Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison between Different Care Settings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Buso ◽  
Lucia Mazzolai ◽  
José Antonio Rueda-Camino ◽  
Carmen Fernández-Capitán ◽  
David Jiménez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
First 90 Days ◽  
Acute Pe

AbstractThe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who develop pulmonary embolism (PE) in the full spectrum of patient care settings need to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment, and 90-day outcomes in patients diagnosed with PE while recovering from COVID-19 in the outpatient setting versus those who were diagnosed with PE while being hospitalized with COVID-19. Data from the international Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry were used. The major study outcomes were all-cause death, major bleeding, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrences during the first 90 days after PE. From March 2020 to March 2021, 737 patients with COVID-19 experienced acute PE. Of these, 340 (46%) were recovering from COVID-19 as outpatients (267 patients who had been treated at home for COVID-19 and 73 discharged after being hospitalized with COVID-19). Compared with inpatients with COVID-19, those recovering in the outpatient setting upon PE were less likely to be men (odds ratio [OR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.72) and less likely to have hypertension (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41–0.74) or diabetes (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33–0.76). At 90-day follow-up, eight patients (none recovering from COVID-19 as outpatient vs. 2.4% of inpatients with COVID-19) developed recurrent VTE, 34 (1.9 vs. 7.9%) had major bleeding, and 128 (10 vs. 24%) died. On multivariable analysis, inpatients with COVID-19 were at a higher risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 6.80; 95% CI: 1.52–30.4) or death (adjusted HR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.40–3.58). In conclusion, using a large multinational registry of patients with COVID-19 who experienced PE, thromboembolic episodes occurring in those recovering from COVID-19 as outpatients were associated with less ominous outcomes than inpatients with COVID-19.

Bleeding, death, and costs of care during hospitalization for acute pulmonary embolism: Insights from the Saint Luke’s Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (SLOPE) study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1358863X2096741
Author(s):  
Matthew C Bunte ◽  
Kensey Gosch ◽  
Ahmed Elkaryoni ◽  
Anas Noman ◽  
Erin Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Acute Pe

Limited data exist that comprehensively describe the practical management, in-hospital outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and rates of post-hospital readmission among patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE). Consecutive discharges for acute PE were identified from a single health system over 3 years. Records were audited to confirm presence of acute PE, patient characteristics, disease severity, medical treatment, and PE-related invasive therapies. Rates of in-hospital major bleeding and death, hospital length of stay (LOS), direct costs, and hospital readmission are reported. From January 2016 to December 2018, 371 patients were hospitalized for acute massive or submassive PE. In-hospital major bleeding (12.1%) was common, despite low utilization of systemic thrombolysis (1.8%) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (3.0%). In-hospital death was 10-fold higher among massive PE compared to submassive PE (36.6% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001). Massive PE was more common during hospitalizations not primarily related to venous thromboembolism, including hospitalizations primarily for sepsis or infection (26.8% vs 8.2%, p = 0.001). Overall, the median LOS was 6.0 days (IQR, 3.0–11.0) and the median standardized direct cost of admissions was $10,032 (IQR, $4467–$20,330). Rates of all-cause readmission were relatively high throughout late follow-up but did not differ between PE subgroups. Despite low utilization of thrombolysis, in-hospital bleeding remains a common adverse event during hospitalizations for acute PE. Although massive PE is associated with high risk for in-hospital bleeding and death, those successfully discharged after a massive PE demonstrate similar rates of readmission compared to submassive PE into late follow-up.

