Modeling of Droplet Evaporation for Gas Turbine Inlet Fogging Systems with Different Water Injection Ratios

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Hoon Kim ◽  
Hyung-Jong Ko ◽  
Young Sun Park ◽  
Theodore E. Simos ◽  
George Psihoyios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Droplet Evaporation ◽  
Turbine Inlet

Numerical Analysis of Gas Turbine Inlet Fogging Nozzle Manifold Pressure Drop

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai Zhang ◽  
Qun Zheng ◽  
Mustapha Chaker ◽  
Cyrus Meher-Homji
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Flow Resistance ◽  
Research Effort ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Injection Velocity ◽  
Injection Angle ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Area Of Concern ◽  
Inlet Duct

The air pressure drop over the nozzles manifolds of inlet fogging system and the flow resistance downstream of the nozzle array (manifold) have always been an area of concern and is the object of this paper. Fogging nozzles arrays (involving several hundred nozzles) are mounted on channels and beams, downstream of the inlet filters and affect the pressure drop. The water injection angle, nozzle injection velocities and the progressive evaporation of the water droplets evaporation all influence the inlet pressure seen at the gas turbine inlet. This paper focuses on a numerical simulation investigation of flow resistance (pressure drop) of inlet fogging systems. In this research effort, the inlet duct is meshed in order to compute the pressure drop over the nozzles frames in fogging and non-fogging conditions. First, the resistance coefficients of an air intake filter are obtained by numerical and experimental methods, and then the coefficients are used for the simulation of the inlet duct by considering the filter as a porous media. Effects of nozzle spread pattern and water injection pattern are then modeled. The results indicate that injection velocity and arrangement of nozzles could have significant effects on the pressure drop and intake distortion, which will affect compressor performance. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the pressure drop and evaporation of inlet fogging and will be of value to gas turbine inlet fogging system designers and users.

Gas Turbines with Heat Exchanger and Water Injection in the Compressed Air

1970 ◽  
Vol 185 (1) ◽  
pp. 953-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Gašparović ◽  
J. G. Hellemans
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Compressed Air ◽  
Specific Work ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Higher Temperature ◽  
Gas Turbine Cycle

Water injection into the compressed air between the compressor and the heat exchanger of a gas turbine plant represents only one of various possible methods of introducing water into a gas turbine cycle. With this process, it is advantageous to inject just sufficient water to produce saturation of the compressed air with water vapour. Assuming that the same size of heat exchanger is used, the following changes are introduced as compared with a gas turbine cycle without water injection. The efficiency is increased to an extent equivalent to raising the temperature at the turbine inlet by 100 degC. The gain in specific work is still greater. It attains values which can only be achieved with about 140 degC higher temperature at the turbine inlet. With a normal size of heat exchanger, the water consumption is about 6–8 per cent of the mass flow of air. This rate of consumption is not high enough to introduce any detrimental side effects in the cycle. Special water treatment is not necessary. The performance of existing designs or installations without a heat exchanger can be improved by adding a heat exchanger and water injection without necessitating any change in pressure ratio.

Analysis of water droplet evaporation in a gas turbine inlet fogging process

2012 ◽  
Vol 33-34 ◽  
pp. 62-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Hoon Kim ◽  
Hyung-Jong Ko ◽  
Kyoungjin Kim ◽  
Horacio Perez-Blanco
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Water Droplet ◽  
Droplet Evaporation ◽  
Turbine Inlet

scholarly journals Performance Gains Derived From Water Injection in Regenerative, Indirect-Fired, Coal-Fueled Gas Turbines

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward L. Parsons ◽  
Thomas F. Bechtel
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Performance Studies ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Simple Cycle ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Turbine Inlet Temperature ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Cycle Efficiency

