scholarly journals Evaluation of Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients who Attempted Suicide by Self-Inflicted Burn Using Catalyzer

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Yabanoglu ◽  
Huseyin Ozgur Aytac ◽  
Emin Turk ◽  
Erdal Karagulle ◽  
Sedat Belli ◽  
...  

Our aim was to assess demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated at our units who attempted suicide by self-incineration, and to compare the results of burns with or without catalyzer use. Twenty patients who attempted suicide by self-incineration were examined in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics. Average age of the study population was 35 years (range 13−85 years). Average percentage of total body surface area burn was 53% (9%−100%). Six (30%) patients used gasoline and 5 (25%) used paint thinner in order to catalyze burning. Of these 11 patients who used a catalyzer, 5 (45.4%) had inhalation injury and 7 (63.6%) died. Among 9 patients who did not use any catalyzer, 1 (11.1%) had inhalation injury and 4 (44.4%) died. In general, inhalation injury was diagnosed in 6 patients (30%) while 11 (55%) patients died. A high morbidity and mortality rate was found in patients who used a catalyzer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
James H Holmes ◽  
Brett Arnoldo ◽  
Michael Peck ◽  
Amalia Cochran ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Studies suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy is safe in burns, yet the efficacy of a restrictive transfusion policy in massive burn injury is uncertain. Our objective: compare outcomes between massive burn (≥60% total body surface area (TBSA) burn) and major (20–59% TBSA) burn using a restrictive or a liberal blood transfusion strategy. Methods Patients with burns ≥20% were block randomized by age and TBSA to a restrictive (transfuse hemoglobin <7 g/dL) or liberal (transfuse hemoglobin <10 g/dL) strategy throughout hospitalization. Data collected included demographics, infections, transfusions, and outcomes. Results Three hundred and forty-five patients received 7,054 units blood, 2,886 in massive and 4,168 in restrictive. Patients were similar in age, TBSA, and inhalation injury. The restrictive group received less blood (45.57 ± 47.63 vs. 77.16 ± 55.0, p < 0.03 massive; 11.0 ± 16.70 vs. 16.78 ± 17.39, p < 0.001) major). In massive burn, the restrictive group had fewer ventilator days (p < 0.05). Median ICU days and LOS were lower in the restrictive group; wound healing, mortality, and infection did not differ. No significant outcome differences occurred in the major (20–59%) group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A restrictive transfusion strategy may be beneficial in massive burns in reducing ventilator days, ICU days and blood utilization, but does not decrease infection, mortality, hospital LOS or wound healing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hao Liu ◽  
Keqiang Yue ◽  
Siyi Cheng ◽  
Wenjun Li ◽  
Zhihui Fu

Burn is a common traumatic disease with high morbidity and mortality. The treatment of burns requires accurate and reliable diagnosis of burn wounds and burn depth, which can save lives in some cases. However, due to the complexity of burn wounds, the early diagnosis of burns lacks accuracy and difference. Therefore, we use deep learning technology to automate and standardize burn diagnosis to reduce human errors and improve burn diagnosis. First, the burn dataset with detailed burn area segmentation and burn depth labelling is created. Then, an end-to-end framework based on deep learning method for advanced burn area segmentation and burn depth diagnosis is proposed. The framework is firstly used to segment the burn area in the burn images. On this basis, the calculation of the percentage of the burn area in the total body surface area (TBSA) can be realized by extending the network output structure and the labels of the burn dataset. Then, the framework is used to segment multiple burn depth areas. Finally, the network achieves the best result with IOU of 0.8467 for the segmentation of burn and no burn area. And for multiple burn depth areas segmentation, the best average IOU is 0.5144.


PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9984
Author(s):  
Shin-Yi Tsai ◽  
Chon-Fu Lio ◽  
Shou-Chuan Shih ◽  
Cheng-Jui Lin ◽  
Yu-Tien Chen ◽  
...  