Acute Treatment Of Pulmonary Embolism With Rivaroxaban - Real Life Data From The Prospective Dresden Noac Registry (NCT01588119)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2380-2380
Author(s):  
Christina Köhler ◽  
Sebastian Werth ◽  
Luise Tittl ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Daily Care ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Bayer Healthcare ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Acute Pe

Abstract Background and Objectives In the EINSTEIN PE study rivaroxaban (RX) was found to be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with superior safety. However, study results need to be confirmed in unselected PE patients in daily care. Patients and Methods Using prospectively collected data from a large regional registry of patients treated with novel direct oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in the district of Saxony, Germany, we evaluated the rate of recurrent VTE, other cardiovascular complications and bleeding events in patients receiving rivaroxaban for acute PE. In this ongoing registry, a network of 239 physicians enrols up to 2500 daily care NOAC patients who receive central prospective follow up (FU) by the registry office at day 30 day and quarterly thereafter to collect efficacy and safety data. All outcome events are centrally adjudicated using standard scientific definitions. Results Until July 31th 2013, 2249 patients were enrolled. Of these, 72 patients received RX for acute PE treatment (demographic data in table 1). Registry patients were older than the EINSTEIN PE population (67.3 vs. 55.8 years), 55.6% were female and 23.6% were treated for a recurrent VTE. During follow-up, unplanned rivaroxaban discontinuation rates were low (around 5%; table 1). So far, only one recurrent VTE event occurred (1.7 events per 100 patient years). One patient experienced non-fatal ischaemic stroke within 4 weeks after PE diagnosis (1.7 events per 100 patient years). Bleeding complications were frequent but only 2 major bleeding (non-fatal vaginal bleeds) occurred (3.3 events per 100 patient years). During follow-up three patients died of underlying diseases but none of these deaths were related to VTE or bleeding complications. Conclusion Acute PE treatment with rivaroxaban in daily care is effective, safe and well tolerated with low rates of unplanned treatment discontinuation. Thromboembolic and major bleeding complications are rare and seem to occur predominantly in the early phase of PE treatment. At ASH, updated results from our registry will be presented Disclosures: Werth: Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria. Beyer-Westendorf:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Should Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis Alone be Treated as Those with Concomitant Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism? A Prospective Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 938-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Büller ◽  
Anthonie Lensing ◽  
Montserrat Bonet ◽  
Javier Roncales ◽  
Jordi Muchart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryThe established initial treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) consists of the administration of subcutaneous, weight adjusted, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). However, the use of the same LMWH dosages for patients with either DVT or PE is not supported by data from comparative studies.1,000 consecutive patients with acute, proximal DVT were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a ventilation-perfusion lung scan on admission, and remained in hospital for at least 7 days. Patients with silent PE received once daily 10,000 to 15,000 IU subcutaneous LMWH dalteparin according to body weight for 7 days, and then vitamin K antagonists. Patients with DVT alone received LMWH in a fixed dose of 10,000 IU once daily for at least 5 days, and then vitamin K antagonists. The rate of both, major bleeding and symptomatic PE episodes during the 7-day study period was evaluated.Thirteen patients (1.3%) developed recurrent PE (1 died) and 16 patients (1.6%) had major bleeding (7 died). Recurrent PE was significantly more common in patients with silent PE (9 of 258 patients, 3.5%) than in those with DVT alone (4 of 742 patients, 0.5%. Odds ratio: 6.5; p <0.001). There were no significant differences in bleeding rate between patients with silent PE and those with DVT alone. However, the use of a fixed 10,000 IU dose in patients with DVT alone led to a significantly lower bleeding rate in patients weighing over 70 kg: 1 of 349 patients (0.3%) as compared to 9 of 393 patients (2.3%) in those weighing less than 70 kg (odds ratio: 0.12; p = 0.018).Fixed-dose 10,000 IU of LMWH dalteparin once daily proved to be both effective and safe in patients with DVT alone. The observed recurrence rate of 0.5% in these patients compares favourably with the 3.5% rate in patients with silent PE. Furthermore, this fixed-dosage was also safe. Patients weighing over 70 kg had a significant decrease in the rate of major bleeding, and no compensatory increase in the rate of recurrent PE.

