Information-seeking Behaviors of Podiatric Physicians

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Perzeski
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Internet Survey ◽  
State University ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Kent State University ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Information Seeking Behaviors

Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the information-seeking behaviors of podiatric physicians as they search for answers to clinical questions that arise during patient care visits. Methods: Invitations to participate in an Internet survey were e-mailed to alumni of the Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine (now Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine [KSUCPM]). Twenty-nine questions surveyed the types and frequency of information that podiatric physicians need during patient care visits, which information resources are used by podiatric physicians, and which barriers podiatric physicians encounter when seeking information in general. Results: With 143 completed surveys, results of this study indicate a preference for searching the Internet over using colleagues and print literature. The most common need is for drug information, and common barriers include lack of time and cost of accessing information. Results are similar to those for physicians and other health-care providers seeking information. Conclusions: Podiatrists recognize the need to become proficient at locating high-quality information, evaluating resources, and improving their understanding and use of resources on evidence-based medicine. Furthermore, with an increased awareness of their own behaviors, practicing podiatric physicians should pursue the best methods to find, judge, and use medical information for patient care. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(6): 451–462, 2012)

scholarly journals Continuity of care in Ghana: the promise of smart-med

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 473
Author(s):  
Henry Ogoe ◽  
Odame Agyapong ◽  
Fredrick Troas Lutterodt
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Personal Health Records ◽  
Personal Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Fragmentation Of Care

Individuals tend to receive medical care from different health care providers as they drift from one location to another. Oftentimes, multiple providers operate disparate systems of managing patients medical records. These disparate systems, which are unable to share and/or exchange information, have the propensity to create fragmentation of care, which poses a serious threat to the realization of continuity of care in the Ghanaian health care delivery. Continuity of care, which is the ability to seamlessly access, update, and manage patients medical information as they visit multiple providers, is a crucial component of quality of care in any health delivery system. The current system of managing patients records in Ghanapaper-basedmakes continuity of care difficult to actualize. To this end, we have developed a smartcard based personal health records system, SMART-MED, which can effectively promote continuity of care in Ghana. SMART-MED is platform-independent; it can run as standalone or configured to plug into any Java-based electronic medical record system. Results of a lab simulation test suggest that it can effectively promote continuity of care through improved data security, support interoperability for disparate systems, and seamless access and update of patients health records. Keywords: Continuity of Care, Fragmentation of Care, Interoperability, Personal Health Records, Smartcard.

scholarly journals Examining the role of MEDLINE as a patient care information resource: an analysis of data from the Value of Libraries study

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathel Dunn ◽  
Joanne Gard Marshall ◽  
Amber L. Wells ◽  
Joyce E. B. Backus
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Information Resource ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Other Information

Objective: This study analyzed data from a study on the value of libraries to understand the specific role that the MEDLINE database plays in relation to other information resources that are available to health care providers and its role in positively impacting patient care.Methods: A previous study on the use of health information resources for patient care obtained 16,122 responses from health care providers in 56 hospitals about how providers make decisions affecting patient care and the role of information resources in that process. Respondents indicated resources used in answering a specific clinical question from a list of 19 possible resources, including MEDLINE. Study data were examined using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to determine the number of information resources used and how they were used in combination with one another.Results: Health care professionals used 3.5 resources, on average, to aid in patient care. The 2 most frequently used resources were journals (print and online) and the MEDLINE database. Using a higher number of information resources was significantly associated with a higher probability of making changes to patient care and avoiding adverse events. MEDLINE was the most likely to be among consulted resources compared to any other information resource other than journals.Conclusions: MEDLINE is a critical clinical care tool that health care professionals use to avoid adverse events, make changes to patient care, and answer clinical questions.