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most severe complications of burn injury. AKI with severe burn injury causes high mortality. This study aims to investigate the incidence of and predisposing factors for AKI in burn patients. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective, descriptive criterion standard study conducted from June 27, 2015, to March 8, 2016. We used Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria to define and select patients with AKI. The study was conducted by recruiting in hospital patients who suffered from the flammable cornstarch-based powder explosion and were treated under primary care procedures. A total of 49 patients who suffered from flammable dust explosion-related burn injury were enrolled and admitted on June 27, 2015. The patients with more than 20% total body surface area of burn were transferred to the intensive care unit. Patients received fluid resuscitation in the first 24 hours based on the Parkland formula. The primary measurements were the incidence of and predisposing factors for AKI in these patients. Demographic characteristics, laboratory data, and inpatient outcomes were also evaluated. The incidence of AKI in this cohort was 61.2% (n = 30). The mortality rate was 2.0% (n = 1) during a 59-day follow-up period. The multivariate analysis revealed inhalation injury (adjusted OR = 22.0; 95% CI [1.4–358.2]) and meeting ≥3 American Burn Association (ABA) sepsis criteria (adjusted OR = 13.7; 95% CI [1.7–110.5]) as independent risk factors for early advanced AKI. Conclusions The incidence rate of AKI was higher in this cohort than in previous studies, possibly due to the flammable dust explosion-related burn injury. However, the mortality was lower than that expected. In clinical practice, indicators of inflammation, including ABA sepsis criteria may help in predicting the risk of AKI in patients with burn injury.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1004-1008
Author(s):  
Courtney L Cox ◽  
Allyson M McIntire ◽  
Kimberly J Bolton ◽  
David R Foster ◽  
Andrew C Fritschle ◽  
...  

Abstract Inhalation injury causes significant morbidity and mortality secondary to compromise of the respiratory system as well as systemic effects limiting perfusion and oxygenation. Nebulized heparin reduces fibrin cast formation and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with inhalation injury. To date, no study has compared both dosing strategies of 5000 and 10,000 units to a matched control group. This multicenter, retrospective, case-control study included adult patients with bronchoscopy-confirmed inhalation injury. Each control patient, matched according to age and percent of total body surface area, was matched to a patient who received 5000 units and a patient who received 10,000 units of nebulized heparin. The primary endpoint of the study was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days in the first 28 days, difference in lung injury scores, length of hospitalization, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and rate of major bleeding. Thirty-five matched patient trios met inclusion criteria. Groups were well-matched for age (P = .975) and total body surface area (P = .855). Patients who received nebulized heparin, either 5000 or 10,000 units, had 8 to 11 less days on the ventilator compared to controls (P = .001). Mortality ranged from 3 to 14% overall and was not statistically significant between groups. No major bleeding events related to nebulized heparin were reported. Mechanical ventilation days were significantly decreased in patients who received 5000 or 10,000 units of nebulized heparin. Nebulized heparin, either 5000 units or 10,000 units, is a safe and effective treatment for inhalation injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Herman Yosef Limpat Wihastyoko ◽  
Arviansyah Arviansyah ◽  
Erdo Puncak Sidarta

Work from home (WFH) mandate is one of the major changes known during this pandemic, aimed as a preventive way to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 virus. This study aimed to observe the characteristics of pediatric burn injury during COVID-19 pandemic and WFH mandate's impact on pediatric burn injury admission at some Hospital burn centers in Malang. Every patient’s age, gender, clinical characteristics, parent's background, and other variables such as the possession of siblings, response time using our burn registry form, and comparative analysis of the incident in WFH housewife mother were assessed. The majority were in the group age of under five years old group age (70%) with a mean of 5.5 years. The most frequent part of the burn injured is extremity 36.7%, and hot liquid dominates as the cause of the injury 73.3% with the total body surface area of burn injury group >10% is the most common 56.7%. The burn injury incident happened more frequently in mothers with children less than two in both groups. This study showed that the increase in increasement of the pediatric burn injury during COVID-19 pandemic between housewife mother and WFH mother has no significant difference also showed that parent especially mother unable to supervise the children during WFH. Strategies to mitigate pediatric burn injuries during WFH should be thoughtfully implemented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S17-S18
Author(s):  
Philip D Hewes ◽  
Derek Bell

