scholarly journals Identification of element at risk due to tidal flood hazard in Genuk Sub-District coastal area

Author(s):  
A G H Yoga ◽  
M A Marfai ◽  
D R Hizbaron
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Siti Dahlia ◽  
Tricahyono Nurharsono ◽  
Wira Fazri Rosyidin

ABSTRACT  Special Capital Region of Jakarta Province is Capital City of Indonesia, which has various strategic functions, such as central government and economic and business center. Geographically DKI Jakarta Province is lowland, it caused Jakarta has high of flood hazard. This condition potentially result of high risk. Based on it, the aims of research is: 1). Making map of flood susceptibility in Special Capital Region of Jakarta area, based on geomorphology approach, and 2). Data inventory element at risk of flood. The method of data analysis used qualitative, based on interpretation satellite imagery data using elements of interpretation. Indicators used to result map of flood susceptibility are elevation, slope, and landform, using scoring and overlay technique. The result of research is flood susceptibility of low area is 13.613,40 ha, medium is 23.238,67 ha, and higt is 27.216,72 ha. Based on it, the majority of research area have hight of flood susceptibility. Based on spatial pattern, it showed that areas with high flood susceptibility are mostly located in the northern part of research area, and areas with the lowest flood susceptibility are majority in the southern part of researh area. The result analysis of element at risk, it showed that element at risk  affected by flood for high, medium, or low level is settlement. Key Words: Flood Susceptibility of Map, Exposure, Geomorphology, and Special Capital Region of Jakarta ABSTRAK Provinsi DKI Jakarta merupakan Ibu Kota negara Indonesia yang memiliki beragam fungsi startegis, seperti pusat pemerintahan, dan pusat ekonomi dan bisnis. Akan tetapi, kondisi geografis Provinsi DKI Jakarta yang merupakan dataran rendah, mengakibatkan wilayah Jakarta memiliki ancaman tinggi terhadap bahaya banjir. Hal ini dapat berpotensi menghasilkan tingginya risiko kerugian terhadap bencana. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, tujuan dalam penelitian ini yaitu: 1) Membuat peta kerawanan banjir Provinsi DKI Jakarta berdasarkan pendekatan geomorfologi, dan 2). Melakukan inventarisasi elemen berisiko yang berpotensi terpapar banjir. Metode analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis kualitatif, karena berdasarkan teknik interpretasi data citra secara kualitatif yaitu menggunakan unsur-unsur interpretasi. Parameter- parameter yang digunakan untuk menghasilkan peta kerawanan banjir yaitu elevasi, kemiringan lereng, dan bentuklahan, dengan menggunakan skoring dan tumpang susun. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kerawanan banjir rendah seluas 13.613,40 ha, sedang seluas 23.238,67 ha, dan tinggi seluas 27.216,72 ha. Mayoritas wilayah penelitian terletak pada tingkat kerawanan banjir tinggi. Berdasarkan pola spasial menunjukkan bahwa daerah dengan tingkat kerawanan banjir tinggi mayoritas terletak di bagian utara wilayah penelitian, dan daerah dengan tingkat kerawanan banjir rendah mayoritas dibagian selatan wilayah penelitian. Hasil analisis keterpaparan elemen berisiko wilayah penelitian menunjukkan bahwa elemen berisiko yang berpotensi tertinggi terkena banjir baik tingkat tinggi, sedang, atau rendah yaitu pemukiman. Kata Kunci: Pemetaan Kerawanan Banjir, Keterpaparan, Gemorfologi, dan DKI Jakarta


Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Didier Hantz ◽  
Jordi Corominas ◽  
Giovanni B. Crosta ◽  
Michel Jaboyedoff

