Data Sources, Management, and Presentation
In the previous chapters, the various techniques for delimiting the continental shelf have been outlined. However many continental shelf claims will be developed largely on the basis of existing information. Therefore, a coastal state should begin its article 76 implementation by assembling and reviewing all available information that is relevant for determining the outer limit of the continental shelf, and for assessing the resource potential beyond 200 nautical miles (M). Data compilation activities tend to be labor-intensive, and the amount of time needed for their successful execution depends to a large extent upon the quantity and condition of the data sets, the skill and experience of the compilation staff, and the data-handling facilities at their disposal. However, it is reasonably safe to assume that almost any compilation of existing data will be less expensive than mobilizing and executing a field program for collecting new data, so it is usually more cost-effective to begin with a compilation. Even if the data compilation operation serves primarily to demonstrate the inadequacy of existing data, it will serve a useful purpose by identifying specifically where and what kind of new information is needed. To satisfy the requirements of article 76, and to provide a foundation for an understanding of the resources within the continental shelf, we are concerned primarily with data in the fields of hydrography, geodesy, geology, geophysics, and geochemistry and their subdisciplines. Such data are usually characterized by their spatial variations, in two or three dimensions, which are of a far greater magnitude than any temporal changes, as for example in the case of gravity anomaly data. However, the temporal variation of some geoscience parameters is becoming increasingly important as an indicator of environmental change. Because of the importance of their spatial changes with respect to the delineation of the continental shelf, the traditional form of presentation of geoscience data has been as maps. Whereas maps provide an excellent visualization of the data field, they may not be sufficient to carry out the analysis needed to satisfy article 76, and increasingly, digital data, profiles, and other data forms are becoming necessary.