scholarly journals WILL CORRUPTIONS DREAM OF COMMUNISM?

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-30
Author(s):  
А.Д. Беляев
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Natural Rights ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Domestic Legislation

В данной статье рассматривается проблема защиты естественных прав человека от коррупционных явлений. После анализа их положения в отечественном законодательстве вносятся предложения по улучшению правовой системы путём изменения норм антикоррупционного и конституционного законодательства, что необходимо для выполнения основной функции государства по защите общества от негативной деятельности отдельных индивидов, нарушающих нормы антикоррупционного законодательства. In this article, the problem of protecting natural rights from corruption is considered. After analyzing the position of natural human rights in domestic legislation, proposals are made to improve the legal system by changing the norms of anti-corruption and constitutional legislation. From our point of view, this is necessary to fulfill the main function of the state to protect society from the negative manifestations of the activities of separate individuals.

scholarly journals Basic approaches to understanding the concept of the legal system

2020 ◽  
pp. 24-26
Author(s):  
Andrii TALYMONCHYK
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Soviet Period ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
Basic Approaches ◽  
Theory Of Law

Introduction. The article analyzes the methodology of the legal system research. The basic approaches to understanding the concept of the legal system as an autonomous, coherent and coherent set of legal phenomena, aiming to comprehend social ideals-values of justice, equality, freedom and humanism and to achieve the end result of its functioning, in particular, the state of law and order. The position of eminent scientists is supported according to which the legal system is considered from the point of view of the functions it performs, and in particular its main function - legal regulation. The legal system is a fundamental category of the theory of law and the state and law in general. Thus, according to some researchers, it includes all legal phenomena, in particular: the system of law and law, justice and legal culture, law and order, etc. In view of this, the legal system has been and is the object of much basic research. The purpose of the paper is to reveal the main approaches to understanding the concept of legal system. Results. An active study of the legal system as a phenomenon began in the 80s of the last century. Since then, several approaches to understanding the legal system have emerged in domestic jurisprudence. Proponents of the first approach include in the concept of the legal system is not an exhaustive list of elements. This position is based on understanding the legal system as a complex of all legal phenomena of a particular society. Representatives of the second approach provide a comprehensive list of elements of the legal system. However, for the most part, such scientists do not specify the criteria for selecting such elements. Today's understanding of the legal system must be free from unnecessary elements that are alien to the legal system. In this case, it is a so-called "legal" or "legal" add-on. It was this alien element that artificially burdened the construction of the legal system as a phenomenon in the Soviet period. However, this element is still included in the legal system in modern scientific literature. Conclusion. The legal system is an autonomous, coherent, coherent set of legal phenomena, the purpose of which is to comprehend the social ideals-values of justice, equality, freedom and humanism and to achieve the end result of its functioning, and in particular the state of law and order.

DEFINITION OF THE PUBLIC SECURITY AND ORDERLINESS ENSURING MECHANISM IN UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
Marina Aleksandrovna Kalievskaya
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Development Strategy ◽  
State Policy ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Public Security ◽  
National Priority ◽  
Institu Tions ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Definition Of

In this article, a model of the mechanism of ensuring public security and orderliness in accordance with the principles and tasks of the relevant institu- tions in public administration, taking into account resources, technologies, mea- sures for the state policy implementation in the spheres of ensuring the protection of human rights and freedoms, the interests of society and the state, combating crime, maintaining public security and order. It was found that ensuring public security and order in Ukraine is a mechanism for the implementation of national goals of state policy in the areas of ensuring the protection of human rights and freedoms, the interests of society and the state, combating crime, maintaining public security and order, by defining tasks according to certain principles. The idea is that if one considers the state policy in the spheres of ensuring the protec- tion of human rights and freedoms, the interests of society and the state, combat- ing crime, maintaining public security and order as a national priority (purpose, task), then the mechanism of ensuring public security and order in Ukraine needs coordination with the state development strategy. From the point of view of the implementation of the state policy in the areas of ensuring the protection of hu- man rights and freedoms, the interests of society and the state, combating crime, maintaining public security and order, the mechanism of ensuring public security and order in Ukraine can be considered as the main system providing intercon- nection such elements as institutions (implementing the specified state policy), resources (human resources, logistical, natural and so on, with the help of which it is possible to implement state policy), technologies (skills, knowledge, means and so on the implementation of state policy), measures (action plans), as well as external (internal) threats.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

scholarly journals The state liability for damages caused by its judicial authorities

2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 409-422
Author(s):  
Nikola Mihailović
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Member States ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
State Liability ◽  
Domestic Law

A breach of any right or freedom under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, leads to but is not limited to liability of the State for damages. That liability is much stricter than the State liability for damage provided according to the domestic law provisions currently in force. The current provisions on State liability for the work of its judiciary do not include the damage caused by improper interpretation and application of the relevant legal provisions. In contrast, the liability of the Council of Europe Member States for the damage caused by their judicial and other authorities, through the breach of the human rights and fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Convention includes their liability for improper interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the Convention. That liability is so strict that it in fact comes equal to no-fault liability, from the point of view of its legal consequences. This is so, although it is regulated only as a presumed liability for which there are no grounds of limitation. As a result, two systems of liability for damage caused by judicial authorities will exist in our State Union and in its member states, after the ratification of the aforementioned Convention: liability pursuant to the domestic legal provisions and liability pursuant to the Convention. For that reason, a reform of the provisions on liability is necessary, which will lead to tightening of liability for damage caused by judiciary pursuant to the domestic rules. How to achieve this is a separate issue, which will not be discussed on this occasion.

