scholarly journals Evaluation of reservoir performance by waterflooding: case based on Lanea oilfield, Chad

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1339-1352
Author(s):  
Mahamat Tahir Abdramane Mahamat Zene ◽  
Nurul Hasan ◽  
Ruizhong Jiang ◽  
Guan Zhenliang ◽  
Nurafiqah Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Reservoir Pressure ◽  
Reservoir Performance ◽  
Production Location ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Production Behavior

AbstractThe research of the current study is primarily focused on evaluating the reservoir performance by utilizing waterflood technique, based on a case study at Lanea oil field located in Chad; various mechanisms along with approaches were used in considering the best suitable pattern for waterflooding. All the simulation work was compared against a base case, where there was no involvement of water injection. Moreover, for the base case, a significant amount of oil left behind and cannot be swept, because of lower reservoir pressure at the downhill. The recovery factor obtained was in the range of 14.5–15% since 2010, and in order to enhance the oil production, an injection well was applied to boost the reservoir pressure; oil recovery is improved. In addition, sensitivity analysis study was performed to reach the optimum production behavior achieved by possible EOR method. Parameters, such as grid test, injection position, proper selection production location, permeability, and voidage substitution, were defined in the simulation study.

scholarly journals Water Injection for Oil Recovery in Mishrif Formation for Amarah Oil Field

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Ayat Ahmed Jassim ◽  
Abdul Aali Al-dabaj ◽  
Aqeel S. AL-Adili
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Petroleum Reservoirs ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Reservoir Pressure ◽  
Vertical Wells ◽  
First Case ◽  
New Ideas

The water injection of the most important technologies to increase oil production from petroleum reservoirs. In this research, we developed a model for oil tank using the software RUBIS for reservoir simulation. This model was used to make comparison in the production of oil and the reservoir pressure for two case studies where the water was not injected in the first case study but adding new vertical wells while, later, it was injected in the second case study. It represents the results of this work that if the water is not injected, the reservoir model that has been upgraded can produce only 2.9% of the original oil in the tank. This case study also represents a drop in reservoir pressure, which was not enough to support oil production. Thus, the implementation of water injection in the second case study of the average reservoir pressure may support, which led to an increase in oil production by up to 5.5% of the original oil in the tank. so that, the use of water injection is a useful way to increase oil production. Therefore, many of the issues related to this subject valuable of study where the development of new ideas and techniques.

Challenges, Opportunities and Threats of Deep Bottoms-Up Water Injection in Heavy Oil Reservoir: Lessons Learnt from the G Field, South Oman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitanya Behera ◽  
Sandip Mahajan ◽  
Carlos Annia ◽  
Mahmood Harthi ◽  
Jane-Frances Obilaja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Oil Fields ◽  
Reservoir Pressure ◽  
Light Oil ◽  
Alternative Water ◽  
Variable Water

Abstract This paper presents the results of a comprehensive study carried out to improve the understanding of deep bottom-up water injection, which enabled optimizing the recovery of a heavy oil field in South Oman. Understanding the variable water injection response and the scale of impact on oil recovery due to reservoir heterogeneity, operating reservoir pressure and liquid offtake management are the main challenges of deep bottoms-up water injection in heavy oil fields. The offtake and throughput management philosophy for heavy oil waterflood is not same as classical light oil. Due to unclear understanding of water injection response, sometimes the operators are tempted to implement alternative water injection trials leading to increase in the risk of losing reserves and unwarranted CAPEX sink. There are several examples of waterflood in heavy oil fields; however, very few examples of deep bottom water injection cases are available globally. The field G is one of the large heavy oil fields in South Oman; the oil viscosity varies between 250cp to 1500cp. The field came on-stream in 1989, but bottoms-up water-injection started in 2015, mainly to supplement the aquifer influx after 40% decline of reservoir pressure. After three years of water injection, the field liquid production was substantially lower than predicted, which implied risk on the incremental reserves. Alternative water injection concepts were tested by implementing multiple water injection trials apprehending the effectiveness of the bottoms-up water injection concept. A comprehensive integrated study including update of geocellular model, full field dynamic simulation, produced water re-injection (PWRI) model and conventional field performance analysis was undertaken for optimizing the field recovery. The Root Cause Analysis (RCA) revealed many reasons for suboptimal field performance including water injection management, productivity impairment due to near wellbore damage, well completion issues, and more importantly the variable water injection response in the field. The dynamic simulation study indicated negligible oil bank development due to frontal displacement and no water cut reversal as initial response to the water injection. Nevertheless, the significance of operating reservoir pressure, liquid offtake and throughput management impact on oil recovery cann't be precluded. The work concludes that the well reservoir management (WRM) strategy for heavy oil field is not same as the classical light oil waterflood. Nevertheless, the reservoir heterogeneity, oil column thickness and saturation history are also important influencing factors for variable water injection response in heavy oil field.

