scholarly journals 142. Effect of Discontinuation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs on the Antibiotic Usage Pattern and Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance in the Major Bacterial Species

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S183-S184
Author(s):  
Wooyoung Jang ◽  
Hyeonjun Hwang ◽  
Hyun-uk Jo ◽  
Yong-Han Cha ◽  
Bongyoung Kim

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of discontinuation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) activity on the antibiotic usage pattern. Methods An interrupted time series analysis assessing the trends in antibiotic use and incidence of antimicrobial resistance in major pathogens was conducted between March 2017 and April 2019 in an 859-bed university-affiliated hospital in Korea, where all ASP activities were discontinued in February 2018. The major activity of the ASP was a restrictive measure for designated antibiotics. We defined antibiotics as medication with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class J01, and the antibiotic consumption was measured as days of therapy (DOT), which was then standardized per 1,000 patient-days. Results The use of antibiotics against multidrug-resistant pathogens increased immediately after the discontinuation of restrictive antibiotic program (41.01 and 150.99 days of therapy [DOT]/1,000 patient-days in the general ward [GW] and intensive care unit [ICU], respectively). In addition, there were positive changes for the GW and ICU (4.20 and 31.57 DOT/1,000 patient-days per month, respectively). The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients in the ICU significantly decreased (-674.26 DOT/1,000 patient-days). For non-broad-spectrum antibiotics, there were positive changes for the GW and ICU (18.17 and 22.69 DOT/1,000 patient-days per month, respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, after discontinuation of ASP, antibiotic usage patterns rapidly returned to the patterns prior to ASP implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S682-S682
Author(s):  
Pem Chuki ◽  
Monica L Bianchini ◽  
Thupten Tshering ◽  
Ragunath Sharma ◽  
Pema Yangzom ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics drives antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and the prevalence of highly-resistant Gram-negative infections is increasing across the world, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Carbapenem resistance is of particular concern since these are often the last line agents. Antimicrobial restriction is an antimicrobial stewardship intervention (AMS) that aims to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics to preserve antimicrobial susceptibility. Methods This is retrospective, observational study of antibiotic consumption and prevalence of antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolates from inpatients at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, a 350-bed multi-specialty hospital in Thimphu, Bhutan. Antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial susceptibility were monitored from January 2015 to December 2017 by the pharmacy department and the microbiology lab, respectively. Antibiotic consumption was measured using defined daily doses (DDD) and expressed as DDDs per 1,000 persons per day. The antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline. A hospital AMS program with multidisciplinary team and good hospital managerial/ leadership support were initiated in 2016 and interventions included antimicrobial restrictions, educations, guidelines for use, post prescription review, de-escalation, audit and feedback. Results From 2015 to 2016, the DDDs of carbapenems and piperacillin–tazobactam (PTZ) increased while ceftriaxone decreased (Figure 1). After the AMS program was implemented in 2016, the annual DDDs of carbapenems decreased while PTZ and ceftriaxone increased. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escheriachia coli blood isolates to carbapenems and ceftriaxone increased from 2016 to 2017: 50/61 (82%) vs. 45/49 (92%) and 24/91 (26%) vs. 31/92 (34%), respectively. Conclusion Implementing an AMS program that restricted the use of carbapenems resulted in a decrease in carbapenem use and increased antimicrobial susceptibility for carbapenems and ceftriaxone. AMS interventions can be successful to decrease carbapenem-resistance in LMIC.


Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Sílvia Simó ◽  
Eneritz Velasco-Arnaiz ◽  
María Ríos-Barnés ◽  
María Goretti López-Ramos ◽  
Manuel Monsonís ◽  
...  

The effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in reducing antimicrobial use (AU) in children has been proved. Many interventions have been described suitable for different institution sizes, priorities, and patients, with surgical wards being one of the areas that may benefit the most. We aimed to describe the results on AU and length of stay (LOS) in a pre-post study during the three years before (2014–2016) and the three years after (2017–2019) implementation of an ASP based on postprescription review with feedback in children and adolescents admitted for appendix-related intraabdominal infections (AR-IAI) in a European Referral Paediatric University Hospital. In the postintervention period, the quality of prescriptions (QP) was also evaluated. Overall, 2021 AR-IAIs admissions were included. Global AU, measured both as days of therapy/100 patient days (DOT/100PD) and length of therapy (LOT), and global LOS remained unchanged in the postintervention period. Phlegmonous appendicitis LOS (p = 0.003) and LOT (p < 0.001) significantly decreased, but not those of other AR-IAI diagnoses. The use of piperacillin–tazobactam decreased by 96% (p = 0.044), with no rebound in the use of other Gram-negative broad-spectrum antimicrobials. A quasisignificant (p = 0.052) increase in QP was observed upon ASP implementation. Readmission and case fatality rates remained stable. ASP interventions were safe, and they reduced LOS and LOT of phlegmonous appendicitis and the use of selected broad-spectrum antimicrobials, while increasing QP in children with AR-IAI.


Author(s):  
Kathleen Chiotos ◽  
Lauren D’Arinzo ◽  
Eimear Kitt ◽  
Rachael Ross ◽  
Jeffrey S. Gerber

OBJECTIVES Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely administered for short durations to children with suspected bacteremia while awaiting blood culture results. Our aim for this study was to estimate the proportion of broad-spectrum antibiotic use accounted for by these “rule-outs.” METHODS The Pediatric Health Information System was used to identify children aged 3 months to 20 years hospitalized between July 2016 and June 2017 who received broad-spectrum antibiotics for suspected bacteremia. Using an electronic definition for a rule-out, we estimated the proportion of all broad-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy accounted for by this indication. Clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as antibiotic choice, are reported descriptively. RESULTS A total of 67 032 episodes of suspected bacteremia across 42 hospitals were identified. From these, 34 909 (52%) patients were classified as having received an antibiotic treatment course, and 32 123 patients (48%) underwent an antibiotic rule-out without a subsequent treatment course. Antibiotics prescribed for rule-outs accounted for 12% of all broad-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy. Third-generation cephalosporins and vancomycin were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics, and substantial hospital-level variation in vancomycin use was identified (range: 16%–58% of suspected bacteremia episodes). CONCLUSIONS Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic use for rule-out infections appears common across children’s hospitals, with substantial hospital-level variation in the use of vancomycin in particular. Antibiotic stewardship programs focused on intervening on antibiotics prescribed for longer durations may consider this novel opportunity to further standardize antibiotic regimens and reduce antibiotic exposure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S327-S327
Author(s):  
Bongyoung Kim ◽  
Hyeonjun Hwang ◽  
Myoung-Jae Lee ◽  
Jieun Kim ◽  
Hyunjoo Pai

Abstract Background This study was performed to evaluate the changing pattern of antibiotics usage among hospitalized patients of tertiary hospital in South Korea. Methods Total antibiotics prescription record of hospitalized patients from 2004 to 2013 were collected at a tertiary university hospitals. The antibiotics is defined as class J01 from anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC). The consumption of each class of antibiotic was converted to defined daily dose (DDD)/1,000 patient-days by using ATC of World Health Organization. Results Over the 10-year study period, the annual consumption of systemic antibiotics ranged from 815.10 to 1047.96. The proportion of broad-spectrum antibiotics and non-broad-spectrum antibiotics use are as follows: 45.4% (417.55/920.69) vs.. 54.6% (503.15/920.69), respectively. A 16.9% of decrease in total antibiotics consumption was observed in 2013 compared with 2004 (1000.69 in 2004 vs.. 831.46 in 2013). The decrease rate of non-broad spectrum antibiotics usage was 39.3% during the study period (607.21 in 2004 vs. 368.88 in 2013). In contrast, a stepwise increase in consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics was observed (14.9% of increase; 393.48 in 2004 vs. 462.58 in 2013). Among broad-spectrum antibiotics, a significant decrease trend was observed for third-generation cephaloporins (P &lt; 0.001). In contrast, a significant increase trend was observed for β-lactam/lactamase (P &lt; 0.001). The monthly overall consumption trend of fluoroquinolones and glycopeptides remained stable (P = 0.061; P = 0.107, respectively). In addition, there were significant decrease trends for consumption of non-broad-spectrum antibiotics, including first generation cephalosporins (P = 0.019) and aminoglycosides (P = 0.004). However, the consumption of second generation cephalosporins, imidazole and penicillins showed a stable trend (P = 0.175; P = 320; P = 0.234, respectively). Conclusion A total antibiotics consumption showed significantly decrease trend from 2004 to 2013. In contrast, a stepwise increase in consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics was observed in the tertiary hospital in South Korea. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s36-s36
Author(s):  
Connie Schaefer

