scholarly journals Role of the transcriptional regulator SP140 in resistance to bacterial infections via repression of type I interferons

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisy X Ji ◽  
Kristen C Witt ◽  
Dmitri I Kotov ◽  
Shally R Margolis ◽  
Alexander Louie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Viral Immunity ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Important Negative Regulator

Type I interferons (IFNs) are essential for anti-viral immunity, but often impair protective immune responses during bacterial infections. An important question is how type I IFNs are strongly induced during viral infections, and yet are appropriately restrained during bacterial infections. The Super susceptibility to tuberculosis 1 (Sst1) locus in mice confers resistance to diverse bacterial infections. Here we provide evidence that Sp140 is a gene encoded within the Sst1 locus that represses type I IFN transcription during bacterial infections. We generated Sp140-/- mice and find they are susceptible to infection by Legionella pneumophila and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Susceptibility of Sp140-/- mice to bacterial infection was rescued by crosses to mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (Ifnar-/-). Our results implicate Sp140 as an important negative regulator of type I IFNs that is essential for resistance to bacterial infections.

scholarly journals Role of the transcriptional regulator SP140 in resistance to bacterial infections via repression of type I interferons

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisy X. Ji ◽  
Kristen C. Witt ◽  
Dmitri I. Kotov ◽  
Shally R. Margolis ◽  
Alexander Louie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Responses ◽  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Viral Immunity ◽  
Type I Ifns

AbstractType I interferons (IFNs) are essential for anti-viral immunity, but often impair protective immune responses during bacterial infections. How type I IFNs are strongly induced during viral infections, and yet are appropriately restrained during bacterial infections, remains poorly understood. The Super susceptibility to tuberculosis 1 (Sst1) locus in mice confers resistance to many bacterial infections. Here we provide evidence that Sp140 is a gene encoded within the Sst1 locus that functions to repress the expression of type I IFNs during bacterial infections. We generated Sp140−/− mice and find they are susceptible to infection by diverse bacteria, including Listeria monocytogenes, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Susceptibility of Sp140−/− mice to bacterial infection was rescued by crosses to mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (Ifnar−/−). Our results implicate Sp140 as an important repressor of type I IFNs that is essential for resistance to bacterial infections.

scholarly journals Getting “Inside” Type I IFNs: Type I IFNs in Intracellular Bacterial Infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deann T. Snyder ◽  
Jodi F. Hedges ◽  
Mark A. Jutila
Keyword(s):  
Host Cell ◽  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Intracellular Bacteria ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Serovar Typhimurium

Type I interferons represent a unique and complex group of cytokines, serving many purposes during innate and adaptive immunity. Discovered in the context of viral infections, type I IFNs are now known to have myriad effects in infectious and autoimmune disease settings. Type I IFN signaling during bacterial infections is dependent on many factors including whether the infecting bacterium is intracellular or extracellular, as different signaling pathways are activated. As such, the repercussions of type I IFN induction can positively or negatively impact the disease outcome. This review focuses on type I IFN induction and downstream consequences during infection with the following intracellular bacteria:Chlamydia trachomatis,Listeria monocytogenes,Mycobacterium tuberculosis,Salmonella entericaserovar Typhimurium,Francisella tularensis,Brucella abortus,Legionella pneumophila, andCoxiella burnetii. Intracellular bacterial infections are unique because the bacteria must avoid, circumvent, and even co-opt microbial “sensing” mechanisms in order to reside and replicate within a host cell. Furthermore, life inside a host cell makes intracellular bacteria more difficult to target with antibiotics. Because type I IFNs are important immune effectors, modulating this pathway may improve disease outcomes. But first, it is critical to understand the context-dependent effects of the type I IFN pathway in intracellular bacterial infections.

scholarly journals DEAD-box RNA helicase 18 disrupts IRF3-binding to the interferon-β promoter

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaobo Xiao ◽  
Xun Xiao ◽  
Mohan Wang ◽  
Wenkai Zhao ◽  
Puxian Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infections ◽  
Rna Helicase ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Dead Box ◽  
Nuclear Factors ◽  
Important Negative Regulator ◽  
Antiviral Innate Immunity