There is an increasing need for quantitative rockfall hazard and risk assessment that requires a precise definition of the terms and concepts used for this particular type of landslide. This paper suggests using terms that appear to be the most logic and explicit as possible and describes methods to derive some of the main hazards and risk descriptors. The terms and concepts presented concern the rockfall process (failure, propagation, fragmentation, modelling) and the hazard and risk descriptors, distinguishing the cases of localized and diffuse hazards. For a localized hazard, the failure probability of the considered rock compartment in a given period of time has to be assessed, and the probability for a given element at risk to be impacted with a given energy must be derived combining the failure probability, the reach probability, and the exposure of the element. For a diffuse hazard that is characterized by a failure frequency, the number of rockfalls reaching the element at risk per unit of time and with a given energy (passage frequency) can be derived. This frequency is relevant for risk assessment when the element at risk can be damaged several times. If it is not replaced, the probability that it is impacted by at least one rockfall is more relevant.


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 3434
Author(s):  
José David del Moral-Erencia ◽  
Patricio Bohorquez ◽  
Pedro Jesus Jimenez-Ruiz ◽  
Francisco José Pérez-Latorre

We present a basin-scale method to assimilate hydrological data from remote-sensed flood evidence and map civil infrastructures with risk of flooding. As in many rural areas with a semi-arid climate, the studied catchments do not contain stream gauge, and precipitation data does not capture the spatial variability of extreme hydrological events. Remote-sensed flood evidence as slackwater sediments were available at the whole basin, allowing the paleohydrological reconstruction at many sites across the catchment. The agreement between the predicted and observed inundation area was excellent, with an error lower than 15% on average. In addition, the simulated elevations overlapped the observed values in the flooded areas, showing the accuracy of the method. The peak discharges that provoked floods recorded the spatial variability of the precipitation. The variation coefficients of the rainfall intensity were 30% and 40% in the two studied basins with a mean precipitation rate of 3.1 and 4.6 mm/h, respectively. The assumption of spatially uniform precipitation leads to a mean error of 20% in evaluating the local water discharges. Satellite-based rainfall underpredicted the accumulated precipitation by 30–85.5%. Elaborating an inventory of the civil infrastructures at risk was straightforward by comparing the water surface elevation and transport network. The reconstructed maps of rainfall rate were used in the distributed hydrological model IBERPLUS to this end. Recent flood events that overtopped the infrastructures at risk verified our predictions. The proposed research methods can be easily applied and tested in basins with similar physical characteristics around the Mediterranean region.


Author(s):  
H. McGrath ◽  
E. Stefanakis ◽  
M. Nastev

In New Brunswick flooding occurs typically during the spring freshet, though, in recent years, midwinter thaws have led to flooding in January or February. Municipalities are therefore facing a pressing need to perform risk assessments in order to identify communities at risk of flooding. In addition to the identification of communities at risk, quantitative measures of potential structural damage and societal losses are necessary for these identified communities. Furthermore, tools which allow for analysis and processing of possible mitigation plans are needed. Natural Resources Canada is in the process of adapting Hazus-MH to respond to the need for risk management. This requires extensive data from a variety of municipal, provincial, and national agencies in order to provide valid estimates. The aim is to establish a data warehouse to store relevant flood prediction data which may be accessed thru Hazus. Additionally, this data warehouse will contain tools for On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP) and knowledge discovery to quantitatively determine areas at risk and discover unexpected dependencies between datasets. The third application of the data warehouse is to provide data for online visualization capabilities: web-based thematic maps of Hazus results, historical flood visualizations, and mitigation tools; thus making flood hazard information and tools more accessible to emergency responders, planners, and residents. This paper represents the first step of the process: locating and collecting the appropriate datasets.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1771-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Papathoma-Köhle