This paper discusses the performance benefits available from compressor discharge water injection in an indirect-fired gas turbine. The results of parametric performance studies are the main technical focus. The performance studies are part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Morgantown Energy Technology Center (METC) indirect-fired gas turbine program. The key technical approach is to develop a high-pressure, coal-fired ceramic heat exchanger to serve as the air heater. A high-pressure coal-fired ceramic air heater is now under development in a DOE-sponsored program at Hague International. The goal of this program is to develop a heat exchanger suitable for turbine inlet temperatures from 1,100 to 1,260 °C. With a turbine inlet temperature in this range, coal-fired indirect systems have performance superior to direct-fired gas-fueled simple cycle systems. Using conservative assumptions, the coal-fired indirect cycle has calculated net plant efficiencies in the 32 to 37 percent range, on a higher heating value (HHV) basis, at typical pressure ratios and 1,260 °C (2,300 °F) turbine inlet temperature. Adding a steam bottoming cycle raises the net plant efficiency (NPE) to 44–48 percent HHV. Adding water injection raises the simple cycle efficiency to 41–43 percent HHV and the combined cycle efficiency to 47–54 percent HHV. These NPE’s compare favorably to the most advanced industrial direct-fired systems. For example, a natural gas-fired GE MS7001-F has published HHV efficiencies of 31.1 percent simple cycle and 46.1 percent combined cycle (Gas Turbine World, 1990).

Field Conversion of a Low-Firing Frame 7B Gas Turbine Power Plant to Ultra-Low Emission Combustion

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Demougeot ◽  
Jeffrey A. Benoit
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Energy Demand ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Nox Emissions ◽  
Environmental Controls ◽  
Low Emission ◽  
Technical Discussion

The search for power plant sustainability options continues as regulating agencies exert more stringent industrial gas turbine emission requirements on operators. Purchasing power for resale, de-commissioning current capabilities altogether and repowering by replacing or converting existing equipment to comply with emissions standards are economic-driven options contemplated by many mature gas turbine operators. NRG’s Gilbert power plant based in Milford, NJ began commercial operation in 1974 and is fitted with four (4) natural gas fired GE’s 7B gas turbine generators with two each exhausting to HRSG’s feeding one (1) steam turbine generator. The gas turbine units, originally configured with diffusion flame combustion systems with water injection, were each emitting 35 ppm NOx with the New Jersey High Energy Demand Day (HEED) regulatory mandate to reduce NOx emissions to sub 10 ppm by May 1st, 2015. Studies were conducted by the operator to evaluate the economic viability & installation of environmental controls to reduce NOx emissions. It was determined that installation of post-combustion environmental controls at the facility was both cost prohibitive and technically challenging, and would require a fundamental reconfiguration of the facility. Based on this economic analysis, the ultra-low emission combustion system conversion package was selected as the best cost-benefit solution. This technical paper will focus on the ultra low emissions technology and key features employed to achieve these low emissions, a description of the design challenges and solution to those, a summary of the customer considerations in down selecting options and an overview of the conversion scope. Finally, a technical discussion of the low emissions operational flexibility will be provided including performance results of the converted units.

Rolls Royce/Allison 501-K Gas Turbine Anti-Fouling Compressor Coatings Evaluation

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Caguiat
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Fuel Consumption ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Performance Degradation ◽  
Specific Fuel Consumption ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Compressor Performance ◽  
Compressor Efficiency

The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD) Gas Turbine Emerging Technologies Code 9334 was tasked by NSWCCD Shipboard Energy Office Code 859 to research and evaluate fouling resistant compressor coatings for Rolls Royce Allison 501-K Series gas turbines. The objective of these tests was to investigate the feasibility of reducing the rate of compressor fouling degradation and associated rate of specific fuel consumption (SFC) increase through the application of anti-fouling coatings. Code 9334 conducted a market investigation and selected coatings that best fit the test objective. The coatings selected were Sermalon for compressor stages 1 and 2 and Sermaflow S4000 for the remaining 12 compressor stages. Both coatings are manufactured by Sermatech International, are intended to substantially decrease blade surface roughness, have inert top layers, and contain an anti-corrosive aluminum-ceramic base coat. Sermalon contains a Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) topcoat, a substance similar to Teflon, for added fouling resistance. Tests were conducted at the Philadelphia Land Based Engineering Site (LBES). Testing was first performed on the existing LBES 501-K17 gas turbine, which had a non-coated compressor. The compressor was then replaced by a coated compressor and the test was repeated. The test plan consisted of injecting a known amount of salt solution into the gas turbine inlet while gathering compressor performance degradation and fuel economy data for 0, 500, 1000, and 1250 KW generator load levels. This method facilitated a direct comparison of compressor degradation trends for the coated and non-coated compressors operating with the same turbine section, thereby reducing the number of variables involved. The collected data for turbine inlet, temperature, compressor efficiency, and fuel consumption were plotted as a percentage of the baseline conditions for each compressor. The results of each plot show a decrease in the rates of compressor degradation and SFC increase for the coated compressor compared to the non-coated compressor. Overall test results show that it is feasible to utilize anti-fouling compressor coatings to reduce the rate of specific fuel consumption increase associated with compressor performance degradation.

