scholarly journals Patient safety incidents in ambulatory care in Germany

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Geraedts ◽  
S Krause ◽  
M Schneider ◽  
J Leinert ◽  
W de Cruppé

Abstract Background In contrast to the inpatient sector, reliable data on the epidemiology and public health impact of patient safety incidents (PSI) are hardly found in the outpatient sector. Thus, this study focusses on the incidence of PSI; the distribution among the various specialist groups; the harmful consequences; the causes and how affected patients deal with PSI in Germany. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using a newly developed computer-assisted-telephone-interview survey tool. Based on random telephone numbers, citizens >39 years were asked to report whether they had experienced a PSI in the last year or since their 40th birthday; whereby the PSI happened, what consequences the PSI had for them and if they reported the PSI back to their physician. We performed descriptive and multivariate analyses and extrapolated the results to the total population >39 years in Germany. Results 10037 citizens were surveyed (response rate 13%): 8841 had an outpatient visit last year, of whom 1570 (18%) had experienced at least one PSI. In total, 2832 PSI were reported. General practitioners caused 43% of PSI. Among specialists (54%), most PSI were found among orthopedists (15%) and internists (9%) and arose in connection with anamnesis and clinical examination (61%) as well as drug prescriptions (15%). 72% of the PSI caused health related harm. The most frequent harm was a deterioration in health (23%) and persistent pain (22%). 54% of those affected described the harm as severe or very severe. 27% considered doctors’ stress and lack of time or poor communication (18%) as causes for PSI. 32% of PSI were reported back to the treating physician. Discussion Extrapolated to the total population >39 years in Germany (47.2 million), an incidence of 12 million PSI per year must be expected with around 6.6 million affected outpatients. Thus, PSI in the outpatient sector are of immense public health importance in Germany. Key messages Patient safety incidents (PSI) often happen in the German outpatient sector. Outpatient PSI can also be accompanied by severe harm for patients.

Author(s):  
Verónica Aranaz Ostáriz ◽  
María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro ◽  
Francisco López Rodríguez-Arias ◽  
José Lorenzo Valencia Martín ◽  
Carlos Aibar Remón ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Identifying and measuring adverse events (AE) is a priority for patient safety, which allows us to define and prioritise areas for improvement and evaluate and develop solutions to improve health care quality. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence of AEs in surgical and medical-surgical departments and to know the health impact of these AEs. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study determining the prevalence of AEs in surgical and medical-surgical departments was conducted and a comparison was made among both clinical areas. A total of 5228 patients were admitted in 58 hospitals in Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru, within the Latin American Study of Adverse Events (IBEAS), led by the Spanish Ministry of Health, the Pan American Health Organization, and the WHO Patient Safety programme. (3) Results: The global prevalence of AEs was 10.7%. However, the prevalence of AEs in surgical departments was 11.9%, while in medical-surgical departments it was 8.9%. The causes of these AEs were associated with surgical procedures (38.6%) and nosocomial infections (35.4%). About 60.6% of the AEs extended hospital stays by 30.7 days on average and 25.8% led to readmission with an average hospitalisation of 15 days. About 22.4% resulted in death, disability, or surgical reintervention. (4) Conclusions: Surgical departments were associated with a higher risk of experiencing AEs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah N. Ngugi ◽  
Eric M. Fèvre ◽  
Georgies F. Mgode ◽  
Mark Obonyo ◽  
Ginethon G. Mhamphi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Leptospirosis is a neglected zoonosis of public health importance transmitted through contact with contaminated soil, water or urine of infected animals. In pigs the disease is characterized by abortion, still births and weak piglets. A cross-sectional study was conducted in May to July 2018 to estimate the sero-prevalence of leptospirosis and factors associated with seropositivity in slaughter pigs. A questionnaire was used to collect information on animal demographics. Serum was tested for anti-leptospiral antibodies using microscopic agglutination test (MAT) with a panel of 8 serovars. Sera were considered positive for sero-reactivity at a MAT titre ≥1:40 against at least one serovar. Chi-square tests were used to measure the strength of association between the MAT test result and exploratory variables. Results A total of 252 pig serum samples from seven slaughterhouses were tested for Leptospira antibodies by MAT. Of the 252 pigs sampled, 88.8% (244/252) were indigenous breeds; 55.6% (140/252) were female and 88.7% (220/252) were reared in extensive production systems. Eighty-three (32.9%; 83/252) sera samples tested positive on MAT against at least one serovar. Of the 8 serovars, the highest prevalence was recorded for serovar Lora 21.4% followed by Kenya 5.2%, Sokoine 3.6% and Grippotyphosa at 3.2%. Risk factors for leptospirosis seropositivity in pigs were: originating from farms with other types of livestock (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0–4.5) and mature pigs (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1–3.3). Conclusion This study demonstrates that there is a high prevalence of leptospirosis positive pigs at slaughter in a small-holder livestock keeping region of the Lake Victoria basin. The potential for cross species transmission of pathogenic serovars is highlighted as well as the potential for occupational exposure to slaughterhouse personnel. Improvements in husbandry practices (confinement and rodent control) and public health education among slaughterhouse workers and other high-risk groups is recommended.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e034617
Author(s):  
Max Geraedts ◽  
Svenja Krause ◽  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Annette Ortwein ◽  
Johannes Leinert ◽  
...  

