The aim of the paper is to compare two forms of work organisation, the first of which assumes extending the mine’s operation fromfive to six days a week, and the other – implementing a continuous work organisation system. To illustrate this in terms of unitmining costs, a model hard coal mine was used. In addition to the current organisational solution, which serves as the startingpoint for comparative analysis, solutions were proposed to increase the degree of utilisation of the existing production potential,mainly with regard to technical means of production and human resources. The proposed solutions assume increasing the intensityof use of technical means of production on an annual basis by extending the annual working time of selected mining crews. For thecomparative analysis, three variants of the mine’s operation in terms of the production organisation system were adopted. UnderVariant I, treated as the baseline option, the current organisation of production is to be continued (5 days a week, Monday to Friday,excluding public holidays). Variant II provides for extending the working time of some mining crews to 6 days a week (fromMonday to Saturday, excluding public holidays). Variant III assumes continuous operation for 7 days a week (excluding publicholidays and several days for shaft inspections). Having adopted appropriate baseline assumptions for simulation calculations anda set of input data reflecting the characteristics of a specific mine, simulation calculations were performed and their results wereused to carry out a comparative analysis of selected organisational solutions.