Abstract. The assessment of the physical vulnerability of elements at risk as part of the risk analysis is an essential aspect for the development of strategies and structural measures for risk reduction. Understanding, analysing and, if possible, quantifying physical vulnerability is a prerequisite for designing strategies and adopting tools for its reduction. The most common methods for assessing physical vulnerability are vulnerability matrices, vulnerability curves and vulnerability indicators; however, in most of the cases, these methods are used in a conflicting way rather than in combination. The article focuses on two of these methods: vulnerability curves and vulnerability indicators. Vulnerability curves express physical vulnerability as a function of the intensity of the process and the degree of loss, considering, in individual cases only, some structural characteristics of the affected buildings. However, a considerable amount of studies argue that vulnerability assessment should focus on the identification of these variables that influence the vulnerability of an element at risk (vulnerability indicators). In this study, an indicator-based methodology (IBM) for mountain hazards including debris flow (Kappes et al., 2012) is applied to a case study for debris flows in South Tyrol, where in the past a vulnerability curve has been developed. The relatively "new" indicator-based method is being scrutinised and recommendations for its improvement are outlined. The comparison of the two methodological approaches and their results is challenging since both methodological approaches deal with vulnerability in a different way. However, it is still possible to highlight their weaknesses and strengths, show clearly that both methodologies are necessary for the assessment of physical vulnerability and provide a preliminary "holistic methodological framework" for physical vulnerability assessment showing how the two approaches may be used in combination in the future.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1857-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kjellgren

Abstract. In response to the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC), flood hazard maps are currently produced all over Europe, reflecting a wider shift in focus from "flood protection" to "risk management", for which not only public authorities but also populations at risk are seen as responsible. By providing a visual image of the foreseen consequences of flooding, flood hazard maps can enhance people's knowledge about flood risk, making them more capable of an adequate response. Current literature, however, questions the maps' awareness raising capacity, arguing that their content and design are rarely adjusted to laypeople's needs. This paper wants to complement this perspective with a focus on risk communication by studying how these tools are disseminated and marketed to the public in the first place. Judging from communication theory, simply making hazard maps publicly available is unlikely to lead to attitudinal or behavioral effects, since this typically requires two-way communication and material or symbolic incentives. Consequently, it is relevant to investigate whether and how local risk managers, who are well positioned to interact with the local population, make use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes. A qualitative case study of this issue in the German state of Baden-Württemberg suggests that many municipalities lack a clear strategy for using this new information tool for hazard and risk communication. Four barriers in this regard are identified: perceived disinterest/sufficient awareness on behalf of the population at risk; unwillingness to cause worry or distress; lack of skills and resources; and insufficient support. These barriers are important to address – in research as well as in practice – since it is only if flood hazard maps are used to enhance local knowledge resources that they can be expected to contribute to social capacity building.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
Farouki Dinda Rassarandi ◽  
Bungaran Roy Satria Tambunan

Banjir merupakan suatu bencana yang dapat menimbulkan kerugian dan kerusakan di berbagai bidang, khususnya infrastruktur. Salah satu upaya untuk mencegah dan mengurangi dampak dari bencana banjir yaitu dengan pembuatan simulasi melalui pemodelan spasial dalam bentuk peta element at risk. Pada pembuatan peta element at risk, input data berupa peta yang diunduh dari Open Street Map yang berisikan kenampakan alam maupun infrastruktur dari simulasi bencana yang dibuat menggunakan logika Fuzzy. Penerapan logika Fuzzy digunakan untuk menginterpretasikan statemen yang samar dari persentase area bangunan yang terdampak pada setiap klasifikasi area luapan banjir menjadi sebuah pengertian yang logis dalam pengklasifikasian kerusakan “Berat’, “Sedang” dan “Ringan”. Berdasarkan hasil simulasi bencana banjir yang telah dilakukan, didapati bahwa jumlah bangunan yang terkena dampak bencana banjir luapan Sungai Air Bengkulu adalah sebanyak 37 bangunan “Rusak Berat’, 216 “Rusak Sedang’ dan 329 “Rusak Ringan’, dengan jumlah korban jiwa terdampak sebanyak 2.328 jiwa.


