scholarly journals Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. e26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Ferrara ◽  
Zeyao Yang
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Information Diffusion ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Positive Bias ◽  
Unexpected Events ◽  
Production And Consumption ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Messages ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
And Diffusion

Social media has become the main vehicle of information production and consumption online. Millions of users every day log on their Facebook or Twitter accounts to get updates and news, read about their topics of interest, and become exposed to new opportunities and interactions. Although recent studies suggest that the contents users produce will affect the emotions of their readers, we still lack a rigorous understanding of the role and effects of contents sentiment on the dynamics of information diffusion. This work aims at quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion, to understand: (i) whether positive conversations spread faster and/or broader than negative ones (or vice-versa); (ii) what kind of emotions are more typical of popular conversations on social media; and, (iii) what type of sentiment is expressed in conversations characterized by different temporal dynamics. Our findings show that, at the level of contents, negative messages spread faster than positive ones, but positive ones reach larger audiences, suggesting that people are more inclined to share and favorite positive contents, the so-calledpositive bias. As for the entire conversations, we highlight how different temporal dynamics exhibit different sentiment patterns: for example, positive sentiment builds up for highly-anticipated events, while unexpected events are mainly characterized by negative sentiment. Our contribution represents a step forward to understand how the emotions expressed in short texts correlate with their spreading in online social ecosystems, and may help to craft effective policies and strategies for content generation and diffusion.

scholarly journals Analyzing Sentiments and Diffusion Characteristics of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation Topics in Social Media

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Mohammad Daradkeh
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Data Analytics ◽  
Latent Dirichlet Allocation ◽  
Topic Model ◽  
Diffusion Characteristics ◽  
Sentiment Orientation ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
And Diffusion ◽  
Machine Learning Models

This study presents a data analytics framework that aims to analyze topics and sentiments associated with COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in social media. A total of 40,359 tweets related to COVID-19 vaccination were collected between January 2021 and March 2021. Misinformation was detected using multiple predictive machine learning models. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model was used to identify dominant topics in COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Sentiment orientation of misinformation was analyzed using a lexicon-based approach. An independent-samples t-test was performed to compare the number of replies, retweets, and likes of misinformation with different sentiment orientations. Based on the data sample, the results show that COVID-19 vaccine misinformation included 21 major topics. Across all misinformation topics, the average number of replies, retweets, and likes of tweets with negative sentiment was 2.26, 2.68, and 3.29 times higher, respectively, than those with positive sentiment.

scholarly journals Trends in Patient, Physician, and Public Perception of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Social Media Analytics

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199005
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Yu ◽  
James B. Carr ◽  
Jacob Thomas ◽  
Julianna Kostas ◽  
Zhaorui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Public Perception ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Social Media Analytics ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
The Past ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

Background: Social media posts regarding ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and reconstruction surgeries have increased in recent years. Purpose: To analyze posts shared on Instagram and Twitter referencing UCL injuries and reconstruction surgeries to evaluate public perception and any trends in perception over the past 3 years. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A search of a 3-year period (August 2016 and August 2019) of public Instagram and Twitter posts was performed. We searched for >22 hashtags and search terms, including #TommyJohn, #TommyJohnSurgery, and #tornUCL. A categorical classification system was used to assess the sentiment, media format, perspective, timing, accuracy, and general content of each post. Post popularity was measured by number of likes and comments. Results: A total of 3119 Instagram posts and 267 Twitter posts were included in the analysis. Of the 3119 Instagram posts analyzed, 34% were from patients, and 28% were from providers. Of the 267 Twitter posts analyzed, 42% were from patients, and 16% were from providers. Although the majority of social media posts were of a positive sentiment, over the past 3 years, there was a major surge in negative sentiment posts (97% increase) versus positive sentiment posts (9% increase). Patients were more likely to focus their posts on rehabilitation, return to play, and activities of daily living. Providers tended to focus their posts on education, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. Patient posts declined over the past 3 years (–28%), whereas provider posts increased substantially (110%). Of posts shared by health care providers, 4% of posts contained inaccurate or misleading information. Conclusion: The majority of patients who post about their UCL injury and reconstruction on social media have a positive sentiment when discussing their procedure. However, negative sentiment posts have increased significantly over the past 3 years. Patient content revolves around rehabilitation and return to play. Although patient posts have declined over the past 3 years, provider posts have increased substantially with an emphasis on education.