Breaking bad news in the oncologic population: Residents' perspective.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24113-e24113
Author(s):  
Vihitha Thota ◽  
Mahati Paravathaneni ◽  
Sudheer Konduru ◽  
Bohdan Baralo ◽  
Sana Mulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Bad News ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prior Training ◽  
Oncologic Patients ◽  
Delivering Bad News

e24113 Background: Delivering bad news to patients is a delicate but required skill for doctors as part of patient care. There has been evidence that good communication from health care providers can improve patients' compliance to treatment as well as be beneficial emotionally. While many studies have been done in regards to patients' perceptions of receiving bad news, there are limited studies looking at a physicians' perspective, and even more so concerning residents' perceptions. In community hospitals, many patients are diagnosed with cancer, and resident physicians are often responsible for informing the patients and their families regarding the diagnosis. The manner in which the news is delivered is important, however it is unclear how much training is provided to residents before they are required to break bad news to patients. The lack of training can often result in improper delivery and poor patient care. Methods: We surveyed Internal Medicine and General Surgery residents at Mercy Catholic Medical Center, a conglomeration of two community teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, about prior training, confidence level, attitudes, and need for further education on delivering bad news to oncologic patients using a survey created after extensive research. The factors associated with confidence level were analyzed using paired T-test and ANOVA methods. Results: A total of 65 residents (72%) participated. No statistical significance was seen between American versus foreign medical graduates, MD vs. DO residents, or among those in different specialties when assessing their confidence in delivering bad news. Though only 62% of participants reported having had prior training in delivering bad news, residents with previous training (p1) or who have had to deliver bad news previously (p2) reported higher confidence when it came to delivering a new diagnosis of cancer (p1 0.03, p2 0.001), delivering news regarding the progression of cancer (p1 0.03, p2 0.02), delivering news regarding the recurrence of cancer (p1 0.04, p2 0.002), and delivering news regarding end-stage cancer with little to no treatment options left (p1 0.04, p2 0.003). 100% of participants thought communicating bad news is an important skill for a physician, and 92% of participants thought further education would help prepare them for similar scenarios in the future. Simulated patient scenarios (64%), grand rounds lectures/presentations (59%), and feedback from faculty after actual patient scenarios (57%) were the most requested whereas pamphlets/brochures (17%) and online training courses (20%) were less popular. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of prior training or exposure among residents in being able to deliver bad news to patients effectively. We propose that implementing further training in the form of simulated scenarios and lectures can improve residents' confidence at delivering bad news and result in a better physician-patient relationship.

Critical Aspects of a Sustainable Clinical Research Program in the Community-Based Oncology Practice

2019 ◽  
pp. 176-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Ersek ◽  
Stephanie L. Graff ◽  
Francis P. Arena ◽  
Neelima Denduluri ◽  
Edward S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Technological Infrastructure ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Research Programs

Increasing enrollment into clinical trials is a top priority across the field of oncology. Because the vast majority of those afflicted with cancer receive their care in the community, creating strong clinical research programs in the community-based setting is important. This article comprehensively outlines the most important elements of creating and sustaining a successful community-based research program. Establishing a clear mission and defining the scope of the research program in collaboration with key physicians and administrative leadership are critical to success. Standard operating procedures should detail operational processes. Ensuring sound financial planning and protected physician time are crucial for a healthy program. Providing mentorship opportunities to investigators and other team members will provide necessary guidance for junior investigators and long-term program stability. Prioritizing provider and patient volunteer engagement through education and awareness will potentially improve enrollment and research ownership. Incorporating administrative and clinical research staff and health care providers, including physicians, advanced practice providers, and pharmacists, will result in a multidisciplinary and unified approach and may also promote research as a routine part of patient care. Regular safety and scientific meetings will reduce regulatory complications and, most importantly, improve patient care. Other keys to a successful program include establishing a diverse trial portfolio, collaboration between different institutions, and ensuring appropriate technological infrastructure. Serial programmatic review provides opportunities to refine suboptimal practices and recognize successful strategies. Community-based research programs are critical to improve access to optimal cancer care. Implementation of successful programs is possible with a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach.

scholarly journals Literacy, Numeracy, and Health Information Seeking Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Yamashita ◽  
Anthony R. Bardo ◽  
Darren Liu ◽  
Phyllis A. Cummins
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Information Seeking ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Nationally Representative

Objectives: Health literacy is often viewed as an essential skill set for successfully seeking health information to make health-related decisions. However, this general understanding has yet to be established with the use of nationally representative data. The objective of this study was to provide the first nationally representative empirical evidence that links health information seeking behaviors with health literacy among middle-age to older adults in the United States. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2012/2014 Program for the International Assessment of Adult Literacy (PIAAC). Our analytic sample is representative of adults age 45 to 74 years ( N = 2,989). Results: Distinct components of health literacy (i.e., literacy and numeracy) were uniquely associated with the use of different health information sources (e.g., health professionals, the Internet, television). Discussion: Findings should be useful for government agencies and health care providers interested in targeting health communications, as well as researchers who focus on health disparities.

