  
Maria Ekes
Keyword(s):  
Labor Market ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Policy Instruments ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
Employment Services ◽  
The Public ◽  
Measuring Efficiency ◽  
Dea Method ◽  
The Unemployed

Public Employment Services (PES) are identified as important institutions in the process of improving the match between supply and demand in the labor market, which, despite their importance, still do not achieve the desired efficiency. The indicated problem is partly due to the lack of appropriate evaluation methods for the applied labor market policy instruments. This paper aims to verify the possibility of using the two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method in measuring the efficiency of public sector entities. The authors focused on 39 PES operating in Mazovia province, Poland in 2019. In the first stage, the model of technical efficiency of local PES included six variables (four inputs and two outputs). Only seven PES obtained full efficiency. The inefficiency of analyzed PES varied from about 1% to 80%. In the second stage, the attention focuses on the relationship between true unknown efficiency and its determinants (five environmental variables, both demand and supply oriented). Then, the regression coefficients and confidence intervals showed that three out of five variables influence the efficiency results, the share of the long-term unemployed, the share of the unemployed under 30, and the share of the unemployed over 50 in the total number of unemployed.

ISO 9001 and the public service: an investigation of the effect of the QMS on the quality of public service organizations

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Armando López-Lemus
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
The State ◽  
Iso 9001 ◽  
Knowledge Generation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the influence exerted by a quality management system (QMS) under ISO 9001: 2015 on the quality of public services organizations in Mexico. Design/methodology/approach The methodological design was quantitative, explanatory, observational and transversal, for which a sample of 461 public servants from the state of Guanajuato, Mexico was obtained. To test the hypotheses, a structural equation model (SEM) was developed through the statistical software Amos v.21. For the analysis of the data, software SPSS v.21 was used. Regarding the goodness and adjustment indices of the SEM (χ2 = 720.09, df = 320, CFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.926 and RMSEA = 0.05) which, therefore, proved to be acceptable. Findings According to the results obtained through the SEM model, the QMS under ISO 9001: 2015 is positively and significantly influenced tangible aspects (β1 = 0.79, p < 0.01), reliability (β2 = 0.90, p < 0.01), related to response quality (β3 = 0.93, p < 0.01), guarantees (β4 = 0.91, p < 0.01) and empathy (β5 = 0.88, p < 0.01) of the quality related to public services in Mexico. The study’s key contribution is that it discovered that implementing a QMS in accordance with the ISO 9001: 2015 standard has an impact on the quality of public services, with the most influential quality of response. Similarly, the assurance and dependability of service quality turned out to be important in providing public service quality. Research limitations/implications In this paper, the QMS was only evaluated as a variable that intervenes in the process of obtaining quality in public service under the ISO 9001 standard in its 2015 version. In this regard, the results’ trustworthiness is limited to the extent that the findings may be generalized in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico’s public service. As a result, the scientific community is left primarily focused on service quality to promote new future research. Practical implications The ISO 9001: 2015 standard’s QMS is one of the tools for success in both the commercial and government sectors. However, there are practical limitations, which focus on the time during which managers exercise their vision in the public sector: first, the dynamics that managers play in public policy; second, the length of time they have served in public office; and third, the interest of directors of public institutions to improve the quality of service provided by the government. Other practical consequences concern organizational culture and identity, public servant commitment, senior management or secretaries of government, as well as work and training. Originality/value The findings of this paper are important and valuable because they foster knowledge generation in the public sector through the ISO 9000 quality area. A model that permits the adoption and implementation of a QMS based on the ISO 9001: 2015 standard in public organizations that seek to provide quality in their services offered to the user is also presented to the literature. Similarly, the paper is important because there is currently insufficient research focusing on the variables examined in the context of public service in Mexico.

scholarly journals Public private partnership as a last resort for traditional public procurement

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktorija Bojovic
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Management Culture ◽  
Complex Projects

This paper discusses recent changes in the way public services are delivered A marked increase in the cooperation between the public and private sector in the realization of complex projects, mostly concerning development of infrastructure, is the main characteristic of present-day developing economies. The creation of new, innovative agreements is driven by the limitation of public funds and an ever-growing demand for an increase in the quality of public services. Looking upon the western economies experience alternatives to the traditional public sector procurement are identified in the public/private partnership. The public/private partnership can be seen as one component in the rearrangement of the public sector with a management culture that focuses on the citizen or customer. Also included in this are accountability for results, investigation of a wide variety of alternative service delivery mechanisms, and competition between public and private bodies for contracts to deliver services consistent with cost recovery and the achievement of value for money. The partnership can be realized through an array of models and in this paper priority is given to the DBFO (design-build-finance-operate) model, due to its importance in implementation. The DBFO model is considered to be a synonym for the public/private partnership, as it is the most suitable for complex projects and gains the most benefits.

scholarly journals Digital Transformation of the German State

2021 ◽  
pp. 331-355
Author(s):  
Ines Mergel
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
Legacy Systems ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
German State ◽  
Administrative Responsibilities

AbstractDigital transformation of the German public sector is embedded in a large-scale reform focussing on digitalisation and de-bureaucratisation of public services. By 2022, 575 public services will have been digitised. Digitalisation is, however, a contested topic in Germany: modernisation efforts have been stalled resulting in backlogs and the delay of IT consolidation of outdated legacy systems. At the same time, however, innovation pockets are emerging across all levels of government. The chapter first provides an overview of the legal basis of digital transformation, centralised and decentralised organisational embeddedness of administrative responsibilities and then highlights insights into selected implementation cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document