Undersaturated Hydrocarbon Reservoir Waterflooding: A simulation Approach to Performance Assessment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekunle Tirimisiyu Adeniyi ◽  
Miracle Imwonsa Osatemple ◽  
Abdulwahab Giwa
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Solution Approach ◽  
Hydrocarbon Reservoir

Abstract There are a good numbers of brown hydrocarbon reservoirs, with a substantial amount of bypassed oil. These reservoirs are said to be brown, because a huge chunk of its recoverable oil have been produced. Since a significant number of prominent oil fields are matured and the number of new discoveries is declining, it is imperative to assess performances of waterflooding in such reservoirs; taking an undersaturated reservoir as a case study. It should be recalled that Waterflooding is widely accepted and used as a means of secondary oil recovery method, sometimes after depletion of primary energy sources. The effects of permeability distribution on flood performances is of concerns in this study. The presence of high permeability streaks could lead to an early water breakthrough at the producers, thus reducing the sweep efficiency in the field. A solution approach adopted in this study was reserve water injection. A reverse approach because, a producing well is converted to water injector while water injector well is converted to oil producing well. This optimization method was applied to a waterflood process carried out on a reservoir field developed by a two - spot recovery design in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria that is being used as a case study. Simulation runs were carried out with a commercial reservoir oil simulator. The result showed an increase in oil production with a significant reduction in water-cut. The Net Present Value, NPV, of the project was re-evaluated with present oil production. The results of the waterflood optimization revealed that an increase in the net present value of up to 20% and an increase in cumulative production of up to 27% from the base case was achieved. The cost of produced water treatment for re-injection and rated higher water pump had little impact on the overall project economy. Therefore, it can conclude that changes in well status in wells status in an heterogenous hydrocarbon reservoir will increase oil production.

scholarly journals Development of an analytical model to predict oil reservoirs performance using mechanical waves propagation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham A. Abu Zaid ◽  
◽  
Sherif A. Akl ◽  
Mahmoud Abu El Ela ◽  
Ahmed El-Banbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Actual Performance ◽  
Reservoir Performance ◽  
Mechanical Waves ◽  
Incremental Oil Recovery ◽  
Wave Induced

The mechanical waves have been used as an unconventional enhanced oil recovery technique. It has been tested in many laboratory experiments as well as several field trials. This paper presents a robust forecasting model that can be used as an effective tool to predict the reservoir performance while applying seismic EOR technique. This model is developed by extending the wave induced fluid flow theory to account for the change in the reservoir characteristics as a result of wave application. A MATLAB program was developed based on the modified theory. The wave’s intensity, pressure, and energy dissipation spatial distributions are calculated. The portion of energy converted into thermal energy in the reservoir is assessed. The changes in reservoir properties due to temperature and pressure changes are considered. The incremental oil recovery and reduction in water production as a result of wave application are then calculated. The developed model was validated against actual performance of Liaohe oil field. The model results show that the wave application increases oil production from 33 to 47 ton/day and decreases water-oil ratio from 68 to 48%, which is close to the field measurements. A parametric analysis is performed to identify the important parameters that affect reservoir performance under seismic EOR. In addition, the study determines the optimum ranges of reservoir properties where this technique is most beneficial.

