scholarly journals Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Study of Patients Diagnosed between 1978 and 2002

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza ◽  
María Milagros Bernal ◽  
Javier Jerez Roig ◽  
Maria Paula Curado

Objective. This paper aims at studying oropharyngeal cancer survival from the Population-Based Cancer Registry of Zaragoza, Spain, for the 1978–2002 period. Methods. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the automated calculation method of the Catalan Institute of Oncology was utilized to obtain the relative survival. Results. The oropharyngeal cancer survival rate was 61.3% in the first year and 33.9% in the fifth year. One-year relative survival was 62.2% (CI 95%: 57.4–67.4), and five-year relative survival was 36.6% (CI 95%: 31.8–42.1). Comparison of survival rates by sex revealed statistically significant differences (P value = 0.017) with better survival in women. There were no differences when comparing the three age groups and the three studied time periods 1978–1986, 1987–1994, and 1995–2002. Conclusions. The data suggests that there were no significant changes in oropharyngeal cancer survival in the province of Zaragoza throughout the years.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327481983608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaida Gedvilaitė ◽  
Edvardas Danila ◽  
Saulius Cicėnas ◽  
Giedrė Smailytė

Lung cancer is the most common cancer-related death worldwide. The aim of this study is to describe the most recent survival rates by sex, age group, extent of disease, and histology of lung cancer in Lithuania. The study is based on the Lithuanian Cancer Registry database. The analysis included patients with primary invasive lung cancer diagnosed in 1998 to 2012 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision C33 and C34). Patients were followed up with respect to vital status until December 31, 2012. Five-year relative survival estimates were calculated using period analysis. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of the observed survival of patients with cancer and the expected survival of the underlying general population. In our study, the overall 5-year relative survival was low but increased slightly (10.7%) from 2003–2007 to 2008–2012. Positive changes in survival were evident in both sexes, in almost all age groups and for all histological groups and disease stages. Adenocarcinoma relative survival increased from 6.7% in 2003–2007 to 12.8% in 2008–2012 and squamous cell carcinoma increased from 7.4% in 2003–2007 to 11.1% in 2008–2012. Patients with small-cell carcinoma had the worst survival (2.9% in 2003-2007 and 3.6% in 2008–2012). The majority of patients with lung cancer are diagnosed with advanced disease. The number of new cases of advanced lung cancer increased from 35.1% to 37.8%. Despite low overall survival, there were positive changes in survival in both sexes, in almost all age groups, and for all histological groups and disease stages. The survival rate of patients with lung cancer in Lithuania is similar to that in other European countries.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 990-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Sjöberg ◽  
Cat Halthur ◽  
Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Ulla Axdorph Nygell ◽  
...  

Abstract In recent decades, attention has focused on reducing long-term, treatment-related morbidity and mortality in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). In the present study, we looked for trends in relative survival for all patients diagnosed with HL in Sweden from 1973-2009 (N = 6949; 3985 men and 2964 women; median age, 45 years) and followed up for death until the end of 2010. Patients were categorized into 6 age groups and 5 calendar periods (1973-1979, 1980-1986, 1987-1994, 1994-2000, and 2001-2009). Relative survival improved in all age groups, with the greatest improvement in patients 51-65 years of age (P < .0005). A plateau in relative survival was observed in patients below 65 years of age during the last calendar period, suggesting a reduced long-term, treatment-related mortality. The 10-year relative survival for patients diagnosed in 2000-2009 was 0.95, 0.96, 0.93, 0.80, and 0.44 for the age groups 0-18, 19-35, 36-50, 51-65, and 66-80, respectively. Therefore, despite progress, age at diagnosis remains an important prognostic factor (P < .0005). Advances in therapy for patients with limited and advanced-stage HL have contributed to an increasing cure rate. In addition, our findings support that long-term mortality of HL therapy has decreased. Elderly HL patients still do poorly, and targeted treatment options associated with fewer side effects will advance the clinical HL field.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2408-2408
Author(s):  
Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Paul Dickman ◽  
Asa Derolf ◽  
Magnus Bjorkholm

