scholarly journals Outcomes of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy With Ceftriaxone for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections—A Single-Center Observational Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasir Hamad ◽  
Lee Connor ◽  
Thomas C Bailey ◽  
Ige A George
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Care ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Mssa Infection ◽  
Single Center Observational Study

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Ceftriaxone is convenient for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but data for this indication are limited. Methods Adult patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) BSI discharged on OPAT with cefazolin, oxacillin, or ceftriaxone for at least 7 days were included. We compared outcomes of ceftriaxone vs either oxacillin or cefazolin. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, readmission due to MSSA infection, and microbiological failure were examined as a composite outcome and compared among groups. Rates of antibiotic switches due to intolerance were assessed. Results Of 243 patients included, 148 (61%) were discharged on ceftriaxone and 95 (39%) were discharged on either oxacillin or cefazolin. The ceftriaxone group had lower rates of intensive care unit care, endocarditis, and shorter duration of bacteremia, but higher rates of cancer diagnoses. There was no significant difference in the composite adverse outcome in the oxacillin or cefazolin group vs the ceftriaxone group (18 [19%] vs 31 [21%]; P = .70), comprising microbiological failure (6 [6.3%] vs 9 [6.1%]; P = .94), 90-day all-cause mortality (7 [7.4%] vs 15 [10.1%]; P = .46), and readmission due to MSSA infection (10 [10.5%] vs 13 [8.8%]; P = .65). Antibiotic intolerance necessitating a change was similar between the 2 groups (4 [4.2%] vs 6 [4.1%]; P = .95). Conclusions For patients with MSSA BSI discharged on OPAT, within the limitations of the small numbers and retrospective design we did not find a significant difference in outcomes for ceftriaxone therapy when compared with oxacillin or cefazolin therapy.

scholarly journals Twice daily cefazolin is effective for treatment of serious methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611988284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Birrell ◽  
Andrew Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Vertebral Osteomyelitis ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Prosthetic Material ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Therapy Program ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Failure ◽  
Mssa Infection

Background: The use of cefazolin for infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus has been demonstrated to be effective, and associated with fewer adverse effects compared with anti-staphylocccal penicillins; however, use of cefazolin on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs often requires the use of continuous infusions. We report the outcomes of patients with serious infections caused by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) treated using twice daily cefazolin by a large tertiary hospital OPAT program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and outcomes after 90 days of follow up for patients with serious infections caused by MSSA treated with twice daily cefazolin by our OPAT program. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes of cases treated for a serious infection proven to be caused by MSSA treated with cefazolin monotherapy on the OPAT program at a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and July 2016 (6.5 years). Outcome measures included readmission rate, adverse drug reactions and clinical cure. Results: A total of 111 cases of serious MSSA infection were treated with cefazolin in the OPAT service during the study period, including 52 with peripheral or vertebral osteomyelitis and 13 with infective endocarditis; 56 patients had bacteraemia. Median duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 41 days, and the median proportion of intravenous therapy administered via OPAT was 69%. Two patients had recurrence of infection within 90 days, but were in the setting of retained prosthetic material. A total of 4% of patients experienced an adverse drug reaction. No cases of antibiotic failure were identified. Conclusions: The use of twice daily cefazolin for serious MSSA infection on an OPAT program is safe and effective. Further study is needed to assess for noninferiority to conventional treatment regimes.

scholarly journals Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection with or without Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1014
Author(s):  
Alberto Enrico Maraolo ◽  
Agnese Giaccone ◽  
Ivan Gentile ◽  
Annalisa Saracino ◽  
Davide Fiore Bavaro
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Invasive Infections ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of invasive infections, mainly bloodstream infections (BSI) with or without endocarditis. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare vancomycin, the mainstay treatment, with daptomycin as therapeutic options in this context. Materials: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database were searched from their inception to 15 February 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, infection recurrence, persistence of infection, length-of-stay, antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and 30-day re-admission. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020169413. Results: Eight studies (1226 patients, 554 vs. 672 in daptomycin vs. vancomycin, respectively) were included. No significant difference in terms of overall mortality was observed [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.33, I2 = 67%]. Daptomycin was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical failure (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.89, I2 = 60%), as confirmed by pooling adjusted effect sizes (adjusted OR against the use of vancomycin 1.94, 95%CI 1.33–1.82, I2 = 41%), and was linked with fewer treatment-limiting AEs (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.06–0.36, I2 = 19%). No difference emerged between the two treatments as secondary outcomes. Results were not robust to unmeasured confounding (E-value lower than 95% CI 1.00 for all-cause mortality). Conclusions: Against MRSA BSI, with or without endocarditis, daptomycin seems to be associated with a lower risk of clinical failure and treatment-limiting AEs compared with vancomycin. Further studies are needed to better characterize the differences between the two drugs.