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 2237-2244
Author(s):  
Parth Patel ◽  
Payal Patel ◽  
Meha Bhatt ◽  
Cody Braun ◽  
Housne Begum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Suspected Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Mortality Incidence ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Prompt evaluation and therapeutic intervention of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) are of paramount importance for improvement in outcomes. We systematically reviewed outcomes in patients with suspected PE, including mortality, incidence of recurrent PE, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and postthrombotic sequelae. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. We included 22 studies with 15 865 patients. Among patients who were diagnosed with PE and discharged with anticoagulation, 3-month follow-up revealed that all-cause mortality was 5.69% (91/1599; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.56-6.83), mortality from PE was 1.19% (19/1597; 95% CI, 0.66-1.72), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in 1.38% (22/1597; 95% CI: 0.81-1.95), and major bleeding occurred in 0.90% (2/221%; 95% CI, 0-2.15). In patients with a low pretest probability (PTP) and negative D-dimer, 3-month follow-up revealed mortality from PE was 0% (0/808) and incidence of VTE was 0.37% (4/1094; 95% CI: 0.007-0.72). In patients with intermediate PTP and negative D-dimer, 3-month follow-up revealed that mortality from PE was 0% (0/2747) and incidence of VTE was 0.46% (14/3015; 95% CI: 0.22-0.71). In patients with high PTP and negative computed tomography (CT) scan, 3-month follow-up revealed mortality from PE was 0% (0/651) and incidence of VTE was 0.84% (11/1302; 95% CI: 0.35-1.34). We further summarize outcomes evaluated by various diagnostic tests and diagnostic pathways (ie, D-dimer followed by CT scan).

Clinical characteristics and 3-month outcomes in cancer patients with incidental versus clinically-suspected and confirmed pulmonary embolism

2020 ◽  
pp. 2002723
Author(s):  
Marisa Peris ◽  
Juan J. López-Nuñez ◽  
Ana Maestre ◽  
David Jimenez ◽  
Alfonso Muriel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Incidental Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Related Mortality

BackgroundCurrent guidelines suggest treating cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism (PE) similar to those with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE. However, the natural history of these presentations has not been thoroughly compared.MethodsWe used the data from the RIETE registry to compare the 3-month outcomes in patients with active cancer and incidental PE versus those with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were PE-related mortality, symptomatic PE recurrences and major bleeding.ResultsFrom July 2012 to January 2019, 946 cancer patients with incidental asymptomatic PE and 2274 with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE were enrolled. Most patients (95% versus 90%) received low-molecular-weight heparin therapy. During the first 90 days, 598 patients died, including 42 from PE. Patients with incidental PE had a lower all-cause mortality rate than those with suspected and confirmed PE (11% versus 22%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95%CI: 0.34–0.54). Results were consistent for PE-related mortality (0.3% versus 1.7%; OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06–0.59). Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with incidental PE were at lower risk to die (adjusted OR: 0.43; 95%CI: 0.34–0.56). Overall, 29 patients (0.9%) developed symptomatic PE recurrences, and 122 (3.8%) had major bleeding. There were no significant differences in PE recurrences (OR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.25–1.54) or major bleeding (OR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.51–1.18).ConclusionsCancer patients with incidental PE had a lower mortality rate than those with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE. Further studies are required to validate these findings, and to explore optimal management strategies in these patients.

Outpatient Treatment In Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Hestia Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. LBA-1-LBA-1
Author(s):  
Wendy Zondag ◽  
Inge Mos ◽  
Dina Creemers ◽  
Lidia Hoogerbrugge ◽  
Olaf Dekkers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Outpatient Treatment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Acute Pe