Abstract Background: Over the last decades there have been advances in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and prognosis has improved with the introduction of new treatment strategies. However, few studies have addressed the issue which patients benefit most from these therapeutic changes over the years. Aims: To evaluate relative survival in all diagnosed MM patients in Sweden 1973–2001 and relate the changes to age, sex and type of hospital where diagnosis was made. Methods: All patients with MM notified to the Swedish Cancer Register in 1973–2001 were followed up by record linkage to the nationwide Cause of Death Register. Survival analyses were performed by obtaining relative survival (RS) defined as the ratio of observed versus expected survival. The study period was divided arbitrarily to four calendar periods: 1973–1979, 1980–1986, 1987–1993, and 1994–2002. Patients were grouped according to age at diagnosis (0–40, 41–50, 51–60, 61–70, 71–80, and 80+), sex, and hospital category. RS was estimated using SAS (Cary, NC, USA) and excess mortality modelled using Poisson regression. Results: A total of 13,376 patients (7,114 males and 6,262 females, mean age 69.8 years, and 32% diagnosed at a university hospital) were diagnosed with MM in Sweden between January 1st 1973 and December 31st 2001. The overall one-year RS estimates were 73%, 78%, 80%, and 81%, respectively, for the four calendar periods. The overall five-year RS was 31%, 32%, 34%, and 36% and the ten-year RS remained stable at 12%, 11% 13% in the first three periods; ten-year RS could not be calculated for the last calendar period. The increase in one-year RS was observed in all age categories over the four calendar periods, while the increase in five-year RS was restricted to patients <70 years. Younger age at onset was associated with a superior survival in all calendar periods. Differences in survival by age at diagnosis and calendar period were highly statistically significant (p<0.0001). Females had a superior 1- (p=0.002), 5- (p=0.024), and 10-year RS (p=0.019) compared to males, after adjusting for age and period. Patients diagnosed at university hospitals had superior 5- and 10-year RS (p=0.007) but not 1-year RS. Summary/conclusions: The present study shows an improved prognosis over time in a population-based study including > 13,000 MM patients diagnosed during a 29-year period. Of interest is that even one-year RS has improved in all age groups over the whole study period. Increase in five-year RS was only observed in patients aged <70 years. The ten-year RS did not improve over the first 20 years and could not be estimated for patients diagnosed in the last period. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with superior one-, five- and ten-year RS in all calendar periods. Females had a significantly better survival than males. A significant difference in survival was seen according to type of hospital, with patients diagnosed at a university hospital surviving longer. In conclusion, the results show that survival of MM patients has improved during the study period. However, long-term survival has not improved significantly. Males, elderly patients and patients diagnosed during early calendar periods experienced higher excess mortality.


2000 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Crocetti ◽  
Alessandro Barchielli ◽  
Andrea Amorosi ◽  
Francesco Bartoloni Saint Omer ◽  
Massimo Biancalani ◽  
...  

Aim The specific goal of the study was to evaluate the availability of the histologic grading of cancer and its effect on survival in an Italian population-based cancer series. Methods Data were drawn from the Tuscany Cancer Registry, active in central Italy since 1985. Among the cases incident during the period 1985 to 1989, bladder, prostate, colon, corpus uteri, rectum and stomach cancers, for which the proportion of graded cases exceeded 50%, were analyzed. Overall, 5,923 cancer cases were included. Ten-year relative survival rates by grade were computed. Results Overall, data on histologic grading was available only for 38% of cases. The sites most frequently graded were urinary bladder (80%), prostate (73%), colon (71%), corpus uteri (69%), rectum (65%) and stomach (56%). For all the cancer sites analyzed, the 10-year relative survival rates increased as the histologic grading improved. The grade distribution resulted related also to the disease extension, more limited the extension higher the proportion of well differentiated cases. Conclusions Due to the evidenced importance of histologic grading as a valuable prognostic factor, it should be requested by clinicians and reported by pathologists more frequently than has been done in the area.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2514-2520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Björkholm ◽  
Lotta Ohm ◽  
Sandra Eloranta ◽  
Åsa Derolf ◽  
Malin Hultcrantz ◽  
...  

