scholarly journals Changes in the conduct of administrative proceedings in the scope of cadaster database

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 00007
Author(s):  
Ewa Sudoł
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
District Level ◽  
National Geographic ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
State Register ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

One of the components of the national spatial information infrastructure database (National Geographic Information System) at the district level is the records database of land and buildings. It is a state register that contains databases related to space and procedures and techniques for collecting, updating, processing and sharing information. A legal system regulating the procedures for keeping, updating and making available subject and object information included in the cadastres database is determined by the proper functioning of the land and buildings register (as part of the geodetic resource). The basis of department work in the field of keeping land and buildings records are primarily provisions of the Codex of Administrative Procedure of the Geodetic and Cartographic Law and regulations in the register of land and buildings. On 1 June 2017, a new Codex of Administrative Procedure came into force. In this paper have been presented the most important changes in conducting of administrative procedures in the field of geodesy at the district level after the aforementioned legal amendment. This paper touched the topics related to, among others, issued principle of resolving doubts in favor of the party (Article 7a), silent settlement of the case (Article 122a), administrative simplified proceedings (Chapter 14), appeal proceedings (Chapter 10). There have been presented examples of the most frequently conducted cases in the field of land and buildings registration in district country with particular emphasis on changes introduced by the latest legal amendments in connection with detailed regulations. The author focused on the logical interpretation of legal changes in order to show the problems connected with their application in practice (from the point of view of the proceedings and local government administration).

SPECYFIKA REGULACJI ADMINISTRACYJNOPRAWNEJ W PRAWIE KONSULARNYM. WYBRANE PROBLEMY USTROJOWE I PROCEDURALNE

2021 ◽  
pp. 354-375
Author(s):  
Michał Możdżeń-Marcinkowski
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Fundamental Condition ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The article discusses a significantly modified regulation within administrative law applied in the consular service. There seems to be a need for a voice in the discussion regarding the legal status of a Consul of the Republic of Poland (as well as the other members of the diplomatic corpus) as seen from an administrative law point of view. In the background of two regimes of administrative and consular law, it is also undoubtedly necessary to indicate the basic procedural border problems. A very typical example are the modified administrative procedures provided for diplomacy, with particular emphasis put on the importance of jurisdictional administrative proceedings lead by the consul. The administrative procedure constructed in this way by the legislature differs in many points from the general administrative procedure performed by other Polish authorities. Therefore, to some extent, it can be perceived as a specific administrative consular law. The aim of this article is to signal the typical procedural differences and to point out their sources. “Consular administrative law” can be perceived as a special administrative procedure, which does not constitute part of the general administrative procedure applicable to all national authorities and citizens in Poland, but which still is a sub-branch of Polish consular law which applies to the Polish citizens and foreigners in a specific administrative situations. The existence of so-called “consular administrative law”, however, presupposes one fundamental condition, which is having and maintaining foreign relations in the first place.

scholarly journals DETERMINING INDIVIDUAL CATEGORIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC REGISTRATION OF CIVIL STATES WITH ACCOUNTING OF LEGISLATIVE TRANSFORMATIONS

2019 ◽  
pp. 170-173
Author(s):  
O. H. Pohrebniak
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Modern Development ◽  
The Status ◽  
Civil Status ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Theoretical Developments

The article defines certain peculiarities of administrative proceedings of state registration of marriage and establishment of paternity in Ukraine. It has been established that the procedures for state registration of acts of civil status are types of administrative procedures, it should first be noted that the general normative act which should define the notions and peculiarities of such procedures should be the Law of Ukraine “On the administrative procedure” 2018, which at present time is a project and submitted to the VerkhovnaRada of Ukraine for consideration. As a rule, scholars agree that the administrative procedure is directly related to the activities of the public administration and is an established algorithm for the functioning of the subjects of power. In this case, the procedures for state registration of acts of civil status are no exception. They are a kind of administrative procedures and implemented by state authorities, and in certain cases, and by local self-government bodies. At the same time having its own peculiarities regarding the procedure for implementation and the subject structure of such procedures. It has been established that the modern development of domestic administrative legislation and the practice of its application testifies that at present the administrative procedure as an independent component of administrative law has not yet been fully formed, although, given the active theoretical developments of the representatives of the administrative and legal science on the pages of scientific, journalistic and educational publications concerning the concept, features, types and structure of administrative procedures, and referring to the active legislative development of this tyranny, it is safe to say that the process of the administrative procedure in the structure of administrative law is actively continuing. Therefore, on the basis of theoretical developments and practical features, the author’s understanding of the concept of “administrative procedure of state registration of acts of civil status” is determined. In addition, given the specific features of administrative proceedings for state registration of civil status acts, as well as for a more complete clarification of the status and authority of all participants in certain administrative procedures, the necessary additional introduction of the concept of “implementation of the administrative procedure” is argued. Such category will allow to find out the place, role and authority not only of the administrative body, but also other participants in administrative proceedings. Thus, under the implementation of an administrative procedure, it should be understood as the observance, execution, use and application of procedural steps directed at the consideration and resolution of an administrative case.