Abstract Abstract LBA-1 Introduction: Patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are initially treated in the hospital with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The most recent guideline of the American College of Chest Physicians on Antithrombotic therapy 2008 reports some small studies on outpatient treatment in patients with pulmonary embolism, which suggest outpatient treatment in selected patients with PE is potentially effective and safe but firm recommendations for clinical practice are lacking. Clinicians urgently need reliable, easy-to-use selection criteria for selection of patients with pulmonary embolism eligible for outpatient treatment. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient treatment according to predefined criteria (Hestia criteria) in patients with acute PE. Patients and Methods: Open-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial of patients with objectively proven acute pulmonary embolism, conducted in twelve hospitals in the Netherlands from 2008 to 2010. Follow-up was completed in September 2010. Patients with acute PE were triaged with the predefined Hestia criteria for eligibility for outpatient treatment starting with therapeutic weight adjusted doses of LMWH (Nadroparin), followed by vitamin K antagonists. All patients eligible for outpatient treatment according to the Hestia criteria, were sent home either immediately or within 24 hours after PE was objectively diagnosed. Outcome: Outpatient treatment was evaluated with respect to recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), including PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), major haemorrhage and total mortality during initial LMWH treatment and 3 months follow up. We considered outpatient treatment to be effective if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the incidence of recurrent VTE would not exceed 7%. Results: Of 297 included patients, who all completed follow-up, 6 patients (2.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8–4.3) had recurrent VTE (5 PE (1.7%), 1 DVT (0.3 %)). Three patients (1.0%, 95% CI 0.2–2.9) died during three months follow-up, but none as a result of fatal PE. One patient died of fatal intracerebral haemorrhage, the other two patients died of progressive malignancy. In addition to the patient with intracranial bleeding, one other patient had a major bleeding event (0.7 %, 95% CI 0.08%-2.4%). Conclusion: Outpatient anticoagulant treatment is effective and safe for patients with pulmonary embolism who have been selected with the Hestia criteria. (Dutch Trial Register NTR1319). Disclosures: Huisman: GSK: Research Funding; Actelion: Research Funding; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Outcome Following Hemorrhage From Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Koch ◽  
Christopher J. Stapleton ◽  
Ridhima Guniganti ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Jason Sheehan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Dural Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Cerebrovascular Lesions ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulae ◽  
Poor Outcome

Background and Purpose: Dural arteriovenous fistulae can present with hemorrhage, but there remains a paucity of data regarding subsequent outcomes. We sought to use the CONDOR (Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research), a multi-institutional registry, to characterize the morbidity and mortality of dural arteriovenous fistula–related hemorrhage. Methods: A retrospective review of patients in CONDOR who presented with dural arteriovenous fistula–related hemorrhage was performed. Patient characteristics, clinical follow-up, and radiographic details were analyzed for associations with poor outcome (defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≥3). Results: The CONDOR dataset yielded 262 patients with incident hemorrhage, with median follow-up of 1.4 years. Poor outcome was observed in 17.0% (95% CI, 12.3%–21.7%) at follow-up, including a 3.6% (95% CI, 1.3%–6.0%) mortality. Age and anticoagulant use were associated with poor outcome on multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.04, odds ratio, 5.1 respectively). Subtype of hemorrhage and venous shunting pattern of the lesion did not affect outcome significantly. Conclusions: Within the CONDOR registry, dural arteriovenous fistula–related hemorrhage was associated with a relatively lower morbidity and mortality than published outcomes from other arterialized cerebrovascular lesions but still at clinically consequential rates.

P2772The rule-out criteria for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension can identify patients without haemodynamic abnormalities and functional limitation 3 and 12 months after acute PE

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Barco ◽  
A Mavromanoli ◽  
F A Klok ◽  
S V Konstantinides
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
High Probability ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Functional Limitation ◽  
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Acute Pe ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background Up to one-third of patients report persisting hemodynamic abnormalities and functional limitation over long-term follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Purpose We tested whether a validated algorithm designed to rule-out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after acute PE can be used for identifying patients at lower risk of presenting with persisting symptoms and echocardiographic abnormalities. Methods The multicentre Follow-up of Acute Pulmonary Embolism (FOCUS) cohort study prospectively enrolled 1,100 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute symptomatic PE; two-year follow-up is ongoing. We focused on the scheduled visits for 3- and 12-month follow-up. The rule-out criteria are based on: the absence of ECG signs of right ventricular dysfunction and normal NT-proBNP/BNP values. Echocardiographic abnormalities were defined according to the presence of abnormal parameters indicating an intermediate/high probability of pulmonary hypertension as recommended by the 2015 ESC/ERS Society Guidelines on Pulmonary Hypertension. The presence of functional limitation was defined based on a World Health Organization classification grade ≥3, a Borg dyspnoea index ≥4, or a 6-minute walking distance <300 m. Results We included 323 patients (mean age 61 years, 58% men), of whom 255 have meanwhile completed a one-year follow-up. At 3- and 12-month follow-up, 194 (60%) and 155 (61%) of patients exhibited no abnormal echocardiographic findings or natriuretic peptide levels. The percentage of patients with echocardiographic abnormalities was 20.4% and 18.0%, respectively. The negative predictive value of the score for ruling out the combination of functional limitation and intermediate/high probability of pulmonary hypertension as recommended by the 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines on Pulmonary Hypertension was 0.96 (95% CI 0.92–0.98) at 3 and 0.97 (0.92–0.99) at 12 months. The corresponding positive predictive values were 0.10 (0.06–0.17) and 0.09 (0.05–0.17), respectively. Conclusions The CTEPH rule-out criteria are capable of excluding functional limitation and evidence of (chronic) pulmonary hypertension 3 and 12 months after the diagnosis of acute PE. Acknowledgement/Funding The sponsor (University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz) has obtained grants from Bayer Vital GmbH and Bayer Pharma AG

Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism as outpatients or following early discharge

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (05) ◽  
pp. 756-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Janjua ◽  
Aaref Badshah ◽  
Fadi Matta ◽  
Liviu G. Danescu ◽  
Abdo Y. Yaekoub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Pe

SummaryThe purpose of this systematic review is to test the hypothesis that carefully selected low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can safely be treated entirely as outpatients or after early hospital discharge.Included articles were required to describe inclusion or exclusion criteria and outcome of patients treated for PE.Early hospital discharge was defined as an average hospital stay ≤3 days.Six investigations included patients with PE who were treated entirely as outpatients; two investigations included patients with PE who were treated after early discharge. All investigations included only low-risk patients or patients with small or medium sized PE. Outcome after 3-46 months in patients treated entirely as outpatients showed recurrent PE in 0% to 6.2% of patients, major bleeding in 0% to 2.8% with one death from an intracerebral bleed. Definite death from PE did not occur, but there was one possible death from PE. Outcome in three months in patients treated after early discharge showed no instances of recurrent PE. Major bleeding occurred in 0% to 3.7% of patients.There were no deaths from PE, but there was one death from bleeding. In conclusion, outpatient therapy of acute PE is probably safe in low-risk,carefully selected compliant patients who have access to outpatient care if necessary. Such outpatient treatment would be cost-effective.

scholarly journals Long-term mortality after massive, submassive, and low-risk pulmonary embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Gupta ◽  
Zaid Ammari ◽  
Osama Dasa ◽  
Mohammed Ruzieh ◽  
Jordan J Burlen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Acute Pe ◽  
Long Term Mortality ◽  
Overall Mortality

Guidelines for management of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) emphasize further risk stratification on the basis of right ventricular (RV) size and biomarkers of RV injury or strain; however, the prognostic importance of these factors on long-term mortality is not known. We performed a retrospective cohort study of subjects diagnosed with acute PE from 2010 to 2015 at a tertiary care academic medical center. The severity of initial PE presentation was categorized into three groups: massive, submassive, and low-risk PE. The primary endpoint of all-cause mortality was ascertained using the Centers for Disease Control National Death Index (CDC NDI). A total of 183 subjects were studied and their median follow-up was 4.1 years. The median age was 65 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7% and the overall mortality rate through the end of follow-up was 40.4%. The overall mortality rates for massive, submassive, and low-risk PE were 71.4%, 44.5%, and 28.1%, respectively ( p < 0.001). Landmark analysis using a 30-day cutpoint demonstrated that subjects presenting with submassive PE compared with low-risk PE had increased mortality during both the short- and the long-term periods. The most frequent causes of death were malignancy, cardiac disease, respiratory disease, and PE. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality were cancer at baseline, age, white blood cell count, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, female sex, and initial presentation with massive PE. In conclusion, the diagnosis of acute PE was associated with substantial long-term mortality. The severity of initial PE presentation was associated with both short- and long-term mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document