scholarly journals Evaluation Of Use of Stone Column in Unengineered Closed Landfill Soil

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 538-548
Author(s):  
Mandeep Singh ◽  
◽  
Dr Prashant Garg ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Confining Pressure ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
Silty Sand ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Closed Landfill

In the building industry, ground improvement techniques based on stone column are widely employed. It is a very successful approach for enhancing the engineering characteristics of soil in all aspects, as well as reducing the settling issue in poor-grounded soils including silt, clay, silty sand, and organic soil. The performance of stone columns, is determined by the confining pressure provided by the surrounding soils. Engineering constructions built on thick layers of soft soil strata face issues such as limited bearing capacity, excessive total and differential settlement, lateral spreading, and so on. To address such issues, many ground improvement techniques are available. In exceptionally soft soils, the lateral confining pressure may be inadequate, resulting in column bulging failure. Individual stone column encasement improves lateral resistance to bulging by adding restricting pressure. This research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of building on closed landfill sites. A total of 33 models were tested in a geotechnical engineering laboratory on virgin former landfill soil and stone column with and without encasement in this current study. The increased diameter, length and L/D ratio of the column has demonstrated that the load capacity has increased and soil settling has decreased. When an unreinforced stone column has been installed, the ultimate bearing capacity of landfill soil is increased by 75-112.50 per cent and 87.50-176 per cent respectively, for 10mm and 20mm diameter stone column. Furthermore, when a fully reinforced stone column has been installed, it had increased by 156.25-212.50 per cent and 200-298 per cent for 10mm and 20mm diameters respectively. The stiffness of soil is increased by the stone column, which contributes to increase in the load capacity. The geogrid layer confines an aggregate, which contribute to enhance shear stiffness and bearing capacity.

scholarly journals Settlement Behaviour of Soft Soil Reinforced with Geogrid Encased Stone Column under Sustained Loading

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1307-1311
Keyword(s):  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Replacement Ratio ◽  
Sustained Loading ◽  
Settlement Behavior ◽  
Column Material ◽  
Area Replacement Ratio ◽  
Different Diameters

The use of stone columns in improving the bearing capacity of soft soil is well researched, but the understanding of settlement requires further studies. This paper presents the results of a series of laboratory tests carried out to study the settlement behavior of soft soil bed reinforced with ordinary stone column (OSC) and Geogrid encased stone columns (GESC). Kaolin was used as the soft soil and stones of size from 2.5 to 10 mm were used as column material. The stone columns of four different diameters were installed, by the method of replacement, into the soil having undrained shear strength of 22.5 kPa. The OSC and GESC test beds were subjected to pressure of 250 and 300 kPa. Each pressure was sustained for 24 hours and the settlement of the composite soil with time was noted. It is found that Geogrid encased stone columns have small settlement than the corresponding ordinary stone columns. The SRR (settlement reduction ratio) being a measure of ground improvement, is found increasing with the area replacement ratio. Further, at a particular sustained pressure SRR is found more for GESC than the corresponding value for OSC.

scholarly journals Comparison between unit cell and plane strain models of stone column ground improvement

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Maryam Gaber ◽  
Anuar Kasa ◽  
Norinah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Jamal Alsharef
Keyword(s):  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Plane Strain ◽  
Clayey Soil ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Unit Cell ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
The Impact

This article presents a comparative study of the behaviour of clayey soil reinforcements using stone column ground improvement by means of numerical analyses. Two-dimensional finite element analyses with commercially available software, PLAXIS, were performed on end-bearing stone columns using 15-noded triangular elements to investigate the impact of the modelling type on the stress concentration ratio and failure mechanism of an improved foundation system. Consolidation analyses were conducted throughout the study using Mohr-Coulomb’s criterion. The computed values of the stress concentration ratios were compared for different key parameters, including the diameters of stone columns, c/c spacing of columns, friction angle of stone column material, and undrained cohesion of soft soil. The major conclusions of this study were that the stone column in the unit cell model shared between 2.5 to 3.14 times more loads than the surrounding soil, whilst in the plane strain model it shared between 1.7 to 2.9 times more loads. The use of plane strain approach to model the stone column gave a more comprehensive representation of the stress distribution and load transfer between the soil and columns, in addition to being a better method than the unit cell concept to evaluate the failure mode in this system.

scholarly journals Numerical Study on Bearing Capacity and Bulging of the Composite Stone Column

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-28
Author(s):  
Mahmood A. Salam ◽  
Qiyao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Clay Soil ◽  
Confining Pressure ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Soil Stiffness ◽  
Preliminary Model ◽  
Concrete Part ◽  
Surrounding Soil