Purpose Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) management changed dramatically with the development of imatinib mesylate (IM), the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. In Sweden, the drug was approved in November 2001. We report relative survival (RS) of patients with CML diagnosed during a 36-year period. Patients and Methods Using data from the population-based Swedish Cancer Registry and population life tables, we estimated RS for all patients diagnosed with CML from 1973 to 2008 (n = 3,173; 1,796 males and 1,377 females; median age, 62 years). Patients were categorized into five age groups and five calendar periods, the last being 2001 to 2008. Information on use of upfront IM was collected from the Swedish CML registry. Results Relative survival improved with each calendar period, with the greatest improvement between 1994-2000 and 2001-2008. Five-year cumulative relative survival ratios (95% Cls) were 0.21 (0.17 to 0.24) for patients diagnosed 1973-1979, 0.54 (0.50 to 0.58) for 1994-2000, and 0.80 (0.75 to 0.83) for 2001-2008. This improvement was confined to patients younger than 79 years of age. Five-year RSRs for patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2008 were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.94) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.47) for patients younger than 50 and older than 79 years, respectively. Men had inferior outcome. Upfront overall use of IM increased from 40% (2002) to 84% (2006). Only 18% of patients older than 80 years of age received IM as first-line therapy. Conclusion This large population-based study shows a major improvement in outcome of patients with CML up to 79 years of age diagnosed from 2001 to 2008, mainly caused by an increasing use of IM. The elderly still have poorer outcome, partly because of a limited use of IM.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 355-355
Author(s):  
Oxana V. Makarova-Rusher ◽  
Susanna Varkey Ulahannan ◽  
Austin G. Duffy ◽  
Tim F. Greten ◽  
Sean Altekruse

355 Background: Transplant, resection, and ablation are potentially curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with limited outcome data in young-old (65-74) and older (≥75) patients. Methods: We evaluated curative treatment and relative survival (RS) outcomes in patients with HCC in 3 age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years). Patients with HCC diagnostic codes (histology 8,170-8,175, morphology C22) were identified in the SEER 18 database from 2000 to 2011. Treatments included curative (transplant, resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and other ablations) and palliative therapies. Primary outcome was 5 year RS. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Chi-Square tests. Results: We identified 29,654 cases. The mean age was 62 years with almost 40% of HCC cases in patients over 65 years old. Potentially curable, localized stage rates were similar in all age groups, 46%, 48% and 46%, respectively. As a result of less resection and rare transplant use, fewer cases underwent curative treatments in the group 75 years and older in comparison to all other age groups (15% vs. 27%, p = 0.001). Five-year RS in all 3 age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years) was better after resection relative to RFA (47% vs. 35% p<0.0001, 44% vs. 37%, p=0.0093, and 43% vs. 28% p=0.0002). The highest survival was seen after liver transplant. Interestingly, among transplanted patients with HCC, 13% were 65-75 years old. Five-year RS was similar in transplanted patients 65-75 vs. those under 65 (76% vs 74% p=0.65). Conclusions: The use of curative treatments for HCC significantly decreases with age, yet there are clear survival benefits in elderly patients receiving such. Even when considering transplant, the data shows that outcome is as good in elderly patients as in younger patients. The benefit of hepatic resection appears to be superior compared to RFA in all age groups, in our analysis. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2639-2639
Author(s):  
Jayadev Manikkam Umakanthan ◽  
Dipesh Uprety ◽  
Vineela Kasireddy