ObjectivesData on patient safety problems (PSPs) in ambulatory care are scarce. The aim of the study was to record the frequency, type, severity and point of origin of PSPs in ambulatory care in Germany.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.SettingComputer-assisted telephone interviews with randomly recruited citizens aged ≥40 years in Germany who were asked about their experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care.Participants10 037 citizens ≥40 years.MeasuresA new questionnaire was developed to record patient experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care. The study reported here targets patient experiences in the last 12 months. The questionnaire focuses on PSPs in seven areas of medical treatment: anamnesis/diagnostic procedures; medication; vaccination, injection, infusion; aftercare; outpatient surgery; office administration; other areas. For each PSP reported, detailed questions were asked about the specialist group concerned, and, on the most serious harm, the severity of the harm and its consequences. The target parameters are presented as proportions with 95% CIs.Results1422 of the respondents (14%) reported 2589 PSPs. The areas most frequently affected by PSPs were anamnesis/diagnostic procedures (61%) and medication (15%). General practitioners accounted for 44% of PSPs, orthopaedists for 15% and internists for 10%. 75% of PSPs were associated with harm, especially unnecessarily prolonged pain or deterioration of health; 35% of PSPs led to permanent harm. 804 PSPs (32%) prompted patients to see another doctor for additional treatment; 255 PSPs (10%) required inpatient treatment.ConclusionPSPs experienced by patients are widespread in ambulatory care in Germany. The study reveals in which areas of medical treatment efforts to prevent PSPs could make the greatest contribution to improving patient safety. It also demonstrates the valuable contribution of patient reports to the analysis of PSPs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ángel López-Nicolás ◽  
Michal Stoklosa

ObjectivesThe European Commission has formally opened a process of revision of its tobacco tax directive. The purpose of this study is to analyse the evolution of cigarette and roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco prices in order to identify avenues for the improvement of public health goals.MethodsPooled cross-sectional data on prices and taxes on cigarettes and RYO tobacco in the Member States over 2004–2015 is used to track the distributions of the most popular price category and the weighted average price of these products and to relate them to the underlying tax structure.ResultsThe inflation-adjusted prices for the two products have increased over the period, but the dispersion of prices across Member States has remained constant. Throughout the period, there was a pervasive price gap between cigarettes and RYO tobacco within the Member States. Such features are explained by the underlying tax design.DiscussionThe current tax stance has been successful at increasing both cigarette and RYO tobacco prices. To further enhance the public health impact of the European Union tax directive, the revision should promote the convergence of prices across Member States and aim at closing the price gap between cigarettes and RYO tobacco. These objectives call for increasing the mandatory minimum levels of excise duty on the two products, preferably linking them to the evolution of a European weighted average price. The pace of increase should be faster for RYO tobacco in order to close the gap with respect to cigarette prices.


BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. e009079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Carson-Stevens ◽  
Peter Hibbert ◽  
Anthony Avery ◽  
Amy Butlin ◽  
Ben Carter ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Pohlman ◽  
Linda Carroll ◽  
Lisa Hartling ◽  
Ross T. Tsuyuki ◽  
Sunita Vohra

A reporting and learning system is a method of monitoring the occurrence of incidents that affect patient safety. This cross-sectional survey asked pediatric chiropractors about factors that may limit their participation in such a system. The list of potential barriers for participation was developed using a systematic approach. All members of the 2 pediatric councils associated with US national chiropractic organizations were invited to complete the survey (N = 400). The cross-sectional survey was created using an online survey tool (REDCap) and sent directly to member emails addressed by the respective executive committees. Of the 400 potential respondents, 81 responded (20.3%). The most common limitations to participating were identified as time pressure (96%) and patient concerns (81%). Reporting and learning systems have been utilized to increase safety awareness in many high-risk industries. To be successful, future patient safety studies with pediatric chiropractors need to ensure these barriers are understood and addressed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Maria Yuventa Wanda ◽  
Nursalam Nursalam ◽  
Andri Setiya Wahyudi

Introduction: Patient Safety Incident Report hereinafter referred to as incident reporting, is a system of documenting patient safety incident reports, analyzing and obtaining recommendations and solutions from the health care facility patient safety team. This study aims to analyze the factors of work experience, education, perceptions, attitudes, motivation, leadership towards reporting patient safety incidents to nurses in the inpatient room of Prof. Dr. W. Z. Johannes Kupang.Method: The design of this study was cross-sectional. The sample size of the study was 143 respondents who met the inclusion criteria. The dependent variable is the reporting of patient safety incidents, while the independent variables are work experience, education, perception, attitude, motivation,  leadership. Data were collected using a questionnaire and observation on nurses. Data were then analyzed using multiple logistic regression with a significant value < 0.05.Results:  The results show that there is a perception effect on patient safety incident reporting (p = 0.05) and leadership influence on patient safety incident reporting (p = 0.02).Conclusion: The concludes is that there is an influence of perception and leadership on reporting patient safety incidents. Further researchers are advised to research the effect of training on improving patient safety incident reporting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 28-37
Author(s):  
Mualimin Mualimin ◽  
Thomson P Nadapdap ◽  
Deli Deli

The patient safety mission at the hospital is to prevent patient safety incidents from occurring, the number of incidents is said to be like an iceberg phenomenon. The incidence rate in Indonesia based on data from the Joint Commission International (2012) shows that as many as 13% due to surgical errors and 68% due to blood transfusion errors. This study aims to analyze the relationship between leadership support and compliance with nurses in identifying patients in the implementation of patient safety in the Datu Beru Aceh Hospital. Tengah. The research design used a quantitative analytic survey with a cross-sectional design. The population of all nurses working in the Women's Internal Medicine Room at Datu Beru Hospital, Central Aceh was 34 people. The sampling technique used total sampling. Data analysis was carried out by univariate, bivariate and multivariate with chi_square. The results of the research variable Leadership Support with Nurse Adherence obtained p-value = 0,000, meaning that there is a relationship between leadership support and nurse compliance to identify patients in the application of patient safety. Multivariate analysis of leadership support variables obtained sig value of 0.000 <p = 0.05, which means that there is a significant influence of the leadership support variable on nurse compliance. There is a relationship between leadership support and the compliance of nurses to identify patients in the application of patient safety and there is a significant effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document