Background: In weak clay soil, a proper ground improvement technique using a stone column can be limited by the absence of sufficient lateral confining pressure. Stone columns should be strengthened to provide the minimum required lateral confining pressure. Objective: The aim of this study is to find out the significant improvement of the composite stone columns compared to the conventional stone columns by comparing the bearing capacity enhancement and the treated soil stiffness for both models. Composite stone columns with a solid concrete part at the top-head not only enhance the bearing capacity of the stone columns but also decrease the bulging failure and increase the surrounding soil stiffness. Methods: The 2D finite element analyses were carried out to simulate an experimental study conducted by Ambily and Gandhi on conventional stone columns. ABAQUS software program with the Mohr-Coulomb criterion for soft clay soil and stones was used in the simulation. First, a preliminary numerical model was created to simulate the experiment model. Similar material properties, boundary conditions, and constraints were considered in the preliminary model. The results were compared, and they were similar to the experimental results. During this process, the efficiency of the numerical model was confirmed. Second, the same numerical model was performed for the composite stone columns without modifying the material properties, boundary conditions, and constraints of the preliminary model. The parameters that influence the composite stone column bearing capacity as the length of the concrete part, the stress concentration ratio, and the shear strength of the surrounding soil, were all studied. Results: The data obtained from the aforesaid study was used along with ABAQUS software package. Compared to existing work, our approach achieves a significant correlation, and it indicates that the solid concrete part increases the surrounding soil stiffness, in addition to increasing the bearing capacity of the stone column. The solid concrete part resists bulging deformation by moving the bulging failure downward where the confining pressure is larger. The stress concentration ratio increases with the length of the solid concrete part. Conclusion: Composite stone columns have a significant influence on the improvement of weak clay soil and increase the bearing capacity of soil under superstructures. Furthermore, they also increase the stiffness of weak soil around the column. The magnitude of weak soil improvement by using composite stone columns is greater than conventional stone columns. Therefore, composite stone columns are more efficient and effective than conventional stone columns.

scholarly journals Improvement of Soft Soil Using Linear Distributed Floating Stone Columns under Foundation Subjected to Static and Cyclic Loading

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi O Karkush ◽  
Anwar Jabbar
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Soil Improvement ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Column Material ◽  
Area Replacement Ratio ◽  
Static And Cyclic Loading

A stone column is one of the soil improvement methods that are mainly used for improving the geotechnical behavior of soft soils. For deep improvement of soft soil, the floating stone columns are considered the best and effective economically which provide lateral confinement and drainage and longitudinal skin friction. In this study, six tests were carried out on the natural soft soil of undrained shear strength of 5.5 kPa improved by single and two linear distributed floating stone columns. The stone column dimensions are 30 mm in diameter and 180 mm in length and the stone column material is sand of high internal friction angle of 48°. The natural and improved soil samples are tested under isolated raft foundation of dimensions 120×120 mm subjected to vertical static and cyclic loading of frequency 2Hz and continued for 50 seconds. The results showed a significant improvement in soil bearing capacity when reinforced with stone columns despite the small area replacement ratio, where the bearing capacity of improved soil increased by 120 to 145%. The compressibility of improved soil decreased by 57 to 86% in comparison with that of natural soft soil. Also, the floating stone columns reduced the porewater pressure, where the stone columns considered efficient in providing short drainage pathways. This can be one of the reasons why soil reinforced with floating stone columns hold higher cyclic and static stresses regardless the end bearing of stone columns.

Distribution of Stress on Stone Column-Reinforced Soft Soil under Cylindrical Storage Tank

2014 ◽  
Vol 567 ◽  
pp. 699-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kousik Deb ◽  
Amit Kumar Das
Keyword(s):  
Contact Stress ◽  
Storage Tank ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Granular Fill ◽  
Mechanical Elements

Structures with circular foundation (chimney, silo, oil tank) constructed on compressible soft soil, often have to opt for ground improvement like stone columns before construction. In this paper, the stress distribution on stone column-reinforced ground under cylindrical storage tank has been presented. Actual foundation soil reinforced with stone column is assumed as composite ground of soil and hollow cylindrical stone rings keeping the area ratio constant to carry the analysis in axi-symmetric condition. The soft soil, stone columns and granular fill are idealized using mechanical elements. The floor slab of the storage tank is assumed to be flexible enough to satisfy the theory of thin plate. Governing differential equations are derived to determine the vertical settlement and solved with finite difference technique. Contact stress at ground level is calculated from vertical settlement. It is observed that soft soil experiences heavy settlement and contact stress when the tank is full despite of low spacing to diameter ratio (S/dc = 3) and reasonable modular ratio (Ec/Es = 20). It is also observed that stress acting on edge stone column is lower as compared to the stress acting on center stone column even under uniformly loaded condition.

