The Legal Rendering of Immiseration

Author(s):  
John Linarelli ◽  
Margot E Salomon ◽  
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah

This chapter introduces the reader to the ideas and arguments that animate this wide-ranging book. Whereas many works focus on violations of international law, this book is concerned with the law itself. It seeks to demonstrate how the truth about the role and effects of the law in the creation and perpetuation of misery fail adequately to inform it. From its early inception to the present day, international law has always been predicated on private property and commodification and so the social and political values that are constitutive of economies as much as property and contract have, in important ways, been forsaken. In laying the ground, this chapter distinguishes fact from fiction in the nature and scale of harms and alienations, to introduce the pluralist approach taken in this critique of international law. In that diverse traditions from liberal to radical shed light on the problems and their possible redress, it is explained in this chapter how the book engages these various traditions. In calling for a ‘predistributive’ international law, the chapter foregrounds the need to move from mere redistribution to making international law just in the first place, in a structural sense. In its coverage of what this book is and is not about, this first chapter seeks to unshackle the reader from deep-rooted assumptions that frame the debates around economic globalization and to begin the critical project of exploring how international law is both constituted by capitalism and constitutive of it and with what implications for justice reasonably understood.

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lefkowitz

As traditionally conceived, the creation of a new rule of customary international law requires that states believe the law to already require the conduct specified in the rule. Distinguishing the process whereby a customary rule comes to exist from the process whereby that customary rule becomes law dissolves this chronological paradox. Creation of a customary rule requires only that states come to believe that there exists a normative standard to which they ought to adhere, not that this standard is law. What makes the customary rule law is adherence by officials in the international legal system to a rule of recognition that treats custom as a source of valid law. Confusion over this distinction arises because in the international legal system the same agents whose beliefs give rise to a customary rule are the legal officials whose adherence to the rule of recognition leads them to deem that rule legally valid. The proposed solution to the chronological paradox employs H.L.A. Hart’s analysis of the concepts of law and a legal system, and in particular, the idea of a rule of recognition. Yet Hart famously denies the existence of a rule of recognition for international law. Hart’s denial rests on a failure to distinguish between the ontological and authoritative resolution functions of a rule of recognition, however. Once such a distinction is drawn, it can be argued that customary international law rests on a rule of recognition that serves the ontological function of making customary norms legal, though not the authoritative resolution function of settling disputes over the alleged legality of particular norms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana Lakićević-Đuranović

This paper aims to show the significance of maritime delimitation in the Law of the Sea, as well as the contribution of international jurisprudence to the creation of the rules of maritime delimitation. The decisions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the awards of arbitration tribunals are especially significant in the part of the Law of the Sea dealing with maritime delimitation. Based on the analysis of the principle of equity and the method of equidistance, the jurisprudence of the courts is shown to have established precedents and to have an irreplaceable role in the development of the international Law of the Sea, particularly in the segment of maritime delimitations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Antonio Ojeda Avilés

<p class="Standard"><span lang="PT-BR"><strong>RESUMO:</strong></span></p><p class="Standard">Trata-se de artigo que pretende enfrentar o surgimento do chamado Direito Transnacional do Trabalho, como ramo autônomo do Direito, a partir da análise de seus interlocutores e da vinculatividade de sua atuação. Para tanto, examinamse os fatores que culminaram no fenômeno sob análise, tais como a globalização digital e econômica e a repercussão e a violação mundial das violações aos direitos humanos. Os pontos de partida são diversos episódios de danos causados por transnacionais no último século. O estudo teve por objetivo lançar luz no fenômeno cada vez mais comum e forte decorrente da atuação das transnacionais em um mercado globalizado. </p><p> </p><p><strong>ABSTRACT:</strong></p><p>The present article intends to deal with the emergence of the so-called Transnational Labor Law, understood as an autonomous branch of the Law. The analysis is focused on transnational actors and the binding character of their actions. It is examined the factors that resulted in the phenomenon under analysis, such as digital and economic globalization and the repercussion and global violation of human rights. The points of departure are several instances of damages caused by transnational employers in the last century. The objective of this study was to shed light on the increasingly common phenomenon that result from the action of transnational actors on a globalized world.   </p><p> </p><p><strong>Errata: </strong>O artigo foi recebido em maio 17, 2018 e aceito em maio 18, 2018</p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 703
Author(s):  
David Baragwanath

This is the written form of a lecture delivered at the Law Faculty on 28 April 2010 by Justice Baragwanath as part of a series of lectures delivered the various New Zealand law schools, to mark the judge's retirement from the New Zealand Court of Appeal.  In this lecture the judge argues for the creation of a New Zealand public law that both acknowledges the special nature of New Zealand society and recognises the global context within which all New Zealand law must now fit and to some extent must be judged.


