Discussing patient preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment: development and pilot testing of a Danish POLST form

Background Medically frail and/or chronically ill patients are often admitted to Danish hospitals without documentation of patient preferences. This may lead to inappropriate care. Modelled on the American Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, the purpose of the study was to develop and pilot test a Danish POLST form to ensure that patients’ preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment are known and documented. Methods The study was a mixed methods study. In the initial phase, a Danish POLST form was developed on the basis of literature and recommendations from the National POLST organisation in the US. A pilot test of the Danish POLST form was conducted in hospital wards, general practitioners’ clinics, and nursing homes. Patients were eligible for inclusion if death was assessed as likely within 12 months. The patient and his/her physician engaged in a conversation where patient values, beliefs, goals for care, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment alternatives were discussed. The POLST form was completed based on the patient’s values and preferences. Family members and/or nursing staff could participate. Participants’ assessments of the POLST form were evaluated using questionnaires, and in-depth interviews were conducted to explore experiences with the POLST form and the conversation. Results In total, 25 patients participated, 45 questionnaires were completed and 14 interviews were conducted. Most participants found the POLST form readable and understandable, and 93% found the POLST form usable to a high or very high degree for discussing preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment. Three themes emerged from the interviews: (a) an understandable document is essential for the conversation, (b) handling and discussing wishes, and (c) significance for the future. Conclusion The Danish version of the POLST form is assessed by patients, families, physicians, and nurses as a useful model for obtaining and documenting Danish patients’ preferences for life-sustaining treatment. However, this needs to be confirmed in a larger-scale study.

Development of On-Site Medical System for Mass-Gathering Events During TOKYO 2020: Vulnerability Analysis Using Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

At mass-gathering events of the Olympic and Paralympic Games, a well-organized, on-site medical system is essential. This study evaluated the vulnerabilities of the prehospital medical system of the TOKYO 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games (TOKYO2020) to propose corrections that can be generalized to other mass gatherings. The healthcare failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) was adopted to analyze vulnerabilities of the on-site medical system proposed by the organizing committee of TOKYO2020. Processes from detecting a patient on the scene to completing transport to a hospital were analyzed. Ten processes with 47 sub-processes and 122 possible failure modes were identified. HFMEA revealed 9 failure modes as vulnerabilities: misidentification of patient, delayed immediate care at the scene, misjudgment of disposition from the on-site medical suite, and inappropriate care during transportation to hospital. Proposed corrections included surveillance to decrease blind spots, first aid brochures for spectators, and uniform protocol for health care providers at the scene. The on-site medical system amended by HFMEA seemed to work appropriately in TOKYO2020.

Understanding the factors that affect the appropriateness of rheumatology referrals

Background Reducing inappropriate referrals to specialists is a challenge for the healthcare system as it seeks to transition from volume to value-based healthcare. Given the projection of a severe shortage of rheumatologists in the near future, innovative strategies to decrease demand for rheumatology services may prove more fruitful than increasing the supply of rheumatologists. Efforts to increase appropriate utilization through reductions in capacity may have the unintended consequence of reducing appropriate care as well. This highlights the challenges in increasing the appropriate use of high cost services as the health system transitions to value based care. The objective of this study was to analyze factors affecting appropriateness of rheumatology services. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of patients receiving Rheumatology services between November 2013 and October 2019. We used a proxy for “appropriateness”: whether or not there was any follow-up care after the first appointment. Results from regression analysis and physicians’ chart reviews were compared using an inter-rater reliability measure (kappa). Data was drawn from the EHR 2013–2019. Results We found that inappropriate referrals increased 14.3% when a new rheumatologist was hired, which increased to 14.8% after wash-out period of 6 months; 15.7% after 12 months; 15.5% after 18 months and 16.7% after 18 months. Other factors influencing appropriateness of referrals included severity of disease, gender and insurance type, but not specialty of referring provider. Conclusions Given the projection of a severe shortage of rheumatologists in the near future, innovative strategies to decrease demand for rheumatology services may prove more fruitful than increasing the supply of rheumatologists. Innovative strategies to decrease demand for rheumatology services may prove more fruitful than increasing the supply of rheumatologists. These findings may apply to other specialties as well. This study is relevant for health care systems that are implementing value-based payment models aimed at reducing inappropriate care.