Background: Blood culture is a crucial diagnostic tool for healthcare systems, but false-positive results drain clinical resources, imperil patients with an increased length of stay (and associated hospital-acquired infection risk), and undermine global health initiatives when broad-spectrum antibiotics are administered unnecessarily. Considering emerging technologies that mitigate human error factors, we questioned historically acceptable rates of blood culture contamination, which prompted a need to promote and trial these technologies further. In a 3-month trial, 3 emergency departments in a midwestern healthcare system utilized an initial specimen diversion device (ISDD) to draw blood cultures to bring their blood culture contamination rate (4.4% prior to intervention) below the 3% benchmark recommended by the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods: All emergency department nursing staff received operational training on the ISDD for blood culture sample acquisition. From June through August 2019, 1,847 blood cultures were drawn via the ISDD, and 862 were drawn via the standard method. Results: In total, 16 contamination events occurred when utilizing the ISDD (0.9%) and 37 contamination events occurred when utilizing the standard method (4.3%). ISDD utilization resulted in an 80% reduction in blood culture contamination from the rate of 4.4% rate held prior to intervention. Conclusions: A midwestern healthcare system experienced a dramatic reduction in blood culture contamination across 3 emergency departments while pilot testing an ISDD, conserving laboratory and therapeutic resources while minimizing patient exposure to unnecessary risks and procedures. If the results obtained here were sustained and the ISDD utilized for all blood culture draws, nearly 400 contamination events could be avoided annually in this system. Reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in this manner will lower rates of associated adverse events such as acute kidney injury and allergic reaction, which are possible topics for further investigation. The COVID-19 pandemic has recently highlighted both the importance of keeping hospital beds available and the rampant carelessness with which broad-spectrum antibiotics are administered (escalating the threat posed by multidrug-resistant organisms). As more ambitious healthcare benchmarks become attainable, promoting and adhering to higher standards for patient care will be critical to furthering an antimicrobial stewardship agenda and to reducing treatment inequity in the field.Funding: NoDisclosures: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S836-S837
Author(s):  
Khanh-Linh Le ◽  
Heather Young ◽  
Timothy C Jenkins ◽  
Robert Tapia ◽  
Katherine C Shihadeh

