scholarly journals Statin Use and In-hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 and Coronary Heart Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Shen ◽  
Lin Qiu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Hengye Huang ◽  
Dong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Statin Group ◽  
Academic Hospitals ◽  
Statin Use

AbstractThe worsening progress of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is attributed to the proinflammatory state, leading to increased mortality. Statin works with its anti-inflammatory effects and may attenuate the worsening of COVID-19. COVID-19 patients were retrospectively enrolled from two academic hospitals in Wuhan, China, from 01/26/2020 to 03/26/2020. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was compared between the statin and the non-statin group by CHD status using multivariable Cox regression model after propensity score matching. Our study included 3133 COVID-19 patients (median age: 62y, female: 49.8%), and 404 (12.9%) received statin. Compared with the non-statin group, the statin group was older, more likely to have comorbidities but with a lower level of inflammatory markers. The Statin group also had a lower adjusted mortality risk (6.44% vs. 10.88%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29–0.77). Subgroup analysis of CHD patients showed a similar result. Propensity score matching showed an overall 87% (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05–0.36) lower risk of in-hospital mortality for statin users than nonusers. Such survival benefit of statin was obvious both among CHD and non-CHD patients (HR = 0.30 [0.09–0.98]; HR = 0.23 [0.1–0.49], respectively). Statin use was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in COVID-19. The benefit of statin was both prominent among CHD and non-CHD patients. These findings may further reemphasize the continuation of statins in patients with CHD during the COVID-19 era.

scholarly journals Edoxaban versus warfarin on stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: a territory-wide cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dicken Kong ◽  
Jiandong Zhou ◽  
Sharen Lee ◽  
Keith Sai Kit Leung ◽  
Tong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Risk Predictors

AbstractBackgroundIn this territory-wide, observational, propensity score-matched cohort study, we evaluate the development of transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke (TIA/Ischaemic stroke) in patients with AF treated with edoxaban or warfarin.MethodsThis was an observational, territory-wide cohort study of patients between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019, in Hong Kong. The inclusion were patients with i) atrial fibrillation, and ii) edoxaban or warfarin prescription. 1:2 propensity score matching was performed between edoxaban and warfarin users. Univariate Cox regression identifies significant risk predictors of the primary, secondary and safety outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval [CI] and p values were reported.ResultsThis cohort included 3464 patients (54.18% males, median baseline age: 72 years old, IQR: 63-80, max: 100 years old), 664 (19.17%) with edoxaban use and 2800 (80.83%) with warfarin use. After a median follow-up of 606 days (IQR: 306-1044, max: 1520 days), 91(incidence rate: 2.62%) developed TIA/ischaemic stroke: 1.51% (10/664) in the edoxaban group and 2.89% (81/2800) in the warfarin group. Edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of TIA or ischemic stroke when compared to warfarin.ConclusionsEdoxaban use was associated with a lower risk of TIA or ischemic stroke after propensity score matching for demographics, comorbidities and medication use.

scholarly journals Temporal Trends in Sepsis Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Cancer in the US Population

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. e71-e79
Author(s):  
Michael A. Liu ◽  
Brianna R. Bakow ◽  
Tzu-Chun Hsu ◽  
Jia-Yu Chen ◽  
Ke-Ying Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Background Few population-based studies assess the impact of cancer on sepsis incidence and mortality. Objectives To evaluate epidemiological trends of sepsis in patients with cancer. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults (≥20 years old) identified using sepsis-indicator International Classification of Diseases codes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2006-2014). A generalized linear model was used to trend incidence and mortality. Outcomes in patients with cancer and patients without cancer were compared using propensity score matching. Cox regression modeling was used to calculate hazard ratios for mortality rates. Results The study included 13 996 374 patients, 13.6% of whom had cancer. Gram-positive infections were most common, but the incidence of gram-negative infections increased at a greater rate. Compared with patients without cancer, those with cancer had significantly higher rates of lower respiratory tract (35.0% vs 31.6%), intra-abdominal (5.5% vs 4.6%), fungal (4.8% vs 2.9%), and anaerobic (1.2% vs 0.9%) infections. Sepsis incidence increased at a higher rate in patients with cancer than in those without cancer, but hospital mortality rates improved equally in both groups. After propensity score matching, hospital mortality was higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24-1.26). Of patients with sepsis and cancer, those with lung cancer had the lowest survival (hazard ratio, 1.65) compared with those with breast cancer, who had the highest survival. Conclusions Cancer patients are at high risk for sepsis and associated mortality. Research is needed to guide sepsis monitoring and prevention in patients with cancer.

scholarly journals Statins and clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prateek Lohia ◽  
Shweta Kapur ◽  
Sindhuri Benjaram ◽  
Zachary Cantor ◽  
Navid Mahabadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Statin Group ◽  
Statin Use

