Fostamatinib for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVD-19 A randomized trial

Abstract Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) requiring hospitalization is characterized by robust antibody production, dysregulated immune response and immunothrombosis. Fostamatinib, is a novel spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor we hypothesize will ameliorate Fc activation and attenuate harmful effects of the anti-COVID-19 immune response. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized adults requiring oxygen with Covid-19 where patients receiving standard of care were randomized to receive fostamatinib or placebo. The primary outcome was serious adverse events by day 29. Results A total of 59 patients underwent randomization (30 to fostamatinib and 29 to placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in 10.5% of patients in the fostamatinib group compared to 22% in placebo (P = .2). Three deaths occurred by day 29, all receiving placebo. The mean change in ordinal score at day 15 was greater in the fostamatinib group (-3.6 ± 0.3 vs. -2.6 ± 0.4, P = .035) and the median length in the ICU was 3 days in the fostamatinib group vs. 7 days in placebo (P = .07). Differences in clinical improvement were most evident in patients with severe or critical disease (median days on oxygen, 10 vs. 28, P = .027). There were trends towards more rapid reductions in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, fibrinogen and ferritin levels in the fostamatinib group. Conclusion For COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, the addition of fostamatinib to standard of care was safe and patients were observed to have improved clinical outcomes compared to placebo. These results warrant further validation in larger confirmatory trials.

Download Full-text

Inhibition of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Reverses Anemia In Patients with Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.640.640 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 640-640 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael W. Schuster ◽

James R Rigas ◽

Sergey V Orlov ◽

Branislav Milovanovic ◽

Kumar Prabhash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Clinical Chemistry ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Safety Data ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Cancer Related Anemia

Abstract Abstract 640 Background: ALD518 is a humanized, desialyated anti-IL-6 antibody being developed for the treatment of cancer-related anemia, cachexia and fatigue. The primary objective of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ALD518 in patients with advanced NSCLC. Secondary objectives examined hematologic parameters. Methods: 124 patients with NSCLC, ECOG 0–3, weight loss in the preceding 3 months of >5% body weight, hemoglobin (Hb) >7g/dL, and C-reactive protein (CRP) >10mg/L were dosed. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n~30/group). Placebo or ALD518 80mg, 160mg, or 320mg was administered intravenously every 8 weeks. Pts were followed up for 24 weeks. Data included hematologic parameters, clinical chemistry, CRP, D-dimer, lean body mass and adverse events (AEs). Quality of life data included the FACIT-F, FACT-L, and FAACT questionnaires. Data presented in this abstract relates to the safety and hematology results. Results: 29 pts completed the study treatments and evaluations, 38 failed to complete every visit, 52 died of progressive disease, and 5 withdrew because of adverse events. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), infusion reactions, or anti-idiotypic antibody responses to ALD518 observed in the study. 84 pts had serious AEs of which 1 was deemed to be possibly related to administration of ALD518 (rectal hemorrhage). The majority of the serious adverse events were due to progression of the NSCLC. Six patients had a CTC grade 4 change in laboratory safety data during the study. Four patients experienced a grade 4 hypercalcemia: 1 (3.6%), 2 (6.1%), and 1 (3.2%) in the ALD518 80mg, 160mg and placebo groups, respectively, and there was 1 patient with grade 4 GGT elevation (placebo) and 1 patient with grade 4 hypokalemia (ALD518 160mg). There were no treatment related differences in vitals sign or 12-lead ECG data. The mean (±SD) values for Hb, hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular Hb (MCH) and platelet counts are listed below: 38/93 pts treated with ALD518 and 10/31 given placebo had a pre-dose Hb =< 11g/dL. 24 of these pts on ALD518 and 7 of these pts on placebo remained in the study at week 4. 14/24 pts on ALD518 and 0/7 on placebo had raised their Hb from =< 11g/dL to >= 12g/dL. Conclusions: ALD518 increased Hb, Hct, MCH in NSCLC pts and raised Hb to >= 12g/dL in 58% of pts with a Hb =< 11g/dL at baseline. There was also a modest fall in platelet count observed in patients treated with ALD518 but no patients had a CTC grade 4 thrombocytopenia and only one patient (ALD518 160mg group) had a grade 3 thrombocytopenia at one time point. There were no major safety signals related to the administration of ALD518. Further study of ALD518 as a novel non-erythropoietic stimulating agent for cancer-related anemia is warranted. Disclosures: Schuster: Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Honoraria. Rigas: Alder Biopharmaceuticals inc: Honoraria. Smith:Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Employment.