Prescribing an App? Oncology Providers’ Views on Mobile Health Apps for Cancer Care

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Callie M. Berkowitz ◽  
Leah L. Zullig ◽  
Bridget F. Koontz ◽  
Sophia K. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Supportive Services ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Oncology Providers

Introduction Although there are over 500 mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) available for download in the field of oncology, little research has addressed their acceptability among health care providers. In addition, the providers’ perspectives regarding patient app use has been largely unexamined. We conducted a qualitative study to explore opportunities and barriers for mHealth app use for oncology care. Methods We developed a structured interview guide focusing on acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability of the use of apps in cancer care. We interviewed 15 oncology providers about their attitudes and preferences. De-identified audio recordings were transcribed and coded for emerging themes. Results Providers interviewed included physicians (n = 8) and advanced practice (n = 3) and supportive services (n = 4) providers who care for a wide range of cancer types; ages ranged from 32 to 68 years. Interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes. Oncology providers reported limited exposure to mHealth apps in patient care, but were generally open to recommending or prescribing apps in the future. Key themes included opportunities for mobile app use (including general health promotion, tracking symptoms, and engaging patients) and barriers to implementation (including access to technology, responsibility, workflow, and the source of the app itself). Conclusion Our results show openness among oncology providers to using mHealth technology as part of patient care, but concerns regarding implementation. Designing acceptable apps may be challenging and require involvement of key stakeholders, partnering with trustworthy institutions, and outcome-based research.

scholarly journals Making the Case for a P2P Personal Health Record

Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 512
Author(s):  
William Connor Horne ◽  
Zina Ben Miled
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Personal Health ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Client Server ◽  
Proposed Model

Improved health care services can benefit from a more seamless exchange of medical information between patients and health care providers. This exchange is especially important considering the increasing trends in mobility, comorbidity and outbreaks. However, current Electronic Health Records (EHR) tend to be institution-centric, often leaving the medical information of the patient fragmented and more importantly inaccessible to the patient for sharing with other health providers in a timely manner. Nearly a decade ago, several client–server models for personal health records (PHR) were proposed. The aim of these previous PHRs was to address data fragmentation issues. However, these models were not widely adopted by patients. This paper discusses the need for a new PHR model that can enhance the patient experience by making medical services more accessible. The aims of the proposed model are to (1) help patients maintain a complete lifelong health record, (2) facilitate timely communication and data sharing with health care providers from multiple institutions and (3) promote integration with advanced third-party services (e.g., risk prediction for chronic diseases) that require access to the patient’s health data. The proposed model is based on a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network as opposed to the client–server architecture of the previous PHR models. This architecture consists of a central index server that manages the network and acts as a mediator, a peer client for patients and providers that allows them to manage health records and connect to the network, and a service client that enables third-party providers to offer services to the patients. This distributed architecture is essential since it promotes ownership of the health record by the patient instead of the health care institution. Moreover, it allows the patient to subscribe to an extended range of personalized e-health services.

Using On-scene EMS Responders’ Assessment and Electronic Patient Care Records to Evaluate the Suitability of EMD-triaged, Low-acuity Calls for Secondary Nurse Triage in 911 Centers

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Scott ◽  
Jeff Clawson ◽  
Mark C. Fivaz ◽  
Jennie McQueen ◽  
Marie I. Gardett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Vital Sign ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Medical Dispatch ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Alpha Level ◽  
Nurse Triage

