scholarly journals Labor Admission Test

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabaratnam Arulkumaran ◽  
Vikram Sinai Talaulikar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Uterine Contractions ◽  
Active Labor ◽  
Admission Test ◽  
Adequate Sample Size

ABSTRACT Labor admission test (LAT) is performed at the onset of labor to establish fetal well-being in low-risk pregnancies and identify those fetuses who either may be hypoxic, needing delivery or at risk of developing hypoxia during labor so that additional measures of fetal surveillance can be instituted to prevent adverse outcomes. We searched the literature in Medline, Cochrane Library and PubMed using the words— cardiotocograph, cardiotocogram, nonstress test, vibroacoustic stimulus (VAS), amniotic fluid index (AFI), Doppler, labor admission test, labor admission cardiotocography (CTG) and reviewed four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three systematic reviews to summarize the current evidence regarding use of LAT. Although the existing RCTs and systematic reviews do not favor admission testing, we have critically reviewed the methodology used in some of these major studies. There is a need for robust RCTs with adequate sample size to evaluate the effectiveness of LAT. In clinical practice, while a normal admission CTG reassures the mother and the clinician about the health of the baby, an admission CTG with nonreassuring FHR pattern leads to careful review which may reveal a growth restricted or compromised fetus before onset of active labor when the risk of fetal hypoxia is higher with increasing frequency and duration of uterine contractions. Like in other obstetric interventions, the woman should be offered the choice of LAT after providing appropriate information and her informed decision should be respected.

scholarly journals Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Chow ◽  
Eileen Huang ◽  
Allen Li ◽  
Sophie Li ◽  
Sarah Y. Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postpartum Depression ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Measurement Tool

Abstract Background Postpartum depression (PPD) is a highly prevalent mental health problem that affects parental health with implications for child health in infancy, childhood, adolescence and beyond. The primary aim of this study was to critically appraise available systematic reviews describing interventions for PPD. The secondary aim was to evaluate the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews and their conclusions. Methods An electronic database search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to 2020 was conducted to identify systematic reviews that examined an intervention for PPD. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews was utilized to independently score each included systematic review which was then critically appraised to better define the most effective therapeutic options for PPD. Results Of the 842 studies identified, 83 met the a priori criteria for inclusion. Based on the systematic reviews with the highest methodological quality, we found that use of antidepressants and telemedicine were the most effective treatments for PPD. Symptoms of PPD were also improved by traditional herbal medicine and aromatherapy. Current evidence for physical exercise and cognitive behavioural therapy in treating PPD remains equivocal. A significant, but weak relationship between AMSTAR score and journal impact factor was observed (p = 0.03, r = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.43) whilst no relationship was found between the number of total citations (p = 0.27, r = 0.12; 95% CI, − 0.09 to 0.34), or source of funding (p = 0.19). Conclusion Overall the systematic reviews on interventions for PPD are of low-moderate quality and are not improving over time. Antidepressants and telemedicine were the most effective therapeutic interventions for PPD treatment.

scholarly journals YOGA IN CHRONIC NECK PAIN: AN EFFECTIVE COMPLEMENTARY THERAPEUTIC OPTION - A META - ANALYSIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Jaza Rizvi ◽  
Batool Hassan ◽  
Sadia Shafaq
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complementary Method

BACKGROUND Neck pain is recognized as the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide. The severity of neck pain may lead to adverse outcomes related to individual’s health and well-being that augment the risk of disability and may severely interfere in activities of daily living (ADL’s) and participation in the society. AIM The aim of the quantitative analysis is to determine the effectiveness of yoga in relieving chronic neck pain and disability. METHODS Databases such as Google scholar, MEDLINE, PEDro, the Cochrane Library and Pub Med were explored from October-November for randomized controlled trials which assessed neck pain and related disability among chronic neck pain individuals. RESULTS Total six studies consisted of 298 participants with chronic neck pain. In risk of bias assessment, all six studies reported low risk of allocation and reporting bias, while one or two study disclosed high or unknown risk of bias in several domains. Moderate to large effect of -0.857 SMD at 95% CI suggest evidence in favor of the effectiveness of yoga; (Q 30.32, df 5, I2 83.51%) on a significant P-value of <0.0001. CONCLUSION The analysis of studies provided robust evidence with pool effect of -0.857 SMD at 95% CI (p<0.0001) concluded that yoga is an effectual and complementary method for the management of chronic or non-specific neck pain. KEYWORDS Yoga, Neck Pain, Cervical, Therapeutic, Prevention, Meditation

