scholarly journals Step-wise endoscopic approach to palliative bilateral biliary drainage for unresectable advanced malignant hilar obstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Ho Choi ◽  
Sang Hyub Lee ◽  
Min Su You ◽  
Bang-sup Shin ◽  
Young Hoon Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biliary Drainage ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Malignant Hilar Obstruction ◽  
Transhepatic Biliary Drainage ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract The ideal type of stent utilized at index endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in management of malignant hilar obstruction (MHO) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the ideal stent choice in patients with MHO. In this retrospective study, patients with unresectable MHO were separated into the plastic stent (PS) group and the self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) group. The primary outcome was the risk and rate of rescue percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). The secondary outcomes were the progression-free survival, the overall survival and the PTBD-free period (days). Thirty-six patients in the PS group and 38 patients in the SEMS group were enrolled. The risk for PTBD was higher in SEMS group (HR = 2.205, 95% C.I. 0.977–4.977, P = 0.057). The rate of PTBD was significantly lower in the PS group. (22.2% vs 50.0%, P = 0.017) There were no differences in overall survival and progression-free survival (410 and 269 in the PS group, 395 and 266 in the SEMS group, P = 0.663 and P = 0.757). The PTBD-free period was significantly longer in the PS group. (836.43 vs 586.40, P = 0.039) Although comparable in clinical efficacy, utilization of PS at index ERCP may reduce patient’s discomfort by avoiding PTBD and prolonging PTBD-free period in patients with MHO.

Evaluating Mortality with Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in the Oncology Setting: The Importance of Selecting Trials That Include Survival or Loco-Regional Tumor Control as a Primary Endpoint

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4681-4681
Author(s):  
Athena T Samaras ◽  
Sara E Barnato ◽  
Benjamin Kim ◽  
Stephen Y Lai ◽  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Safety Signals

Abstract In February 2008, we reported increased risks of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.20) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (relative risk (RR) 1.57, 95% CI 1.31–1.87) among anemic cancer patients. Fifty-one trials including 13,611 patients and 38 trials including 8,172 patients were included in the mortality and VTE analyses, respectively. At ASH 2007, we reported that trials within the nephrology setting that measure survival as a primary or secondary safety endpoint should be used over trials that measure efficacy as a primary or secondary endpoint to detect significant safety signals. Herein, we compare the percentage of trials and patients included in various published meta-analyses within the cancer setting that prospectively evaluated overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival and/or loco-regional tumor control as a primary outcome, to determine whether these studies can better identify safety signals than studies that do not include these primary endpoints. Randomized trials of ESA administration to anemic cancer patients that evaluated survival or loco-regional control as primary endpoints were selected for review. Overviews published since 2006 were identified in Medline databases. HRs for mortality and 95% CIs were evaluated for the survival-focused meta-analyses and published overviews. A subset analysis of our 2008 meta-analysis including studies that prospectively evaluated overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival and/or loco-regional tumor control as a primary outcome resulted in an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.35). Among recently reported meta-analyses, safety signals are most apparent when the percentage of patients and trials that evaluated survival or loco-regional tumor control as a primary outcome is greatest, emphasizing the importance of trial selection when conducting safety-focused meta-analyses. Wilson et al. 2007 Bohlius et al. 2006 Seidenfeld et al. 2006 Bennett et al. 2008 Bennett et al. subset analysis 2008 # of trials (# of patients) 28 (5,308) 42 (8,167) 35 (6,918) 51 (13,611) 14 (5,785) Median/Mean # of patients 146/216 147/201 147/201 223/271 370/413 % of trials included that prospectively evaluated overall survival, disease –free survival, progression-free survival, or loco-regional tumor control as a primary outcome (# included, total #) 7.1% (2/28) 16.7% (7/42) 17.1% (6/35) 27.5% (14/51) 100% (14/14) % of patients included that prospectively evaluated overall survival, disease –free survival, progression-free survival, or loco-regional tumor control as a primary outcome (# included, total #) 24.3% (1,290/5,308) 26.7% (2,181/8,167) 29..9% (2,068/6,918) 39.1% (5,324/13,611) 100% (5,787/5,787) HR for mortality(95% CI) 1.03 (0.92–1.16) 1.08 (0.99–1.18) 1.11 (0.99–1.23) 1.10 (1.01–1.20) 1.18 (1.04, 1.35)

scholarly journals CHALLENGES AND METHODOLOGIES IN USING PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL AS A SURROGATE FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL IN ONCOLOGY

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte ◽  
Alastair Fischer ◽  
Nicholas Latimer
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
The Relationship

Objectives:A primary outcome in oncology trials is overall survival (OS). However, to estimate OS accurately requires a sufficient number of patients to have died, which may take a long time. If an alternative end point is sufficiently highly correlated with OS, it can be used as a surrogate. Progression-free survival (PFS) is the surrogate most often used in oncology, but does not always satisfy the correlation conditions for surrogacy. We analyze the methodologies used when extrapolating from PFS to OS.Methods:Davis et al. previously reviewed the use of surrogate end points in oncology, using papers published between 2001 and 2011. We extend this, reviewing papers published between 2012 and 2016. We also examine the reporting of statistical methods to assess the strength of surrogacy.Results:The findings from 2012 to 2016 do not differ substantially from those of 2001 to 2011: the same factors are shown to affect the relationship between PFS and OS. The proportion of papers reporting individual patient data (IPD), strongly recommended for full assessment of surrogacy, remains low: 33 percent. A wide range of methods has been used to determine the appropriateness of surrogates. While usually adhering to reporting standards, the standard of scholarship appears sometimes to be questionable and the reporting of results often haphazard.Conclusions:Standards of analysis and reporting PFS to OS surrogate studies should be improved by increasing the rigor of statistical reporting and by agreeing to a minimum set of reporting guidelines. Moreover, the use of IPD to assess surrogacy should increase.

LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with breast cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Budhi Singh Yadav ◽  
Nagarjun Ballari ◽  
Namrata Das ◽  
Ngangom Robert
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Surgery

Abstract Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. In this study we aim to report clinical outcomes with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for BM in patients of breast cancer. Methods: Clinical and dosimetric records of breast cancer patients treated for BM at our institute between May, 2015 and December, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients of previously treated or newly diagnosed breast cancer with at least a radiological diagnosis of BM; 1–4 in number, ≤3·5 cm in maximum dimension, with a Karnofsky Performance Score of ≥60 were taken up for treatment with SRS. SRT was generally considered if a tumour was >3·5 cm in diameter, near a critical or eloquent structure, or if the proximity of moderately sized tumours would lead to dose bridging in a single-fraction SRS plan. The median prescribed SRS dose was 15 Gy (range 7–24 Gy) and SRT dose was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Clinical assessment and MR imaging was done at 6 weeks post-SRS and then every 3 months thereafter. Intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using log rank test. Results: Total, 40 tumours were treated in 31 patients. The median tumour diameter was 2·3 cm (range 1·0–4·6 cm). SRS and SRT were delivered in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. SRS/SRT was given as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in four patients and as salvage for progression after WBRT in six patients. In general, nine patients underwent prior surgery. The median follow-up was 7·9 months (0·2–34 months). Twenty (64·5%) patients developed local recurrence, 10 (32·3%) patients developed distant intracranial relapse and 7 patients had both local and distant intracranial relapse. The estimated local control at 6 months and 1 year was 48 and 35%, respectively. Median intracranial progression free survival (PFS) was 3·73 months (range 0·2–25 months). Median intracranial PFS was 3·02 months in patients who received SRS alone or as boost after WBRT, while it was 4·27 months in those who received SRS as salvage after WBRT (p = 0·793). No difference in intracranial PFS was observed with or without prior surgery (p = 0·410). Median overall survival (OS) was 21·7 months (range 0·2–34 months) for the entire cohort. Patients who received prior WBRT had a poor OS (13·31 months) as compared to SRS alone (21·4 months; p = 0·699). Conclusion: In patients with BM after breast cancer SRS alone, WBRT + SRS and surgery + SRS had comparable PFS and OS.

scholarly journals IMMU-08. MODELING UPFRONT GLIOBLASTOMA SURGICAL RESECTION AND STEROID USE REVEALS IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE CHANGES AND SUGGESTS THAT PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTE COUNTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH TUMOR VOLUME AND PROGNOSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii106-ii106
Author(s):  
Balint Otvos ◽  
Tyler Alban ◽  
Matthew Grabowski ◽  
Defne Bayik ◽  
Robert Winkelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Peripheral Lymphocyte ◽  
Steroid Use ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Steroid Administration

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) and its treatment produces systemic immunosuppression, which is being targeted by immunotherapies. However, it remains unclear how surgical resection and steroids specifically in GBM alter the immune system. To further explore this issue, immunocompetent C57Bl/6 mice were intracranially inoculated with syngeneic glioma cells (GL261 and CT-2A) and growth of tumors was evaluated by MRI. Host immune cell populations were analyzed during surgical resection and steroid administration. Mice with surgically resected tumors had a longer median survival compared to mice subjected to tumor biopsies, and had increased bone marrow sequestration of both CD4 and CD8 T cells with corresponding decreased blood lymphocytes. Furthermore, physiologic doses of dexamethasone administered perioperatively decreased tumor edema, but increased the number and proliferative capacity of both marrow and circulating MDSCs while generating no survival benefit. Independent of therapy or dexamethasone, intracranial tumor volume correlated linearly with decreased CD4 and CD8 T cells in peripheral blood, and increased T cell sequestration within the bone marrow. We validated these parameters in steroid-naïve newly diagnosed GBM patients and observed decreased lymphocytes correlated linearly with increased tumor volume. When initial lymphocyte counts in both steroid-naïve and steroid-administered patients were used in univariate and multivariate models predicting progression-free survival and overall survival, decreased initial lymphocyte counts were an independent predictor of decreased progression free survival and decreased overall survival, with steroid use and initial tumor size falling out of significance during stepwise selection. Taken together, tumor volume is linearly correlated with marrow sequestration of lymphoid cells, but both surgery and steroid administration further suppress active immune responses along lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Furthermore, decreasing peripheral lymphocyte counts at diagnosis of GBM indicate an immune system less able to mount responses to the tumor and portent a worse progression free and overall survival.

scholarly journals Single arm, phase two study of low-dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Kiah Farr ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Isaac Jenkins ◽  
Alex Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.

scholarly journals Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingduo Kong ◽  
Hongyi Wei ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yilin Li ◽  
Yongjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Jun Nie ◽  
Ling Dai ◽  
Weiheng Hu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document