Gas Turbine Corrected Parameters Control: Humidity Correction – Sensors Evaluation and Selection

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malath I. Arar
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Ambient Conditions ◽  
Humidity Measurement ◽  
Nox Abatement ◽  
Test Criterion ◽  
Control Methodology ◽  
Performance Enhancing

Gas Turbine, GT, control methodology applied to power generation is being evaluated. Corrected parameter control methodology has been adopted for this purpose. This method uses the corrected physical ambient conditions such as pressure, temperature and humidity in controlling the GT operations. Humidity correction becomes increasingly important in this control scheme. The following are the reasons for accurate and robust humidity measurement: (1) Humidity measurement is important to the operation control of the dry low NOX, DLN, combustor system. (2) GT inlet performance enhancing devices, such as evaporative coolers and inlet foggers, depend upon the accurate humidity measurement to determine the amount of water needed for inlet temperature depression. (3) Humidity measurement is used to determine the amount of water to be injected in the combustor for NOX abatement when running on liquid fuel as an alternative to natural gas fuel. In order to obtain accurate and reliable humidity readings, several commercially available humidity sensors were extensively tested and evaluated in a controlled laboratory environment. The sensors were tested for their measurement accuracy, saturation conditions, power interruption and surge, sudden temperature changes and medium air speed. Test ambient temperature ranges from −30 °C to 50 °C. This covers the operating ambient conditions range for the Gas Turbine. The test criterion is that the error in the response of the sensor shall not exceed ±1 °C from the test reference for all the tests conducted on the sensors. The combustion requirements for Dry Low NOX operations and mode transfer dictate this criterion. Also, as a DLN requirement, error in specific humidity shall not exceed 0.904 g/g of air. This test criterion also satisfies the water injection requirements for NOX abatement and inlet performance enhancing devices. The results show that for ±1 °C error in the sensor measurement, the resulting error in NOX calculation is less than 0.2 ppm. The test results show that all sensors except the current one in use have met the test criterion. The current sensor, General Eastern DT-2, has a large measurement error in the order of ±5 °C. Programs have been launched to field test and evaluate these sensors in order to replace the current one.

Guidance on Conducting Tests of Inlet Chiller Systems Installed in GT Inlets

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry B. Sullivan ◽  
Michael Giampetro
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Air Conditioning ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Project Team ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Timely Manner ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Plant Equipment ◽  
Conditioning Equipment

This paper provides comprehensive methodology on testing inlet chiller systems that are used for Gas Turbine Inlet Air Conditioning. It will serve as a guiding document for the Inlet Chiller Project Team formed by PTC 51, “Combustion Turbine Inlet Air Conditioning Equipment” for use in scripting that code’s section on Inlet Chiller Performance Testing. This paper shows the conceptual similarities that can be drawn between inlet chiller and overall plant performance testing, as well as detailing the pertinent test scopes and boundaries, identifying expected test objectives, and listing the applicable test boundary parameters to be used for correction. Addressing an industry need, this paper also offers guidance on testing these components / systems at conditions different than design. Current equipment code committees, such as ASME PTC 22 on Gas Turbines, and ASME PTC 46 on Overall Plant Performance Testing, have concluded that inlet air conditioning equipment must be out of service while testing the major plant equipment. This would require the inlet chilling system to be tested separately. This requirement dictates that a technically-sound method of inlet chiller testing be codified in a timely manner.

scholarly journals High-Temperature Turbine Technology Readiness

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Horner ◽  
A. Caruvana
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Technology Readiness ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Turbine Inlet ◽  
Combined Cycle Plant ◽  
Gas Fuel

Final component and technology verification tests have been completed for application to a 2600°F rotor inlet temperature gas turbine. These tests have proven the capability of combustor, turbine hot section, and IGCC fuel systems and controls to operate in a combined cycle plant burning a coal-derived gas fuel at elevated gas turbine inlet temperatures (2600–3000°F). This paper presents recent test results and summarizes the overall progress made during the DOE-HTTT Phase II program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document