scholarly journals Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical procedures: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Eva Brocard ◽  
Ludovic Reveiz ◽  
Jean-Philippe Régnaux ◽  
Veronica Abdala ◽  
Pilar Ramón-Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Objectives. To map the current evidence on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administration and identify knowledge gaps in the literature available in this field. Methods. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, and Health Systems Evidence databases were searched from January 2015 to March 2020 for systematic reviews published in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish. Results. Eighty-three systematic reviews were included, the quality of the reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and data were extracted for all primary outcomes. Perioperative antibiotic administration, the use of first generation cephalosporins, and surgical site infection (SSI) were the most commonly reported for timing of antibiotic administration, drug class, and primary outcome, respectively. Findings showed that, overall, SAP may reduce SSIs compared with a placebo or with no SAP. Results suggested that intraoperative SAP may lower SSI, while postoperative SAP did not show a statistically significant difference. Conclusions. Findings have confirmed the role of SAP in reducing postoperative SSI across various surgeries and do not support the use of antibiotics after surgery to prevent infections. The findings of this scoping review have enhanced the evidence base that can inform decisions regarding the development of global guidelines for the prevention of SSI. However, high-quality systematic reviews and research reflecting diverse populations and settings are needed.

scholarly journals Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (19) ◽  
pp. 3553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Pieper ◽  
Sarah Schröer ◽  
Anna-Lisa Eilerts
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Workplace Health Promotion ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Older Employees ◽  
Health Promotion Interventions

Work environment factors are highly correlated with employees’ health and well-being. Our aim was to sum up current evidence of health promotion interventions in the workplace, focusing on interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, psychological and behavioral disorders as well as interventions for older employees and economic evaluations. We conducted a comprehensive literature search including systematic reviews published from April 2012 to October 2017 in electronic databases and search engines, websites of relevant organizations and institutions. It consisted of simple and specific terms and word combinations related to workplace health promotion based on the search strategy of a previous review. After full-text screening, 74 references met the eligibility criteria. Using the same search strategy, there was a higher proportion of relevant high-quality studies as compared with the earlier review. The heterogeneity of health promotion interventions regarding intervention components, settings and study populations still limits the comparability of studies. Future studies should also address the societal and insurer perspective, including costs to the worker such as lost income and lost time at work of family members due to caregiving activities. To this end, more high-quality evidence is needed.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and safety of inpatient versus extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with heparin following major pelvic surgery for malignancy: protocol for a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Heijkoop ◽  
Natalie Parker ◽  
George Kiroff ◽  
Daniel Spernat
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Pelvic Surgery ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Optimum Duration ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common postoperative complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic heparin postoperatively reduces this risk, and the use of extended duration prophylaxis is becoming increasingly common. Malignancy and pelvic surgery both independently further increase the risk of postoperative VTE and patients undergoing major pelvic surgery for malignancy are at particularly high risk of VTE. However, the optimum duration of prophylaxis specifically in this population currently remains unclear. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of literature in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0.,2011) to evaluate current evidence of the effectiveness and safety of inpatient versus extended VTE prophylaxis with heparin (all forms) following major pelvic surgery for malignancy. We will search PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Regarding safety, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) websites will be searched, including all levels of evidence. Results will be the postoperative timeframe in which a VTE event can be considered to have been provoked by the surgery, and the number of patients needed to treat with both inpatient and extended prophylaxis to prevent a VTE event in this timeframe, comparing these to determine if there is a significant benefit from extended prophylaxis. Discussion This systematic review will aim to identify the postoperative period in which patients undergoing major pelvic surgery for malignancy are at further increased risk of VTE as a result of their surgery and the optimum duration of heparin VTE prophylaxis with heparin to reduce this risk. Determining this will allow evidence-based recommendations to be made for the optimum duration of heparin VTE prophylaxis post major pelvic surgery for malignancy, leading to improved standards of care that are consistent between different providers and institutions. Systematic review registration In accordance with guidelines, our systematic review was submitted to PROSPERO for consideration of registration on 16/12/17 and was registered on 12/1/18 with the registration number CRD42018068961, and it was last updated on December 1, 2018.