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is an antineoplastic agent that acts through protease inhibition. Since, its approval in 2003 by U.S. Food and Drug administration, it has been used religiously for multiple myeloma. There is no current population based study that assesses the survival benefit in multiple myeloma from bortezomib. We conducted a population based study to evaluate the relative survival rates in multiple myeloma patients in pre and post-Bortezomib era in the United States. Methods: We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry database to compare five-year relative survival rates (RS) among multiple myeloma patients. The study arms were categorized by gender (male and female), race (Caucasians and African-Americans) and age (20-59, ≥60 years). The RS were compared between pre-bortezomib era (1991-2002) and post-bortezomib era (2004-2011). The survival rate accompanied standard errors and the statistical significance was defined as p value <0.05. Results: The database comprised of 57,328 patients. The RS have improved significantly during post-bortezomib era in all cohorts under consideration. There was no significant difference in survival rate between male and female and between the African American and Caucasian. However, the relative survival was much better with the young adult (20-59 years) as compared to adult ≥60 years. The table detailing the relative survival is given below. Conclusion: The Primary treatment protocols for Multiple Myeloma have changed dramatically since the approval of Bortezomib in 2003. Other novel agents introduced in the last decade include thalidomide, Lenalidomide and liposomal doxorubicin that are used in conjunction with Bortezomib. Survival trends continue to improve and we believe this modest improvement in survival rate is mainly due to the introduction of Bortezomib and other novel agents. The next challenge is to find new drugs which would prevent relapses and further prolong survival. Abstract 2639. Table.Study armSubclass of cohortsPre-bortezomib era (1991-2002)Post- bortezomib era (2004-2011)Z scoreP ValueNRS (%)Relative Standard Error (SE) (%)NRS (%)Relative Standard Error (SE) (%) GenderMale13,06634.60.517,76546.10.615.904<0.0001Female11,58032.10.514,91743.70.614.765<0.0001 RaceCaucasian18,83632.90.423,98145.00.519.259<0.0001African American4,27434.70.86,39145.10.98.488<0.0001 Age group20-596,35848.10.69,43960.20.712.920<0.0001>=6018,28827.80.423,24338.40.516.606<0.0001 Total: male and female: 1991-2002; 24,646, RS 33.4%; SE 0.3%; 2004-2011; 32,682, RS 45.0%, SE 0.4%; Z score 21.766, P value <0.0001. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1747-1747
Author(s):  
Amir Bista ◽  
Bahman Shafii ◽  
Binay K. Shah

Abstract Background Rituximab was approved by FDA as first line agent for treatment of advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) on February 2006. We conducted this population based study to determine if the results from clinical trials have translated into survival benefit in general population. Methods We selected patients with advanced diffuse large B cell lymphoma (Distant stage based on LRD Summary Staging 1998+ in SEER*Stat) from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database (1973-2010), and calculated relative survival rates for patients diagnosed from 2002-2005(pre-rituximab) and March 2006 to 2009 (post-rituximab). We used Z-test in the SEER*Stat to compare the relative survival rates in cohorts categorized by race (white, black and other), gender, and age groups (<60 and 60+). The “Cansurv” software, and specifically, Cox proportional hazard function were used to investigate the influence of age (<60 ; 60+ years), sex (male; female), race (white; black; others) and marital status (married; single; separated/divorced/widowed) on the relative survival. Results A total of 15627 patients with advanced stage DLBCL as the only primary cancer were identified. Patients were predominantly white of non-Hispanic, non-Spanish/non-Latino origin, males, belonging to the older age category and married. The median age at the diagnosis was 65 years. One-year relative survival in ‘Whites’ and ‘Others’ improved significantly in post-rituximab era compared to pre-rituximab era (64.80 ± 0.6% vs 61.3 ± 0.6%; p= 0.0002 and 64.5 ± 1.9% vs 54.9 ± 2.2%; p= 0.0011, respectively). Also, three year relative survival improved significantly in ‘Whites’ and ‘Others’ in post-rituximab era compared to pre-rituximab era (53.7 ± 0.7% vs 50.3 ± 0.7%; p= 0.0001 and 52.0 ± 2.3% vs 40.8 ± 2.3%; p= 0.0002, respectively). However, no significant improvement were observed in one-year and three-year relative survival in blacks, during post rituximab era comapared to pre-rituximab era. Interestingly, in pre-rituximab era, relative survival in blacks was comparable to that of whites, but it was significantly better than that of others (p<.05). Although there was significant improvement in one- and three-year relative survival in young females, old males and old females, no significant improvement (p>.05) in survival was observed in the young males. Factors such as young age, female sex, non-Hispanic origin, white race, married status and post-rituximab era were associated with significantly better survival (p<.05). Conclusion The relative survival rates among young males and black patients with advanced diffuse large B cell lymphoma has not improved during post-rituximab era. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Lim ◽  
C. Fitzgerald ◽  
S. Gill ◽  
B. Melosky ◽  
C. Speers ◽  
...  