Final Report of the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure

1941 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-506
Author(s):  
James Hart
Keyword(s):  
Attorney General ◽  
Final Report ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Private Interests ◽  
Public Hearings ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Rule Making

What is undoubtedly the most thorough and comprehensive study ever made of Federal administrative procedure was completed with the submission to the Attorney General, in a letter dated January 22, 1941, of the final report of the Committee named. In its investigation and report, the Committee confined its attention to those Federal agencies that substantially affect private interests by their powers of rule-making and adjudication. To the study of their procedures, it assigned a staff of lawyer-investigators, which produced 27 mimeographed monographs, 13 of which have been printed as Sen. Doc. No. 186, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. In its interim report of January 31, 1940, the Committee thus described the methods being employed in the preparation of these monographic studies: “They have involved extended interviews with officials and employees of the agencies involved, with members of the public affected, and with attorneys who have represented clients before these agencies. Members of the Committee's staff have attended numerous hearings and other administrative proceedings as observers, and have closely examined the files of the agencies to discover the methods utilized in disposing of matters arising under the various statutes and regulations. Upon the completion of these investigations, the staff has prepared for the study of the Committee a preliminary report upon each agency, discussing in detail its administrative procedures. The report has been given to the officers of the affected agency for their consideration and comment. Thereafter, the full Committee has met with the agency's officers to discuss with them the facts and problems disclosed by the report.” (Final Report, pp. 254–255). The Committee held public hearings in June and July, 1940. In Chapter IX of its final report, it presents recommendations concerning a number of the individual agencies studied; and in Appendices B through M, it summarizes data collected on significant topics.

OSTATECZNOŚĆ I PRAWOMOCNOŚĆ DECYZJI ADMINISTRACYJNEJ

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Olczyk
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The aim of this article was an indication the most important differences between finaladministrative decision and valid administrative decision. The main basic for writing the articlewas a jurisdiction of administrative courts, both the Voivodship Administrative Courts, as theSupreme Administrative Court. Also served the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.In the article was discussed an essence of one of general principles of the administrativeproceedings, i.e. the principle of stability of administrative decisions. Subsequently, the terms “finaladministrative decision” and “valid administrative decision” were defined and differences betweenthem were determined. In addition, in the article was presented the importance of administrativedecision in relation to two registers – the land and mortgage register and the land register.The matter which was addressed in the article is a proclamation to the last amendment of theCode of Administrative Procedure, which added a concept of valid decision. The showing differencesof final administrative decision and valid administrative decision is a special important knowledgefrom the point of view of administrative proceedings’ party, but the distinction both aspectsof administrative decision raises a problem even for organs, which settle the matter.

scholarly journals Monitoring of the Legislative Innovations in the Field of Administrative Procedures in Ukraine

2019 ◽  
pp. 103-113
Author(s):  
Oleh Muza
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Private Person ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
Administrative Body ◽  
Systemic Problems ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Discretionary Powers