What is the impact of physicians in prehospital treatment for patients in need of acute critical care? – An overview of reviews

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gitte Valentin ◽  
Lotte Groth Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Critical Conditions ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Prehospital Treatment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this overview was to systematically identify and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews on the impact of prehospital physician involvement.MethodsThe Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched from 1 January 2000 to 17 November 2017. We included systematic reviews comparing physician-based with non–physician-based prehospital treatment in patients with one of five critical conditions requiring a rapid response.ResultsTen reviews published from 2009 to 2017 were included. Physician treatment was associated with increased survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patients with severe trauma; in the latter group, the result was based on more limited evidence. The success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) has improved over the years, but ETI by physicians is still associated with higher success rates than intubation by paramedics. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, intubation by paramedics who were not well skilled to do so markedly increased mortality.ConclusionsCurrent evidence is hinting at a benefit of physicians in selected aspects of prehospital emergency services, including treatment of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and critically ill or injured patients in need of prehospital intubation. Evidence is, however, limited by confounding and bias, and comparison is hampered by differences in case mix and the organization of emergency medical services. Future research should strive to design studies that enable appropriate control of baseline confounding and obtain follow-up data for the proportion of patients who die in the prehospital setting.

scholarly journals Management of haemorrhoids: protocol of an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e035287
Author(s):  
Min Chen ◽  
Tai-Chun Tang ◽  
Tao-Hong He ◽  
Yong-Jun Du ◽  
Di Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe prevalence of haemorrhoidal diseases was high in general population, and many treatments are proposed for the management of haemorrhoids. The treatments include conservative and surgical interventions; the credibility and strength of current evidence of their effectiveness are not comprehensively evaluated. We aim to evaluate the credibility of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that assess the effectiveness of the treatments for haemorrhoidal diseases through an umbrella review.Methods and analysisWe will search Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science from inception to March 2020 without any language restriction. We will include meta-analyses that examine the effectiveness of treatments in the management of haemorrhoids. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of retrieved articles, and they will extract data from the included meta-analyses. For each meta-analysis, we will estimate the effect size of a treatment through the random-effect model and the fixed-effect model, and we will evaluate between-study heterogeneity (Cochrane’s Q and I2statistics) and small-study effect (Egger’s test); we will also estimate the evidence of excess significance bias. Evidence of each treatment will be graded according to prespecified criteria. Methodological quality of each meta-analysis will be evaluated by using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2. The corrected cover area method will be used to assess the impact of overlap in reviews on the findings of the umbrella review.Ethics and disseminationWe will present the results of the umbrella review at conferences and publish the final report in a peer-reviewed journal. The umbrella review does not require ethical approval.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019140702.