Abstract Introduction Estimates on frequency and outcomes of burn or inhalation injury in the United States are limited since reported databases are confined to specific phases of care, included facilities, length of follow-up, facility/provider/patient identification and/or lack of longitudinal tracking. A population-based database addresses these issues. Methods We queried a statewide mandated-reporting database for the years from 2000 through 2015 at the time of injury using a set of ICD9-CM codes for second degree or deeper burns, inhalation injury, and chemical and electrical burns. Burn total body surface area percentage by anatomical region was assigned as appropriate using modified and age-stratified Lund and Browder charts. Records for each patient were extracted out to one year pre- and post-injury, as available. Provider and facility burn volume and survival was stratified into quartiles. We applied the Committee on Trauma/American Burn Association referral criteria to the index presentation. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to 1-year post injury for testing combinations of burn percent total body surface area of 20% and inhalation injury for age ranges < 15, 15 - 60, and >60 years. Regression models were developed to model the probabilities of in-patient, 90-day, and 365-day mortality and readmission. Results 56,712 patients were included. Overall, 22% of patients meeting referral criteria were never seen at a burn center within 1-year post-injury. The greatest positive predictors of in-patient mortality were facility case volume and burn percent total body surface area. The greatest negative predictors were high provider burn case volume (for highest quartile, adjusted odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence intervals 0.06 – 0.12). The highest risk of unscheduled 30-day readmission was associated with index presentation to a non-burn care facility (p < 0.001). For all groups, the first 100 days had the greatest mortality rate, the most severe being among patients of age greater than 60 with >20% burn percent total body surface area and inhalation injury, with a 40% survival rate. Conclusions This study is the first to be able to simultaneously evaluate in-patient, post-discharge, and facility-based parameters for outcomes. A significant number of patients are not accounted with current databases. Applicability of Research to Practice A population-based approach with longitudinal tracking allows for greater realization of the outcomes of all patients following burn injury. Existing association-supported or government databases fail to account for a significant portion of burn victims, motivating further evaluation of burn care efforts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1037-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliza Kruger ◽  
Stacey Kowal ◽  
S Pinar Bilir ◽  
Eileen Han ◽  
Kevin Foster

