scholarly journals Prospective applications of new technologies and artificial intelligence for systematizing the results of intellectual activity

2020 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 03018
Author(s):  
L Novoselova ◽  
E Grin

The article addresses the prospects of using distributed ledger technologies – blockchain and artificial intelligence – for the purpose of systematizing the rights to the results of intellectual activity for their subsequent commercialization. The authors describe the key characteristics of the distributed ledger technology and review various legal problems pertaining to the use of blockchain technologies. The authors draw conclusions regarding the prospects of using blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies as measures for rapid prevention and elimination of intellectual rights violations. They also express their views on the process of commercializing intellectual property and reducing the number of conflicts related to the inclusion of intellectual property objects into distributed ledger systems. The article was prepared with the financial support of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the framework of the research “Scientific and methodological support for the development of theoretical and applied legal structures (models) of accounting and disposal of rights to the results of intellectual activity (technology transfer)

Author(s):  
Maryam Abdurakhmanovna Akhmadova

The subject of this research is the examination of legal perspective on the approaches towards regulation of artificial intelligence and robotic technologies in military sector of the Russian Federation, including in ensuring the protection of the results of intellectual activity of researchers and developers, as well as the analysis of law enforcement practice on the protection of intellectual property in the interests of the state. In this format, the author determines the key conditions for recognition of the results of intellectual activity of military, special, and dual purpose as protectable object in accordance with the effective civil legislation. Attention is given to the practical results of domestic military equipment development using the artificial intelligence systems. The scientific novelty consists in articulation of the problem and approaches towards its research. The conclusion is made wide use of artificial intelligence technologies in the sphere of ensuring national security, as well as regulation based on the technical approach, rather than legal, not only create advantages in the military context, but can also cause issues that must be resolved. Taking into account real achievements in legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity, including the theoretical component, the author ascertains the need for improvement of the legislative framework on both, federal level and bylaws, including for the purpose of achieving a uniform use of the conceptual-categorical apparatus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
I.A. Zenin ◽  

The purpose is to identify and evaluate the doctrinal definitions of the concept and recommendations on ensuring the protection of the results created by AI as products of the functioning of its technologies using the norms of the current copyright, patent and other legislation. At the same time, the goal of scientific evaluation of the existing legal definitions of the concept of AI and its accompanying categories is pursued. The methodology includes methods of logical, historical, systematic and comparative legal analysis of legal definitions, methods of translation (implementation) of doctrinal categories in normative legal acts, interpretation of differences in copyright and patent protection of the results of human creative activity and the need to take them into account when deciding on the possibility of legal protection of products generated by artificial intelligence. Result. As part of the assessment of the existing doctrinal and legal definitions of the concept of AI, its technologies and the possibilities of protecting the protective results created in the course of their operation, conclusions are drawn in favor of legal structures. In the sense of the latter: artificial intelligence is recognized as a human-created “complex of technological solutions”; operations performed by this complex are not identified with human actions, but are recognized only as their similarity (“imitation»); the results of these operations are not equated with the creative achievements of the natural (human) mind, but are recognized as their visibility, which can only be compared (“compared”) with the products of the cognitive functions of the human brain as the results of its “intellectual activity”.


Archeion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Stępień

W artykule przedstawiono możliwości zastosowania technologii sztucznej inteligencji oraz blockchain w działalności archiwalnej. Przedmiotem analizy były wyniki projektów badawczych realizowanych w ostatnich latach z udziałem zagranicznych archiwów. Tekst artykułu powstał w oparciu o przegląd anglojęzycznej literatury przedmiotu. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na informacje zawarte w raportach i sprawozdaniach z badań poświęconych problematyce wykorzystania nowych technologii na gruncie archiwalnym. Przedstawione w artykule przykłady dowodzą, że sztuczna inteligencja i blockchain znajdują zastosowanie w różnych obszarach działalności współczesnych archiwów. Technologie na nich oparte mają potencjał, aby zautomatyzować procesy wartościowania i selekcji dokumentacji elektronicznej oraz wspierać identyfikację danych wrażliwych zawartych w e-dokumentach. Innym polem ich zastosowania są systemy wyszukiwania i udostępniania materiałów archiwalnych w postaci cyfrowej, jak też platformy do rozpoznawania tekstu i struktury dokumentów historycznych. Blockchain, czyli technologia rozproszonego rejestru i łańcuchów blokowych, pozwala zachować integralność i autentyczność obiektów cyfrowego dziedzictwa archiwalnego. Possibilities of using artificial intelligence and blockchain in archival activities. Review of international experiences The article presents the possibilities of using artificial intelligence and blockchain technology in archival activity. The analysis covers results of research projects carried out in recent years with participation of foreign archives. The text of the article is based on a review of literature available in English. Particular attention was given to information contained in research reports devoted to application of new technologies in archival work. The examples presented in the article prove that artificial intelligence and blockchain are used in various areas of activity of modern archives. Technologies based on them have the potential to automate the processes of evaluation and selection of electronic documents and to support identification of sensitive data contained in e-documents. Another possible field of application for such technologies are the systems for searching and accessing archival materials in digital form, as well as platforms for recognition of text and structure of historical documents. Blockchain, or distributed ledger and blockchain technology, preserves the integrity and authenticity of digital archival heritage objects.