scholarly journals Analysis of Social Media Users Sentiments against Omnibus Law Based on Hashtags on Twitter

SISTEMASI ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Okta Fanny ◽  
Heri Suroyo
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Main Topic ◽  
Accuracy Score ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
The Public ◽  
Average Accuracy ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

From the research that has been done, it can be concluded that Sentiment Analysis can be used to know the sentiment of the public, especially Twitter netizens against omnibus law. After the sentiment analysis, it looks neutral artmen with the largest percentage of 55%, then positive sentiment by 35% and negative sentiment by 10%. The results of the analysis showed that the Naïve Bayes Classifier method provides classification test results with accuracy in Hashtag Pro with an average accuracy score of 92.1%, precision values with an average of 94.8% and recall values with an average of 90.7%. While Hashtag Counter For data classification, with an average accuracy value of 98.3%, precision value with an average of 97.6% and recall value with an average of 98.7%. The result of text cloud analysis conducted on a combination of hashtags both Hashtag pros and Hashtags cons, the dominant word appears is Omnibus Law which means that all hashtags in scrap is really discussing the main topic that is about Omnibus Law

scholarly journals Mining social media data to investigate patient perceptions regarding DMARD pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1432-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanakya Sharma ◽  
Samuel Whittle ◽  
Pari Delir Haghighi ◽  
Frada Burstein ◽  
Roee Sa'adon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Computer Algorithms ◽  
Social Media Platforms ◽  
Synthetic Agents ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Media Data

ObjectivesWe hypothesise that patients have a positive sentiment regarding biological/targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and a negative sentiment towards conventional synthetic agents (csDMARDs). We analysed discussions on social media platforms regarding DMARDs to understand the collective sentiment expressed towards these medications.MethodsTreato analytics were used to download all available posts on social media about DMARDs in the context of rheumatoid arthritis. Strict filters ensured that user generated content was downloaded. The sentiment (positive or negative) expressed in these posts was analysed for each DMARD using sentiment analysis. We also analysed the reason(s) for this sentiment for each DMARD, looking specifically at efficacy and side effects.ResultsComputer algorithms analysed millions of social media posts and included 54 742 posts about DMARDs. We found that both classes had an overall positive sentiment. The ratio of positive to negative posts was higher for b/tsDMARDs (1.210) than for csDMARDs (1.048). Efficacy was the most commonly mentioned reason in posts with a positive sentiment and lack of efficacy was the most commonly mentioned reason for a negative sentiment. These were followed by the presence/absence of side effects in negative or positive posts, respectively.ConclusionsPublic opinion on social media is generally positive about DMARDs. Lack of efficacy followed by side effects were the most common themes in posts with a negative sentiment. There are clear reasons why a DMARD generates a positive or negative sentiment, as the sentiment analysis technology becomes more refined, targeted studies could be done to analyse these reasons and allow clinicians to tailor DMARDs to match patient needs.

scholarly journals Analisis Sentimen Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Pemilu 2019 Pada Media Sosial Twitter Menggunakan Naive Bayes

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 552
Author(s):  
Safitri Juanita
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Participation Rate ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Community Perception ◽  
Positive Perception ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