Download Full-text

Adverse events and blinding in two randomized trials of hyperbaric oxygen for persistent post-concussive symptoms

Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine ◽

10.22462/13.15.2019.10 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 331-340

Author(s):

Susan Churchill ◽

◽

Kayla Deru ◽

Lindell K. Weaver ◽

Steffanie H. Wilson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Hyperbaric Oxygen ◽

Gas Flow ◽

Randomized Trials ◽

Symptom Improvement ◽

Sham Control ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

To Receive

Safety monitoring and successful blinding are important features of randomized, blinded clinical trials. We report chamber- and protocol-related adverse events (AEs) for participants enrolled in two randomized, double-blind clinical trials of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) for persistent post-concussive symptoms clinicaltrials.gov identifiers NCT01306968, HOPPS, and NCT01611194, BIMA), as well as the success of maintaining the blind with a low-pressure sham control arm. In both studies, participants were randomized to receive HBO2 (1.5 atmospheres absolute, >99% oxygen) or sham chamber sessions (1.2 atmospheres absolute, room air). In 143 participants undergoing 4,245 chamber sessions, chamber-related adverse events were rare (1.1% in the HOPPS study, 2.2% in the BIMA study). Minor, non-limiting barotrauma was the most frequently reported. Rarely, some participants experienced headache with chamber sessions. No serious adverse events were associated with chamber sessions. An allocation questionnaire completed after intervention revealed that the sham control arm adequately protected the blind in both trials. Participants based allocation assumptions on symptom improvement or lack of symptom improvement and could not discern intervention arm by pressure, smell, taste, or gas flow.

Download Full-text

Safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of PGT121, a broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody against HIV-1: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial

Nature Medicine ◽

10.1038/s41591-021-01509-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kathryn E. Stephenson ◽

Boris Julg ◽

C. Sabrina Tan ◽

Rebecca Zash ◽

Stephen R. Walsh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Antiviral Activity ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Hiv 1

AbstractHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-specific broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are currently under development to treat and prevent HIV-1 infection. We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled trial of a single administration of the HIV-1 V3-glycan-specific antibody PGT121 at 3, 10 and 30 mg kg–1 in HIV-uninfected adults and HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART), as well as a multicenter, open-label trial of one infusion of PGT121 at 30 mg kg–1 in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART (no. NCT02960581). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antiviral activity in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART. The secondary endpoints were changes in anti-PGT121 antibody titers and CD4+ T-cell count, and development of HIV-1 sequence variations associated with PGT121 resistance. Among 48 participants enrolled, no treatment-related serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases or Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported. The most common reactions among PGT121 recipients were intravenous/injection site tenderness, pain and headache. Absolute and relative CD4+ T-cell counts did not change following PGT121 infusion in HIV-infected participants. Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were not elicited. PGT121 reduced plasma HIV RNA levels by a median of 1.77 log in viremic participants, with a viral load nadir at a median of 8.5 days. Two individuals with low baseline viral loads experienced ART-free viral suppression for ≥168 days following antibody infusion, and rebound viruses in these individuals demonstrated full or partial PGT121 sensitivity. The trial met the prespecified endpoints. These data suggest that further investigation of the potential of antibody-based therapeutic strategies for long-term suppression of HIV is warranted, including in individuals off ART and with low viral load.