Abstract Background Prior to 2016, Denver Health Medical Center had a higher-than-expected rate of hospital onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI). A multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented, including the use of a probiotic as primary prevention for HO-CDI and antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in inpatients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. We aimed to study the effectiveness of probiotic use in this clinical context. Methods During the intervention, inpatient orders for a broad-spectrum antibiotic triggered a best practice advisory recommending once daily co-administration of 100 billion units of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus casei, L. rhamnosus, and L. acidophilus (BioK+ ®). To evaluate effectiveness and safety of this intervention, we performed a retrospective cohort study including adult inpatients who received > 24 hours of a broad-spectrum antibiotic between April 2016 and March 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of HO-CDI (> 3 days after admission) compared between patients who received antibiotics alone vs. antibiotics plus the probiotic. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of AAD, defined as a negative CDI test after antibiotic initiation, and the incidence of Lactobacillus species identified in clinical cultures. Results 3,291 patients were included; 1,835 received antibiotics alone and 1,456 received antibiotics plus the probiotic. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar, except patients in the antibiotic alone group had a greater incidence of cirrhosis and proton-pump inhibitor use (16.1% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001; 39.1% vs 31.5%, P < 0.001). Length of stay and antibiotic days of therapy were longer in the antibiotic plus probiotic group [6 days (IQR, 3–11) vs 6 days (IQR, 4–12), P = 0.014; 4 days (IQR, 3–7) vs 5 days (IQR, 3–7), P < 0.001]. The incidence of HO-CDI (37, 2% vs 35, 2.4%; P = 0.450) and AAD (231, 12.6% vs 199, 13.7%; P = 0.362) were similar between groups. Lactobacillus was identified in at least one clinical culture from 0.2% (3/1835) and 0.3% (4/1456) of patients in the antibiotic alone group and antibiotic plus probiotic group, respectively (P = 0.497). Conclusion In hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics, co-administration of a probiotic did not appear to reduce the incidence of HO-CDI or AAD. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Estera Jachowicz ◽  
Anna Różańska ◽  
Monika Pobiega ◽  
Mariusz Topolski ◽  
Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach

Background: The most important pathomechanism of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) is post-antibiotic intestinal dysbiosis. CDI affects both ambulatory and hospital patients. Aim: The objective of the study was to analyze the possibility of utilizing databases from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control subject to surveillance for the purpose of identifying areas that require intervention with respect to public health. Methods: The analysis encompassed data concerning CDI incidence and antibiotic consumption expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) and quality indicators for antimicrobial-consumption involving both ambulatory and hospital patients in 2016. Results: In 2016, in the European Union countries, total antibiotic consumption in hospital and outpatient treatment amounted to 20.4 DDD (SD 7.89, range 11.04–39.69); in ambulatory treatment using average of ten times more antibiotics than hospitals. In total, 44.9% of antibiotics used in outpatient procedures were broad-spectrum antibiotics. We have found a significant relationship between the quality of antibiotics and their consumption: The more broad-spectrum antibiotics prescribed, the higher the sales of antibiotics both in the community sector and in total. CDI incidence did not statistically significantly correlate with the remaining factors analyzed on a country-wide level. Conclusion: Antibiotic consumption and the CDI incidence may depend on many national variables associated with local systems of healthcare organization and financing. Their interpretation in international comparisons does not give clear-cut answers and requires caution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S397-S398
Author(s):  
Natalie Tucker ◽  
Ezzeldin Saleh ◽  
Marcela Rodriguez

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are required in all acute care hospitals per The Joint Commission. ASP must adhere to the recommendations laid out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but how each ASP chooses to implement these recommendations is left to the individual program. In January 2018, we began formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) walking rounds, led by infectious diseases trained physician and pharmacist, in our 99-bed pediatric hospital. Methods In January 2018, we started twice-weekly AMS rounds on the pediatric hospitalist service. A custom-made “Antimicrobial Stewardship Patient List” was designed in our electronic medical record (EMR) to generate a list of all patients receiving antibiotics. The ASP team (comprised of an infectious diseases pharmacist and a pediatric infectious diseases physician) reviewed EMR charts to determine antibiotic prescribing appropriateness and design recommended interventions. Any recommendations and teaching points were then discussed with the hospitalist team in person. After piloting the hospitalist service, AMS rounds were extended to include the general surgery patients and finally the intensive care unit. Data on number of charts reviewed, proposed interventions, and acceptance rates were collected throughout the process. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the intervention data. Results In the first year of the program, 427 patient charts were reviewed with 186 identified interventions. In total, 156 (84.3%) of the interventions were accepted and implemented by the primary team. The most common types of interventions were the duration of therapy (29%), antibiotic discontinuation (16.7%), intravenous to oral conversion (11.3%), de-escalation (10.2%), and infectious diseases consult (5.9%). Conclusion Pediatric AMS rounds led to the successful implementation of the majority of recommended interventions. Future goals of the program include calculating days of therapy per 1000 patient-days to assess antibiotic consumption before and after AMS rounds and to expand into other services to further promote appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized pediatric patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 3133-3141 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Tegos ◽  
Frank R. Stermitz ◽  
Olga Lomovskaya ◽  
Kim Lewis