Les minorités dans la Déclaration Universelle des Droits de l’Homme, une absence délibérée

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 557-590
Author(s):  
Fernando Arlettaz
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Interwar Period ◽  
Minority Rights ◽  
League Of Nations ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
The United Nations

Summary The League of Nations established, in the interwar period, a legal regime for the protection of minorities which considered them as intermeditate groups between the State and the individuals. On the contrary, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, adopted in 1948 by the United Nations, assumed a radically individualistic point of view and did not include any mention to minority rights. The travaux préparatoires of the Universal Declaration suggest that the question of minorities caused strong tension among States and that, for this reason, they avoided its inclusion in the 1948 document.

Comparing the incomparable and legal discourse

Semiotica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (209) ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
Augusto Ponzio
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Personal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Discourse ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Human Being ◽  
The Law

AbstractIt is not with the State that personal responsibility arises towards the other. According to Emmanuel Levinas, the other is every single human being I am responsible for, and I am this responsibility for him. The other, my fellow, is the first comer. But I do not live in a world with just one single “first comer”; there is always another other, a third, who is also my other, my fellow. Otherness, beginning with this third, is a plurality. Proximity as responsibility is a plurality. There is a need for justice. There is the obligation to compare unique and incomparable others. This is what is hidden, unsaid, implied in legal discourse. But recourse to comparison among that which cannot be compared, among that which is incomparable is justified by love of justice for the other. It is this justification that confers a sense to law, which is always dura lex, and to the statement that citizens are equal before the law. From this point of view, State justice is always imperfect with respect to human rights understood as the rights of the other, of every other in his absolute difference, in his incomparable otherness.

PECULIARITIES OF DEVELOPMENT AND LEGAL REGULATION OF ACTIVITY OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN RUSSIA IN THE 17th – THE 21st CENTURIES

2018 ◽  
pp. 149-154
Author(s):  
Denis Viktorovich SHEPELEV ◽  
Dina Viktorovna SHEPELEVA
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
Regulation Of Activity ◽  
Legal Structures ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Commercial Organizations ◽  
State Defense

The peculiarities of the historical way of development of state-owned enterprises and the expression of their legitimate interests in obtaining profit are considered. That acquires the actual aspect taking into account modern economic realities and market conditions. The development of social values that make up the legal culture of society is dynamic with the market and economy development. The existence on the market of such public legal structures as state-owned enterprises allows the state simultaneously to make profit and realize specific, sometimes unique goals and objectives, such as the implementation of separately subsidized activities, chemical and military industries. By their legal nature, state-owned enterprises have the purpose of making a profit and are commercial organizations. The concept of “state-owned enterprise” had not been directly fixed in the domestic legislation until the adoption of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Such formulations as “state-owned factories”, “state-owned plants” were typical for state-owned enterprises in the pre-revolutionary period. In this regard the use of the term “state-owned enterprises” was applicable to all state-owned industry. In Soviet legislation the term “enterprise” was used without specifying the characteristics that reflect their state nature. It is concluded that the historical way of state-owned enterprises formation in Russia has passed a rather long and complicated process from the point of view of ownership, but the essence and historical purpose of the creation have not changed – it is the state defense and industry maintenance.

scholarly journals AN ATTEMPT FOR THE PROTECTION OF SEXUAL DIVERSITY IN BRAZILIAN LAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-165
Author(s):  
Marcos Vinicius Torres Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
The State ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Sexual Diversity ◽  
Same Sex Couples ◽  
The Road ◽  
Bar Association ◽  
State Of Art

This article intends to talk about a democratic initiative of the Brazilian Bar Association to promote human rights and sexual diversity in Brazil.  Brazil is walking up the road to protect LGBTI citizens and to legally recognize same-sex couples.  The country has guaranteed many rights to homosexual couples and their children, but the lack of a specific act to rule these matters is a problem in a country whose legal system is still very dependent to legal acts and positivism.  This work tries to show the state of art of homosexual couples’ rights in Brazil and how the proposal of a new statute to protect the rights of LGBTI people, in all aspects of their daily life could protect them and contribute for a democratic society. 

scholarly journals AN ATTEMPT FOR THE PROTECTION OF SEXUAL DIVERSITY IN BRAZILIAN LAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-165
Author(s):  
Marcos Vinicius Torres Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
The State ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Sexual Diversity ◽  
Same Sex Couples ◽  
The Road ◽  
Bar Association ◽  
State Of Art

This article intends to talk about a democratic initiative of the Brazilian Bar Association to promote human rights and sexual diversity in Brazil.  Brazil is walking up the road to protect LGBTI citizens and to legally recognize same-sex couples.  The country has guaranteed many rights to homosexual couples and their children, but the lack of a specific act to rule these matters is a problem in a country whose legal system is still very dependent to legal acts and positivism.  This work tries to show the state of art of homosexual couples’ rights in Brazil and how the proposal of a new statute to protect the rights of LGBTI people, in all aspects of their daily life could protect them and contribute for a democratic society. 

scholarly journals Special Legal Regimes and Their Status under the Lithuanian Legal System

Teisė ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 79-98
Author(s):  
Vaidotas A. Vaičaitis
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Disaster Management ◽  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Management Regime ◽  
Legal Regimes

Based on the constitutional approach, this article examines three special legal regimes in the Lithuanian legal system: the state of emergency, disaster management regime, and quarantine. The article uses four methodological criteria to reveal the differences and similarities between these legal regimes: a) the basis for the declaration of a particular legal regime, b) the subjects of their declaration and management, c) their duration, and d) the special measures applied during them, including human rights restrictions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document