scholarly journals 1271. Efficacy and Safety of Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy in Patients with Serious Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections: Results of the Pathogen-Focused Phase 3 CREDIBLE-CR Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S652-S653
Author(s):  
Matteo Bassetti ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Simon Portsmouth ◽  
Mari Ariyasu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panel Member ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background The CREDIBLE-CR study assessed the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel siderophore cephalosporin, in the treatment of serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative (GN) bacteria. Methods CREDIBLE-CR was an open-label, prospective, randomized 2:1, Phase 3 study (NCT02714595) in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), bloodstream infections/sepsis (BSI/Sepsis), or complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) with evidence of CR GN pathogens. Adults received intravenous CFDC 2 g, q8h, 3-h infusion or best available therapy (BAT; up to 3 drugs) for 7–14 days (extendable to 21 days). The primary endpoint at test of cure in the CR microbiological intent-to-treat (CR-MITT) population was clinical cure (NP, BSI/Sepsis) or microbiological eradication (cUTI). Secondary endpoints were clinical and microbiological outcomes, all-cause mortality (ACM) and safety. Only descriptive statistics were pre-specified. Results A total of 101 patients received CFDC and 49 received BAT (CR-MITT: CFDC n=80, BAT n=38): 50% had pneumonia, 31.4% BSI/Sepsis, and 18.6% cUTI (Table 1). Most frequent CR pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (45.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (37.3%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.7%). CFDC monotherapy was given to 83% of patients, while BAT monotherapy to 29% of patients. Primary outcome in the CFDC and BAT arms was achieved in 50.0% and 52.6% in NP, 43.5% and 42.9% in BSI/Sepsis, and 52.9% and 20.0% in cUTI patients (Figure). CFDC was highly efficacious vs CREs and NDM-producing pathogens. Day 28 ACM was 24.8% (25/101) with CFDC and 18.4% (9/49) with BAT. Rescue therapy was given more frequently in the BAT than CFDC arm. Mortality results by pathogen showed an imbalance in Acinetobacter spp. infections (Table 2) with a higher rate in the CFDC arm than BAT arm. ICU and shock at randomization were more frequent in the CFDC arm than in the BAT arm in Acinetobacter spp. infections (Table 2). No safety concerns related to CFDC emerged. Table 1. Baseline demographics and characteristics (CR-MITT population) Figure. CREDIBLE-CR study primary efficacy endpoints and secondary outcomes at test-of-cure visit in CR-MITT population. Table 2. All-cause mortality by baseline pathogen inpatients with or without Acinetobacter spp. infection (safety population) Conclusion Efficacy of CFDC was demonstrated in this descriptive pathogen-focused study, including CREs, metallo-NDM producers and CR non-fermenters. Baseline imbalances of ICU and shock in the subset of infections with Acinetobacter spp. may have contributed to the mortality difference between CFDC and BAT arms. Disclosures Matteo Bassetti, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Simon Portsmouth, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Mari Ariyasu, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Kiichiro Toyoizumi, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee)

scholarly journals 165. Cefiderocol Treatment for Serious Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Bacteria: Post-hoc Analysis of Outcomes by Pathogen in the CREDIBLE-CR Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S212-S212
Author(s):  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Mari Ariyasu ◽  
Miki Takemura ◽  
Yoshinori Yamano ◽  
Kiichiro Toyoizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel siderophore cephalosporin, for the treatment of serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative pathogens was assessed in the CREDIBLE-CR study. The current analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes by baseline CR pathogen. Methods An open-label, prospective, randomised 2:1, Phase 3 study (CREDIBLE-CR; NCT02714595) was conducted in adult patients with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections or sepsis, and complicated urinary tract infections caused by CR Gram-negative pathogens. Patients received either intravenous (IV) CFDC 2g, q8h, 3-h infusion, or IV best available therapy (BAT: up to 3 drugs in combination), for 7–14 days (extendable to 21 days). Clinical and microbiological outcomes were assessed in the CR microbiological intent-to-treat (CR-MITT) population by CR pathogen, baseline MIC and by mechanism of carbapenem resistance at test of cure (TOC). Only summary statistics were collected. Results In the CR-MITT population (CFDC N=80; BAT N=38), Acinetobacter baumannii (46.3% and 44.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (33.8% and 31.5%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15% and 26%) were the most frequent pathogens in CFDC and BAT arms, respectively. For all CR pathogens, clinical cure rates were achieved in 52.5% in the CFDC arm and 50.0% in the BAT arm at TOC; rates were similar between treatment arms by baseline CR pathogen (Table 1). Numerically higher clinical cure and microbiological outcomes were observed with CFDC for Enterobacterales (Table 1), especially against NDM-producing bacteria or those with porin-channel mutations (Table 1). CFDC MIC values ranged between ≤0.03 and 4 μg/mL, except for one pathogen (Table 2). Microbiological outcomes for CR A. baumannii, CR K. pneumoniae, and CR P. aeruginosa at TOC by baseline MICs of ≤4 μg/mL ranged between 0–40%, 0–100%, and 0–100%, respectively; at MIC ≤4 μg/mL, clinical and microbiological outcomes were equal (Table 2). Conclusion CFDC, via a novel mechanism of entry and its stability against β-lactamases, was effective against serious infections caused by CR pathogens with various resistance mechanisms or baseline MIC values. Disclosures Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Mari Ariyasu, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Miki Takemura, MSc, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Kiichiro Toyoizumi, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Masahiro Kinoshita, MPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee)

