porous biomaterials
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

112
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

33
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Mythili Prakasam ◽  
Jean-François Silvain ◽  
Alain Largeteau

Biomaterials and their clinical application have become well known in recent years and progress in their manufacturing processes are essential steps in their technological advancement. Great advances have been made in the field of biomaterials, including ceramics, glasses, polymers, composites, glass-ceramics and metal alloys. Dense and porous ceramics have been widely used for various biomedical applications. Current applications of bioceramics include bone grafts, spinal fusion, bone repairs, bone fillers, maxillofacial reconstruction, etc. One of the common impediments in the bioceramics and metallic porous implants for biomedical applications are their lack of mechanical strength. High-pressure processing can be a viable solution in obtaining porous biomaterials. Many properties such as mechanical properties, non-toxicity, surface modification, degradation rate, biocompatibility, corrosion rate and scaffold design are taken into consideration. The current review focuses on different manufacturing processes used for bioceramics, polymers and metals and their alloys in porous forms. Recent advances in the manufacturing technologies of porous ceramics by freeze isostatic pressure and hydrothermal processing are discussed in detail. Pressure as a parameter can be helpful in obtaining porous forms for biomaterials with increased mechanical strength.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nupur Kohli ◽  
Jennifer C. Stoddart ◽  
Richard J. van Arkel

AbstractMuch research effort is being invested into the development of porous biomaterials that enhance implant osseointegration. Large micromotions at the bone-implant interface impair this osseointegration process, resulting in fibrous capsule formation and implant loosening. This systematic review compiled all the in vivo evidence available to establish if there is a universal limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42020196686). Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases were searched for studies containing terms relating to micromotion and osseointegration. The mean value of micromotion for implants that osseointegrated was 32% of the mean value for those that did not (112 ± 176 µm versus 349 ± 231 µm, p < 0.001). However, there was a large overlap in the data ranges with no universal limit apparent. Rather, many factors were found to combine to affect the overall outcome including loading time, the type of implant and the material being used. The tables provided in this review summarise these factors and will aid investigators in identifying the most relevant micromotion values for their biomaterial and implant development research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 1248-1254
Author(s):  
Darragh S. Egan ◽  
Caitríona M. Ryan ◽  
Andrew C. Parnell ◽  
Denis P. Dowling

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lubinda Mbundi ◽  
Miguel González-Pérez ◽  
Fernando González-Pérez ◽  
Diana Juanes-Gusano ◽  
José Carlos Rodríguez-Cabello

Porous biomaterials are of significant interest in a variety of biomedical applications as they enable the diffusion of nutrients and gases as well as the removal of metabolic waste from implants. Pores also provide 3D spaces for cell compartmentalization and the development of complex structures such as vasculature and the extracellular matrix. Given the variation in the extracellular matrix composition across and within different tissues, it is necessary to tailor the physicochemical characteristics of biomaterials and or surfaces thereof for optimal bespoke applications. In this regard, different synthetic and natural polymers have seen increased usage in the development of biomaterials and surface coatings; among them, elastin-like polypeptides and their recombinant derivatives have received increased advocacy. The modular assembly of these molecules, which can be controlled at a molecular level, presents a flexible platform for the endowment of bespoke biomaterial properties. In this review, various elastin-like recombinamer–based porous biomaterials for both soft and hard tissue applications are discussed and their current and future applications evaluated.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Solazzo ◽  
Michael G. Monaghan

A new approach for obtaining highly conductive, yet biocompatible, 3D electroconductive porous scaffolds based on PEDOT:PSS and treated with sulphuric acid crystallisation, that can be processed with both isotropic and anisotropic microarchitecture.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 3404-3413
Author(s):  
Yanping Liu ◽  
Yingchao Wang ◽  
Mengnan Zhang ◽  
Zhiyuan Qi ◽  
Jun Zeng ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 5014-5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunmi Zo ◽  
Soonmo Choi ◽  
Hyunduk Kim ◽  
Eunjoo Shin ◽  
Sungsoo Han

Bone tissue engineering has been rapidly developed in regenerative medicine field, which aims to induce new functional bone regeneration through the synergistic combination of biomaterials and cells. Porous biomaterials with sufficient mechanical properties and functional impregnating for bone substitutes have been imposed in the oncoming generation of bone reconstruction. In this study, we fabricated Carboxymethyl chitosan three dimensional (3D) porous scaffold modified with waterborne polyurethane (WPU) through freeze drying technique. In order to check its potential in bone tissue substitutes, osteoblast cells (hFOB 1.19) were seeded onto the fabricated scaffolds and then, SEM and proliferation assay were performed. The enhanced proliferation was contributed to 3D macroporous network structure, large surface area, and osteoconductive environments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 137 (25) ◽  
pp. 48943
Author(s):  
Erasmo Lopez Calleros ◽  
Felix I. Simonovsky ◽  
Shai Garty ◽  
Buddy D. Ratner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document