Author(s):  
E. V. Altukhova

Present day economy is based on knowledge and intellect, where the principle element of competitiveness is intellectual property. Availability of intellectual property market is an integral part of the innovation economy development, which determines the form and procedure of objects of intellectual property circulation. In industrialized countries intellectual property becomes a factor of production. The necessity to use objects of intellectual property in economic relations is stipulated also by globalization processes taking place in economy. It is impossible to realize the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation without new technologies. At the same time the development, protection and introduction of new technologies are not feasible without new approaches and methods of using objects of intellectual property in the system of economic relations. One of these approaches is the use of intellectual property as a mortgage tool. The article analyzes a possibility of using objects of intellectual property as a mortgage. It studies practice and features of such deals in Russia and abroad. Legislative regulation of these relations is also investigated. Key conditions of the credit deal using object of intellectual property as a mortgage were formulated, the principle criterion of conducting this transaction is the use of the effective object of intellectual property, which can guarantee min risks both for the creditor and the borrower.


Author(s):  
Bhuvana R. ◽  
P. S. Aithal

Despite various countries getting hands-on technology such as blockchain for banking, transaction, and multiple benefits, a developing country such as India must use these technologies because of the advantages it provides in order to keep pace. In the age of digital currencies and new emerging technologies, central banking is a fast-growing topic in the monetary economy. Cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and distributed Ledger technologies appear to be feasible rivals to Fiat Currency central bank. Blockchain technology's influence behind Cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrencies have the ability to boost payments and operations by central banks and serve as a forum from which central banks could Perhaps launch their own digital currencies. RBI Indian central bank is no less important when it comes to technology that would pave the way for the new economy, enriched with technology-centric growth momentum, by increasing support from India's reserve bank and the Indian government for innovation and integrating technologies through regulatory sandboxes and various other systems. This article illustrates distributed ledger technology in the Indian context. The secondary data were obtained from various scholarly journals and websites. We have analysed distributed ledger technology, India’s move towards learning new technologies, different central banks distributed ledger project and examined blockchain technology in the Indian market using the SWOC framework as a research case study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-125
Author(s):  
N. V. Buzova ◽  
◽  
M. M. Karelina ◽  

Introduction. Information and intellectual property are becoming increasingly important not only in Russia but all round the world. They form the basis of information resources in information and telecommunication networks, which are actively used in modern society. The concept of information has several meanings. The confusion of its technical and legal meanings can lead to legal ambiguity, which will complicate the protection of rights in connection with the introduction of objects into civil circulation, and their use in the digital environment, including in court. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The article provides a comparative analysis of the legislation of the Russian Federation on information and intellectual property in its historical context in order to identify common problems and identify trends in further development. Results. Information from a technical point of view is the data which forms any digital object (its form), including an information resource or information system. Such an object is able to exist only in a digital environment, and its use is possible only with the help of technical means. Information also has a legal meaning. In this sense, it constitutes the content of the result of intellectual activity, for example, a piece of work. Discussion and Conclusion. Currently, there are new technologies, objects, for example, digital rights, utilitarian digital rights, and legal relationships concerning their use, requiring changes in legal regulation. It is important to avoid confusion between different concepts of information in order to facilitate the subsequent proper and effective enforcement of the introduced legal norms in the development of new legislation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 76-90
Author(s):  
B. A. Shakhnazarov

The paper is devoted to the issues associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in intellectual property objects, in particular vaccines, in the context of fight against a pandemic. It is emphasized that AI technologies allow us to overcome similar problems at the national and international levels and to prevent their recurrence in the future. The author highlights that the most important requirements for observance of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens consolidated in regulatory acts and impossibility of their restriction in AI technologies must be supplemented with clear rules regulating the legal framework of artificial intelligence, including intellectual activity, and responsibility of developers and AI users. At the same time, the AI legal personality also needs to be thoroughly elaborated with the focus on providing a reasonable balance of rights, responsibilities and eligibility among developers, AI users, and other addressees entering into legal relationships involving artificial intelligence. A key aspect in the context of the legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity created entirely or partially by artificial intelligence is represented by the balance between the interests of rights holders and the public interests. Possible restrictions of rights of copyright holders as established in international instruments (Para 31 of the 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) should be accepted as a harmonizing basis and adopted in national legal systems. At the same time, rights holders must be provided with appropriate guarantees of respect for their rights (In particular, the non-exclusive nature of the use of intellectual rights in the context of such restrictions, payment of reasonable remuneration, etc.).


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 944-949
Author(s):  
R. A. Dolzhenko ◽  
◽  
I. P. Chelak ◽  

The use of blockchain technology is one of the most promising areas in the development of the digital economy. The high potential of its applicability, obvious benefits from reducing the number of transactions and cutting costs mean that the implementation of blockchain technology is inevitable in social and labor relations (SLR). The impediment to this process is the absence of an established institutional environment that would determine uniform characteristics of the technology, language, ontology, and principles of using distributed ledgers. The purpose of this study is to develop recommendations for establishing framework standards for the application of blockchain technology in SLR. The ecosystem approach, practical analysis and institutional synthesis are used as research methods. As a result, the study proposes a set of areas for standardization of the application of distributed ledger technology in SLR. The pool of basic standardization areas includes institutional, technological, relational (stakeholder) conditions as well as conditions for ensuring security. Analysis of the national project (program) “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” identified areas for developing standards for the use of blockchain technology in SLR. In addition, the study described serious risks and obstacles to the implementation of digital technologies in this sphere of economic relations.


2019 ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
M.D. Shapsugova

Digitalization of the economy makes research in the field of artificial intelligence relevant. The introduction of robots in all spheres of human life gives rise to problems of responsibility for the actions of artificial intelligence, for example, in the event of an accident involving an unmanned taxi. No less relevant is the problem of intellectual property in the results of intellectual activity. Who should be considered the author of a work created by artificial intelligence: the robot itself, man? These practical problems entail the need for a scientific and theoretical understanding of the personality of the robot. The article explores the basic approaches to understanding artificial intelligence, its types. It is determined as the degree of autonomy of artificial intelligence can determine its legal personality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document