scholarly journals DNA damage checkpoint activation impairs chromatin homeostasis and promotes mitotic catastrophe during aging

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M Crane ◽  
Adam E Russell ◽  
Brent J Schafer ◽  
Ben W Blue ◽  
Riley Whalen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Altered Cell ◽  
Histone Transcription ◽  
Cell Cycle Dynamics

Genome instability is a hallmark of aging and contributes to age-related disorders such as cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. The accumulation of DNA damage during aging has been linked to altered cell cycle dynamics and the failure of cell cycle checkpoints. Here, we use single cell imaging to study the consequences of increased genomic instability during aging in budding yeast and identify striking age-associated genome missegregation events. This breakdown in mitotic fidelity results from the age-related activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and the resulting degradation of histone proteins. Disrupting the ability of cells to degrade histones in response to DNA damage increases replicative lifespan and reduces genomic missegregations. We present several lines of evidence supporting a model of antagonistic pleiotropy in the DNA damage response where histone degradation, and limited histone transcription are beneficial to respond rapidly to damage but reduce lifespan and genomic stability in the long term.

scholarly journals Dynamics of age-related catastrophic mitotic failures and recovery in yeast

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Crane ◽  
Adam E. Russell ◽  
Brent J. Schafer ◽  
Mung Gi Hong ◽  
Joslyn E. Goings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Mother Cell ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Retrograde Transport ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Single Cell Imaging ◽  
Age Related

AbstractGenome instability is a hallmark of aging and contributes to age-related disorders such as progeria, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease. In particular, nuclear quality control mechanisms and cell cycle checkpoints have generally been studied in young cells and animals where they function optimally, and where genomic instability is low. Here, we use single cell imaging to study the consequences of increased genomic instability during aging, and identify striking age-associated genome missegregation events. During these events the majority of mother cell chromatin, and often both spindle poles, are mistakenly sent to the daughter cell. This breakdown in mitotic fidelity is accompanied by a transient cell cycle arrest that can persist for many hours, as cells engage a retrograde transport mechanism to return chromosomes to the mother cell. The repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) has been previously identified as being highly vulnerable to age-related replication stress and genomic instability, and we present several lines of evidence supporting a model whereby expansion of rDNA during aging results in nucleolar breakdown and competition for limited nucleosomes, thereby increasing risk of catastrophic genome missegregation.

scholarly journals Specific Role of Chk1 Phosphorylations in Cell Survival and Checkpoint Activation

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 2572-2581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Niida ◽  
Yuko Katsuno ◽  
Birendranath Banerjee ◽  
M. Prakash Hande ◽  
Makoto Nakanishi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Multifunctional Protein

ABSTRACT Chk1 is a multifunctional protein kinase that plays essential roles in cell survival and cell cycle checkpoints. Chk1 is phosphorylated at multiple sites by several protein kinases, but the precise effects of these phosphorylations are largely unknown. Using a knockout-knockin system, we examined the abilities of Chk1 mutants to reverse the defects of Chk1-null cells. Wild-type Chk1 could rescue all the defects of Chk1-null cells. Like endogenous Chk1, wild-type Chk1 localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus, and its centrosomal association was enhanced by DNA damage. The mutation at S345 resulted in mitotic catastrophe, impaired checkpoints, and loss of the ability to localize in the cytoplasm, but the mutant retained the ability to be released from chromatin upon encountering genotoxic stressors. In contrast, the mutation at S317 resulted in impaired checkpoints and loss of chromatin release upon encountering genotoxic stressors, but its mutant retained the abilities to prevent mitotic catastrophes and to localize in the cytoplasm, suggesting the distinct effects of these phosphorylations. The forced immobilization of S317A/S345A in centrosomes resulted in the prevention of apoptosis in the presence or absence of DNA damage. Thus, two-step phosphorylation of Chk1 at S317 and S345 appeared to be required for proper localization of Chk1 to centrosomes.

scholarly journals DNA Damage and L1 Retrotransposition

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan A. Farkash ◽  
Eline T. Luning Prak
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Barbara Mcclintock ◽  
L1 Element

Barbara McClintock was the first to suggest that transposons are a source of genome instability and that genotoxic stress assisted in their mobilization. The generation of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) is a severe form of genotoxic stress that threatens the integrity of the genome, activates cell cycle checkpoints, and, in some cases, causes cell death. Applying McClintock's stress hypothesis to humans, are L1 retrotransposons, the most active autonomous mobile elements in the modern day human genome, mobilized by DSBs? Here, evidence that transposable elements, particularly retrotransposons, are mobilized by genotoxic stress is reviewed. In the setting of DSB formation, L1 mobility may be affected by changes in the substrate for L1 integration, the DNA repair machinery, or the L1 element itself. The review concludes with a discussion of the potential consequences of L1 mobilization in the setting of genotoxic stress.

