scholarly journals MEDICAL VS SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR SYMPTOMATIC ENLARGED INFERIOR TURBINATE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl-3) ◽  
pp. S487-90
Author(s):  
Habib -Ur- Rehman ◽  
Fazal -I- Wahid ◽  
Bakht Zada ◽  
Muhammad Javaid ◽  
Naseem Ul Haq
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Sample Size Calculation ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Nasal Patency ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine the nasal patency after reducing the size of hypertrophied inferior turbinate with medication and surgery. Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan, from Jan to Dec 2019. Methodology: This study was conducted at the After-sample size calculation using an online sample size calculator (OpenEpi) and after obtaining informed consent patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group A were put on medicine only and in group B surgery was conducted to reduce the size of hypertrophied inferior turbinate. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: This study comprised of total 86 patients, in the age range 15-55 years with mean ± SD age 33.47 ± 9.57 years. Males were 47 (54.7%) and females were 39 (45.3%) with male to female ratio of 1.2:1. In group A, males were 22 (25.25%), females were 21 (24.41%), while in group B males were 25 (29.1%) and females were 18 (20.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in nasal patency between the two groups before treatment (p=0.59) and after 10 days of treatment (p=0.69). However, at the end of one month, there was a statistically significant difference in nasal patency between the medically treated and surgically treated groups of patients (p=0.023).Conclusion: Surgical treatment is significantly effective than medical treatment alone.

scholarly journals Anterior Trimming vs Outer Displacement of Inferior Turbinate: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital

1969 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
Habib-Ur-Rehman ◽  
Fazal-I-Wahid ◽  
BakhtZada ◽  
Muhammad Javaid ◽  
Naseemul Haq
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Adhesion Formation ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A

Background: Obstruction of nose due to enlargement of inferior turbinate is a very common problem faced by ENT surgeon.In thisstudy a usefultechnique for treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy is described.Objective:To determine the surgical outcome and complications ofthe two surgicalprocedures.Material and Methods: This non-randomized comparative study was performed in the Department of ENT, HNS, MTI/LRH,Peshawar, Pakistan, from June 01, 2017 to May 31, 2018. After ethical approval, sample size of 112 was calculated and patientsincluded of both genders fulfilling inclusion criteria. After taking consent patients were equally divided into two groups with nonrandom number table method. Both subjective and objective assessment was carried out and observations were recorded on apredesignedproforma.Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.Results: Total patients were 112,in age range from 16 to 50 years. There were 56(50%) patients in each group.Maleswere 71 andfemale 41withmale to female ratio of 1.7:1 and mean age was 32.92+S.D 10.29 years.Relief from nasal obstruction obtained was94.64% and 92.86% in Group A and B respectively. Headachewas relived 83.34 % and 88.38% in Group A and B respectively. Thecomplications experienced were post operative bleeding, adhesion formation and crusting 2.6%, 3.5% and 1.78% respectively.Statistics showed no significant difference between the two operations (p >0.05).Conclusion: Both trimming and outer displacement of hypertrophied inferior turbinate are effective procedures for relief of nasalobstruction but there was no significant difference betweenthe two techniques interm of outcome and complications.Keywords:Inferiorturbinate, Hypertrophy, Trimming, Outer displacement. Nasal obstruction

A Comparative Study of Epidemiology, Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Patients between Ain Shams University Hospitals and Luxor International Hospital

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Hussein Kamel ◽  
Amr Lotfy Farag ◽  
Dr/Sherif Hassanin Ahmed ◽  
Chresteen Talaat Samy Hanna
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Clinicopathologic Features ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in the world. It is the third most common malignancy after lung & breast and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, accounting for approximately 1,400,000 new cases and about 700,000 deaths worldwide. Objectives The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the epidemiology, clinicopathologic features, different treatment modalities and outcomes regarding disease free survival (DFS), progression free survival (PFS) & overall survival (OS) of colorectal cancer disease between cases presented to Ain shams university hospital & to Luxor international hospital in 3 consecutive years. Patients and Methods The study is retrospective comparative study. Clinical oncology department in Ain Shams University Hospital and Luxor International Hospital. The data Collected from January 2013 to December 2015. This study analyzed hospital records of patients who diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) and allocated into two groups: Group A: CRC patients presented to Ain-Shams University Hospital from January 2013 to December 2015, group B: CRC patients presented to Luxor International Hospital from January 2013 to December 2015. Results There was no statistically significant difference regarding age parameter in LIH when compared to ASU, but the study was consistent with higher incidence in patients who were aged more than forty- accounted about 70.5% in all CRC cases. Cases less than 40 years old, in group A were 35.2%, while in Group B were 23.5%. Even there was no statistically significant difference but it may be attributable to more westernization in Lower Egypt. Other explanation may be due to decreased low socioeconomic status and different lifestyle factors in more developing region what increase risk of colorectal cancer. Among our cases, there is no statistically significant difference regarding gender between the two hospitals. Both sexes almost were affected equally, females appeared to be at a slightly higher risk of developing CRC cancer with current prevalence 1.3:1 in ASU group, and 1.1:1 in LIH group. Conclusion The need to increase awareness about CRC in Egypt especially upper Egypt, is recommended. An awareness campaign should be performed to promote detection of CRC at its earliest and most curable stage by recognizing early symptoms and enabling early referrals for colonoscopy. Those at higher risk should be offered more intensive surveillance. Similarity of the data from different centers suggests that this is the picture of colorectal cancer typical of Egypt.

