Prognostic impact of thyroid dysfunctions on progression-free survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies

Aims: It is debated whether the NRAS-mutant melanoma is more aggressive than NRAS wildtype. It is equally controversial whether NRAS-mutant metastatic melanoma (MM) is more responsive to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CII). 331 patients treated with CII as first-line were retrospectively recruited: 162 NRAS-mutant/BRAF wild-type (mut/wt) and 169 wt/wt. We compared the two cohorts regarding the characteristics of primary and metastatic disease, disease-free interval (DFI) and outcome to CII. No substantial differences were observed between the two groups at melanoma onset, except for a more frequent ulceration in the wt/wt group (p = 0.03). Also, the DFI was very similar in the two cohorts. In advanced disease, we only found lung and brain progression more frequent in the wt/wt group. Regarding the outcomes to CII, no significant differences were reported in overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) (42% versus 37%, 60% versus 59%, 12 (95% CI, 7–18) versus 9 months (95% CI, 6–16) and 32 (95% CI, 23–49) versus 27 months (95% CI, 16–35), respectively). Irrespectively of mutational status, a longer OS was significantly associated with normal LDH, <3 metastatic sites, lower white blood cell and platelet count, lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (N/L) ratio. Our data do not show increased aggressiveness and higher responsiveness to CII in NRAS-mutant MM.

Download Full-text

Long-term progression-free survival of patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma following high-dose interleukin-2

Journal of Investigative Medicine ◽

10.1136/jim-2020-001650 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 69 (4) ◽

pp. 888-892

Author(s):

Joseph I Clark ◽

Brendan Curti ◽

Elizabeth J Davis ◽

Howard Kaufman ◽

Asim Amin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Metastatic Melanoma ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Interleukin 2 ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose ◽

Free Survival

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) was approved in the 1990s after demonstrating durable complete responses (CRs) in some patients with metastatic melanoma (mM) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients who achieve this level of disease control have also demonstrated improved survival compared with patients who progress, but limited data are available describing the long-term course. The aim of this study was to better characterize long-term survival following successful HD IL-2 treatment in patients with no subsequent systemic therapy. Eleven HD IL-2 treatment centers identified patients with survival ≥5 years after HD IL-2, with no subsequent systemic therapy. Survival was evaluated from the date of IL-2 treatment to June 2017. Treatment courses consisted of 2 1-week cycles of HD IL-2. Patients were treated with HD IL-2 alone, or HD IL-2 followed by local therapy to achieve maximal response. 100 patients are reported: 54 patients with mM and 46 patients with mRCC. Progression-free survival (PFS) after HD IL-2 ranges from 5+ years to 30+ years, with a median follow-up of 10+ years. 27 mRCC and 32 mM are alive ≥10 years after IL-2. Thus, a small subset of patients with mM and mRCC achieve long-term PFS (≥5 years) after treatment with HD IL-2 as their only systemic therapy. The ability of HD IL-2 therapy to induce prolonged PFS should be a major consideration in studies of new immunotherapy combinations for mM and mRCC.

Download Full-text

G-8 Geriatric Screening Tool Independently Predicts Progression-Free Survival in Older Ovarian Cancer Patients Irrespective of Maximal Surgical Effort: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study

Gerontology ◽

10.1159/000520328 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Katharina Anic ◽

Sophie Birkert ◽

Mona Wanda Schmidt ◽

Valerie Catherine Linz ◽

Anne-Sophie Heimes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Global Health ◽

Screening Tool ◽

Prognostic Index ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Free Survival ◽

Geriatric Screening ◽

The Impact

Background: We evaluated the prognostic impact of various global health assessment tools in patients older than 60 years with ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: G-8 geriatric screening tool (G-8 score), Lee Schonberg prognostic index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined retrospectively in a consecutive cohort of elderly patients with OC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier method were performed to analyze the impact of the preoperative global health status on survival. Results: 116 patients entered the study. In multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical-pathological factors, only the G-8 score retained significance as a prognostic parameter of progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.970; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.056–3.677]; p = 0.033). Fifty-six patients were classified as G-8-nonfrail with an increased PFS compared to 50 G-8-frail patients (53.4% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.010). A higher CCI was associated with decreased PFS (45.1% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.012), but it did not influence the risk of recurrences or death (p = 0.360; p = 0.111). The Lee Schonberg prognostic index, the ECOG, and age were not associated with survival. Conclusions: The G-8 score independently predicted PFS in elderly OC patients regardless of maximal surgical effort. Thus, it could be useful to assess surgical treatment based on frailty rather than age alone.