PP66 Hospital Cleaning: Detergent Or Disinfectant-Detergent? A Rapid Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
Kathleen Harkin ◽  
Anne Dee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Microbial Resistance ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Healthcare Environment ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Routine Cleaning

Introduction:Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important, potentially preventable reason to maintain a clean healthcare environment. However, guidelines from Europe and North America do not concur—European guidelines recommend using neutral detergent (followed by chlorine-based disinfection (CBD) if required), whilst North American guidelines recommend using detergent or hospital-grade disinfectant-detergents for routine cleaning or decontamination of noncritical healthcare environmental surfaces. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness on rates of HAIs of: (i) disinfectant-detergents versus detergents; and (ii) the active ingredient of many disinfectant-detergents—quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC)—versus CBD.Methods:A rapid review of systematic reviews was conducted using the following search terms: keywords and controlled vocabulary terms for the concepts of “healthcare environmental surfaces” AND (“QAC-based disinfectants” OR “disinfectant-detergents” OR “decontamination”) AND (“environmental contamination” OR “colonization” OR “HAIs”). The search filters included systematic reviews, guidelines, and technology reports. The following databases were searched: The Cochrane Library; PubMed; and health technology assessment and guideline websites for gray literature. Systematic reviews of studies comparing the effects of disinfectant-detergents with detergent, or comparing QAC with CBD, on rates of HAIs in the healthcare environment were included. Reviews on the cleaning or disinfection of body surfaces or disinfection of invasive medical devices were excluded. Quality assessment was not conducted. Data extraction was performed using a pro forma.Results:The literature search resulted in 356 titles. From ninety-four potentially relevant abstracts, fifty-seven full-texts were evaluated: fifty-one were excluded (eight non-English) and six were included. All review authors cautioned that the evidence was low level, methodologically poor, subject to confounding, and didn't address adverse outcomes. The reviews identified eight relevant primary studies, three of which compared disinfectant-detergents with detergent and found no difference in rates of HAI. Five studies compared QAC with CBD. All five demonstrated that CBD was superior to QAC and reduced Clostridium difficile infection rates in outbreak contexts. Furthermore, QAC may induce sporulation and microbial resistance.Conclusions:Low-level evidence suggested that: there is no advantage in using disinfectant-detergents for routine cleaning of noncritical surfaces; CBD is superior to QAC-based disinfection in reducing clostridial infections; and QAC agents may induce sporulation or microbial resistance.

Exercise, physical activity and mental well-being in later life

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gill Windle
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Psychological Functioning ◽  
Later Life ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Time Activity ◽  
Mental Well Being

SummaryExercise and physical activity are thought to be among the most important lifestyle factors for the maintenance of health and prevention of premature disease and mortality. Yet sedentary lifestyles are common. Many people avoid exercise, and have done so across their lifespan. Exercise and physical activity are also considered important for positive psychological functioning; however, this has received limited research attention. This mini-review discusses the effects of exercise and physical activity on mental health and well-being in later life. It draws on international peer reviewed research, summarized in systematic reviews and/or meta-anlaysis, and presents the key findings. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses generally confirm the importance of exercise for mental well-being; however, there is a lack of good quality research. The review discusses some of the barriers to exercise, and identifies strategies that may facilitate uptake and adherence in later life. Limitations in the current evidence are discussed. Based on the current evidence, it is recommended that health practitioners should encourage exercise or physical activity of low to moderate intensity, and leisure time activity such as walking, especially at retirement. Future intervention research would benefit by focusing on people who have not self-selected into studies so as to understand the causal direction, and include theory driven approaches to behaviour change.

scholarly journals A systematic meta-review of self-management support for people with dementia

Dementia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-269
Author(s):  
Judith G Huis in het Veld ◽  
Renate Verkaik ◽  
Berno van Meijel ◽  
Anneke L Francke
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Management Support ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Literature Searches ◽  
Meta Review ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Self-management support for people with dementia is important to help them and their family caregivers to cope with challenges in daily live. Insight into the effects of self-management support interventions on people with dementia is however lacking, despite existing relevant systematic reviews. We therefore conducted a meta-review of relevant systematic reviews, following the PRISMA statement. Systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycINFO. The searches were done in December 2015, and all relevant references until then were taken into consideration. No conclusions about the effects of self-management support interventions on people with dementia could be drawn. Recommendations for future research and practice include that self-management support interventions and effect measurements should be wider in scope than psychological well-being.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document