scholarly journals Comparative study of patient-based versus case-based teaching in prescription writing skills of second year MBBS students

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
Shilpa P. Jadav ◽  
Nishant B. Bhansali ◽  
Dinesh M. Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Writing Skills ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Good Tool ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Case Based ◽  
Prescription Writing

Background: Prescription writing errors can lead to deficiencies in healthcare. Although prescription writing is a part of the medical students' curriculum with traditional methods, their prescribing skills are still poor due to inadequate training. To fulfil the need for new educational interventions this study aims to compare patient-based teaching with case-based teaching in improving prescription writing skills of second year MBBS students.Methods: This prospective comparative study was carried out after orientation of participants to prescription writing as per WHO prescribing guidelines (n=71). Group A (n=37) and group B (n=34) were given patient-based teaching and case-based teaching respectively of prescription writing for the same five common clinical conditions. The prescription writing skill was assessed by evaluating the prescriptions written by both the groups and scored by 19-point scoring system. Feedback from the group A students was also taken.Results: Statistical analysis of mean scores of group A (15.90) and group B (13.14) was done by Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.001). Comparison of both the groups for the individual parameters was done by Chi-square test which found significant difference in writing some important parameters like doctor’s registration no., contacts of prescriber, name of the medicine, strength of drug, dosage form, dosing instructions, total quantity of medicine and duration of medication etc. Group A students’ feedback brought out the fact that patient-based teaching is a good tool for teaching and learning.Conclusions: Patient-based teaching for prescription writing improves students’ prescription writing skills in an effective way in comparison with traditional case-based teaching.

scholarly journals To Study the effect of Traditional Back Exercises vs Exercise Ball Exercise on Pain Intensity, Core Endurance and Limitation of Activities in Individuals with Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
Jay Kumar Soni ◽  
Edrish Contractor
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Core Stability ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Swiss Ball

Aims: Non specific Low back pain is defined as pain without any known pathology which affects almost all the leading occupation where body's awkward posture, twisting and stress forces are commonly encountered across the globe and it is highly prevalent 60% to 70% in a year. Studies have shown various exercise regimen individual effect on the same but superiority of regimen out of these is not clear. Study Design: Comparative Study Place and Duration of Study: Ahmedabad Institute of Medical Sciences, Duration 2013-15 Objective: To assess and compare the effect of core stability exercise, back school program and Swiss ball exercise on Pain, core endurance and Functional disability. Methodology: A group of 24 patients having non-specific low back pain between age groups 18-40 were randomly selected and allocated in to two groups. Group A(n=12) received traditional exercise whereas Swiss ball exercise was given to Group B(n=12). The subjects were treated for two weeks. Baseline data for VAS, Core endurance and MODI were taken on day1 and at the end of two weeks Result: The results were analyzed by wilcoxon signed rank test within both groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS, core endurance and MODI at the end of 2weeks.Comparison between both the Group A and Group B was done by Mann- whitney U test and statistically no significant difference was seen in VAS, core endurance and MODI between the groups Conclusion: The study concluded that both the exercises are equally effective in reducing pain intensity, improves core endurance and functional status in subjects with non specific low back pain

scholarly journals A randomized clinical study: outcome of submucous resection of compensatory inferior turbinate during septoplasty

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57
Author(s):  
Nimet Ozalp Devseren ◽  
Mustafa Cenk Ecevit ◽  
Taner Kemal Erdag ◽  
Kerim Ceryan
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Nasal Patency ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Turbinate Hypertrophy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy ◽  
Submucous Resection

