P258 Real-world secukinumab retention, response rates and adverse events in the treatment of PsA and axSpA

Abstract Background Secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, has been licensed for use in the United Kingdom for both axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for several years. Despite this there is minimal published data on its use out with randomised controlled trials. We present here the collated real-world rheumatology experience of secukinumab use in Glasgow. Methods Patients who have ever received secukinumab for any rheumatology indication were identified using available medical records (from 14/05/2012 to 18/09/2019). Diagnosis, baseline demographics, disease activity at baseline and at 6 months, and whether patients are still currently on secukinumab was recorded. Primary inefficacy was defined as stopping treatment due to inefficacy ≤6 months. Reasons for discontinuation were also recorded. As disease activity scores were variably recorded, the primary outcome was retention rate as a surrogate for efficacy and lack of adverse event. Patients only included in disease scores if scores available both at baseline and 6 months. Results 352 patients (with 530 patient-years of exposure) identified. 251 (71.3%) patients currently remain on secukinumab. 301 of 336 (89.6%) patients remained on drug at six-month review (16 await review). Characteristics and response of two main diagnostic groups listed in Table 1 (Note: 3 patients had SAPHO, 5 had Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, 1 had reactive arthritis). Common adverse events were infections (11 patients), rash and/or pruritis (6 patients), mood change and/or fatigue (4 patients). Three patients developed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subsequent to starting secukinumab. Five patients had pre-existing IBD, none of which flared on secukinumab. Two patients required hospitalisation for abscesses whilst on secukinumab. One patient had a stroke and one patient had a myocardial infarction whilst on secukinumab - both patients had multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease. No malignancies identified. Three patients died, with none felt related to secukinumab (cerebellar haemorrhage in warfarinised patient with high INR; pneumonia six months after switching from secukinumab to tocilizumab; one out of hospital death over one year after stopping secukinumab). Conclusion In this real world cohort of patients with axSpA and PsA, secukinumab retention rates at 6 months are high with no new safety signals identified. Disclosures A. Tindell None. S. Batool None. A. McGucken None. S. Siebert Consultancies; S.S. has received speaker or consultation fees or honoraria from AbbVie, UCB, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Celgene. Honoraria: S.S. has received speaker or consultation fees or honoraria from AbbVie, UCB, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Celgene. Grants/research support; S.S has received funding for research/ grants from Pfizer, Janssen, BMS, Celgene, UCB, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GSK.

Download Full-text

The Effectiveness and Retention Rate of Iguratimod in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with/without Methotrexate in Daily Medical Care

Life ◽

10.3390/life10110261 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (11) ◽

pp. 261

Author(s):

Asuka Inoue ◽

Yuji Nozaki ◽

Yasuaki Hirooka ◽

Koji Kinoshita ◽

Yasutaka Chiba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Clinical Response ◽

Disease Activity Score ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Retention Rates ◽

C Reactive Protein ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

Secondary Endpoints

(1) Background: We evaluated the clinical response of iguratimod (IGU) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) being treated with or without methotrexate (MTX) over 54 weeks. (2) Methods: 106 patients with RA undergoing IGU were retrospectively observed. RA patients were divided into those treated with MTX+IGU (n = 35) and those treated with IGU (n = 71). The primary endpoint was the clinical response of the Disease Activity Score assessing 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) differences in the changes from baseline to 54 weeks between MTX+IGU and IGU groups. Secondary endpoints, such as the clinical response, retention rate, and safety, were evaluated. (3) Results: The DAS28-CRP difference in the changes between the two groups were −0.2. DAS28-CRP were significantly reduced from the baseline in the MTX+IGU and IGU groups (−1.43 and −1.20 from baseline, respectively). The retention rates were 71.4% in the MTX+IGU groups and 59.2% in the IGU groups (p = 0.16). Adverse events were observed in a total of 6 (17.1%) MTX+IGU patients and 20 (28.2%) IGU patients (p = 0.21). (4) Conclusions: IGU therapy may be a useful treatment option for patients who cannot be treated with MTX.