Author(s):  
A. Ahmed

Integrating malaria data into a decision support system (DSS) using Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote sensing tool can provide timely information and decision makers get prepared to make better and faster decisions which can reduce the damage and minimize the loss caused. This paper attempted to asses and produce maps of malaria prone areas including the most important natural factors. The input data were based on the geospatial factors including climatic, social and Topographic aspects from secondary data. The objective of study is to prepare malaria hazard, Vulnerability, and element at risk map which give the final output, malaria risk map. The malaria hazard analyses were computed using multi criteria evaluation (MCE) using environmental factors such as topographic factors (elevation, slope and flow distance to stream), land use/ land cover and Breeding site were developed and weighted, then weighted overlay technique were computed in ArcGIS software to generate malaria hazard map. The resulting malaria hazard map depicts that 19.2 %, 30.8 %, 25.1 %, 16.6 % and 8.3 % of the District were subjected to very high, high, moderate, low and very low malaria hazard areas respectively. For vulnerability analysis, health station location and speed constant in Spatial Analyst module were used to generate factor maps. For element at risk, land use land cover map were used to generate element at risk map. Finally malaria risk map of the District was generated. Land use land cover map which is the element at risk in the District, the vulnerability map and the hazard map were overlaid. The final output based on this approach is a malaria risk map, which is classified into 5 classes which is Very High-risk area, High-risk area, Moderate risk area, Low risk area and Very low risk area. The risk map produced from the overlay analysis showed that 20.5 %, 11.6 %, 23.8 %, 34.1 % and 26.4 % of the District were subjected to very high, high, moderate, low and very low malaria risk respectively. This help to plan valuable measures to be taken in early warning, monitor, control and prevent malaria epidemics.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1411-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Mazzorana ◽  
S. Simoni ◽  
C. Scherer ◽  
B. Gems ◽  
S. Fuchs ◽  
...  

Abstract. The design of efficient hydrological risk mitigation strategies and their subsequent implementation relies on a careful vulnerability analysis of the elements exposed. Recently, extensive research efforts were undertaken to develop and refine empirical relationships linking the structural vulnerability of buildings to the impact forces of the hazard processes. These empirical vulnerability functions allow estimating the expected direct losses as a result of the hazard scenario based on spatially explicit representation of the process patterns and the elements at risk classified into defined typological categories. However, due to the underlying empiricism of such vulnerability functions, the physics of the damage generating mechanisms for a well-defined element at risk with its peculiar geometry and structural characteristics remain unveiled, and, as such, the applicability of the empirical approach for planning hazard-proof residential buildings is limited. Therefore, we propose a conceptual assessment scheme to close this gap. This assessment scheme encompasses distinct analytical steps: modelling (a) the process intensity, (b) the impact on the element at risk exposed and (c) the physical response of the building envelope. Furthermore, these results provide the input data for the subsequent damage evaluation and economic damage valuation. This dynamic assessment supports all relevant planning activities with respect to a minimisation of losses, and can be implemented in the operational risk assessment procedure.


Author(s):  
R. C. Hasan ◽  
Q. A. Rosle ◽  
M. A. Asmadi ◽  
N. A. Mohd Kamal

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> One of the most critical steps towards landslide risk analysis is the determination of element at risk. Element at risk describes any object that could potentially fail or exposed to hazards during disaster. Without quantification of element at risk information, it is difficult to estimate risk. This paper aims at developing a methodology to extract and quantity element at risk from airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. The element at risk map produced was then used to construct exposure map which describes the amount of hazard for each element at risk involved. This study presented two study sites at Kundasang and Kota Kinabalu in Sabah with both areas have experienced major earthquake in June 2015. The results show that not all the features can be automatically extracted from the LiDAR data. For example, automatic extraction process could be done for building footprint and building heights, but for others such as roads and vegetation areas, a manual digitization is still needed because of the difficulties to differentiate between these features. In addition to this, there were also difficulties in identifying attribute for each feature, for example to separate between federal roads with state and unpaved roads. Therefore, for large area hazard and risk mapping, the authors suggested that an automatic process should be investigated in the future to reduce time and cost to extract important features from LiDAR data.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document