Background: Septoplasty and/or turbinate surgery are commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of mechanical nasal obstruction. The aim of this study was to define the effectiveness of submucous resection of a hypertrophied turbinate together with simultaneous septoplasty for the treatment of nasal obstruction. Methods: Forty-two patients with septum deviation and compensatory contralateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy were recruited in this study. The inferior turbinate hypertrophy was diagnosed based on examination. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A, a submucous resection was performed to treat a hypertrophied inferior turbinate, together with a septoplasty. In group B, only a septoplasty was performed. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry tests were conducted for an objective evaluation of nasal patency. A visual analog scale (VAS) was applied to the patients for the subjective evaluation of nasal obstruction complaints. Results: The application of submucous resection intended to reduce a hypertrophied inferior turbinate led to a distinctive increase in cross-sectional area of nasal patency; however, when the two groups were compared, it was statistically significant only at the post-operative sixth month. There was no difference between the results of rhinomanometry. The subjective symptom scores were better in group A than in group B between the post-operative first to sixth month. Conclusion: Submucous resection of a hypertrophied inferior turbinate is necessary for the treatment of nasal obstruction.

scholarly journals Palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: a comparative study in a tertiary care hospital from India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2197
Author(s):  
Shubhatara Swamy ◽  
Vijaya Rajendran ◽  
Durga Prasan ◽  
Pratibha Nadig
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Despite advances in symptom management, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains one of the most dreadful consequences of cancer therapy.Methods: The study was carried out at Medical Oncology Department, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore. Hundred and forty-four cancer patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years with adequate blood counts requiring moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) as per Hesketh classification were included. The patients were prospectively divided into two groups before the initial cycle of chemotherapy. Patients in Group A (n=71) received ondansetron, and dexamethasone along with aprepitant capsules, Whereas, Group B (n=73) received palonosetron, and dexamethasone along with placebo capsules, 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Thereafter the patients were administered with the drugs and observed for nausea and vomiting. The efficiency of both regimens was assessed by adopting validated functional living index emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. Analysis of the data was done using the SPSS 21.0 software.Results: The mean age of the patients was 40.5 years and the male to female ratio was 1:2.4. In all the patients, no changes were detected in the ECG readings after MEC. The nausea and vomiting score were comparable in both groups. No significant difference (p>0.05) was noticed between group A and group B in both mm and in FLIE points. No serious adverse events were found relating to antiemetic treatment.Conclusions: Palonosetron in combination with corticosteroids was non inferior to ondansetron in combination with aprepitant and corticosteroids in controlling acute and delayed stages of CINV in patients requiring MEC. Thus, it can be recommended as first-line therapy for patients treated with MEC.

scholarly journals A comparative study of early postoperative feeding versus conventional feeding for patients undergoing caesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 5002
Author(s):  
Neeraja S. ◽  
Naritha Reddy ◽  
Naima Fathima
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Normal Diet ◽  
Early Feeding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Postoperative Feeding

Background: Early alimentation after caesarean delivery probably has limited clinical significance in terms of improved energy and protein intake. Decreasing the post-operative ileus is possible with early feeding. Objective of this study was to study efficacy of early postoperative feeding versus conventional feeding for patients undergoing caesarean section.Methods: Present study was hospital based comparative study carried out among 200 women who fulfilled the selection criteria. The cases were divided into 2 groups of 100 each by suitable random sampling technique. Group A included 100 cases who were given early feeding within 6 hours of caesarean delivery. Group B included 100 control who were given the feeding after 24 hours of caesarean delivery.Results: The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay in Group A and Group B was 4.59±0.65 and 4.81±0.81 days respectively (p <0.05). The mean time to return of bowel sounds in Group A and Group B was 2.79±1.36 and 3.55±1.49 hours respectively (p <0.01). 2(2%) cases in group A had postoperative ileus symptoms, whereas 3 (3%) cases in Group B had the same. Statistically significant difference (p <0.05) was seen in terms of vomiting 1% versus 17%, nausea 5% versus 16%, abdominal distention 2% versus 7%, diarrhea 4% versus 90% in the early feeding versus conventional feeding groups.Conclusions: It can be concluded from present study that fast return to the normal diet is possible with early feeding among women undergoing cesarean section compared to the conventional feeding among women undergoing cesarean section.

scholarly journals A comparative study of the effect of piroxicam versus diclofenac on wound healing in clean abdominal wounds

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandrashekar Reddy J. Madinur ◽  
Prashant Tubachi ◽  
Prashant Tubachi ◽  
A. S. Godhi ◽  
A. S. Godhi
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Individual