The production of type I interferons (IFN-α/β) requires strict control to avoid excessive activation during viral infections. The binding of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) to the IFN-β promoter region in the nucleus is essential for IFN-β transcription; however, whether nuclear factors have important negative-regulatory roles in this process is largely unknown. By screening for IRF3-interacting partners in the nucleus, we identified DEAD-box RNA helicase 18 (DDX18) as an important negative regulator of intranuclear IRF3. Overexpression of DDX18 suppressed virus- and IRF3-induced IFN-β production, whereas knockdown of DDX18 expression or knockout of the DDX18 gene had opposite effects. Mechanistically, DDX18 interacts with IRF3 and decreases the binding of IRF3 to the IFN-β promoter after viral infection. DDX18 knockdown mice (Ddx18+/-) further demonstrated that DDX18 suppressed antiviral innate immunity in vivo. Thus, despite many members of the DDX family act as important positive regulators in the cytoplasm, DDX18 plays a unique "braking" role in balancing virus-induced type I IFN production.

scholarly journals Type I Interferon Production of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells under Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 4190
Author(s):  
Dóra Bencze ◽  
Tünde Fekete ◽  
Kitti Pázmándi
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Endogenous Factors ◽  
Associated Diseases ◽  
Type I Ifns

One of the most powerful and multifaceted cytokines produced by immune cells are type I interferons (IFNs), the basal secretion of which contributes to the maintenance of immune homeostasis, while their activation-induced production is essential to effective immune responses. Although, each cell is capable of producing type I IFNs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) possess a unique ability to rapidly produce large amounts of them. Importantly, type I IFNs have a prominent role in the pathomechanism of various pDC-associated diseases. Deficiency in type I IFN production increases the risk of more severe viral infections and the development of certain allergic reactions, and supports tumor resistance; nevertheless, its overproduction promotes autoimmune reactions. Therefore, the tight regulation of type I IFN responses of pDCs is essential to maintain an adequate level of immune response without causing adverse effects. Here, our goal was to summarize those endogenous factors that can influence the type I IFN responses of pDCs, and thus might serve as possible therapeutic targets in pDC-associated diseases. Furthermore, we briefly discuss the current therapeutic approaches targeting the pDC-type I IFN axis in viral infections, cancer, autoimmunity, and allergy, together with their limitations defined by the Janus-faced nature of pDC-derived type I IFNs.

scholarly journals In VivoConditions Enable IFNAR-Independent Type I Interferon Production by Peritoneal CD11b+Cells upon Thogoto Virus Infection

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (20) ◽  
pp. 9330-9337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Kochs ◽  
Martina Anzaghe ◽  
Stefanie Kronhart ◽  
Valentina Wagner ◽  
Patricia Gogesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virus Infection ◽  
Positive Feedback ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Type I Ifns

ABSTRACTType I interferons (IFNs) crucially contribute to host survival upon viral infections. Robust expression of type I IFNs (IFN-α/β) and induction of an antiviral state critically depend on amplification of the IFN signal via the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR). A small amount of type I IFN produced early upon virus infection binds the IFNAR and activates a self-enhancing positive feedback loop, resulting in induction of large, protective amounts of IFN-α. Unexpectedly, we found robust, systemic IFN-α expression upon infection of IFNAR knockout mice with the orthomyxovirus Thogoto virus (THOV). The IFNAR-independent IFN-α production requiredin vivoconditions and was not achieved duringin vitroinfection. Using replication-incompetent THOV-derived virus-like particles, we demonstrate that IFNAR-independent type I IFN induction depends on viral polymerase activity but is largely independent of viral replication. To discover the cell type responsible for this effect, we used type I IFN reporter mice and identified CD11b+F4/80+myeloid cells within the peritoneal cavity of infected animals as the main source of IFNAR-independent type I IFN, corresponding to the particular tropism of THOV for this cell type.IMPORTANCEType I IFNs are crucial for the survival of a host upon most viral infections, and, moreover, they shape subsequent adaptive immune responses. Production of protective amounts of type I IFN critically depends on the positive feedback amplification via the IFNAR. Unexpectedly, we observed robust IFNAR-independent type I IFN expression upon THOV infection and unraveled molecular mechanisms and determined the tissue and cell type involved. Our data indicate that the host can effectively use alternative pathways to induce type I IFN responses if the classical feedback amplification is not available. Understanding how type I IFN can be produced in large amounts independently of IFNAR-dependent enhancement will identify mechanisms which might contribute to novel therapeutic strategies to fight viral pathogens.

