Curative treatments and survival benefit in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A SEER population-based analysis.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 355-355
Author(s):  
Oxana V. Makarova-Rusher ◽  
Susanna Varkey Ulahannan ◽  
Austin G. Duffy ◽  
Tim F. Greten ◽  
Sean Altekruse

355 Background: Transplant, resection, and ablation are potentially curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with limited outcome data in young-old (65-74) and older (≥75) patients. Methods: We evaluated curative treatment and relative survival (RS) outcomes in patients with HCC in 3 age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years). Patients with HCC diagnostic codes (histology 8,170-8,175, morphology C22) were identified in the SEER 18 database from 2000 to 2011. Treatments included curative (transplant, resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and other ablations) and palliative therapies. Primary outcome was 5 year RS. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Chi-Square tests. Results: We identified 29,654 cases. The mean age was 62 years with almost 40% of HCC cases in patients over 65 years old. Potentially curable, localized stage rates were similar in all age groups, 46%, 48% and 46%, respectively. As a result of less resection and rare transplant use, fewer cases underwent curative treatments in the group 75 years and older in comparison to all other age groups (15% vs. 27%, p = 0.001). Five-year RS in all 3 age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years) was better after resection relative to RFA (47% vs. 35% p<0.0001, 44% vs. 37%, p=0.0093, and 43% vs. 28% p=0.0002). The highest survival was seen after liver transplant. Interestingly, among transplanted patients with HCC, 13% were 65-75 years old. Five-year RS was similar in transplanted patients 65-75 vs. those under 65 (76% vs 74% p=0.65). Conclusions: The use of curative treatments for HCC significantly decreases with age, yet there are clear survival benefits in elderly patients receiving such. Even when considering transplant, the data shows that outcome is as good in elderly patients as in younger patients. The benefit of hepatic resection appears to be superior compared to RFA in all age groups, in our analysis. [Table: see text]

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15643-e15643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nibash Budhathoki ◽  
Binay Kumar Shah

e15643 Background: Sorafinib was approved for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in 2007. This study was conducted to study relative survival in elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in presorafinib and sorafinib era. Methods: We selected elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (distant metastasis based on SEER’s LRD staging) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed during January 2000 to December 2013. We calculated one year and five year relative survival rates in pre- (2000-2006) and post- sorafinib (2008-2013) era by sex and ethnicity (Caucasians, African-Americans (AA) & Other) using SEER*Stat software. Results: There were total of 1533 patients in presorafinib era and 1694 patients in postsorafinib era. Of the total population, 71.30% were male and 28.70% female, 71% were Caucasian, 10% African-American and 19% were other race. Median age of patients was 73 years (65-99 years) and medial follow up period was 3 months (0-167 months) Survival rates improved significantly from pre- to post- sorafenib era (1 year RS: 10.60% ±0.80% vs 12.10±0.90%, p value = 0.001; 5 year RS: 1.10%±0.30% vs 1.8%±0.6%, p value = 0.001 ). The survival rate improved significantly for male (1 year RS: 11.60%±1.00% vs 12.30%±1.00%, p value = 0.006; 5 year RS: 1.00%±0.40% vs 1.3%± 0.6% , p value = 0.007) and Caucasian (1 year RS: 10.60%±1.00% vs 12.60%±1.10%, p value = 0.0008; 5 year RS: RS = 1.20%±0.40% vs 1.4%±0.7%, P value = 0.001) patients in post sorafenib era. There was no significant difference in the survival rates among any other cohorts examined.However in black (N = 153 vs 158 , RS = 6.80%±2.10% vs 7.80%±2.40% , p value = 0.77) or other races (N = 311 vs 311, RS = 12.20%±1.90% vs 12.80%±2.10%, p value = 0.30 ) , no significant improvement in survival was noted. Conclusions: Our study showed that relative survival rates of elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with distant metastasis has improved in the post-sorafenib compared to pre-sorafenib era. The improvement in survival is limited to male and Caucasian patients.


Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico N De Toni ◽  
Anne Schlesinger-Raab ◽  
Martin Fuchs ◽  
Wolfgang Schepp ◽  
Ursula Ehmer ◽  
...  

ObjectiveHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of death worldwide and its incidence is expected to increase globally. Aim of this study was to assess whether the implementation of screening policies and the improvement of treatment options translated into a real-world survival benefit in HCC patients.Design4078 patients diagnosed with HCC between 1998 and 2016 from the Munich Cancer Registry were analysed. Tumour characteristics and outcome were analysed by time period and according to age and presence of metastases at diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was analysed using Kaplan-Meier method and relative survival (RS) was computed for cancer-specific survival. Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to control for prognostic variables.ResultsWhile incidence of HCC remained substantially stable, tumours were diagnosed at increasingly earlier stages, although the median age at diagnosis increased. The 3 years RS in HCC improved from 19.8% in 1998–2002, 22.4% in 2003–2007, 30.6% in 2008–2012 up to 31.0% in 2013–2016. Median OS increased from 6 months in 1998–2002 to 12 months in 2008–2016. However, analysis according to the metastatic status showed that survival improved only in patients without metastases at diagnosis whereas the prognosis of patients with metastatic disease remained unchanged.ConclusionThese real-world data show that, in contrast to the current assumptions, the incidence of HCC did not increase in a representative German region. Earlier diagnosis, likely related to the implementation of screening programmes, translated into an increasing employment of effective therapeutic options and a clear survival benefit in patients without metastases at diagnosis, irrespective of age.


ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza ◽  
María Milagros Bernal ◽  
Javier Jerez Roig ◽  
Maria Paula Curado

Objective. This paper aims at studying oropharyngeal cancer survival from the Population-Based Cancer Registry of Zaragoza, Spain, for the 1978–2002 period. Methods. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the automated calculation method of the Catalan Institute of Oncology was utilized to obtain the relative survival. Results. The oropharyngeal cancer survival rate was 61.3% in the first year and 33.9% in the fifth year. One-year relative survival was 62.2% (CI 95%: 57.4–67.4), and five-year relative survival was 36.6% (CI 95%: 31.8–42.1). Comparison of survival rates by sex revealed statistically significant differences (P value = 0.017) with better survival in women. There were no differences when comparing the three age groups and the three studied time periods 1978–1986, 1987–1994, and 1995–2002. Conclusions. The data suggests that there were no significant changes in oropharyngeal cancer survival in the province of Zaragoza throughout the years.


Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Rao ◽  
Junjie Hua ◽  
Ruotong Li ◽  
Yanhong Fu ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  

Recent changes in population-based prevalence for circulatory system diseases (CSDs) remain unreported either nationally or locally for China. Data were from the two-round health service household interview survey of Hunan Province, China, in 2013 and 2018. A Rao–Scott chi-square test was performed to examine prevalence differences across socio-demographic variables. The overall age-standardized prevalence of CSDs increased substantially between 2013 and 2018 for inhabitants aged 20 years and older (14.25% vs. 21.25%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.24–2.04). Hypertensive disease was the most prevalent type of CSD, accounting for 87.24% and 83.83% of all CSDs in 2013 and in 2018, respectively. After controlling for other socio-demographic factors, the prevalence of CSDs was significantly higher in 2018 (adjusted OR = 1.40), urban residents (adjusted OR = 1.43), females (adjusted OR = 1.12) and older age groups (adjusted OR = 5.36 for 50–59 years, 9.51 for 60–69 years, 15.19 for 70–79 years, and 12.90 for 80 years and older) than in 2013, rural residents, males and the youngest age group (20–49 years). The recent increase in the overall age-standardized CSD prevalence and the large prevalence disparities across urban/rural residents, sex and age groups merit the attention of policymakers and researchers. Further prevention efforts are needed to curb the increasing tendency and to reduce the prevalence of disparities across socio-demographic groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 722
Author(s):  
Christoph Wohlmuth ◽  
Iris Wohlmuth-Wieser

The aim of this study is to assess the projected incidence and prognostic indicators of gynecologic malignancies in the pediatric population. In this population-based retrospective cohort study, girls ≤18 years with ovarian, uterine, cervical, vaginal and vulvar malignancies diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-18 registry. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS). The age-adjusted annual incidence of gynecologic malignancies was 6.7 per 1,000,000 females, with neoplasms of the ovary accounting for 87.5%, vagina 4.5%, cervix 3.9%, uterus 2.5% and vulva 1.6% of all gynecologic malignancies. Malignant germ-cell tumors represented the most common ovarian neoplasm, with an increased incidence in children from 5–18 years. Although certain subtypes were associated with advanced disease stages, the 10-year OS rate was 96.0%. Sarcomas accounted for the majority of vaginal, cervical, uterine and vulvar malignancies. The majority of vaginal neoplasms were observed in girls between 0–4 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 86.1%. Overall, gynecologic malignancies accounted for 4.2% of all malignancies in girls aged 0–18 years and the histologic subtypes and prognosis differed significantly from patients in older age groups.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii321-iii321
Author(s):  
Muriel Hart ◽  
Amy Mellies ◽  
Alina Beltrami ◽  
Ahmed Gilani ◽  
Adam Green