Download Full-text

A Controlled Trial of Extended-Release Guanfacine and Psychostimulants on Executive Function and ADHD

Journal of Attention Disorders ◽

10.1177/1087054717751197 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 24 (2) ◽

pp. 318-325 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Judy P. M. van Stralen

Keyword(s):

Executive Function ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Extended Release ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Severity Of Illness ◽

P Value ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Stimulant Therapy

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of guanfacine extended-release (GXR) versus placebo as adjunct therapy to usual care stimulant therapy in improving executive function in children aged 6 to 12 years diagnosed with ADHD. Method: In this single center, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, subjects continued to take their psychostimulant and were randomly assigned at baseline to receive active treatment or placebo first. Efficacy measures included Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-P), ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS IV), and Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Safety measures included adverse events and vital signs. Results: Significant benefits of GXR plus psychostimulant were observed on BRIEF-P ( p value = .0392), ADHD-RS-IV ( p < .0001), CGI-S ( p = .0007), and CGI-I ( p = .003). There were no serious adverse events and no new safety signals. Conclusion: Use of GXR as adjunctive therapy to stimulant therapy significantly improves executive function in children with ADHD.

Download Full-text

A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lenvatinib (E7080) in patients with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (SELECT).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.18_suppl.lba6008 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. LBA6008-LBA6008 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Martin Schlumberger ◽

Makoto Tahara ◽

Lori J. Wirth ◽

Bruce Robinson ◽

Marcia S. Brose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Weight Loss ◽

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo

LBA6008 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRβ, RET, and KIT signaling networks. Based on efficacy results of the phase 2 study of patients (pts) with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), this phase 3 Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT) was developed. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study enrolled pts with RR-DTC with documented disease progression within 13 months (mo). Pts were stratified by age (≤65, >65 years), region and ≤1 prior VEGFR-targeted therapies and randomized 2:1 to LEN or PBO (24mg/d, 28-d cycle). Upon progression, pts receiving PBO could crossover to open-label LEN. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by Independent Radiologic Review; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + PR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 392 pts (63.0 years median age; 51.0% male) were randomized. Pts on LEN had a significantly prolonged PFS vs PBO (hazard ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.31; P <.0001); median PFS was LEN: 18.3 mo (95% CI 15.1–not evaluable), PBO: 3.6 mo (95% CI 2.2–3.7). A LEN PFS benefit was observed in all predefined subgroups; median LEN PFS for pts with prior vs no prior VEGF-therapy was 15.1 mo (n=66) and 18.7 mo (n=195), respectively. Rates (n) of CRs were LEN: 1.5% (4), PBO: 0; PRs were LEN: 63.2% (165), PBO: 1.5% (2).Median exposure duration was LEN: 13.8 mo, PBO: 3.9 mo; median time to LEN response was 2.0 mo. Median OS has not been reached; deaths per arm were LEN: 71 (27.2%), PBO: 47 (35.9%). The 5 most common LEN treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; any grade) were hypertension (68%), diarrhea (59%), appetite decreased (50%), weight loss (46%), nausea (41%). LEN grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥5%) were hypertension (42%), proteinuria (10%), weight loss (10%), diarrhea (8%), appetite decreased (5%). The dose was reduced in 78.5% of pts and discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) in 14.2% of pts. Conclusions: LEN significantly improved PFS compared with PBO in pts with progressive RR-DTC. There were no unexpected toxicities and AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT01321554.

Download Full-text

Management of hard-to-heal leg ulcers with an acid-oxidising solution versus standard of care: the MACAN study

Journal of Wound Care ◽

10.12968/jowc.2021.30.9.694 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 30 (9) ◽

pp. 694-704

Author(s):

Robert Strohal ◽

Martina Mittlböck ◽

Werner Müller ◽

Gilbert Hämmerle

Keyword(s):

Wound Healing ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Size Reduction ◽