Download Full-text

AB0217 NON MEDICAL SWITCH FROM ETANERCEPT ORIGINATOR TO BIOSIMILAR GP2015 IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHIES

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1557 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1135.1-1135

Author(s):

M. Colaci ◽

M. L. Aprile ◽

A. La Rosa ◽

A. DI Maggio ◽

L. Malatino

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Current Treatment ◽

Chronic Arthritis ◽

Biologic Drugs ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

One Year ◽

Almost All ◽

Withdrawal Of Therapy

Background:In the last decades, new biologic drugs were introduced for the treatment of chronic inflammatory arthropathies, progressively leading to a relevant increase of medical costs. However, the introduction of biosimilars (biologic molecules similar to branded drugs with expired patent) permitted to optimize the financial resources. The non-medical switch (NMS) is the switch from a biologic originator to a biosimilar agent for economic reasons only, on the basis of the substantial equivalence as regards efficacy and safety between originator and biosimilar drugs.In literature, several evidences from clinical trials and registry studies showed that the switch from etanercept originator to biosimilar SB4 was safe [1]. Instead no sufficient data may be found regarding the biosimilar GP2015.Objectives:We aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, and retention rate in a series of patients with chronic arthritis treated with etanercept originator who underwent to NMS towards the ETN biosimilar GP2015.Methods:From March to June 2020, all patient referred in our Centre affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) treated with etanercept originator and in remission/low disease activity for at least 6 months underwent to NMS. Data on disease activity (DAS28-PCR/CDAI/SDAI; DAPSA; BASDAI), eventual adverse events and causes of withdrawal of therapy were collected at 2, 4 and 6 months after the switch.Results:We recruited 71 consecutive patients (M/F: 24/47; mean age 55,8± 11,1 years; 39 RA; 15 PA; 17 axSpA; mean duration therapy 7.3±3.8 years). Disease activity was unchanged for almost all patients after 6 months from the switch (median ΔDAS28-PCR/CDAI/SDAI: 0,1/0/0,5; median ΔDAPSA: 0; median ΔBASDAI: 0) Moreover, the 6-month retention rate was 97.2%. Only 2 patients (2.8%) switched back to the originator due to loss of efficacy in one case and adverse events in the second case (paraesthesia, headache, dizziness and worsening of arthralgia).Conclusion:Our study confirmed that the NMS from ETN originator to GP2015 represents a safe practice that maintains the efficacy of the current treatment.References:[1]Glintborg B, AG, Omerovic E, et Al. To switch or not to switch: results of a nationwide guideline of mandatory switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept. One-year treatment outcomes in 2061 patients with inflammatory arthritis from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:192–200.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in 608 patients with psoriatic arthritis in real life: a 24-month prospective, multicentre study

RMD Open ◽

10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001519 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. e001519

Author(s):

Roberta Ramonda ◽

Mariagrazia Lorenzin ◽

Antonio Carriero ◽

Maria Sole Chimenti ◽

Raffaele Scarpa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Biological Treatment ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Real Life ◽

Drug Retention ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Drug Retention Rate

ObjectivesTo evaluate in a multicentric Italian cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on secukinumab followed for 24 months: (1) the long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, (2) the drug retention rate and minimal disease activity (MDA), (3) diﬀerences in the outcomes according to the biological treatment line: biologic-naïve patients (group A) versus multifailure (group B) patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with PsA receiving secukinumab were evaluated prospectively. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities and follow-up duration were collected. Disease activity/functional/clinimetric scores and biochemical values were recorded at baseline (T0), 6(T6), 12(T12) and 24(T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated overtime with descriptive statistics; multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of drug-discontinuation and MDA at T6. Infections and adverse events were recorded.Results608 patients (41.28% men; mean (SD) age 52.78 (11.33)) were enrolled; secukinumab was prescribed as first-line biological treatment in 227 (37.34%) patients, as second (or more)-line biological treatment in 381 (62.66%). Effectiveness of secukinumab was shown with an improvement in several outcomes, such as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (T0=3.26 (0.88) vs T24=1.60 (0.69) ;p=0.02) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (T0=25.29 (11.14) vs T24=7.69 (4.51); p<0.01). At T24, group A showed lower Psoriasis Area Severity Index (p=0.04), erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein (p=0.03 ;p=0.05) and joint count (p=0.03) compared with group B. At T24, MDA was achieved in 75.71% of group A and 70.37% of group B. Treatment was discontinued in 123 (20.23%) patients, mainly due to primary/secondary loss of effectiveness, and in 22 due to adverse events. Retention rate at T24 was 71% in the whole population, with some difference depending on secukinumab dosage (p=0.004) and gender (p=0.05).ConclusionsIn a real-life clinical setting, secukimumab proved safe and effective in all PsA domains, with notable drug retention rate.