scholarly journals Activation of Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) and Sjögren Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 893-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Papinska ◽  
H. Bagavant ◽  
G.B. Gmyrek ◽  
M. Sroka ◽  
S. Tummala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Autoimmune Disorder ◽  
Sjögren Syndrome ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Sjogren Syndrome ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifns

Sjögren syndrome (SS), a chronic autoimmune disorder causing dry mouth, adversely affects the overall oral health in patients. Activation of innate immune responses and excessive production of type I interferons (IFNs) play a critical role in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Recognition of nucleic acids by cytosolic nucleic acid sensors is a major trigger for the induction of type I IFNs. Upon activation, cytosolic DNA sensors can interact with the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, and activation of STING causes increased expression of type I IFNs. The role of STING activation in SS is not known. In this study, to investigate whether the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway influences SS development, female C57BL/6 mice were injected with a STING agonist, dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Salivary glands (SGs) were studied for gene expression and inflammatory cell infiltration. SG function was evaluated by measuring pilocarpine-induced salivation. Sera were analyzed for cytokines and autoantibodies. Primary SG cells were used to study the expression and activation of STING. Our data show that systemic DMXAA treatment rapidly induced the expression of Ifnb1, Il6, and Tnfa in the SGs, and these cytokines were also elevated in circulation. In contrast, increased Ifng gene expression was dominantly detected in the SGs. The type I innate lymphoid cells present within the SGs were the major source of IFN-γ, and their numbers increased significantly within 3 d of treatment. STING expression in SGs was mainly observed in ductal and interstitial cells. In primary SG cells, DMXAA activated STING and induced IFN-β production. The DMXAA-treated mice developed autoantibodies, sialoadenitis, and glandular hypofunction. Our study demonstrates that activation of the STING pathway holds the potential to initiate SS. Thus, apart from viral infections, conditions that cause cellular perturbations and accumulation of host DNA within the cytosol should also be considered as possible triggers for SS.

scholarly journals Type I interferons act directly on nociceptors to produce pain sensitization: Implications for viral infection-induced pain

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulino Barragan-Iglesias ◽  
Úrzula Franco-Enzástiga ◽  
Vivekanand Jeevakumar ◽  
Andi Wangzhou ◽  
Vinicio Granados-Soto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infection ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Poly I:C ◽  
Type I ◽  
Drg Neurons ◽  
Pain Hypersensitivity ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Pain Sensitization

ABSTRACTOne of the first signs of viral infection is body-wide aches and pain. While this type of pain usually subsides, at the extreme, viral infections can induce painful neuropathies that can last for decades. Neither of these types of pain sensitization are well understood. A key part of the response to viral infection is production of interferons (IFNs), which then activate their specific receptors (IFNRs) resulting in downstream activation of cellular signaling and a variety of physiological responses. We sought to understand how type I IFNs (IFN-α and IFN-β) might act directly on nociceptors in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to cause pain sensitization. We demonstrate that type I IFNRs are expressed in small/medium DRG neurons and that their activation produces neuronal hyper-excitability and mechanical pain in mice. Type I IFNs stimulate JAK/STAT signaling in DRG neurons but this does not apparently result in PKR-eIF2α activation that normally induces an anti-viral response by limiting mRNA translation. Rather, type I interferons stimulate MNK-mediated eIF4E phosphorylation in DRG neurons to promote pain hypersensitivity. Endogenous release of type I IFNs with the double stranded RNA mimetic poly(I:C) likewise produces pain hypersensitivity that is blunted in mice lacking MNK-eIF4E signaling. Our findings reveal mechanisms through which type I IFNs cause nociceptor sensitization with implications for understanding how viral infections promote pain and can lead to neuropathies.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIt is increasingly understood that pathogens interact with nociceptors to alert organisms to infection as well as to mount early host defenses. While specific mechanisms have been discovered for diverse bacteria and fungal pathogens, mechanisms engaged by viruses have remained elusive. Here we show that type 1 interferons, one of the first mediators produced by viral infection, act directly on nociceptors to produce pain sensitization. Type I interferons act via a specific signaling pathway (MNK-eIF4E signaling) that is known to produce nociceptor sensitization in inflammatory and neuropathic pain conditions. Our work reveals a mechanism through which viral infections cause heightened pain sensitivity