Clinical effectiveness of flucloxacillin delivery using an elastomeric device for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 376-380
Author(s):  
Yuhan Zhang ◽  
Yun Chun Ody ◽  
Linsey Davis
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Vertebral Osteomyelitis ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Antibiotic Infusion

There has been a surging interest in using elastomeric infusion devices to deliver outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), which is more cost-effective than standard antibiotic administration, which requires multiple daily home visits. This has been particularly important since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, because reducing patient contact can also help to minimise transmission of COVID-19 to outpatients who are at a high risk of COVID-19-triggered complications. In this retrospective study, the clinical effectiveness of intravenous (IV) infusion of flucloxacillin using an elastomeric device was explored in a convenience sample of patients. Patients with three primary infective diagnoses—bloodstream infection, non-vertebral osteomyelitis and vertebral osteomyelitis—were included in the analyses. In non-vertebral osteomyelitis patients, Accufuser antibiotic infusion shortened the course of OPAT care relative to standard antibiotic administration (p<.05). In contrast, in vertebral osteomyelitis patients, it prolonged the course of OPAT care relative to standard administration (p<.05). In patients with bloodstream infections, no significant difference was found between the treatment modes (p=.93). Thus, the clinical effectiveness of Accufuser antibiotic infusion varies among patients with different infective diagnoses, and there seems to be a complex relationship between the method of antibiotic delivery and the patient's condition.

scholarly journals 48. Association of Rapid Pathogen Identification and Pharmacist Intervention on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy for Bloodstream Infections at Two Community Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
Bryant M Froberg ◽  
Nicholas Torney
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Pharmacist Intervention ◽  
Pathogen Identification ◽  
Community Hospitals ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background As many as 1 in 3 patients with bloodstream infections at community hospitals receive inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy. Studies have shown that the coupling of real-time intervention with rapid pathogen identification improves patient outcomes and decreases health-system costs at large, tertiary academic centers. The aim of this study was to assess if similar outcomes could be obtained with the implementation of real-time pharmacist intervention to rapid pathogen identification at two smaller, rural community hospitals. Methods This was a pre-post implementation study that occurred from September of 2019 to March 2020. This study included patients ≥18 years of age admitted with one positive blood culture. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had a polymicrobial blood culture, known culture prior to admission, hospice consulted prior to admission, expired prior to positive blood culture, or transferred to another hospital within 24 hours of a positive blood culture. Endpoints of patients prior to intervention were compared to patients post-implementation. The primary endpoint was time to optimal antimicrobial therapy. Secondary endpoints included time to effective antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of hospitalization. Results Of 212 patients screened, 88 patients were included with 44 patients in each group. Both groups were similar in terms of comorbidities, infection source, and causative microbial. No significant difference was seen in the mean time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (27.3±35.5 hr vs 19.4± 30 hr, p=0.265). Patients in the post-implementation group had a significantly higher mean hospitalization cost ($24,638.87± $11,080.91 vs $32,722.07±$13,076.73, p=0.013). There was no significant difference in time to effective antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality, or length of hospital stay. Conclusion There were no between-group differences in the primary outcome of time to optimal therapy, with a higher mean hospitalization cost after implementation. These results suggest further antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed, along with larger studies conducted in the community hospital settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals The effect of additional antimicrobial therapy on the outcomes of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Yi Chen ◽  
Chao-Hsien Chen ◽  
Cheng-Yi Wang ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
Chien-Ming Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lung Function Decline ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background The effect of additional antimicrobial agents on the clinical outcomes of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unclear. Methods We performed comprehensive searches of randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy of additional antimicrobial agents to those of placebo or usual care in the treatment of IPF patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and the risk of adverse events (AEs). Results Four RCTs including a total of 1055 patients (528 receiving additional antibiotics and 527 receiving placebo or usual care) were included in this meta-analysis. Among the study group, 402 and 126 patients received co-trimoxazole and doxycycline, respectively. The all-cause mortality rates were 15.0% (79/528) and 14.0% (74/527) in the patients who did and did not receive additional antibiotics, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 1.51; p = 0.71). No significant difference was observed in the changes in FVC (mean difference [MD], 0.01; 95% CI − 0.03 to 0.05; p = 0.56) and DLCO (MD, 0.05; 95% CI − 0.17 to 0.28; p = 0.65). Additional use of antimicrobial agents was also associated with an increased risk of AEs (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.27; p = 0.002), especially gastrointestinal disorders (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.15; p = 0.001). Conclusions In patients with IPF, adding antimicrobial therapy to usual care did not improve mortality or lung function decline but increased gastrointestinal toxicity.