Use of Diverter Compositions for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Oil Recovery from Productive Deposits

2018 ◽  
Vol 785 ◽  
pp. 159-170
Author(s):  
Vadim Aleksandrov ◽  
Kirill Galinskij ◽  
Andrey Ponomarev ◽  
Vadim Golozubenko ◽  
Yuriy Sivkov
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Geological Structure ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Field Analysis ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
Porosity And Permeability

One of the most important aspects in the activities of oil companies in the Western Siberia is to improve the effectiveness of water-flooding as the main method of impact on the formation. This is due to the fact that at the present time reservoirs of a complex structure with difficult to recover reserves prevail among newly introduced development objects, the extraction of which is extremely difficult using a simple method of water injection volumes regulation. First of all, this refers to reservoirs of Jurassic deposits, which are characterized by the most complex geological structure and porosity and permeability properties. A promising direction in improving the water-flooding system at such objects is the use of physical and chemical technologies to enhance the oil recovery of formations, and primarily, referring to the diverter technology. The research objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of using “hard” type diverter compositions to enhance oil recovery of formations. With the help of detailed oil-field analysis and field-geophysical studies, the nature of the development of oil reserves for Jurassic development sites has been assessed.

scholarly journals Optimization of reinjection treatment technology for oilfield wastewater in Longdong area

2020 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 04046
Author(s):  
Xiulan Zhu ◽  
Yanlong Ran ◽  
Wenjie Guo ◽  
Ke Gai ◽  
Yanju Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
High Water ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Treatment Technology ◽  
Water Separation ◽  
High Water Cut

With the long-term water injection development of Longdong oilfields, most of the oilfield blocks have been fully in the mid-high water cut period, and the amount of oil production wastewater is increasing year by year. In order to prevent the waste of resources and energy of oil production sewage, the oil production sewage after reaching the standard is treated for reinjection, which will ensure the sustainable development of the oil field. Oil production wastewater contains crude oil, solid-phase suspended solids and other pollutants, with high salinity, and problems such as difficulty in oil-water separation, sludge, scaling and corrosion. The sewage treatment system uses a multifunctional water treatment device to effectively remove oil and filter through the “special microorganism + air flotation + filtration” process, and build a sludge sewage tank for sludge discharge and backwashing. The reformed oil recovery wastewater reinjection treatment technology turns “sewage” into “clear flow”, reduces operating costs, improves wastewater treatment efficiency, and meets the water quality requirements of oilfield reinjection water.

scholarly journals Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Water and Polymer Flooding on Geometric and Multifractal Characteristics of Pore Structures

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5288
Author(s):  
Xianguo Zhang ◽  
Chengyan Lin ◽  
Yuqi Wu ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Total Porosity ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Pore Structures

During water and polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery, pore structures may vary because of the fluid–rock interactions, which can lead to variations in petrophysical properties and affect oil field production. To investigate the effects of fluid flooding on pore structures, six samples were subjected to brine water, dual-system, and alkaline–surfactant–polymer (ASP) polymer displacement experiments. Before and after experiments, samples were scanned by X-ray CT. Thin sections, X-ray diffraction, and high pressure mercury injection tests were also carried out to characterize mineralogy and fractal dimension of pore systems before experiments. Experiment results show that water flooding with low injection pore volume ratio (IPVR) can improve reservoir quality since total porosity and connected porosity of samples rise after the flooding and the proportion of large pores also increases and heterogeneity of pore structure decreases. However, water flooding with high IPVR has reverse effects on pore structures. Polymer flooding reduces the total porosity, connected porosity, the percentage of small pores and enhances the heterogeneity of pore structures. It can be found that pore structures will change in fluid flooding and appropriate water injection can improve reservoir quality while excessive water injection may destroy the reservoir. Meanwhile, injected polymer may block throats and destroy reservoirs. The experimental results can be used as the basis for oil field development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document