Outcome of Colorectal cancer in Geriatric Patient

Background: Older surgical patients remain at increased risk of adverse postoperative outcome when undergoing both elective and emergency surgery. The needs of the older surgical patient are often substantially different from those of younger patients. As a surgeons we have dilemmas in appropriately treating elderly patients. Specifically, those with cancer have been shown to receive inappropriate care, being either undertreated or overtreated based on their chronological age rather than their degree of frailty. Aim:To evaluate outcome of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in patients aged 80 years and over. Methods:Retrospective study of all patients 80 years and above managed with colorectal cancer at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital UK from January 2015 through December 2019 Results: In the study period 278 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Male 143 Female 135 ratio 1:1.05. Age range from 80 to 101years. 54.31% patients underwent surgical intervention. 15.10% had complications after surgery. 36.69% patients deemed unsuitable for resection surgery were treated with best supportive care palliatively. 57.19% patients were in ASAIII, 24.10% ASAII and 12.23% ASAIV. 46.40% patients died during the study period. Conclusion:Age on its own would not be taken as for less aggressive therapy; Careful assessment of the patient taking into consideration comorbidities, functional status and patient wishes are essential in decision making and choosing appropriate management plan. Curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma in the geriatric patients are well tolerated. Management of comorbidities preceding surgery may impact postoperative outcome.

Deductible Status in the Pediatric Population: A Barrier to Appropriate Care?

Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of high-deductible health plans on elective surgery (tonsillectomy) in the pediatric population. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Health claims database from a third-party payer. Methods Data were reviewed for children up to 18 years of age who underwent tonsillectomy or arm fracture repair (nonelective control) from 2016 to 2019. Incidence of surgery by health plan deductible (high, low, or government insured) and met or unmet status of deductibles were compared. Results A total of 10,047 tonsillectomy claims and 9903 arm fracture repair claims met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The incidence of tonsillectomy was significantly different across deductible plan types. Patients with met deductibles were more likely to undergo tonsillectomy. In patients with deductibles ≥$4000, a 1.75-fold increase in tonsillectomy was observed in those who had met their deductible as compared with those who had not. These findings were not observed in controls (nonelective arm fracture). For those with met deductibles, those with high deductibles were much more likely to undergo tonsillectomy than those with low, moderate, and government deductibles. Unmet high deductibles were least likely to undergo tonsillectomy. Conclusions Health insurance plan type influences the incidence of pediatric elective surgery such as tonsillectomy but not procedures such as nonelective repair of arm fracture. High deductibles may discourage elective surgery for those deductibles that are unmet, risking inappropriate care of vulnerable pediatric patients. However, meeting the deductible may increase incidence, raising the question of overutilization.

Understanding the Factors that Affect the Appropriateness of Rheumatology Referrals

Background: Reducing inappropriate referrals to specialists is a challenge for the healthcare system as it seeks to transition from volume to value-based healthcare. Given the projection of a severe shortage of rheumatologists in the near future, innovative strategies to decrease demand for rheumatology services may prove more fruitful than increasing the supply of rheumatologists. Efforts to increase appropriate utilization through reductions in capacity may have the unintended consequence of reducing appropriate care as well. This highlights the challenges in increasing the appropriate use of high cost services as the health system transitions to value based care. The objective of this study was to analyze factors affecting appropriateness of rheumatology services.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of patients receiving Rheumatology services between November 2013 and October 2019. We used a proxy for “appropriateness”: whether or not there was any follow-up care after the first appointment. Results from regression analysis and physicians’ chart reviews were compared using an inter-rater reliability measure (kappa). Data was drawn from the EHR 2013-2019. Results: We found that inappropriate referrals increased 14.3% when a new rheumatologist was hired, which increased to 14.8% after wash-out period of 6 months; 15.7% after 12 months; 15.5% after 18 months and 16.7% after 18 months. Other factors influencing appropriateness of referrals included severity of disease, gender and insurance type, but not specialty of referring provider. Conclusions: Given the projection of a severe shortage of rheumatologists in the near future, innovative strategies to decrease demand for rheumatology services may prove more fruitful than increasing the supply of rheumatologists. Innovative strategies to decrease demand for rheumatology services may prove more fruitful than increasing the supply of rheumatologists. These findings may apply to other specialties as well. This study is relevant for health care systems that are implementing value-based payment models aimed at reducing inappropriate care.

Identifying and intercepting health misinformation on Reddit dermatology forums with artificially intelligent bots using natural language processing (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Reddit, the fifth most popular website in the United States, boasts a large and engaged user base on its dermatology forums where users crowdsource free medical opinions. Unfortunately, much of the advice provided is unvalidated and could lead to inappropriate care. Initial testing has shown that artificially intelligent bots can detect misinformation on Reddit forums and may be able to produce responses to posts containing misinformation. OBJECTIVE To analyze the ability of bots to find and respond to health misinformation on Reddit’s dermatology forums in a controlled test environment. METHODS Using natural language processing techniques, we trained bots to target misinformation using relevant keywords and to post pre-fabricated responses. By evaluating different model architectures across a held-out test set, we compared performances. RESULTS Our models yielded data test accuracies ranging from 95%-100%, with a BERT fine-tuned model resulting in the highest level of test accuracy. Bots were then able to post corrective pre-fabricated responses to misinformation. CONCLUSIONS Using a limited data set, bots had near-perfect ability to detect these examples of health misinformation within Reddit dermatology forums. Given that these bots can then post pre-fabricated responses, this technique may allow for interception of misinformation. Providing correct information, even instantly, however, does not mean users will be receptive or find such interventions persuasive. Further work should investigate this strategy’s effectiveness to inform future deployment of bots as a technique in combating health misinformation. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Appropriateness of Neurocritical Care for Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH): A Qualitative Study