Does the Beta-Lactam Matter? Nafcillin versus Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

Chemotherapy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 345-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey C. Burrelli ◽  
Eleanor K. Broadbent ◽  
Alice Margulis ◽  
Graham M. Snyder ◽  
Howard S. Gold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Acute Interstitial Nephritis ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Antistaphylococcal penicillins have historically been regarded as the drugs of choice for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSI). However, recent outcomes data compared to cefazolin treatment are conflicting. Objective: This study compared treatment failure and adverse effects associated with nafcillin and cefazolin for MSSA BSI. Methods: Adult inpatients with MSSA BSI between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2015 were included in this retrospective cohort study if they received ≥72 h of nafcillin or cefazolin as directed therapy after no more than 72 h of any empiric therapy. The primary composite endpoint was treatment failure defined by clinician documentation, 30-day recurrence of infection, all-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality, or loss to follow-up. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related acute kidney injury (AKI), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), hepatotoxicity, and rash. Results: Among 157 patients, 116 (73.9%) received nafcillin and 41 (26.1%) received cefazolin. The baseline characteristics were similar except cefazolin-treated patients had higher APACHE II scores and more frequent renal dysfunction. No difference in the composite treatment failure outcome (28.4 vs. 31.7%; p = 0.69) was detected between the nafcillin and cefazolin groups, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients without known follow-up, there was no significant difference of treatment failure. AKI, AIN, hepatotoxicity, and rash were all numerically more frequent among nafcillin-treated patients. Conclusions: Among nafcillin- or cefazolin-treated patients with MSSA BSI, there was no significant difference in treatment failure. Observing more frequent presumptive adverse effects associated with nafcillin receipt, future prospective studies evaluating cefazolin appear warranted.

scholarly journals Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Septic Thrombosis: The Role of Anticoagulation Therapy and Duration of Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Wilson Dib ◽  
Anne-Marie Chaftari ◽  
Ray Y Hachem ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
Dima Dandachi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Septic Thrombosis