Download Full-text

AB0337 TOFACITINIB MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINED WITH METHOTREXATE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS SHOW SIMILAR RETENTION OVER FOUR YEARS. REPORT FROM RHUMADATA ®

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2479 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1467.1-1467

Author(s):

D. Choquette ◽

L. Bessette ◽

L. Choquette Sauvageau ◽

I. Ferdinand ◽

B. Haraoui ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Real World ◽

Treatment Initiation ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Janus Kinase ◽

P Value ◽

Research Support ◽

Medication Discontinuation ◽

Kaplan Meier

Background:Since the introduction of biologic agents around the turn of the century, the scientific evidence shows that the majority of agents, independent of the therapeutic target, have a better outcome when used in combination with methotrexate (MTX). In 2014, tofacitinib (TOFA), an agent targeting Janus kinase 1 and 3, has reached the Canadian market with data showing that the combination with MTX may not be necessary [1,2].Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and retention rate of TOFA in real-world patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods:Two cohorts of patients prescribed TOFA was created. The first cohort was formed of patients who were receiving MTX concomitantly with TOFA (COMBO) and the other of patients using TOFA in monotherapy (MONO). MONO patients either never use MTX or were prescribed MTX post-TOFA initiation for at most 20% of the time they were on TOFA. COMBO patients received MTX at the time of TOFA initiation or were prescribed MTX post-TOFA initiation for at least 80% of the time. For all those patients, baseline demographic data definitions. Disease activity score and HAQ-DI were compared from the initiation of TOFA to the last visit. Time to medication discontinuation was extracted, and survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier calculation for MONO and COMBO cohorts.Results:Overall, 194 patients were selected. Most were women (83%) on average younger than the men (men: 62.6 ± 11.0 years vs. women: 56.9 ± 12.1 years, p-value=0.0130). The patient’s assessments of global disease activity, pain and fatigue were respectively 5.0 ± 2.7, 5.2 ± 2.9, 5.1 ± 3.1 in the COMBO group and 6.2 ± 2.5, 6.5 ± 2.6, 6.3 ± 2.8 in the MONO group all differences being significant across groups. HAQ-DI at treatment initiation was 1.3 ± 0.7 and 1.5 ± 0.7 in the COMBO and MONO groups, respectively, p-value=0.0858. Similarly, the SDAI score at treatment initiation was 23.9 ± 9.4 and 25.2 ± 11.5, p-value=0.5546. Average changes in SDAI were -13.4 ± 15.5 (COMBO) and -8.9 ± 13.5 (MONO), p-value=0.1515, and changes in HAQ -0.21 ± 0.63 and -0.26 ± 0.74, p-value 0.6112. At treatment initiation, DAS28(4)ESR were 4.4 ± 1.4 (COMBO) and 4.6 ± 1.3 (MONO), p-value 0.5815, with respective average changes of -1.06 ± 2.07 and -0.70 ± 1.96, p-value=0.2852. The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the COMBO and MONO retention curves were not statistically different (log-rank p-value=0.9318).Conclusion:Sustainability of TOFA in MONO or COMBO are not statistically different as are the changes in DAS28(4)ESR and SDAI. Despite this result, some patients may still benefit from combination with MTX.References:[1]Product Monograph - XELJANZ ® (tofacitinib) tablets for oral administration Initial U.S. Approval: 2012.[2] Reed GW, Gerber RA, Shan Y, et al. Real-World Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis [published online ahead of print, 2019 Nov 9].Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6(4):573–586. doi:10.1007/s40744-019-00177-4.Disclosure of Interests:Denis Choquette Grant/research support from: Rhumadata is supported by grants from Pfizer, Amgen, Abbvie, Gylead, BMS, Novartis, Sandoz, eli Lilly,, Consultant of: Pfizer, Amgen, Abbvie, Gylead, BMS, Novartis, Sandoz, eli Lilly,, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Abbvie, Gylead, BMS, Novartis, Sandoz, eli Lilly,, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Loïc Choquette Sauvageau: None declared, Isabelle Ferdinand Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Boulos Haraoui Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB, Frédéric Massicotte Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Janssen, Jean-Pierre Pelletier Shareholder of: ArthroLab Inc., Grant/research support from: TRB Chemedica, Speakers bureau: TRB Chemedica and Mylan, Jean-Pierre Raynauld Consultant of: ArthroLab Inc., Marie-Anaïs Rémillard Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Diane Sauvageau: None declared, Édith Villeneuve Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme,UCB, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Louis Coupal: None declared