Background: The primary function of the skin is to serve as a protective barrier against the environment. The process of wound healing constitutes an array of interrelated and concomitant events. Understanding these processes and various factors affecting these processes continue to expand. The present study was undertaken to compare and evaluate the effect of piroxicam versus diclofenac on wound healing in clean abdominal wounds.Methods: The present one year randomized controlled trial was conducted on all the patients undergoing appendicectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis and uncomplicated inguinal hernia repairs in the Department of Surgery, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belgaum during the period of one year. Based on the thumb rule a total of 60 patients divided into two groups of 30 each were studied. Based on the computer-generated randomization patients were allocated to two groups that is group A (Inj. Piroxicam) and Group B (Inj. Diclofenac).Results: In the present study, males outnumbered females with male to female ratio between of 1.72 to 2:1. The mean age in group A was30.9±7.86 years and in group B it was 30.3±7.97 years. Both the groups that is Group A and B were graded under grade I (Good wound healing) from the POD 3 onwards. Overall the individual score and total scores had no influence of the final grading (outcome) of the wound.Conclusions: Overall, better results were seen on wound healing in patients who received Inj piroxicam with significantly less post-operative redness and edema. However, this did not have significant difference in the final outcome of the grading of the wound. 

scholarly journals Intranasal Splint in Nasal Septal Surgery: Is It Necessary?

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-129
Author(s):  
Jahangir Alam Mazumder ◽  
Md Golam Mustafa ◽  
AHM Delwar ◽  
Shazibur Rashid ◽  
Md Mostafizur Rahaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Healing ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Septal Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Medicine Today ◽  
Group B ◽  
Male To Female

Introduction: After SMR/septoplasty with or without turbinate surgery, it needs to keep apart the septum and turbinates upto their complete healing otherwise there is a chance of adhesion (synechia) formation. To prevent this there are variousprocedures. To place an intranasal splint in one or both sides of the septum is one of them. Nowadays there raised thequestion of whether the splinting is necessary or not. There is no significant difference in result with or without anintranasal splint. Weighing against the co-morbidities the routine use of an intranasal splint can no longer be justified. Materials and Methods: This is a randomized control study of 200 patients of SMR/septoplasty, done for nasal septaldeviation causing symptoms in Cumilla Medical College Hospital in the period of January 2016 to December 2019. Theywere equally divided into two groups, group-A were operated placing an intranasal splint and group-B with no intranasalsplint. They were followed up for 6 weeks to detect any synechia and co-morbidities. Result: The age of our patients wasranged from 13-49 years with a mean age of 22.45 years. The male to female ratio is 1.78:1. Synechia was found in 4% ofthe splinted group and 6 of the nonsplinted groups. Co-morbidities were detected more in the splinted group than that ofnon-splinted. In INS group these were found as follows: pain in the nose, face and head (26%), faint during removal ofnasal splint (6%), nasal obstruction (38%), the anxiety of splint removal in the postoperative period (35%) and vestibulitisdue to persistent irritation by a splint (17%). Conclusion: There is little significant advantage of using intranasal splintroutinely in septal surgery to prevent synechia formation. Medicine Today 2020 Vol.32(2): 126-129

scholarly journals A comparative study of efficacy and safety of glucosamine plus chondroitin sulphate versus rosehip as add on therapy to NSAIDs in patients suffering from osteoarthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 2254
Author(s):  
Kiranpreet Kaur ◽  
Anjleen Kaur ◽  
Prabhsimran Singh ◽  
Amandeep Singh Bakshi
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Chondroitin Sulphate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Efficacy Parameters ◽  
Group B

Background: Osteoarthritis is a chronic and debilitating disease. Management of disease is a big challenge. NSAIDS play an important role but have many adverse reactions. So, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of natural compound rosehip versus glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate in patients of osteoarthritis.Methods: An open label, randomized, parallel group comparative study, conducted on patients of either sex with confirmed diagnosis of osteoarthritis on standard NSAIDs therapy, attending the outpatient department of orthopedics in a tertiary care centre.  150 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups (group A, group B and group C) of 50 each. Patients of group A were given Glucosamine plus chondroitin sulphate for 12 weeks. Group B was given rosehip for 12 weeks and group C placebo.  These supplements were given as add on therapy.  Patients were monitored and adverse drug reactions were noted. The data was analysed statistically using t- test for efficacy and descriptive stats for assessing the safety.Results: Efficacy was assessed by comparing mean reduction in the pain intensity between group A and B, group B gives highly significant results as compared to group A. While comparing joint tenderness, swelling around joint, mean functional capacity and improvement in the overall assessment, group B gives significant results as compared to group A. It was also observed that group A and group B were better than group C in all the efficacy parameters. All the drugs were well tolerated and systemically safe.Conclusions: There was significant difference in efficacy of rosehip compared with glaucosamine and chondroitin sulphate in patients of osteoarthritis. In comparison there was no significant difference in safety of two drugs and both were considered safe in patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document