scholarly journals A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Titov ◽  
Richard G Wunderink ◽  
Antoine Roquilly ◽  
Daniel Rodríguez Gonzalez ◽  
Aileen David-Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Bacterial Pneumonia ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Methods This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7–14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population. Results Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, −5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, −11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, −3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Conclusions Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02493764.

Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1215-1231
Author(s):  
Rania M. El-Lababidi ◽  
John George Rizk
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Pneumonia ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective: This article reviews the available data on the chemistry, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy, and potential place in therapy of cefiderocol. Data Sources: A literature search through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted (2009 to March 2020) using the search terms cefiderocol and S-649266. Abstracts presented at recent conferences, prescribing information, and information from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the manufacturer’s website were reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant published articles, package inserts, and unpublished meeting abstracts on cefiderocol were reviewed. Data Synthesis: Cefiderocol is the first siderophore antibiotic to be approved by the FDA. It was shown to be active against a wide range of resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacteriaceae, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Cefiderocol was studied in the treatment of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and nosocomial pneumonia and was well tolerated. In a recently completed prospective study, higher mortality was observed with cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative pathogens. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The approval of cefiderocol provides a new option in the treatment of cUTIs and potentially treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Given the higher mortality observed with cefiderocol, its use in the treatment of CR Gram-negative infections should be carefully considered. Conclusion: Cefiderocol shows promising activity against MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Its use in the treatment of serious infections caused by CR Gram-negative bacteria needs further evaluation in phase III clinical studies.

Healthcare associated infections caused by non-fermenting Gram negative rods (NFGNR): six years of experience of a tertiary hospital

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 06-12
Author(s):  
Zahidul Hasan ◽  
Md. Kamrul Islam ◽  
Arifa Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Blood Stream Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Recently non-fermenting Gram negative rods (NFGNR) are playing an important role in healthcare associated infections. This observational study in a tertiary care hospital of Dhaka city conducted during 01August 2007 to 30 June 2013 found that 34.8% isolated organisms from patients with healthcare associated infections were NFGNR. Majority (74.3 %) of these infections were occurring inside critical care areas. Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter together constituted 79.6% of the total NFGNR whereas Burkholderia cephacia complex (15.4%), Stenotrophomonas (4.3%) and Chryseobacterium species (0.7%) combined constituted remaining 20.4%. Out of total NFGNRs, Pseudomonas was responsible for highest number of catheter associated urinary tract infections (55.6%), ventilator associated pneumonia (46.3%), respiratory tract infection (65.8%) and surgical site infection (70.6%). Blood stream infection was predominantly caused by Burkholderia cephacia complex (33.5%) and Acinetobacter spp. (39.5%). Other than colistin most of the organisms were resistant to antibiotics commonly recommended for NFGNR.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmm.v7i2.19326 Bangladesh J Med Microbiol 2013; 07(02): 6-12