AbstractIntroductionUsing the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) – a systematic 911 triage process – to identify a large subset of low-acuity patients for secondary nurse triage in the 911 center is a largely unstudied practice in North America. This study examines the ALPHA-level subset of low-acuity patients in the MPDS to determine the suitability of these patients for secondary triage by evaluating vital signs and necessity of lights-and-siren transport, as determined by attending Emergency Medical Services (EMS) ambulance crews.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical status of MPDS ALPHA-level (low-acuity) patients, as determined by on-scene EMS crews’ patient care records, in two US agencies. A secondary objective was to determine which ALPHA-level codes are suitable candidates for secondary triage by a trained Emergency Communication Nurse (ECN).MethodsIn this retrospective study, one full year (2013) of both dispatch data and EMS patient records data, associated with all calls coded at the ALPHA-level (low-acuity) in the dispatch protocol, were collected. The primary outcome measure was the number and percentage of ALPHA-level codes categorized as low-acuity, moderate-acuity, high-acuity, and critical using four common vital signs to assign these categories: systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse rate (PR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Vital sign data were obtained from ambulance crew electronic patient care records (ePCRs). The secondary endpoint was the number and percentage of ALPHA-level codes that received a “hot” (lights-and-siren) transport.ResultsOut of 19,300 cases, 16,763 (86.9%) were included in the final analysis, after excluding cases from health care providers and those with missing data. Of those, 89% of all cases did not have even one vital sign indicator of unstable patient status (high or critical vital sign). Of all cases, only 1.1% were transported lights-and-siren.ConclusionWith the exception of the low-acuity, ALPHA-level seizure cases, the ALPHA-level patients are suitable to transfer for secondary triage in a best-practices, accredited, emergency medical dispatch center that utilizes the MPDS at very high compliance rates. The secondary nurse triage process should identify the few at-risk patients that exist in the low-acuity calls.ScottG, ClawsonJ, FivazMC, McQueenJ, GardettMI, SchultzB, YoungquistS, OlolaCHO. Using on-scene EMS responders’ assessment and electronic patient care records to evaluate the suitability of EMD-triaged, low-acuity calls for secondary nurse triage in 911 centers. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(1):46–57.

A Novel ICU Hand-Over Tool: The Glass Door of the Patient Room

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 514-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Wessman ◽  
Carrie Sona ◽  
Marilyn Schallom
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Night Shift ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Glass Door ◽  
Patient Handover ◽  
Communication Errors

Background: Poor communication among health-care providers is cited as the most common cause of sentinel events involving patients. Patient care in the critical care setting is incredibly complex. A consistent care plan is necessary between day/night shift teams and among bedside intensive care unit (ICU) nurses, consultants, and physicians. Our goal was to create a novel, easily accessible communication device to improve ICU patient care. Methods: This communication improvement project was done at an academic tertiary surgical/trauma/mixed 36-bed ICU with an average of 214 admissions per month. We created a glass door template embossed on the glass that included 3 columns for daily goals to be written: “day team,” “night team,” and “surgery/consultant team.” Assigned areas for tracking “lines,” “antibiotics,” “ventilator weaning,” and “Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) screening” were included. These doors are filled out/updated throughout the day by all of the ICU providers. All services can review current plans/active issues while evaluating the patient at the bedside. Patient-identifying data are not included. We retrospectively reviewed all ICU safety reported events over a 4-year period (2 years prior/2 years after glass door implementation) for specific handover communication-related errors and compared the 2 cohorts. Results: Information on the glass doors is entered daily on rounds by all services. Prior to implementation, 7.96% of reported errors were related to patient handover communication errors. The post glass-door era had 4.26% of reported errors related to patient handover communication errors with a relative risk reduction of 46.5%. Due to its usefulness, this method of communication was quickly adopted by the other critical care services (cardiothoracic, medical, neurology/neurosurgery, cardiology) at our institution and is now used for over 150 ICU beds. Conclusions: Our glass door patient handover tool is an easily adaptable intervention that has improved communication leading to an overall decrease in the number of handover communication errors.

scholarly journals The Use of Medical Records in Research: What Do Patients Want?

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Kass ◽  
Marvin R. Natowicz ◽  
Sara Chandros Hull ◽  
Ruth R. Faden ◽  
Laura Plantinga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
The Past ◽  
Growing Body

In the past ten years, there has been growing interest in and concern about protecting the privacy of personal medical information. Insofar as medical records increasingly are stored electronically, and electronic information can be shared easily and widely, there have been legislative efforts as well as scholarly analyses calling for greater privacy protections to ensure that patients can feel safe disclosing personal information to their health-care providers. At the same time, the volume of biomedical research conducted in this country continues to grow. The budget of the National Institutes of Health, for example, was $20,298 million in 2001, having more than doubled from a budget of $9,218 million 10 years before. This growing body of research includes increased efforts to use stored medical records as a source of data for health services, epidemiologic, and clinical studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document