Download Full-text

THU0399 HOW DO TNF-ALPHA-INHIBITORS IN MEDICAL HISTORY AFFECT PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES AND RETENTION IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH SECUKINUMAB IN REAL WORLD? - GERMAN AQUILA STUDY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.220 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 436-437

Author(s):

U. Kiltz ◽

J. Brandt-Juergens ◽

P. Kästner ◽

E. Riechers ◽

D. Peterlik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Treatment Outcomes ◽

Medical History ◽

Physical Functioning ◽

Real World ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Retention Rates ◽

Research Support ◽

Kaplan Meier

Background:Secukinumab (SEC), a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin 17A, is approved for treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there is lack of real-world evidence on SEC treatment outcomes, disease activity, physical functioning and on its retention, especially in anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) naïve patients and patients pretreated with different anti-TNFs in medical history.1Objectives:The aim of this interim analysis is to evaluate SEC treatment outcomes on disease activity, physical functioning and retention rates in AS patients stratified by number of anti-TNFs (naive, 1 or ≥2) in medical history.Methods:AQUILA is an ongoing, multi-center, non-interventional study. AS and psoriatic arthritis patients treated with SEC in daily practice are enrolled and observed from baseline (BL, d0 or d1 of study start) up to week 52 according to clinical routine. Real-world effectiveness of SEC was assessed prospectively and analyzed as observed. Here, we report interim results of SEC effectiveness on different treatment outcomes in AS patients by means of validated questionnaires such as patient´s global assessment (PGA), Bath Ankylosing Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Assessment of Spondyloarthritis Health Index (ASAS-HI). In addition, retention rates (time from study inclusion until premature SEC treatment discontinuation) were assessed through Kaplan-Meier plots. This interim analysis focuses onanti-TNF naïveand AS patients treated with1 anti-TNFor≥2 anti-TNFsin medical history. Wilcoxon tests were conducted to show significant differences between the subgroups.Results:At BL, 311 AS patients were included; 72 (23.2%) of them received SEC already for more than 1 day up to more than 6 months before BL. Most AS patients were anti-TNF-experienced (71.1%): 82 (26.4%) and 139 (44.7%) AS patients had 1 or ≥2 prior anti-TNF treatments, respectively. BL scores for PGA, BASDAI and ASAS-HI were similar between the different anti-TNF subgroups. Constant improvement was shown in all parameters from BL up to week 52, irrespective of prior anti-TNF treatment (PGA-anti-TNF naïve: 5.9 to 3.5, PGA-1 anti-TNF:6.1 to 4.2 and PGA-≥2 anti-TNFs:6.7 to 5.1; BASDAI-anti-TNF naïve: 5.3 to 3.4, BASDAI-1 anti-TNF:5.5 to 3.7 and BASDAI-≥2 anti-TNFs:5.7 to 4.7). However, overall better improvement was observed inanti-TNF naïvepatients, as seen by the example of ASAS-HI (Fig. 1). Between 30% and 40% of patients prematurely discontinued SEC treatment in the subgroups1 anti-TNFand≥2 anti-TNFs, respectively, while only about 20% did so in theanti-TNF naïveAS patients (Fig. 2).Conclusion:SEC has shown to improve disease activity, physical functioning and QoL in anti-TNF-naïve and pretreated AS patients in a real-world setting. The benefits of SEC were numerically more distinct in anti-TNF-naïve patients. Moreover, SEC demonstrated high retention rate, particularly in anti-TNF-naïve patients, thereby confirming previously reported real-world data on SEC from EuroSpA research collaboration network.2References:[1]Glintborg B, et al, Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1149-55; 2. Michelsen B, et al, Arthritis Rheumatol 2019:71(suppl10) #1822Disclosure of Interests:Uta Kiltz Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly and Company, Grünenthal, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Jan Brandt-Juergens: None declared, Peter Kästner Consultant of: Chugai, Novartis, Elke Riechers Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Daniel Peterlik Employee of: Novartis Pharma GmbH, Hans-Peter Tony Consultant of: AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SanofiFigure 1.Change of health in AS patients treated with SEC stratified by anti-TNF pretreatmentFigure 2.SEC treatment retention depending on anti-TNF pretreatment (Kaplan-Meier plot)