Background and Objective Clinicians working in intensive care frequently report perceptions of inappropriate care (PIC) situations. Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Prognosticating after ICH is complex and may be influenced by clinicians’ subjective impressions and biases, which may, in turn, influence decision making regarding the level of care provided. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore perceptions of neurocritical care in relation to the expected functional outcome for ICH patients. Design Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with neurocritical care doctors and nurses. Setting Neurocritical care (NCC) department in a UK neuroscience tertiary referral center. Subjects Eleven neurocritical care nurses, five consultant neurointensivists, two stroke physicians, three neurosurgeons. Intervention None. Measurements and Main Results We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews and identified five key themes: (1) prognostic uncertainty (2) subjectivity of good versus poor outcome (3) perceived inappropriate care (PIC) situations (including for frail elderly patients) (4) challenging nature of decision-making (5) clinician distress. Conclusions Caring for severely affected ICH patients in need of neurocritical care is challenging, particularly with frail elderly patients. Awareness of the challenges could facilitate interventions to improve decision-making for this group of stroke patients and their families, as well as measures to reduce the distress on clinicians who care for this patient group. Our findings highlight the need for effective interdisciplinary shared decision making involving the family, taking into account patients’ previously expressed values and preferences and incorporating these into bespoke care planning.

End-of-life decisions and appropriateness of care in intensive care: a cross-sectional, pilot study

In Intensive Care Units (ICUs) patients can experience severe organ failures. In several cases, failures can be incurable, making many of the treatments inappropriate, according to ethical principles. Based on the current legislation, in ICUs, clinicians proceed to limit life support care in most of the cases described. Despite this, some studies report that in many cases the care provided is inappropriate for the prognosis. The study aims at investigating the type and frequency of healthcare personnel's End of Life Decisions (DEL) and the point of view of patients' family, contributing to the debate. A non-interventional cross-sectional pilot study was conducted in 3 ICUs in North-Eastern Italy. Two questionnaires were administered: the first investigates DEL and the perception of nurses and physicians regarding the inadequacy of care provided to patients (from the ELDY study), the second focuses on the family's opinions. Data are expressed by frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations. In line with most of previous studies, cases identified as DEL are all related to non-treatment decisions (n = 20, 74%), 44% of these are related to having stopped or not started treatments already knowing the possibility of anticipating the end of life of the patient, while 27% had the precise intention of shortening life. The situation has been discussed with patient's relatives only in two cases. The cause of increased inappropriateness (87%) was the perception that other patients would benefit more from intensive care than the patient in charge, and 40% of the healthcare personnel reported that similar situations occur very frequently. The restriction of treatment has been confirmed as the most frequent DEL, and interruption being more frequent than non-implementation. Given the high rate of inappropriate care, it could be effective to follow adequate guidelines in the management of the DEL and discuss strategies within the team and with patients' family. Key messages When severe organ failures are incurable, in ICUs clinicians proceed to limit life support to the patient in charge. Despite this, in many cases the care provided is inappropriate for the prognosis. Given the high rate of inappropriate care, it could be effective to follow adequate guidelines in the management of the DEL and discuss strategies within the team and with patients’ family.

Clinical Psychologist, 4 years’ experience, UK

This chapter addresses the experience of a Clinical Psychologist who has worked in acute medical settings and on inpatient wards for several years, and has encountered people with a wide range of symptoms and presentations. Unfortunately, in acute medical settings, people who experience Non-Epileptic Seizures (NES) often receive substandard or inappropriate care and have negative interactions with staff as a result of stigma. When someone presents with NES, the situation can be difficult for medical professionals to understand. They can be just as frightened, confused, and unsure about what to do as the person experiencing the seizures. Moreover, it can be difficult for doctors to admit that they do not know what is happening. They can feel under pressure to do or say something—maybe to refer for a test that is not really needed, to prescribe unnecessary medication, or to refer to another specialist for a second opinion. As such, people often go through a seemingly never-ending journey of uncertainty, anxiety, and rejection as they try to find some understanding about what is causing the seizures they cannot predict or explain.