Wound Dressings ◽

Leg Ulcers ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Wound Size

Objective: The efficacy of available wound dressings in the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds is limited. A new therapeutic approach using an acid-oxidising solution (AOS) was developed. Its effect on healing progress, tolerability and safety properties were investigated in a clinical study, and compared with standard of care (SOC) wound dressings. The study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of AOS to SOC in terms of wound healing progress. Method: This open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two study centres in Austria with patients with either infected or non-infected hard-to-heal leg ulcers of different aetiology. Patients were treated for six weeks either with AOS or SOC wound dressings. Outcome assessments included the percentage of granulation and re-epithelialisation tissue, wound size reduction, changes in wound pH, infection control and wound pain, local tolerability and adverse events (AEs). Healing time and rate were also assessed. Results: A total of 50 patients took part. In the AOS group, wounds exhibited higher amounts of granulation and re-epithelialisation tissue, and a faster and more pronounced wound size reduction compared with wounds in the SOC group. In the AOS-treated versus SOC-treated patients, a greater percentage of complete healing of hard-to-heal ulcers was achieved by the end of the study period (32% versus 8%, respectively). Furthermore, the wound pH decreased significantly faster in these wounds (p<0.0001). In all patients with infected leg ulcers, local infection was overcome more rapidly under AOS treatment. In the AOS group, one AE and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were detected versus 24 AEs and two SAEs in the SOC group. Conclusion: In this study, AOS proved to be a highly effective treatment to support wound healing in infected or non-infected hard-to-heal leg ulcers of different aetiology. Efficacy was found to be not only non-inferior but superior to SOC wound dressings. Furthermore, tolerability and safety profiles were favourable for AOS.

Download Full-text

Dasatinib Compared with Imatinib In Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP):Results of Japanese Subset Analysis In DASISION Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4484.4484 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4484-4484

Author(s):

Michinori Ogura ◽

Hirohisa Nakamae ◽

Shin Fujisawa ◽

Kenichi Ishizawa ◽

Masafumi Taniwaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Subset Analysis ◽

To Receive

Abstract Abstract 4484 Background: Dasatinib is a highly potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib 100 mg once daily resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib; both treatment arms were well-tolerated (N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2260-70). The objective of this subset analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of dasatinib compared with imatinib in the Japanese population. Methods: Forty-nine Japanese patients (total 519 pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib 100 mg QD or imatinib 400 mg QD. Confirmed CCyR (cCCyR; CCyR on 2 consecutive assessments at least 28 days apart) was the primary efficacy endpoint with MMR as an important secondary endpoint. The safety profiles were also evaluated. Results: Minimum follow-up time and median treatment duration were 12 months and 15 months, respectively. Twenty-six patients with median age 56 (range, 21–70) years were treated with dasatinib and 23 patients with median age 52 (range, 22–77) years were treated with imatinib. Overall 89% of patients receiving dasatinib and 83% of patients receiving imatinib continue to receive treatment. The cCCyR rate by 12 months (primary endpoint), CCyR rate by 12 months and MMR rate at any time in dasatinib arm were higher than those in imatinib for Japanese patients (96% vs 70%, 96% vs 78%, and 73% vs 48%, respectively). Grade 3/4 cytopenias in dasatinib arm and imatinib arm were as follows: anemia (8% vs 4%), neutropenia (27% vs 39%), and thrombocytopenia (8% vs 9%). Non-hematologic and drug-related adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients are shown as Table. No deaths were reported in either group. Drug-related serious adverse events were rarely reported and all events were not severe (Grade 1–2, including vomiting, hypoxia and cardiomyopathy in dasatinib arm). Conclusion: Dasatinib showed higher rates of cCCyR and MMR compared with imatinib. Both treatments were well tolerated. Given the predictive value of 12 months cCCyR, dasatinib may improve long-term outcomes in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures: Ueda: Bristol-Myers K.K.: Employment. Seriu:Bristol-Myers K.K.: Employment. Bradley-Garelik:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Zhu:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment.

Download Full-text

Tocilizumab in early progressive rheumatoid arthritis: FUNCTION, a randomised controlled trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207628 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 75 (6) ◽

pp. 1081-1091 ◽

Cited By ~ 99

Author(s):