Download Full-text

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FREQUENCY OF RETENTION OF FLOWABLE NANOCLUSTER COMPOSITE AND RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal ◽

10.51253/pafmj.v71i1.2598 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 71 (1) ◽

pp. 299-303

Author(s):

Hannan Humayun Khan ◽

Mafaza Alam ◽

Syed Muzammil Hussain Shah ◽

Saman Mehmood ◽

Ajmal Yousaf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Armed Forces ◽

Retention Rates ◽

Filling Material ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Cervical Lesions ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

One Year

Objective: To investigate and compare the retention rates of Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite and Resinmodified-Glass-Ionomers in non-carious cervical lesions in maxillary molars. Study Design: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Operative Dentistry, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry,Rawalpindi, from Jan 2017 to Dec 2018. Methodology: Male patients ranging from 30-40 years with moderate non-carious cervical lesions of maxillarypremolars and molars of either quadrant presenting to out-patient department were selected through convenience sampling. These lesions were restored with Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite and Resin-Modified-GlassIonomer. Retention of these two materials over the period of 6 months, 1 year and 2 years was noted. Chi square statistics were used to compare groups. Results: The retention of Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite was 92% in 6 months, 85% in one year and 81% in two years. Whereas, for resin-modified-glass-ionomer restorations, the frequency of retention of the filling material was 97% at 6 months, 93% at one year and 89% at two years period. Out of the total 74 resin-modified-glassionomers restorations, 8 (11%) had dislodged by the end of the second year as compared to 14 (19%) dislodged restorations for Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study reveals that resin modified glass-ionomer has a superior retention rate over the period of two years as compared to Flowable-Nanocluster Composite. A dentist should have an insight into compositions of restorative materials for the longevity of their retention in various lesions.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and safety of 12-month certolizumab pegol treatment for axial spondyloarthritis in real-world clinical practice in Europe

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa181 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 60 (1) ◽

pp. 113-124

Author(s):

Xenofon Baraliakos ◽

Torsten Witte ◽

Luc De Clerck ◽

Bruno Frediani ◽

Eduardo Collantes-Estévez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Practice ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽

Certolizumab Pegol ◽

Signs And Symptoms ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

The Mean ◽

One Year

Abstract Objectives The efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP), an Fc-free, PEGylated anti-TNF, in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has been established in clinical trial settings. We report CZP effectiveness and safety in European clinical practice in patients with axSpA, including radiographic (r-) and non-radiographic (nr-) axSpA. Methods CIMAX (NCT02354105), a European non-interventional multicentre prospective study, observed CZP treatment response and safety over 12 months in a real-world axSpA cohort. The primary outcome was change from baseline in BASDAI to week 52, with additional outcomes pertaining to effectiveness and safety. Patients who received ≥1 dose CZP were followed up for adverse events, and those with baseline and ≥1 post-baseline BASDAI assessment were included in effectiveness analyses. Results A total of 672 patients (r-axSpA: 469; nr-axSpA: 201; unconfirmed diagnosis: 2) from 101 sites received ≥1 dose of CZP, of whom 564 (r-axSpA: 384; nr-axSpA: 179; unconfirmed: 1) were included in the effectiveness analyses. The mean baseline BASDAI was 6.1 in the overall axSpA population and r-axSpA and nr-axSpA subpopulations. At week 52, the mean (s.d.) change in BASDAI was −2.9 (2.3; n = 439); for r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, it was −2.9 (2.2; n = 301) and −2.8 (2.4; n = 137), respectively (P <0.0001 for all). Similar improvements were seen across other axSpA disease measures. In total, 37.9% (255/672) patients experienced adverse events, and 1.8% (12/672) experienced ≥1 serious adverse events. Conclusion Improvements observed in signs and symptoms of axSpA following one year of CZP treatment in real-world clinical practice were similar to those from previous randomized clinical trials, with no new safety concerns.

Download Full-text

Mate and Territory Retention in Yellow-Eyed Penguins

The Condor ◽

10.1093/condor/107.3.703 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 107 (3) ◽

pp. 703-709 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alvin N. Setiawan ◽

Melanie Massaro ◽

John T. Darby ◽

Lloyd S. Davis

Keyword(s):

Reproductive Success ◽

Breeding Season ◽

Good Predictor ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Pair Formation ◽

Retention Rates ◽

Fledging Success ◽

Breeding Attempt ◽

Males And Females ◽

One Year

AbstractUsing nest and banding data collected from 1991 to 2002, we investigated mate and territory retention rates of Yellow-eyed Penguins (Megadyptes antipodes), and the effects of reproductive success. Annual mate retention rate was 63%, and territory retention for males and females were 52% and 46% respectively. The majority of pair dissolutions were due to death of a partner, with only 6% of bonds ending in separation. Previous reproductive success was a good predictor of mate or territory retention as pairs that failed to fledge a single chick were significantly more likely to separate or move their territories than those that were successful at fledging chicks. Reproductive success of birds that changed their mates or moved territories was not higher than those that retained their mates or territories. However, birds that moved territories were less likely to have reduced fledging success relative to their previous breeding attempt. Birds that did not retain their mates, particularly males, were significantly more likely to skip breeding for at least one year. This suggests that the costs of mate or territory changes are not accrued at the end of the breeding attempt (as reflected by the number of fledged chicks), but are associated with the costs of pair formation and establishment of territories at the beginning of the breeding season.Retención de Parejas y Territorios en Pingüinos Megadyptes antipodesResumen. Investigamos las tasas de retención de parejas y de territorios por parte de pingüinos Megadyptes antipodes y el efecto del éxito reproductivo sobre estas tasas con base en datos de nidificación y anillamiento recolectados entre 1991 y 2002. La tasa anual de retención de parejas fue del 63% y las de retención de territorios del 52% y 46% para machos y hembras, respectivamente. La mayoría de las disoluciones de parejas se debieron a la muerte de una de las aves y sólo el 6% de las parejas terminaron separándose. El éxito reproductivo previo predijo acertadamente la retención de compañeros y de territorios, ya que las parejas que no lograron emplumar ningún pichón tuvieron una probablilidad de disolverse o de cambiar de territorio significativamente mayor que las que criaron exitosamente. El éxito reproductivo de las aves que cambiaron de pareja o de territorio no fue mayor que el de aquellas que no lo hicieron. Sin embargo, los individuos que cambiaron de territorio fueron más propensos a presentar un éxito de emplumamiento reducido con respecto a su intento reproductivo previo. Las aves que no retuvieron sus parejas, particularmente los machos, presentaron una probabilidad mayor de no reproducirse durante al menos un año. Esto sugiere que los costos que implica cambiar de pareja o de territorio no se hacen evidentes al final del intento reproductivo (como lo indica el número de volantones producidos), sino que están asociados con los costos de la formación de parejas y el establecimiento de territorios al comienzo de la época reproductiva.