Abstract This study establishes important, national benchmarks for burn centers to assess length of stay (LOS) and number of procedures across patient profiles. We examined the relationship between patient characteristics such as age and total body surface area (TBSA) burned and number of procedures and LOS in the United States, using the American Burn Association National Burn Repository (NBR) database version 8.0 (2002–2011). Among 21,175 surviving burn patients (TBSA > 10–60%), mean age was 33 years, and mean injury size was 19.9% TBSA. Outcomes included the number of debridement, excision, autograft procedures, and LOS. Independent variables considered were: age (linear, squared, and cubed to account for nonlinearity), TBSA, TBSAs of partial-thickness and mixed/full-thickness burns, sex, hospital-acquired infection, other infection, inhalation injury, and diabetes status. Regression methods included a mixed-effects model for LOS and ordinary least squares for number of procedures. A backward stepwise procedure (P <0.2) was used to select variables. Number of excision and autografting procedures increased with TBSA; however, this relationship did not hold for debridement. After adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities, predicted LOS for adults (18+) was 12.1, 21.7, 32.2, 43.7, and 56.1 days for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% TBSA, respectively. Similarly, predicted LOS for pediatrics (age < 18) was 8.1, 18.8, 33.2, 47.6, and 56.1 days for the same TBSA groups, respectively. While average estimates for adults (1.12 days) and pediatrics (1.01) are close to the one day/TBSA rule-of-thumb, consideration of other important patient and burn features in the NBR can better refine predictions for LOS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S184-S185
Author(s):  
Jessicah A Respicio ◽  
Patrick Duffy ◽  
Tyler M Smith ◽  
Kiran U Dyamenahalli ◽  
Arek J Wiktor ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) in burn patients is known to increase morbidity and mortality, with significant improvement after the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Our primary objective is to characterize the sub-population of burn patients with early (≤48 hours post-injury) versus late (>48 hours post injury) onset of AKI. We hypothesize that patients with early onset AKI versus late onset AKI have different causalities, risk factors, and outcomes. A secondary aim is to investigate the timing and use of RRT in the setting of early and late AKI with the goal of improving morbidity and mortality. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients admitted to a verified burn center requiring RRT for AKI from 2015 – 2019. Patients were stratified by age, gender, percent total body surface area (TBSA), race, time of onset of AKI, timing of RRT initiation, hospital LOS, pre-admission co-morbidities, admission toxicology, and mortality. Results In total, 1537 burn patients were reviewed and 1.3% (n=20) required RRT for AKI. Out of this cohort, 70% developed early AKI and 30% developed late AKI. Early versus late AKI patients had the same median age (57). Patients with larger TBSA developed early AKI (median TBSA 51%) versus late AKI (median TBSA 21%). Half of the patients who developed late AKI presented with positive alcohol toxicology screens, while 86% of patients with early AKI tested negative. The patient mortality rate in early AKI was 57%, and the mortality rate in late AKI was 17%. Only 14% of early AKI patients required dialysis at discharge, while 33% of late AKI patients required dialysis at discharge. The majority of patients started on early RRT (< 48 hours post injury) did not develop sepsis (43% developed sepsis), while the majority of patients started on late RRT (>48 hours post injury) did develop sepsis (85%). Conclusions Positivity for alcohol on admission may be a predictor for development of late AKI, while larger TBSA may predict early AKI. Mortality is higher for patients with early AKI; however, the need for dialysis at discharge is higher in patients with late AKI. Our data further suggests that early initiation of RRT is negatively correlated with the development of sepsis. Applicability of Research to Practice A deeper understanding of associations and causality of early vs late onset AKI in burn patients will help guide further management and improve outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Qian ◽  
Song Wang ◽  
Yangping Wang ◽  
Xiaorong Zhang ◽  
Mian Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Burns are one of the major traumas that may affect older individuals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of geriatric burns at a major center in south-west China. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at the Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University between 2010 and 2016, and the data collected from medical records included admission date, age, gender, premorbid disease, burn etiology, injured anatomical location, burn area and depth, inhalation injury, number of surgeries, length of stay (LOS), clinical outcome, and medical cost. Results Of the 693 older burn patients included, 60.75% were male and 56.85% were aged 60–69 years. Burns peaked in December–March and June. Flame was the most common cause of burns, making up 51.95% of all cases, and also dominated in the burn patients aged 60–69 years. Limbs were the most common anatomical sites of burns (69.41%), and the median total body surface area (TBSA) was 5% (interquartile range [IQR]: 2%–15%). The percentage of the patients who underwent surgeries and number of surgeries significantly increased in the cases of contact burns, younger age and full-thickness burns. Six deaths resulted in a mortality of 0.9%. The median LOS was 16 days (IQR: 8–29 days), and the main risk factors were more surgeries, better outcomes, and full-thickness burns. The median cost was 20,228 CNY (IQR: 10,457– 46,581.5 CNY), and major risk factors included longer LOS, larger TBSA, and more surgeries. Furthermore, compared to the earlier data from our center, the proportion of older adults among all burns (7.50% vs. 4.15%), proportion of flame burns (51.95% vs. 33.90%), and mean age (69.05 years vs. 65.10 years) were significantly higher, while the proportion of premorbidities (16.9% vs. 83.9%), mortality (0.9% vs. 7.5%) and median TBSA (5% vs. 21%) were significantly lower. Conclusions This study suggested that closer attention should be paid to prevent burn injuries in older people aged 60–69 years, especially males, regarding incidents in the summer and winter, and flame burns. Moreover, tailored intervention strategies based on related risk factors should be under special consideration.


Author(s):  
Kayhan Gurbuz ◽  
Mete Demir

Abstract The current descriptive analysis was designed to document the common epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes of burn injuries, and age-specific mortality patterns covering all age groups admitted for treatment to the Burn Center of Adana City Training and Research Hospital (ACTRH). Medical records were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were stratified into two age groups as pediatric and adults, and then into ten sub-age groups. Among the 946 patients of the study population, there were 24 mortalities with a mortality rate of 2.5%. Patients within the age range of 70-79 years had the highest mortality rate of 33.3%; followed by 60-69, 80+, 18-29, 10-17, and <5 sub-age groups, whose mortality rates were, 13.0%, 7.8%, 7.2%, 2.4%, 0.5%, respectively. In terms of multivariate regression analysis of factors predicting mortality among burn patients in all age groups, fire-flame related burns, age ≥18 years, total body surface area burned ≥20 percent (TBSA ≥20%), the existence of inhalation injury, deep partially/full-thickness burns were found to be significant prognostic factors of mortality. The strongest association was seen in TBSA ≥60% segment (p<0.0001), which had 25.9 times more death risk. As expected, a similar trend was detected when the age groups stratified into age groups, and the strongest association was in the 60+ sub-age group (p<0.0001), whose had 5.84 times more likely death; followed by 29-59, 18-29 sub-age groups, with the ORs of 2.12 (95%CI=1.25-3.61), 2.08 (95%CI=1.90-4.05), respectively. Oppose to these findings; the 0-17 sub-age group was not found to have a statistically significant effect in predicting mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document