Abstract Background Catheter-related septic thrombosis is suspected in patients with persistent central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) after 72 hours of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The clinical diagnosis and management of this entity can be challenging as limited data are available. We retrospectively studied the clinical characteristics of patients with Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related septic thrombosis and the outcomes related to different management strategies. Methods This retrospective study included patients with CLABSI due to S. aureus who had concomitant radiographic evidence of catheter site thrombosis treated at our institution between the years 2005 and 2016. We collected data pertaining to patients’ medical history, clinical presentation, management, and outcome within 3 months of bacteremia onset. Results A total of 128 patients were included. We found no significant difference in overall outcome between patients who had deep vs superficial thrombosis. Patients with superficial thrombosis were found to have a higher rate of pulmonary complications (25% vs 6%; P = .01) compared with those with deep thrombosis. Patients who received less than 28 days of intravascular antibiotic therapy had higher all-cause mortality (31 vs 5%; P = .001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 2 predictors of treatment failure: ICU admission during their illness (odds ratio [OR], 2.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–6.99; P = .034) and not receiving anticoagulation therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11–0.54; P &lt; .001). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the presence of S. aureus CLABSI in the setting of catheter-related thrombosis may warrant prolonged intravascular antimicrobial therapy and administration of anticoagulation therapy in critically ill cancer patients.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections from 2013-2017 at Chiang Mai University: What Changes Occurred from 2007-2011?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kawisara Krasaewes ◽  
Saowaluck Yasri ◽  
Phadungkiat Khamnoi ◽  
Romanee Chaiwarith
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Methicillin Resistance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Arterial Graft ◽  
Chiang Mai ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Vancomycin Mics ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an established pathogen that causes hospital- acquired infections worldwide. Bloodstream infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We conducted a study aimed at describing the epidemiology of MRSA bloodstream infections, to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibiotic vancomycin among MRSA isolates, and to determine the rate and risk factors of mortality.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among patients aged ≥ 18 years whose blood culture grew MRSA at Chiang Mai University from January 2013 to December 2017Results: The annual prevalence of MRSA in S.aureus bloodstream infections from 2013 to 2017 were 32.8, 23.1, 26.8, 19.2 and 15.4%, respectively. This prevalence showed a non-significant decrease (p = 0.086). Eighty-four patients with 84 episodes of MRSA bloodstream infections were enrolled. Fifty-three patients (63.1%) were male, and the median age was 68.5 years (IQR 56, 79). Fifty-eight patients (69%) had bloodstream infections with other sites of infection: pneumonia (28 episodes, 43.1%), skin and soft tissue infections (16 episodes, 24.6%), osteomyelitis (7 episodes, 10.8%), infective endocarditis (4 episodes, 6.2%), septic arthritis (4 episodes, 6.2%), arterial graft infections (4 episodes, 6.2%), and urinary tract infections (2 episodes, 3.1%). Percentage of patients with vancomycin MICs ≥ 1.5 mg/L were 68.2%, 62.5%, 47.4%, 26.7%, and 75% from 2013 to 2017, respectively. (p = 0.325). The mortality rate was 64.3%. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between those infected with MRSA with a MIC of vancomycin < 1.5 and ≥ 1.5 mg/L (p = 0.172). Factors associated with mortality included age ≥ 40 years old (OR 11.35; 95% CI: 1.35–95.78, p = 0.026), presence of alteration of consciousness (OR 11.19; 95% CI: 2.83–44.18, p = 0.001) and concurrent pneumonia (OR 4.44; 95% CI: 1.09–18.14, p = 0.038).Conclusions: Methicillin-resistance among Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections showed a non-significant decrease of 50%, from 32.88% and 15.4%, between 2013 and 2017. Concurrent infection with pneumonia increased mortality. Although the vancomycin MIC was unchanged from 2013 to 2017, the mean MICs were > 1.0 mg/L. Careful monitoring of vancomycin MIC creep is crucial for the selection of the appropriate antibiotic dosage to prevent treatment failure.

scholarly journals Re-Evaluating the Protective Effect of Hemodialysis Catheter Locking Solutions in Hemodialysis Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Hua Chen ◽  
Yu-Min Chen ◽  
Yu Yang ◽  
Yu-Jun Chang ◽  
Li-Jhen Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Catheter Function

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and exit-site infections (ESIs) are common complications associated with the use of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of routine locking solutions on the incidence of CRBSI and ESI, in preserving catheter function, and on the rate of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We selected publications (from inception until July 2018) with studies comparing locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters used in patients undergoing hemodialysis. A total of 21 eligible studies were included, with a total of 4832 patients and 318,769 days of catheter use. The incidence of CRBSI and ESI was significantly lower in the treated group (citrate-based regimen) than in the controls (heparin-based regimen). No significant difference in preserving catheter function and all-cause mortality was found between the two groups. Our findings demonstrated that routine locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters effectively reduce the incidence of CRBSIs and ESIs, but our findings failed to show a benefit for preserving catheter function and mortality rates. Therefore, further studies are urgently needed to conclusively evaluate the impact of routine locking solutions on preserving catheter function and improving the rates of all-cause mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document