Abstract Background The pleiotropic effects of statins may reduce the severity of COVID-19 disease. This study aims to determine the association between inpatient statin use and severe disease outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, especially those with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Research design and methods A retrospective cohort study on hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. The primary outcome was mortality during hospitalization. Patients were classified into statin and non-statin groups based on the administration of statins during hospitalization. Analysis included multivariable regression analysis adjusting for confounders and propensity score matching to achieve a 1:1 balanced cohort. Subgroup analyses based on presence of DM were conducted. Results In the cohort of 922 patients, 413 had a history of DM. About 27.1% patients (n = 250) in the total cohort (TC) and 32.9% patients (n = 136) in DM cohort received inpatient statins. Atorvastatin (n = 205, 82%) was the most commonly prescribed statin medication in TC. On multivariable analysis in TC, inpatient statin group had reduced mortality compared to the non-statin group (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42–0.90; p = 0.01). DM modified this association between inpatient statins and mortality. Patients with DM who received inpatient statins had reduced mortality (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21–0.61; p < 0.001). However, no such association was noted among patients without DM (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67–2.17; p = 0.52). These results were further validated using propensity score matching. Conclusions Inpatient statin use was associated with significant reduction in mortality among COVID-19 patients especially those with DM. These findings support the pursuit of randomized clinical trials and inpatient statin use appears safe among COVID-19 patients.

Abstract 263: Evaluation of Survival Benefit of Statins in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Holzhauser ◽  
Ninel Hovnanian ◽  
Parham Eshtehardi ◽  
Khalid Mojadidi ◽  
David Goodman-Meza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Statin Group ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a multifactorial disease characterized by endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. In line with this, pleiotropic effects of statins have been found beneficial in PH resulting in hemodynamic improvement. However, the role of statins in subgroups of PH, especially inflammation triggered chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown and their effect on mortality has not yet been studied. Methods: Consecutive patients ≥18 years with severe PH (pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥60 mmHg) and preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥50%) defined by transthoracic echocardiograms were included from January 2002 to August 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on being on statin therapy for 12 consecutive months after diagnosis of PH. Propensity score matching was performed for all baseline demographics, comorbidities, labs, lipid profile, and medications with ratio matching of 1 (treated) to 5 (untreated controls). Subgroup analysis was done based on COPD status. Study endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. Results: 2,363 patients (age 71±16; 31% male) were included, 140 (6%) patients were on statin therapy. 1-year mortality for the entire population was 34%. Following propensity score matching, 137 patients on statin (statin group) and 625 patients not on statin (controls), all-cause mortality was significantly lower in statin group compared to controls (15.3% vs. 36.2%, HR 0.38 [95% CI 0.25, 0.60], p<0.001). After stratifying patients based on COPD status, while statins significantly reduced 1-year all-cause mortality in patients without COPD (HR 0.30 [95%CI 0.16, 0.56], p<0.001), patients with COPD did not show a survival benefit from statins (HR 0.54 [95%CI 0.28, 1.05], p=0.069). Conclusions: In this study, we identify statin therapy as an independent predictor of lower 1-year mortality in patients with severe PH but interestingly not in the subgroup of patients with COPD. This observation might be linked to the high severity of PH in our study population and less likely to the lack of anti-inflammatory effects. However the overall survival benefit in patients with severe PH is a novel and promising finding that needs to be confirmed in large randomized trials.

scholarly journals Statin Use and In‐Hospital Mortality in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and COVID‐19

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Saeed ◽  
Francesco Castagna ◽  
Ilir Agalliu ◽  
Xiaonan Xue ◽  
Snehal R. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Survival Models ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Statin Use

Background Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is characterized by a proinflammatory state with high mortality. Statins have anti‐inflammatory effects and may attenuate the severity of COVID‐19. Methods and Results An observational study of all consecutive adult patients with COVID‐19 admitted to a single center located in Bronx, New York, was conducted from March 1, 2020, to May 2, 2020. Patients were grouped as those who did and those who did not receive a statin, and in‐hospital mortality was compared by competing events regression. In addition, propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were used in survival models to examine the association between statin use and death during hospitalization. A total of 4252 patients were admitted with COVID‐19. Diabetes mellitus modified the association between statin use and in‐hospital mortality. Patients with diabetes mellitus on a statin (n=983) were older (69±11 versus 67±14 years; P <0.01), had lower inflammatory markers (C‐reactive protein, 10.2; interquartile range, 4.5–18.4 versus 12.9; interquartile range, 5.9–21.4 mg/dL; P <0.01) and reduced cumulative in‐hospital mortality (24% versus 39%; P <0.01) than those not on a statin (n=1283). No difference in hospital mortality was noted in patients without diabetes mellitus on or off statin (20% versus 21%; P =0.82). Propensity score matching (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83–0.94; P <0.01) and inverse probability treatment weighting (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84–0.92; P <0.01) showed a 12% lower risk of death during hospitalization for statin users than for nonusers. Conclusions Statin use was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality from COVID‐19 in patients with diabetes mellitus. These findings, if validated, may further reemphasize administration of statins to patients with diabetes mellitus during the COVID‐19 era.

