The ability of a GCM-forced hydrological model to reproduce global discharge variability
Abstract. Data from General Circulation Models (GCMs) are often used in studies investigating hydrological impacts of climate change. However GCM data are known to have large biases, especially for precipitation. In this study the usefulness of GCM data for hydrological studies was tested by applying bias-corrected daily climate data of the 20CM3 control experiment from an ensemble of twelve GCMs as input to the global hydrological model PCR-GLOBWB. Results are compared with discharges calculated from a model run based on a reference meteorological dataset constructed from the CRU TS2.1 data and ERA-40 reanalysis time-series. Bias-correction was limited to monthly mean values as our focus was on the reproduction of runoff variability. The bias-corrected GCM based runs resemble the reference run reasonably well, especially for rivers with strong seasonal patterns. However, GCM derived discharge quantities are overall too low. Furthermore, from the arctic regimes it can be seen that a few deviating GCMs can bias the ensemble mean. Moreover, the GCMs do not well represent intra- and inter-year variability as exemplified by a limited persistence. This makes them less suitable for the projection of future runoff extremes.