In the article monitoring of the legislative innovations in the field of administrative procedures on the example of the draft of the Law «On Administrative Procedure» (No. 9456 from 28.12.2018) is done. Despite the existing regulations on the future fate of such drafts, it is important for scientists and public officers to understand the proposed innovations in the field of administrative procedures, given their novelty in comparison with the ideas expressed earlier. Here is given the modern understanding of the institute of administrative procedure: 1) administrative and procedural legal relations arise between a private person and a subject of public powers (mostly administrative body) on the initiative of a private person; 2) the category «administrative procedure» is a general legal phenomenon, which denotes different types of administrative legal relations, in which there is a need to apply elements of the legal process with the aim for comprehensive, full and fair protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of private persons; 3) the implementation of a particular type of administrative procedure is determined by a separate law or by-law; 4) the main purpose of carrying out the administrative procedure is to achieve the result, duly drawn up by the subject of public power, that is, to adopt an administrative act; 5) all legal disputes arising during or as a result of an administrative procedure shall be settled according to the rules of administrative legal proceedings. The particular attention is paid to three components of efficiency of legal regulation of administrative and procedure relations: 1) the questions of administrative law making during the administrative procedure; 2) the evaluation of procedural elements of the administrative procedure; 3) the amount of discretionary powers of the administrative bodies during the administrative procedures. The author admits that the draft does not take into account the systemic problems in the public administration of Ukraine and defines two forms of control over the lawfulness of the exercise of discretionary powers by administrative bodies – preliminary control by the administrative body and judicial control. Thus it is concluded that the legislative innovations in the field of administrative procedures have the risks of additional restrictions appearance for private persons in the unequal relations with administrative bodies. Declaring the prevailing role of the initiative of private persons in the occurrence of administrative and procedural relations, such initiative sides with the administrative body during the administrative proceedings.

scholarly journals Concepts, features and types of administrative procedures

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
В. Ю. Кікінчук
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Management Procedures ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Functional Purpose

Administrative procedures that are in force in Ukraine have been analyzed; their concepts, features and types have been defined. It has been indicated that understanding the content and essence of administrative procedures is a kind of success in qualitative cognition of the entire system of administrative law. The semantics of the term of “administrative procedure” has been specified. It has been offered to understand it as the procedure of administrative proceedings determined by the current legislation of Ukraine. Administrative and judicial, management procedures have been characterized. It has been emphasized that administrative procedures by their functional purpose are inextricably linked with management activities, as well as with the exercise of power. The classification of administrative procedures by their nature, types and purpose has been offered. It has been noted that clearly defined administrative procedures will greatly help the government in establishing a regime of maximum assistance to government agencies and public associations. In this way, the government will be able to ensure the maintenance of the rule of law in Ukraine, which inevitably leads to increased efficiency of the entire state system. It has been stated that the norms that determine administrative procedures should become a reliable foundation for the positive legal activity of the subjects of power. The author has substantiated the conclusion that if the authorities comply with certain requirements for the content and form of administrative procedures (their clarity, unambiguity and focus on effective protection of human and civil rights, freedoms and interests), the possibility of introducing such a management and decision-making system there will be arbitrariness, corruption or inefficiency. To some extent, such actions will also contribute to the establishment of better interaction both between government agencies and between government and citizens. The author has provided recommendations, with the help of which it is possible to bring the functional purpose of administrative procedures to a fundamentally new level. It is also important to consider the current administrative procedures through the prism of their effectiveness in the changing realities of reforming national legislation.

scholarly journals Comparative legal analysis types of administrative procedure

2020 ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
O. Markova
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Full Compliance ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The author conducts a comparative legal study of the types of administrative procedure, using the experience of the United States, France and Poland in order to form a conceptual overview and a systematic approach to the typology of administrative procedure.The author monitors the procedural legislation of the above countries in order to consolidate the types of administrative procedure.In the course of research the author comes to conclusions, in particular: in the USA types of administrative procedure depend on type of rule-making. In accordance with the provisions of the US Federal Act “On Administrative Procedure” distinguish: formal rulemaking, informal, exclusive, hybrid and conciliatory. The approach of the Polish legislator to the types of administrative proceedings differs from the approach of the American legislator in a differentiated nature. The Code of Administrative Procedure reflects the general approach, as the types of proceedings presented in it cover the main activities of public administration bodies, and as for special – the legislator has provided for special regulation.In the legislation of many foreign countries, the general model of administrative procedure is fixed at the level of the Law or Code.As for the Ukrainian legislation, today, the Law “On Administrative Procedure” is absent, therefore, all procedures automatically become special. Details of various aspects of various types of administrative procedures take place both at the level of special laws and at the level of by-laws issued by other executive bodies. The list of these acts is so extensive and heterogeneous that there can be no question of the full compliance of the provisions embodied in them with each other. Moreover, such a variety obviously causes difficulties with the search for anapplicable norm for a private individual who is faced with a particular administrative procedure, and even for officials.The conducted comparative analysis of the species diversity of the administrative procedure will help us: firstly, to formulate a comprehensive vision and develop a unified approach, secondly, to rethink the conceptual framework within which the administrative procedure operates, and thirdly, it will provide an opportunity to introduce proposals into the project legislation.

