Transnational Justice and Non-Domination
This chapter argues that we cannot make progress in thinking about justice beyond the state unless we develop a realistic and critical view of the many and complex relations of domination within, between, and beyond states that mark our current global predicament. To supplement the argument, the chapter first introduces a conception of justice as non-domination. Next, the chapter explains the difference between the book's Kantian, discourse-theoretical conception of non-domination and Philip Pettit's neo-republican conception of non-domination. The book's conception of justice as non-domination is then applied to transnational contexts. To conclude, the chapter explains the difference between the book's view and Pettit's notion of international justice.