scholarly journals Effect of several patterns of floating stone columns on the bearing capacity and porewater pressure in saturated soft soil

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Karkush ◽  
◽  
Anwar Jabbar ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Ultimate Bearing Capacity ◽  
Geotechnical Properties ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Angle Of Internal Friction ◽  
Design Requirements ◽  
The Common ◽  
Porewater Pressure

One of the common geotechnical problems is the construction on soft soil and the improvement of its geotechnical properties to meet the design requirements. A stone column is one of the well-known techniques used to improve the geotechnical properties of soft soils. Sometimes thick layers of soft soil imposed the designer to use floating stone columns for improvement of such soil; in this case, the designer will be lost the end bearing of the stone column. In this study, the effects of several patterns of floating stone columns distribution under footing on the bearing capacity of soil and the distribution of excess porewater pressure are investigated. The soft soil used in this study has a very low undrained shear strength (cu) of 5.5 kPa and improved by several patterns of stone columns (single, two linear, triangular, square, and quadrilateral). The stone column has a length of 180 mm and a diameter of 30 mm. The material of the stone column is poorly graded sand has an angle of internal friction (48.5°) at a relative density of 65%. The results indicated a significant increase in the ultimate bearing capacity of soft soil when treated with floating stone columns despite the small ratio of area replacement and reducing the excess porewater pressure and settlement. Also, the ultimate bearing capacity of soil calculated from experimental work is compared with the corresponding values obtained from the proposed equations in the previous studies to evaluate the validity of using such equations.

Research to build technological procedure for soft ground improvement using sea sand-cement-fly ash column

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (HTCS6) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Thinh Duc Ta ◽  
Phuc Dinh Hoang ◽  
Thang Anh Bui ◽  
Trang Huong Thi Ngo ◽  
Diu Thi Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soil Reinforcement ◽  
Soft Ground ◽  
Design Calculation ◽  
Sea Sand ◽  
Composite Ground ◽  
Soft Ground Improvement

Sea sand-cement-fly ash column technology for soft soil treatment is a new technology in the process of completing the theoretical basis, the experimental basis, and the construction of the ground treatment technological procedure. The paper presents the results of scientific research on design, calculation, construction, and acceptance of sea sand-cement-fly ash column. The scientific basis for the design of column is to consider the role of the column in composite ground, that is to use the column as soft ground improvement or soft soil reinforcement. The important parameters for the column design are: cement and fly ash content; column length; column diameter; number of columns; distance among columns; load capacity and settlement of composite ground. The sequence of steps of construction and acceptance of column includes: selection of construction equipment, preparation of construction sites, trial construction, official construction, evaluation of ground quality after treatment and preparation of document for acceptance.

Analytical Study of Load-Settlement Behavior of Soil Treated with Stone Columns have Different Sectional Shape

2020 ◽  
Vol 857 ◽  
pp. 319-327
Author(s):  
Moataz A. Al-Obaydi ◽  
Zeena A. Al-Kazzaz
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Engineering Properties ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Equivalent Diameter ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Treated Soil ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Sectional Shape

Stone columns have been used widely to improve the engineering properties of the weak soil. Most of the previous works considered a circular section for the stone columns. In the present study, finite element analysis has been carried out to investigate the effect of stone columns shape and length on the settlement and bearing capacity of soft soil. Accordingly, three types of cross sectional shape for stone columns have been selected which they are circular, rectangular, and square sections with equivalent area. Various length of columns are adopted with diameter of 0.75m that achieved length to diameter or equivalent diameter ratios (L/d=2, 4, 6, 8, and 10) of columns spacing (S/d=3). The results show that the stone columns has tangible effects on the settlement of the soil while has minor effects on the bearing capacity. The settlement of the treated soil with stone columns have L/d=2, reduces by 18.0, 17.3, and 19.3% for circular, rectangular , and square sections respectively. With increasing length of the columns to L/d=10, further reductions in the settlement obtained of (27.1, 28.1, and 27.0%). Bearing capacity of the soil increased slightly with length of the stone columns. Almost all cross sectional shapes of the columns give bearing capacity about same. The increased in the bearing capacity of the treated soil with stone columns have L/d=2, not exceeded 10% for all sectional types. The average increments in bearing capacity when L/d=10 are 12 and 15% at settlement 50 and 100mm respectively. Insignificant changes in bearing capacity upon increasing length of columns from L/d=2 to 10 of maximum 5%. The plastic zone recedes with the increasing length of the stone columns. Finally, from the results obtained, it can be concluded that the stone columns shape has negligible effects on the settlement and bearing capacity of the soil.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document