According to the BAWASLU evaluation a variety of related negative content supports supporting prospective couples to burst into various social media pages. So sometimes the content leads to a hoax issue to the issue of religious and inter-group Racial (SARA). One of the social media used by the people of Indonesia is Twitter, according to Kompas.com number of Twitter daily users globally claimed to be increasing, this appears to be the 3rd Quarter Twitter Financial Report of 2019 on Twitter's 3rd quarter of 2019 Financial reports, daily active users on the Twitter platform are recorded to increase by 17 percent, to the number of 145 million users. So it is necessary that a sentiment analysis study can capture a pattern of community perception on social media Twitter against the 2019 elections and it is expected that this research can help interested parties to increase voter participation rate in the next 5 years. This research method uses the Indonesian tweet data taken from 16 April 2018-16 April 2019, further data in preprocessing, text transformation, stemming Bahasa Indonesia, specifying attribute class, load dictonary and a classification of Naive Bayes using Weka. The conclusion of this study was the classification of Naive Bayes finding that the 2019 election tweet dataset had a negative perception pattern of 52% much greater than the positive perception of 18% and the neutral perception had a value of 31% higher than positive perception. Naive Bayes ' degree of classification accuracy against the training dataset is 81% and the dataset testing 76%, the average precision value for positive sentiment is 86.65%, negative sentiment is 77.15%, and neutral sentiment is worth 80.95% while the average recall rate on positive sentiment is 36.8%, negative sentiment is 93.2% and the neutral sentiment is 86.8%

Identifying the Real Differences of Opinion in Social Media Sentiment

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Pettit
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Older People ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Social Media Data ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Media Sentiment ◽  
Media Data

This study examined the differences in social media sentiment based on author gender, age and country. After creating ten category-generic datasets, millions of social media verbatims from thousands of websites were collected, cleaned of spam, and scored into five-point sentiment scales. The results showed that women exhibit more positive sentiment, older people exhibit more positive sentiment, and Australians exhibit more positive sentiment, while Americans share more negative sentiment. The differences were small but clear, suggesting that research methodologists should apply correction factors to ensure that their results more accurately reflect differences of opinion as opposed to differences of word choice. Business users of social media data can be reassured that correction factors are not required to improve the accuracy of their research.

scholarly journals Changes in public response associated with various COVID-19 restrictions in Ontario, Canada: an observational study using social media time series data (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony Chum ◽  
Andrew Nielsen ◽  
Zachary Bellows ◽  
Eddie Farrell ◽  
Pierre-Nicolas Durette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
News Media ◽  
School Closure ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Public Response ◽  
Collective Attention ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

BACKGROUND News media coverage of anti-mask protests, COVID-19 conspiracies, and pandemic politicization has overemphasized extreme views, but does little to represent views of the general public. Investigating the public’s response to various pandemic restrictions can provide a more balanced assessment of current views, allowing policymakers to craft better public health messages in anticipation of poor reactions to controversial restrictions. OBJECTIVE Using data from social media, this study aims to understand the changes in public opinion associated with the implementation of COVID-19 restrictions (e.g. business and school closure, regional lockdown differences, additional public health restrictions such as social distancing and masking). METHODS COVID-related tweets in Ontario (n=1,150,362) were collected based on keywords between March 12 to Oct 31 2020. Sentiment scores were calculated using the VADER algorithm for each tweet to represent its negative to positive emotion. Public health restrictions were identified using government and news media websites, and dynamic regression models with ARIMA errors were used to examine the association between public health restrictions and changes in public opinion over time (i.e. collective attention, aggregate positive sentiment, and level of disagreement) controlling for the effects of confounders (i.e. daily COVID-19 case counts, holidays, COVID-related official updates). RESULTS In addition to expected direct effects (e.g. business closure led to decreased positive sentiment and increased disagreements), the impact of restriction on public opinion is contextually driven. For example, the negative sentiment associated with business closures was reduced with higher COVID-19 case counts. While school closure and other restrictions (e.g. masking, social distancing, and travel restrictions) generated increased collective attention, they did not have an effect on aggregate sentiment or the level of disagreement (i.e. sentiment polarization). Partial (region-targeted) lockdowns were associated with better public response (i.e. higher number of tweets with net positive sentiment and lower levels of disagreement) compared to province-wide lockdowns. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a rapid and flexible method of evaluating the public response to pandemic restrictions using near real-time social media data. This information can help public health practitioners and policymakers anticipate public response to future pandemic restrictions, and ensure adequate resources are dedicated to addressing increases in negative sentiment and levels of disagreement in the face of scientifically informed, but controversial, restrictions.