Biologics targeting type I interferons in SLE: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (14) ◽  
pp. 1845-1853
Author(s):  
Jeffery Wei Heng Koh ◽  
Cheng Han Ng ◽  
Sen Hee Tay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Herpes Zoster ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective The feed-forward loop of type I interferons (IFNs) production and subsequent immunopathology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been hypothesised to be disrupted with inhibition of IFNα or type I IFN receptor subunit 1 (IFNAR). This systematic review and meta-analysis present the treatment efficacy and safety profile of monoclonal antibodies inhibiting IFNα or IFNAR. Methods A search was done using Medline, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov for biologics targeting IFNα or IFNAR in SLE up to 3 Jan 2020. For the meta-analysis, analyses of binary variables were pooled using odds ratio (OR) with the Mantel Haenszel model. Results Anifrolumab 300 mg (n = 3 studies, 927 patients) was more effective than placebo in achieving SRI(4) (pooled OR = 1.91, CI 1.11-3.28, P = 0.02) and BICLA response (pooled OR = 2.25, CI 1.72-2.95, P < 0.00001). In SLE patients with high type I IFN gene signature, SRI(4) response was not achieved with anifrolumab in 2 studies, 450 patients. Treatment with IFNα and IFNAR inhibitors (n = 7 studies, 1590 patients) increased the risk of herpes zoster infection (pooled OR = 3.72, CI 1.88–7.39, P = 0.0002), upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis and bronchitis. Conclusion This meta-analysis substantiates IFNAR as a therapeutic target in SLE. Inhibition of type I IFNs predisposes to herpes zoster and other viral infections.

scholarly journals Context Is Key: Delineating the Unique Functions of IFNα and IFNβ in Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey E. Fox ◽  
Marissa C. Locke ◽  
Deborah J. Lenschow
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infections ◽  
Biological Activities ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Individual Type ◽  
Effector Cytokines ◽  
The Individual

Type I interferons (IFNs) are critical effector cytokines of the immune system and were originally known for their important role in protecting against viral infections; however, they have more recently been shown to play protective or detrimental roles in many disease states. Type I IFNs consist of IFNα, IFNβ, IFNϵ, IFNκ, IFNω, and a few others, and they all signal through a shared receptor to exert a wide range of biological activities, including antiviral, antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and immunomodulatory effects. Though the individual type I IFN subtypes possess overlapping functions, there is growing appreciation that they also have unique properties. In this review, we summarize some of the mechanisms underlying differential expression of and signaling by type I IFNs, and we discuss examples of differential functions of IFNα and IFNβ in models of infectious disease, cancer, and autoimmunity.

scholarly journals Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Inhibits Type I Interferon Signaling by Blocking STAT1/STAT2 Nuclear Translocation

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (21) ◽  
pp. 11045-11055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deendayal Patel ◽  
Yuchen Nan ◽  
Meiyan Shen ◽  
Krit Ritthipichai ◽  
Xiaoping Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Detectable Effect ◽  
Type I ◽  
Live Virus ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT Type I interferons (IFNs) IFN-α/β play an important role in innate immunity against viral infections by inducing antiviral responses. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) inhibits the synthesis of type I IFNs. However, whether PRRSV can inhibit IFN signaling is less well understood. In the present study, we found that PRRSV interferes with the IFN signaling pathway. The transcript levels of IFN-stimulated genes ISG15 and ISG56 and protein level of signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) in PRRSV VR2385-infected MARC-145 cells were significantly lower than those in mock-infected cells after IFN-α treatment. IFN-induced phosphorylation of both STAT1 and STAT2 and their heterodimer formation in the PRRSV-infected cells were not affected. However, the majority of the STAT1/STAT2/IRF9 (IFN regulatory factor 9) heterotrimers remained in the cytoplasm of PRRSV-infected cells, which indicates that the nuclear translocation of the heterotrimers was blocked. Overexpression of NSP1β of PRRSV VR2385 inhibited expression of ISG15 and ISG56 and blocked nuclear translocation of STAT1, which suggests that NSP1β might be the viral protein responsible for the inhibition of IFN signaling. PRRSV infection in primary porcine pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) also inhibited IFN-α-stimulated expression of the ISGs and the STAT2 protein. In contrast, a licensed low-virulence vaccine strain, Ingelvac PRRS modified live virus (MLV), activated expression of IFN-inducible genes, including those of chemokines and antiviral proteins, in PAMs without the addition of external IFN and had no detectable effect on IFN signaling. These findings suggest that PRRSV interferes with the activation and signaling pathway of type I IFNs by blocking ISG factor 3 (ISGF3) nuclear translocation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document