4077 Background: Over the past 10 years, chemotherapeutic options for MCRC has significantly expanded from 5-FU based therapy, to include irinotecan and oxaliplatin. The effect of the availability of these treatments on overall survival is evaluated among patients in 3 time cohorts referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer referred to the BCCA in 1995/96, 2000 and 2003/04 were included. In 1995/96, 5-FU was the only palliative chemotherapy agent available at BCCA and irinotecan and oxaliplatin were available in 2000 and 2003, respectively. A one year period was used for the irinotecan cohort to minimize overlap between groups. Overall survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan Meier method. Survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of distant metastatic disease to either death or last contact date. Results: Cohorts were generally similar, however, a significantly higher proportion of patients received chemotherapy in more recent eras ( Table 1 ). Only 25% of patients received both irinotecan and oxaliplatin in 2003/4 and only 10 % received biologic therapies. An improvement in median survival of 3.6 months was observed. The improvement in the treated subgroup was 4.2 months. Outcomes of patients untreated with chemotherapy were unchanged between cohorts. Conclusions: In this population based study, the proportion of patients with MCRC treated with chemotherapy significantly increased between 1995/6 and 2000/2003/4. Patients treated with chemotherapy experienced a 4.2 month increase in median survival in 2003/4 compared to 1995/6. Survival improvements were only significant in the time period when all three effective chemotherapies (5FU, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) were available. As bevacizumab was not available until 2006, its survival impact in this population is not yet known. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2069-2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jigisha P. Thakkar ◽  
Therese A. Dolecek ◽  
Andra M Popa ◽  
John L. Villano

2069 Background: Race-based outcomes have been documented for inpatient hospital care for glioblastoma (GBM), however, SEER-based population studies do not replicate the differences in race for outcomes in GBM. Moreover, most advanced cancers demonstrate differences in race based outcomes. We hypothesized that there is a difference in race based outcomes for GBM with advanced clinical involvement preventing an established standard of care such as radiation therapy (RT). Methods: We analyzed survival estimates and procedure frequencies by race for GBM patients (n=4931) 20 years and older, not treated with radiation in the initial round of therapy; from 2000-2008, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 registries database and listed them by surgery type. Kaplan–Meier relative survival rates were calculated by surgery type and race group (blacks and whites) followed by evaluation of association between race and survival rate. Race comparisons were limited to 1 year because of small numbers in the subgroups. Results: We found no statistically significant support for a racial disparity in survival among GBM patients with different surgical interventions (tumor destruction/biopsy, partial or total resection). However, for those receiving no surgery (and no RT), blacks actually had better one-year survival than whites. By surgery, those receiving gross total resection had higher survival in both blacks and whites. In whites only, any type of surgery (tumor destruction/biopsy, partial or total resection) had better survival than none. Conclusions: Overall, there are no statistically significant differences between blacks and whites in terms of survival in GBM patients not receiving RT in the initial round of therapy. Differences in race based care for GBM have not been found outside of inpatient hospital based care, which is unusual for an aggressive cancer needing specialized multi-modality care. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document