Relationships among the Dosage of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents, Erythropoietin Resistance Index, and Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Sai Pan ◽  
De-Long Zhao ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Xue-Feng Sun ◽  
Jian-Hui Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Resistance Index ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Erythropoietin Resistance Index ◽  
Erythropoietin Resistance

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) constitute an important treatment option for anemia in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We investigated the relationships among the dosage of ESA, erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) scores, and mortality in Chinese MHD patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multicenter observational retrospective study included MHD patients from 16 blood purification centers (<i>n</i> = 824) who underwent HD in 2011–2015 and were followed up until December 31, 2016. We collected demographic variables, HD parameters, laboratory values, and ESA dosages. Patients were grouped into quartiles according to ESA dosage to study the effect of ESA dosage on all-cause mortality. The ERI was calculated as follows: ESA (IU/week)/weight (kg)/hemoglobin levels (g/dL). We also compared outcomes among the patients stratified into quartiles according to ERI scores. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to measure the relationships between the ESA dosage, ERI scores, and all-cause mortality. Using propensity score matching, we compared mortality between groups according to ERI scores, classified as either &#x3e; or ≤12.80. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 824 patients were enrolled in the study; 200 (24.3%) all-cause deaths occurred within the observation period. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that patients administered high dosages of ESAs had significantly worse survival than those administered low dosages of ESAs. A multivariate Cox regression identified that high dosages of ESAs could significantly predict mortality (ESA dosage &#x3e;10,000.0 IU/week, HR = 1.59, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (1.04, 2.42), and <i>p</i> = 0.031). Our analysis also indicated a significant increase in the risk of mortality in patients with high ERI scores. Propensity score matching-analyses confirmed that ERI &#x3e; 12.80 could significantly predict mortality (HR = 1.56, 95% CI [1.11, 2.18], and <i>p</i> = 0.010). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our data suggested that ESA dosages &#x3e;10,000.0 IU/week in the first 3 months constitute an independent predictor of all-cause mortality among Chinese MHD patients. A higher degree of resistance to ESA was related to a higher risk of all-cause mortality.

scholarly journals Postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and oncological outcomes of rectal cancer

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Grahn ◽  
M Lundin ◽  
M-L Lydrup ◽  
E Angenete ◽  
M Rutegård
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Instrumental Variables ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Instrumental Variables Approach

Abstract Background Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to suppress the inflammatory response after surgery and are often used for pain control. This study aimed to investigate NSAID use after radical surgical resection for rectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes. Methods A cohort of patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in 15 hospitals in Sweden was investigated retrospectively. Data were obtained from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records; follow-up was undertaken until July 2019. Patients who received NSAID treatment for at least 2 days after surgery were compared with controls who did not, and the primary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Cox regression modelling with confounder adjustment, propensity score matching, and an instrumental variables approach were used; missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Results The cohort included 1341 patients, 362 (27.0 per cent) of whom received NSAIDs after operation. In analyses using conventional regression and propensity score matching, there was no significant association between postoperative NSAID use and recurrence-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 0.79 to 1.33). The instrumental variables approach, including individual hospital as the instrumental variable and clinicopathological variables as co-variables, suggested a potential improvement in the NSAID group (HR 0.61, 0.38 to 0.99). Conclusion Conventional modelling did not demonstrate an association between postoperative NSAID use and recurrence-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, although an instrumental variables approach suggested a potential benefit.

scholarly journals Surgical Resection Significantly Promotes the Overall Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Min Hsieh ◽  
Hung-Yu Lin ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
I-Cheng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Background: The benefits of surgical resection (SR) for various Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. We investigated the risk factors of overall survival (OS) and survival benefits of SR over nonsurgical treatments in patients with HCC of various BCLC stages.Methods: Overall, 2316 HCC patients were included, and their clinicopathological data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.Results: In total, 66 (2.8%), 865 (37.4%), 575 (24.8%) and 870 (35.0%) patients had BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively. Furthermore, 1302 (56.2%) of all patients, and 37 (56.9%), 472 (54.6%), 313 (54.4%) and 480 (59.3%) of patients with BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively, died. The median follow-up duration time was 20 (range 0-96) months for the total cohort and was subdivided into 52 (8-96), 32 (1-96), 19 (0-84), and 12 (0-79) months for BCLC stages 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. The risk factors for OS were 1) SR and cirrhosis; 2) SR, cirrhosis, and Child-Pugh (C-P) class; 3) SR, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and C-P class; and 4) SR, HBV infection, and C-P class for the BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. Compared to non-SR treatment, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates in all cohorts. The 5-year OS rates for SR vs non-SR were 44.0% vs 28.7%, 72.2% vs 42.6%, 42.6% vs 36.2, 44.6% vs 23.5%, and 41.4% vs 15.3% (all p-values<0.05) in the total and BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. After PSM, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates compared to non-SR treatment in various BCLC stages.Conclusion: SR conferred significant survival benefits to patients with HCC of various BCLC stages and should be considered a recommended treatment for select HCC patients, especially patients with BCLC stage B and C disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document