scholarly journals Adaptation to DNA damage as a bet-hedging mechanism in a fluctuating environment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Roux ◽  
Delphine Salort ◽  
Zhou Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Signalling Pathway ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Bet Hedging

AbstractIn response to DNA damage, efficient repair is essential for cell survival and genome integrity. In eukaryotes, the DNA damage checkpoint is a signalling pathway that coordinates this response and arrests the cell cycle to provide time for repair. However, when repair fails or when the damage is not repairable, cells can eventually bypass the DNA damage checkpoint and undergo cell division despite persistent damage, a process called adaptation to DNA damage. Interestingly, adaptation occurs with a delayed timing compared to repair and shows a large variation in time, two properties that may provide a survival advantage at the population level without interfering with repair. Here, we explore this idea by mathematically modelling cell survival in response to DNA damage and focusing on adaptation parameters. We find that the delayed adaptation timing indeed maximizes survival, but its heterogeneity is beneficial only in a fluctuating damage-inducing environment. Finally, we show that adaptation does not only contribute to survival but also to genome instability and mutations, which might represent another criterion for its selection through-out evolution. Overall, we propose that adaptation can act as a bet-hedging mechanism for cell survival in response to DNA damage.

scholarly journals Adaptation to DNA damage as a bet-hedging mechanism in a fluctuating environment

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 210460
Author(s):  
Pierre Roux ◽  
Delphine Salort ◽  
Zhou Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Signalling Pathway ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Bet Hedging

In response to DNA damage, efficient repair is essential for cell survival and genome integrity. In eukaryotes, the DNA damage checkpoint is a signalling pathway that coordinates this response and arrests the cell cycle to provide time for repair. However, when repair fails or when the damage is not repairable, cells can eventually bypass the DNA damage checkpoint and undergo cell division despite persistent damage, a process called adaptation to DNA damage. Interestingly, adaptation occurs with a delayed timing compared with repair and shows a large variation in time, two properties that may provide a survival advantage at the population level without interfering with repair. Here, we explore this idea by mathematically modelling cell survival in response to DNA damage and focusing on adaptation parameters. We find that the delayed adaptation timing indeed maximizes survival, but its heterogeneity is beneficial only in a fluctuating damage-inducing environment. Finally, we show that adaptation does not only contribute to survival but also to genome instability and mutations, which might represent another criterion for its selection throughout evolution. Overall, we propose that adaptation can act as a bet-hedging mechanism for cell survival in response to DNA damage.

Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (22) ◽  
pp. 3889-3896 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rhind ◽  
P. Russell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Recent Work ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Great Similarity ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Downstream Effectors

Recent work on the mechanisms of DNA damage and replication cell cycle checkpoints has revealed great similarity between the checkpoint pathways of organisms as diverse as yeasts, flies and humans. However, there are differences in the ways these organisms regulate their cell cycles. To connect the conserved checkpoint pathways with various cell cycle targets requires an adaptable link that can target different cell cycle components in different organisms. The Chk1 and Cds1 protein kinases, downstream effectors in the checkpoint pathways, seem to play just such roles. Perhaps more surprisingly, the two kinases not only have different targets in different organisms but also seem to respond to different signals in different organisms. So, whereas in fission yeast Chk1 is required for the DNA damage checkpoint and Cds1 is specifically involved in the replication checkpoint, their roles seem to be shuffled in metazoans.

scholarly journals Synthetic Lethal Targeting of Mitotic Checkpoints in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Y. Deneka ◽  
Margret B. Einarson ◽  
John Bennett ◽  
Anna S. Nikonova ◽  
Mohamed Elmekawy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
The Us ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Dual Inhibition

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) affect more than 800,000 people annually worldwide, causing over 15,000 deaths in the US. Among HNSCC cancers, human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC has the worst outcome, motivating efforts to improve therapy for this disease. The most common mutational events in HPV-negative HNSCC are inactivation of the tumor suppressors TP53 (>85%) and CDKN2A (>57%), which significantly impairs G1/S checkpoints, causing reliance on other cell cycle checkpoints to repair ongoing replication damage. We evaluated a panel of cell cycle-targeting clinical agents in a group of HNSCC cell lines to identify a subset of drugs with single-agent activity in reducing cell viability. Subsequent analyses demonstrated potent combination activity between the CHK1/2 inhibitor LY2606268 (prexasertib), which eliminates a G2 checkpoint, and the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 (adavosertib), which promotes M-phase entry, in induction of DNA damage, mitotic catastrophe, and apoptosis, and reduction of anchorage independent growth and clonogenic capacity. These phenotypes were accompanied by more significantly reduced activation of CHK1 and its paralog CHK2, and enhanced CDK1 activation, eliminating breaks on the mitotic entry of cells with DNA damage. These data suggest the potential value of dual inhibition of CHK1 and WEE1 in tumors with compromised G1/S checkpoints.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document