ABSTRACT Plant antimicrobials are not used as systemic antibiotics at present. The main reason for this is their low level of activity, especially against gram-negative bacteria. The reported MIC is often in the range of 100 to 1,000 μg/ml, orders of magnitude higher than those of common broad-spectrum antibiotics from bacteria or fungi. Major plant pathogens belong to the gram-negative bacteria, which makes the low level of activity of plant antimicrobials against this group of microorganisms puzzling. Gram-negative bacteria have an effective permeability barrier, comprised of the outer membrane, which restricts the penetration of amphipathic compounds, and multidrug resistance pumps (MDRs), which extrude toxins across this barrier. It is possible that the apparent ineffectiveness of plant antimicrobials is largely due to the permeability barrier. We tested this hypothesis in the present study by applying a combination of MDR mutants and MDR inhibitors. A panel of plant antimicrobials was tested by using a set of bacteria representing the main groups of plant pathogens. The human pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium were also tested. The results show that the activities of the majority of plant antimicrobials were considerably greater against the gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus megaterium and that disabling of the MDRs in gram-negative species leads to a striking increase in antimicrobial activity. Thus, the activity of rhein, the principal antimicrobial from rhubarb, was potentiated 100- to 2,000-fold (depending on the bacterial species) by disabling the MDRs. Comparable potentiation of activity was observed with plumbagin, resveratrol, gossypol, coumestrol, and berberine. Direct measurement of the uptake of berberine, a model plant antimicrobial, confirmed that disabling of the MDRs strongly increases the level of penetration of berberine into the cells of gram-negative bacteria. These results suggest that plants might have developed means of delivering their antimicrobials into bacterial cells. These findings also suggest that plant antimicrobials might be developed into effective, broad-spectrum antibiotics in combination with inhibitors of MDRs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-568
Author(s):  
André Ricardo Araujo da Silva ◽  
Amanda Marques ◽  
Clara Di Biase ◽  
Monique Faitanin ◽  
Indah Murni ◽  
...  

IntroductionAntimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are recommended to improve antibiotic use in healthcare and reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of ASPs in reducing antibiotic consumption, use of broad-spectrum/restricted antibiotics, antibiotic resistance and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in neonates.MethodsWe searched PUBMED, SCIELO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database (January 2000–April 2019) to identify studies on the effectiveness of ASPs in neonatal wards and/or neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Outcomes were as follows: reduction of antibiotic consumption overall and of broad-spectrum/target antibiotics, inappropriate antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance and HAIs. ASPs conducted in settings other than acute care hospitals, for children older than 1 month, and ASPs addressing antifungal and antiviral agents, were excluded.ResultsThe initial search identified 53 173 titles and abstracts; following the application of filters and inclusion criteria, a total of six publications were included in the final analysis. All studies, of which one was multi-centre study, were published after 2010. Five studies were conducted exclusively in NICUs. Four articles applied multimodal interventions. Reduction of antibiotic consumption overall and/or inappropriate antibiotic use were reported by four articles; reduction of broad-spectrum/targeted antibiotics were reported by four studies; No article evaluated the impact of ASPs on AMR or the incidence of HAI in neonates.ConclusionASPs can be effectively applied in neonatal settings. Limiting the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and shorting the duration of antibiotic treatment are the most promising approaches. The impact of ASPs on AMR and HAI needs to be evaluated in long-term studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document