Download Full-text

Sirolimus versus tacrolimus for systemic lupus erythematosus treatment: results from a real-world CSTAR cohort study

Lupus Science & Medicine ◽

10.1136/lupus-2021-000617 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. e000617

Author(s):

Nan Jiang ◽

Mengtao Li ◽

Hongfeng Zhang ◽

Xinwang Duan ◽

Xiaofeng Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Real World ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Activity Index ◽

Drug Discontinuation ◽

Systemic Lupus

ObjectiveThe effectiveness and safety of sirolimus for SLE treatment have been shown in some uncontrolled studies. However, a comparison of sirolimus with other classic immunosuppressants has not been reported. We conducted the study to compare the effectiveness and safety of sirolimus versus tacrolimus for SLE treatment.MethodsA real-world cohort study was conducted. Patients with clinically active SLE who were prescribed sirolimus or tacrolimus were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to ensure equivalent disease conditions and background medications. SLE disease activity indices, serological parameters, steroid doses, modification of other immunosuppressants, renal effectiveness and adverse events were compared between the two groups at 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month follow-up visits.ResultsData from 52 patients in each of the sirolimus and tacrolimus groups were analysed. Indices regarding the effectiveness of sirolimus, including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores, physician’s global assessment (PhGA) scores, and proportion of patients with SLEDAI-2K reduction of ≥4 and PhGA increase of <0.3, were equivalent to those of tacrolimus at all follow-up timepoints (all p≥0.05). Greater improvements in complement levels were observed in the sirolimus group at 3 and 6 months. Higher percentages of patients with prednisone doses ≤7.5 mg/day were observed in the sirolimus group at all timepoints. Seventeen adverse events in the sirolimus group were recorded. None was severe or led to drug discontinuation.ConclusionsOverall, sirolimus was as effective as tacrolimus in the treatment of SLE. Sirolimus had better effects on serological improvement and glucocorticoid tapering. Sirolimus was well tolerated in patients with SLE.

Download Full-text

P504 Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab maintenance therapy in 103 patients with real-world ulcerative colitis: A GETAID multicentre cohort study

Journal of Crohn s and Colitis ◽

10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab076.626 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S486-S487

Author(s):

M Fumery ◽

J Filippi ◽

V Abitbol ◽

A Biron ◽

D Laharie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ulcerative Colitis ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Clinical Remission ◽

Real Life ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Phase Iii Trials ◽

One Year

Abstract Background Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), but no real-life long-term data is currently available. Methods From January to September 2019, all consecutive patients with active UC treated with ustekinumab in a GETAID centre were included. Patients were evaluated at week 52. Remission was defined by a partial Mayo Clinic score ≤ 2. The aim of the present study was to assess long-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in UC. Results 103 UC patients (62 men; mean age: 41.2 ± 16.2 years; 52% pancolitis E3) were included in 21 centres. History of immunomodulator, anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies was noted in 84.5%, 99.0% and 85.4% of the cases, respectively. At week 54, 44 (43%) patients discontinued ustekinumab, for lack of efficacy (n=41), pregnancy (n=1), persistence of eczematiform lesions (n=1) or personal decision (n=1). Cumulative probabilities of ustekinumab persistence were 96.1%, 81.6%, 71.7%, and 58.4% after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a CRP>5 mg/L at week 0 (OR=2.91, CI95%[1.15–7.36]; p=0.02) and concomitant steroids at week 0 (OR=3.05, CI95%[1.30–7.14]; p=0.01) were significantly associated with ustekinumab discontinuation within one year. The overall rate of steroid-free clinical remission at week 52 was 32% of whom 71% had null rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscores. Ten patients (9.7%) underwent colectomy within a median of 6.7 [4.3–10.6] months. Adverse events were observed in 15 (16.9%) patients, of whom 4 (4.5%) had severe adverse events including three patients with exacerbation of UC leading to hospitalization, and a 62 years-old men who died from a myocardial infarction four months after ustekinumab initiation. Conclusion In this real-world cohort study that included patients with refractory ulcerative colitis to multiple therapies, more than one-half of patients were still treated by ustekinumab and one-third were in steroid-free clinical remission, after 52 weeks.

Download Full-text