Abstract BACKGROUND Congenital (&lt;3 months) and infant (3 to 11 months) brain tumors are biologically different from tumors in older children, but epidemiology of these tumors has not been studied comprehensively. Insight into epidemiological differences could help tailor treatment recommendations by age and increase overall survival (OS). METHODS Population-based data from the SEER 18 registries was obtained for 14,493 0-19-year-olds diagnosed with CNS tumors between 1990 and 2015. Incidence, treatment, and survival were analyzed using Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS Between the &lt;3 month, 3–5 month, 6–11 month, and 1–19 year age groups, tumor type distribution differed significantly (p&lt;0.001); high-grade glioma (HGG) was most common in the &lt;3-month-olds, while low-grade glioma (LGG) was most common in the other groups. 5-year OS for all tumors was 36.7% (&lt;3 months), 56.0% (&lt;3–5 months), 63.8% (6–11 months), and 74.7% (1–19 years) (log rank p&lt;0.001). OS by tumor type was worst for &lt;3-month-olds with LGG, medulloblastoma, and other embryonal tumors; OS was worst for 3-5-month-olds with ependymoma, &lt;1-year-olds collectively with atypical teratoid-rhabdoid tumor, and 1-19-year-olds with HGG (log rank p&lt;0.02 for all tumor types). &lt;3-month-olds were least likely to receive any treatment for each tumor type and least likely to undergo surgery for all except HGG. &lt;1-year-olds were far less likely than 1-19-year-olds to undergo radiation for embryonal tumors, as expected, but were also less likely to undergo chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Congenital/infant CNS tumors differ pathologically, therapeutically, and prognostically from those in older children. Treatment changes could help address poorer outcomes for these young patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanghui Wen ◽  
Hui Su ◽  
Wuke Wang ◽  
Feng Ren ◽  
Haitao Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: NBEAL2 is a member of the BEACH domain–containing protein (BDCP) family and little is known about the relationship between NBEAL2 and malignancy.Methods: We downloaded the Gene expression profiles and clinical data of Liver hepatocellular carcinoma(LIHC) form the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. The expression difference of NBEAL2 in LIHC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues was analyzed by R software. The relationship between NBEAL2 expression and clinicopathological parameters was evaluate by Chi-square test. The effect of NBEAL2 expression on survival were assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model. GSEA was used to explore the potential molecular mechanism of NBEAL2 in LIHC.Results: Up-regulation of NBEAL2 expression was detected in the LIHC tissue compared with adjacent nontumor tissues(P < 0.001). The chi-square test showed that no significant correlation between the expression level of NBEAL2 and various clinicopathological parameters (including T, N and M classifications) were detected. The Kaplan–Meier curves suggested that lower NBEAL2 expression was related with poor prognosis. The results of Multivariate analysis revealed that a lower expression of NBEAL2 in LIHC was an independent risk of poor overall survival (HR, 8.873; 95% CI, 1.159-67.936; P = 0.035). GSEA suggested that multiple tumor-related metabolic pathways were evidently enriched in samples with the low-NBEAL2 expression phenotype. Conlusion: NBEAL2 might act as an tumor suppressor gene in the progression of LIHC but the precise role of NBELA2 in LIHC needs further vertification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiu-Qiang Zhang ◽  
Pan-Yi-Sha Wu ◽  
Mugahed ALBahde ◽  
Lu-Fei Zhang ◽  
Zhu-Ha Zhou ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 990-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Sjöberg ◽  
Cat Halthur ◽  
Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Ulla Axdorph Nygell ◽  
...  

Abstract In recent decades, attention has focused on reducing long-term, treatment-related morbidity and mortality in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). In the present study, we looked for trends in relative survival for all patients diagnosed with HL in Sweden from 1973-2009 (N = 6949; 3985 men and 2964 women; median age, 45 years) and followed up for death until the end of 2010. Patients were categorized into 6 age groups and 5 calendar periods (1973-1979, 1980-1986, 1987-1994, 1994-2000, and 2001-2009). Relative survival improved in all age groups, with the greatest improvement in patients 51-65 years of age (P < .0005). A plateau in relative survival was observed in patients below 65 years of age during the last calendar period, suggesting a reduced long-term, treatment-related mortality. The 10-year relative survival for patients diagnosed in 2000-2009 was 0.95, 0.96, 0.93, 0.80, and 0.44 for the age groups 0-18, 19-35, 36-50, 51-65, and 66-80, respectively. Therefore, despite progress, age at diagnosis remains an important prognostic factor (P < .0005). Advances in therapy for patients with limited and advanced-stage HL have contributed to an increasing cure rate. In addition, our findings support that long-term mortality of HL therapy has decreased. Elderly HL patients still do poorly, and targeted treatment options associated with fewer side effects will advance the clinical HL field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document