scholarly journals Airbnb or Hotel?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Li ◽  
Honglin Chen ◽  
Xia Huang
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Online Reviews ◽  
Tourism Industry ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Value For Money ◽  
Consumer Awareness ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

Advances in information technology have hugely influenced the tourism industry. Many tourists can generate and share their travel tips through social media, and people consult online reviews before making travel arrangements because they could access these sources of information easily. Either positive or negative reviews could increase consumer awareness of Airbnb. Using the approach of text mining and sentiment analysis, examining whether guests' emotions are positive or negative, this study investigates the attributes that influence Airbnb consumers' experiences compared with their previous hotel experiences by analysing big data of guests' online reviews. Findings reveal that the factors of guests' positive sentiment are the atmosphere, flexibility, special amenities, and humanized service; the factors of guests' negative sentiment are not value for money, have to clean the room before leaving, sharing amenities and space with strangers, disturbed by hosts' noisy recreational activities, and troubled by hosts' requesting good reviews.

scholarly journals ANALISIS SENTIMEN CALON PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN PERIODE 2019-2024 PASCA DEBAT PILPRES DI TWITTER

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Rizka Ardiansyah
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Social Networking Sites ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

Social networking sites, such as Twitter and Facebook are one of the important spaces for political engagement. Twitter or Facebook have become common elements in political campaigns and elections, especially for Indonesia’s presidential election 2019. for the period 2019 - 2024 there are two presidential and vice presidential candidates namely Ir. H. Joko Widodo - Prof. Dr. K.H. Ma'ruf Amin and Lieutenant General (Ret.) H. Prabowo Subianto - H. Sandiaga Uno. B.B.A., M.B.A. the two candidates who ran for the election triggered a lot of related public opinion where the most suitable candidate to become the president of the next period. Public opinion is generally one of the determining factors for presidential candidates who will later win the election. Presidential candidate debate is the efforts of the election commission to facilitate the presidential candidates to introduce their work programs to the public while building public opinion that they are the right people to become leaders of the next period. Although of course, this is not the only major factor that shapes public opinion. The purpose of this study is to summarize the opinions of the people voiced through social media related to the election of candidates for the Indonesian President and Vice President for the period 2019-2024 post debate on the presidential election. While the benefit is to help the community so that they can understand in a broader context such as what the public opinion about presidential candidates, especially on social media Twitter. The results of this study were presidential candidate Joko Widodo - Makruf Amin obtained a 25% positive sentiment, 4.5% negative sentiment and 70.5% neutral sentiment. while the Prabowo Subianto - Sandiaga Uno pair received a 5.1% positive sentiment, 2.5% negative sentiment and 92.4% neutral sentiment.

scholarly journals Entity Profiling to Identify Actor Involvement in Topics of Social Media Content

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 417
Author(s):  
Puji Winar Cahyo ◽  
Muhammad Habibi
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Topic Modeling ◽  
Latent Dirichlet Allocation ◽  
Online News ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Media Content ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

The efficiency of using social media affected modern society's nature and communication; they are more interested in talking through social media than meeting in the real world. The number of talks on social media content depends on the topic being discussed. The more topic interesting will impact the amount of data on social media will be. The data can be analyzed to get the influence of actors (account mentions) on the conversation. The power of an actor can be measured from how often the actor is mentioned in the conversation. This paper aims to conduct entity profiling on social media content to analyze an actor's influence on discussion. Furthermore, using sentiment analysis can determine the sentiment about an actor from a conversation topic. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) method is used for analyzes topic modeling, while the Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used for sentiment analysis. This research can show that topics with positive sentiment are more likely to be involved in disaster management accounts, while topics with negative sentiment are more towards involvement in politicians, critics, and online news.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document