scholarly journals Procedure to Making Decisions in Administrative Proceedings Under the General Administrative Procedure / Postupak do donošenja rješenja u upravnom postupku po zakonu o opštem upravnom postupku republike srpske

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Млађен Мандић ◽  
Наташа Слагало
Keyword(s):  
Test Procedure ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Paper Briefly ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Simplified Procedure ◽  
Special Examination ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The paper analyzes the regulation of the institute of the test procedure, especially institutes simplified procedure, as well as administrative actions to the decision in the Law on Administrative Procedure of the Republic of Srpska. Specially processed actions authorized officials in this part of the administrative procedure, which can take place to resolve the administrative matter.Thus, first, in the preamble emphasizes the importance that arranging direct solving has to conduct efficient and cost-effective administrative procedures. In the central part of the shortened institutes and special examination procedures are analyzed in detail, with particular attention paid compared institute immediate resolution of the Institute a summary procedure .. In conclusion, the paper briefly discusses the work point out the basic problems and theses, and stresses the duty of officials and that when immediate resolution of protecting the rights of the parties.

scholarly journals POSTĘPOWANIE W SPRAWIE O ROZGRANICZENIE (ZAGADNIENIA WYBRANE)

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Jędrejek
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Body ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

Immovables’ Delimitation Procedure (Chosen Problems)SummaryThe aim of the article is to clear some doubts concerning the immovables’ delimitation procedure. The procedure takes place at the administrative body and then – if it becomes necessary – before the court which examines the case during voluntary jurisdiction proceedings. The legislator has made the possibility of a judicial way in the immovables’ delimitation procedurę dependent on some formal premises concerning the termination of the administrative proceedings. The court is only bound by the ‘objective’ extent of the delimitation procedure. It is by no means bound by the settlements accepted during the administrative procedure. It doesn’t evaluate the administrative procedure from the point of view of its legal accuracy either. The immovables’ delimitation procedure may only regard a part of a boundary between the immovables.

scholarly journals Reflections About the Administrative Process in Modern Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-291
Author(s):  
A. A. Grishkovets
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Justice

The article deals with the problem of understanding the administrative process in modern Russia. Discussion about its essence has not stopped in the science of administrative law for many years. There are two main points of view. The administrative process is understood in a narrow sense as a jurisdictional activity and in a broad sense as a set of administrative procedures, administrative jurisdiction and administrative justice. The opinion is expressed that the understanding of the administrative process should be based on the understanding of the subject of administrative law. After the adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation in our country, a real legal basis appeared for the creation of administrative justice, which resolves disputes between a citizen and the state. The legal nature of administrative justice and administrative jurisdiction is not the same. They belong to various subbranches of administrative law. The situation should be preserved when one part of cases of administrative offenses is considered by courts, and the other - by other bodies of administrative jurisdiction. The proposal to consider cases of administrative offenses in accordance with the norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings is critically assessed. An attempt to create administrative courts in the Russian Federation is analyzed and evaluated. The experience of creating administrative courts in France and Germany is presented. The reasons why the administrative courts were never created are indicated. Administrative cases are considered by courts of general jurisdiction. An attempt to adopt the Administrative and Administrative Procedure Codes of the Russian Federation is analyzed. The Code of Administrative Proceedings of 2015, on the basis of which administrative cases are considered, is, in fact, the Administrative Procedure Code. The proposal to develop and adopt the Federal Law “On Administrative Procedures” is critically assessed. It is concluded that the administrative process is a judicial procedure for considering cases arising from public legal relations according to the norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, as well as the activities of bodies of administrative jurisdiction, including the court, to consider cases of administrative offenses in the manner established by the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document