Gerd R Burmester ◽

William F Rigby ◽

Ronald F van Vollenhoven ◽

Jonathan Kay ◽

Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Physical Function ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesThe efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, has not previously been evaluated in a population consisting exclusively of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn a double-blind randomised controlled trial (FUNCTION), 1162 methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with early progressive RA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups: 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and placebo+MTX (comparator group). The primary outcome was remission according to Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.6) at week 24. Radiographic and physical function outcomes were also evaluated. We report results through week 52.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population included 1157 patients. Significantly more patients receiving 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX and 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo than receiving placebo+MTX achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 24 (45% and 39% vs 15%; p<0.0001). The 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group also achieved significantly greater improvement in radiographic disease progression and physical function at week 52 than did patients treated with placebo+MTX (mean change from baseline in van der Heijde–modified total Sharp score, 0.08 vs 1.14 (p=0.0001); mean reduction in Health Assessment Disability Index, −0.81 vs −0.64 (p=0.0024)). In addition, the 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX groups demonstrated clinical efficacy that was at least as effective as MTX for these key secondary endpoints. Serious adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Adverse events resulting in premature withdrawal occurred in 20% of patients in the 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group.ConclusionsTCZ is effective in combination with MTX and as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with early RA.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01007435

Download Full-text

Safety and immunogenicity of a seasonal trivalent inactivated split influenza vaccine: a double blind, phase III randomized clinical trial in healthy Serbian adults

Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy ◽

10.1177/2515135520925336 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 251513552092533

Author(s):

Goran Stevanovic ◽

Aleksandar Obradovic ◽

Snezana Ristic ◽

Dragan Petrovic ◽

Branislava Milenkovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Injection Site ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Geometric Mean ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Post Vaccination ◽

Robust Immune Response

This study was a phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a seasonal trivalent split, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in healthy Serbian adults between the ages of 18 and 65 years. This egg-based vaccine was manufactured by the Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera, Torlak, Belgrade, Serbia. A total of 480 participants were assigned randomly in a ratio of 2:1 to receive a single intramuscular dose (0.5 ml) of the vaccine (15 µg of hemagglutinin per strain) or placebo (phosphate-buffered saline). Participants were monitored for safety, including solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). No SAEs related to vaccination were reported. Injection site pain (51.3%), injection site tenderness (40.4%), tiredness (17.0%), and headache (15.1%) were the most commonly reported solicited events in the vaccine group. Incidence of related unsolicited AEs was low (1.3%) among vaccinees. Hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers were measured before and 21 days after vaccination in 151 participants. Overall, HAI seroconversion rates to H1 and H3 were observed in 90.1% and 76.2% of vaccinees, respectively. For B antigen, it was 51.5%, likely due to high pre-vaccination titers. Post-vaccination seroprotection rates were in the range of 78.2–95.0% for the three antigens. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers (GMT) were at least 3.8 times higher than baseline levels for all the three strains among vaccinees. Overall, the study showed that the vaccine was safe and well tolerated, and induced a robust immune response against all three vaccine strains. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02935192, October 17, 2016

Download Full-text

Natalizumab in acute ischemic stroke (ACTION II)

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.0000000000010038 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 95 (8) ◽

pp. e1091-e1104 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mitchell S.V. Elkind ◽

Roland Veltkamp ◽

Joan Montaner ◽

S. Claiborne Johnston ◽

Aneesh B. Singhal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Excellent Outcome ◽

Scale Scores ◽

To Receive ◽

Improve Patient

ObjectiveWe evaluated the effect of 2 doses of natalizumab on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsIn this double-blind phase 2b trial, patients with AIS aged 18–80 years with NIH Stroke Scale scores of 5–23 from 53 US and European sites were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of 300 or 600 mg IV natalizumab or placebo, with randomization stratified by treatment window (≤9 or >9 to ≤24 hours from patient's last known normal state). The primary endpoint was a composite measure of excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 and Barthel Index score ≥95) at day 90 assessed in all patients receiving a full dose. Sample size was estimated from a Bayesian model; p values were not used for hypothesis testing.ResultsAn excellent outcome was less likely with natalizumab than with placebo (natalizumab 300 or 600 mg odds ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.39–0.93). There was no effect modification by time to treatment or use of thrombolysis/thrombectomy. For natalizumab 300 mg, 600 mg, or placebo, there were no differences in incidence of adverse events (90.0%, 92.1%, and 92.3%, respectively), serious adverse events (25.6%, 32.6%, and 20.9%, respectively), or deaths (6.7%, 4.5%, and 5.5%, respectively).ConclusionsNatalizumab administered ≤24 hours after AIS did not improve patient outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02730455Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that for patients with AIS, an excellent outcome was less likely in patients treated with natalizumab than with placebo.

Download Full-text