THE BULLETIN ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (390) ◽  
pp. 198-203
Author(s):  
G. B. Akhmetzhanova ◽  
N. M. Mussabekova ◽  
T. E. Voronova ◽  
B. Amangul ◽  
R. V. Grigorieva ◽  
...  

This article discusses the formation of the social protection system in the Republic of Kazakhstan and its component such as social insurance, the place and role of the Head of State - the Leader of the Nation in the implementation of these reforms in Kazakhstan. The essence, goals, principles of social insurance were determined in this article. The points of view of the scientists and experts were studied. The interpretation of the social insurance, comparative analysis of the concepts of social security, social assistance, benefits and compensation was researched. The state could not stay out of this complex process and began to actively participate in it. Moreover, this participation has been carried out in two directions. The first is the creation of the state insurance system, which either protects the states’, mainly property interests, or protects certain socially vulnerable groups of the population. The second is the creation of the mechanism for legal regulation of insurance relations as the special group of the public relations. In the legislation of any country extensive block called legislation on insurance. In the market economy, based on the private property, the main driver of insurance is the desire of the owner to protect his property. At the same time, the growth of welfare causes the individual to take care of himself, which expands the scope of personal insurance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-429
Author(s):  
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah

Abstract Resistance to the law made through expansionist interpretation of investment treaties by arbitral tribunals has led to the disintegration of the resulting structure of investment protection. The creation of an inflexible system of investment protection through arbitral interpretation undermines the exercise of power of states to take measures to protect the public interest. The process of disintegration of this unjust system must be hastened through the creation of new norms that ensure that obligatory rules deter the misconduct of multinational investors. If investment treaties are necessary, the regulatory power of states to promote the public interest should be given priority over investment protection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Aliverti

This article explores the place of law and legality in the formation of British national identity and its reproduction (and contestation) inside the courtroom. It draws on sociolegal scholarship on legal culture, legal consciousness and ‘law and colonialism’ to shed light on the cultural power of the law to forge national subjectivities. The law does more than adjudicating justice and imposing sanctions. Its symbolic power lies in its capacity to construct legal subjectivities, of both individuals and nations. Through the law and its categories, people make sense of the social world and their position in it. The law can articulate national identities by expressing who we are and who we would like to be as a nation. By exploring the place of the law in discourses of British nationhood, this article contributes to our understanding of the ideological role of the law in reifying racial and global hierarchies. It also sheds light on how the boundaries of belonging can be unsettled through law’s power.


Author(s):  
John Linarelli ◽  
Margot E Salomon ◽  
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah

This chapter critiques the international law on foreign investment as not properly reflecting considerations of justice and too focused on fallacious notions of improving economic conditions in countries through ultra-high levels of private property protection for foreign investors. It explores how the focus mainly on protecting the investor, with levels of protection even domestic capital do not enjoy, has its origins in a historical progression from an imperial international law imposed in eras of empire and colonialization. It explores how the international law on foreign investment continues to suffer from these normative deficiencies. It offers a review of how the New International Economic Order was a movement by the Latin American, African, and Asian states to make the international law on foreign investment more universally acceptable but how that movement was circumvented with the rise of neoliberalism beginning in the early 1990s despite opposition by these states. Building on Chapter 3, it then deals with the decline of the NIEO and its relationship to the international law on foreign investment. The chapter goes through how investment law and the tribunal jurisprudence that contributes to its development expanded investor protections to produce injustice. It discusses the resistance to the law that has come about, the ongoing changes in investment treaties because of concerns with their imbalances, and the nature of the legitimacy crisis the law now faces.


2014 ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Michał Wieloński

Article deals with the most important legal issues in the directive on the award of concession contracts using the legal dogmatic method and tools taken from the Austrian school of economics. Author attempts to determine the effectiveness of the proposed legal solutions. The general finding is that the proposed solutions are inefficient, because the law cannot replace the natural tendency of the owner to optimally manage her assets. Solutions should not be sought in the creation of further legislation, but in the promotion of private property ownership and fundamental reduction of areas of activity of the authorities.


Author(s):  
Lucas Lixinski

This article argues that digital and post-colonial engagements with heritage can be reconciled only if they happen in the terms set by the once-colonized community, and for their benefit. Further, the law can play a significant role in embedding certain ethical commitments, provided it can steer away from legal categories such as authenticity and access; categories which, despite their neutral or even cosmopolitan aspirations, function as reinforcers of a status quo that privileges colonial possession of heritage. In order to pursue this thesis, the article focuses on the ways in which the digitization of heritage was suggested – in the context of the Sarr-Savoy Report about the return of objects from French museums to certain African countries – to constitute a precondition for the return of cultural objects taken during colonialism. Drawing on that report, as well as on the responses to it, the article queries whether and how digitization can work to redress (or unfortunately, in some cases reinforce) the harms of colonialism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document