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates by US Census Division

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S371-S372
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Leonard R Duncan ◽  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
Robert K Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Us Census ◽  
Phenotype Screen ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and complicated intra-abdominal infections. C-T is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors C-T resistance to gram-negative (GN) isolates worldwide. In this study, the activities of C-T and comparators vs. GN isolates from each of the 9 US Census divisions were compared. Methods A total of 18,856 Enterobacteriaceae (ENT) and 4,735 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) isolates were collected from 32 US hospitals in 2012–2016. Isolates were tested for susceptibility (S) to C-T and comparators by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central monitoring laboratory. Other antibiotics tested included amikacin (AMK), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), meropenem (MER), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). The following resistant phenotypes were analyzed for ENT: carbapenem resistant (CRE); extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotype screen-positive (ESBL); and ESBL, nonCRE. or PSA, MER-nonsusceptible (NS), TZP-NS, and CAZ-NS isolates were analyzed. CLSI (2017) interpretive criteria were used. Results For all ENT, 94.2% were S to C-T, 91.5% were S to TZP, 98.0% were S to MER, and 98.8% were S to AMK; 1,697 (9.0%) were ESBL, nonCRE and 356 (1.9%) were CRE. For all PSA isolates, 97.4% were S to C-T, 99.3% were S to COL, 96.9% were S to AMK, and 81.2% were S to MER. The % C-T S for each division (DIV) are shown in the table. The % C-T S for ENT ranged from 98.1% (DIV 4) to 87.4% (DIV 2) and % C-T S for ESBL, nonCRE ranged from 93.8% in DIV 4 to 79.8% in DIV 7. For PSA, the % C-T S ranged from 99.6% in DIV 4 to 94.9% in DIV 9. Activity of C-T against PSA NS to MER, CAZ or TZP varied by division and was >80% for all except DIV 9. Conclusion Against PSA, only COL was more active than C-T. C-T demonstrated potent activity against PSA NS to other β-lactams. For ENT, overall activity was good. For both PSA and ENT, C-T varied by DIV. Disclosures D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; M. A. Pfaller, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant

scholarly journals Intravenous Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 208 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Ling Cheng ◽  
Yu-Hung Chen ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
Hung-Jen Tang
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality

This meta-analysis aims to compare intravenous colistin monotherapy and colistin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 2018. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating colistin alone and colistin-based combination therapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant GNB infections were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Five RCTs including 791 patients were included. Overall, colistin monotherapy was associated with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89–1.20, I2 = 0%) for all-cause mortality compared with colistin-based combination therapy. The non-significant difference was also detected in infection-related mortality (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 0.91–1.67, I2 = 0%) and microbiologic response (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.72–1.04, I2 = 62%). In addition, no significant difference was observed in the subgroup analysis—high or low dose, with or without a loading dose, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, and in combination with rifampicin. Finally, colistin monotherapy was not associated with lower nephrotoxicity than colistin combination therapy (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84–1.21, I2 = 0%). Based on the analysis of the five RCTs, no differences were found between colistin monotherapy and colistin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant GNB infections, especially for A. baumannii infections.

scholarly journals Ventilatorassociated lower respiratory tract infections: etiology and diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
Vladimir A. Rudnov ◽  
Vladimir A. Bagin ◽  
D.V. Belsky ◽  
Maria N. Astafyeva ◽  
N.N. Nevskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
English Language ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective. To review a literature published over the past 5 years and our own data on the etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), antimicrobial resistance and its relationships between sepsis and choice of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Materials and Methods. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) criteria were used to diagnose LRTI. A review of the articles regarding LRTI from the Russian and international English language journals published over 6 years was performed. Identification of microorganisms was performed by culture over the period of 2003–2013; since 2014, MALDI-TOF MS method was used for this purpose. Results. Despite the ongoing policy to limit the use of antimicrobial therapy in the ICUs, there is an increase in carbapenemase-producing isolates in the ICUs from 2.2% (2018) to 11.7% (2020, 9 months). Along with the trend to increase in carbapenemase-producing pathogens causing LRTI, their variability is also increasing. In particular, it applies to strains producing carbapenemases OXA-48 or combination of OXA-48 with KPC; with the trend to combined production of carbapenemase beginning at 2019. Conclusions. Carbapenemase producers are becoming more widespread in the ICU settings, including the lower respiratory tract in mechanically ventilated patients. Practitioners didn’t get used to associate VAP with the Sepsis-3 criteria. The changes in etiology include the increased rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, primarily Acinetobacter spp., in Russia. It’s due to improved quality of respiratory support and increased consumption of carbapenems, tigecycline and polymyxins. Significant increase of OXA-48-producing pathogens is likely to be associated with a poor compliance with temporary guidelines on COVID-19 with regard to antibiotic therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document