Download Full-text

Overexpression of the OCT-1 Gene Is a Biomarker Associated with Poor Outcomes in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) - Data from a Retrospective Cohort from Latin America: Defining a Very High-Risk Clinical-Molecular Subgroup

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142715 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 41-42

Author(s):

Luis Alberto de Padua Covas Lage ◽

Gisele Rodrigues Gouveia ◽

Suzete Cleusa Ferreira ◽

Sheila Aparecida Coelho de Siqueira ◽

Abrahão Elias Hallack Neto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

High Risk ◽

B Cell ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Molecular Subgroup ◽

Free Survival ◽

Very High

Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent lymphoid malignancy, representing 30-40% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). They comprise a group of aggressive and heterogeneous neoplasms in terms of clinical presentation, response to therapy and prognosis. The OCT-1 gene is a member of the homodomain-POU family of transcriptional regulators of B-lymphoid differentiation. OCT-1 acts by controlling the expression of specific B-cell genes, such as BCL-2, a potent inhibitor of apoptosis that is essential for the differentiation of B-cells in the germinal center. These genes can be expressed in DLBCL, but the role of BCL-2 in its prognosis has been contradictory and the prognostic impact of the OCT-1 gene has not yet been tested in this lymphoma. Methods: In this observational, retrospective, single-center study, we investigated the prognostic impact of BCL-2 and OCT-1 gene expression in Brazilian patients with DLCBL treated with immunopolychemotherapy R-CHOP in a real-world context. The BCL-2 and OCT-1 genes were assessed in 78.5% (77/98) DLBCL patients, and the RNA for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was isolated from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. The values obtained for gene expression were transformed into categorical variables according to their medians (6.27 for BCL-2 and 24.5 for OCT-1). The association between clinical and laboratory variables and results of gene expression was verified by the Fischer test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed using Cox's bivariate regression method and multivariate analysis using Cox multiple regression methodology. Results: The median age of the cohort was 54.5 years (15-84), 50% (49/98) were male, 49.4% (38/77) and 51.4% (40/77) showed expression of OCT-1 and BCL- 2 ≥ median, respectively. The clinical characteristics of the 98 Brazilian patients with DLBCL that comprised our cohort are summarized in Table 1. The overall response rate (ORR) in all patients was 68.4% (67/98), 65.3% (64/98) showed a complete response (CR), and 3.1% (3/98) showed partial response (PR), while 6.1% (6/98) were primary refractory. With a median follow-up of 3.77 years (95% CI: 3.2-4.1), the median overall survival (OS) was 5.43 years (95% CI: 2.2-NR) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.15 years (95% CI: 2.9-NR). The 5-year OS and PFS was 54.2% (42.2% -64.8%) and 52.0% (40.1-62.6%), respectively. In the univariate analysis OCT-1 ≥ median was associated with shortened OS (HR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.21-4.96, p = 0.013) and PFS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.14-4.51, p = 0.019). Overexpression of BCL-2 was associated with worse PFS (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.02-3.95, p = 0.043). Subgroup analysis showed that OCT-1 overexpression predominated in elderly individuals (≥ 60 years) in a statistically significant mode (29/38 cases - 76.3%, p = 0.029). It was also observed that overexpression of OCT-1 was associated with worse OS in the high-risk adjusted International Prognostic Index (aIPI) subgroup (p = 0.048) - Figure 1, and worse PFS in patients ≥ 60 years old (p = 0.025) - Figure 2. In the multivariate analysis, overexpression of OCT-1 was associated with poor PFS (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.06-4.76, p = 0.035). Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrated that overexpression of the OCT-1 gene was an independent prognostic factor associated with adverse outcomes in Brazilian patients with DLCBL. We also show that in patients with unfavorable risk, such as the elderly and those with intermediate-high and high-risk IPI, overexpression of OCT-1 contributed to the identification of a very high-risk clinical-molecular subgroup, where the results with standard R-CHOP therapy are unsatisfactory, and they may benefit from intensified therapeutic strategies. Our results are preliminary and need to be validated in subsequent studies of prospective nature and with an expanded sample. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

BIOM-38. THE PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF THE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL MARKERS H3K27me3, SSTR1-5 AND BAP1 IN MENINGIOMA

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noab196.069 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽

pp. vi19-vi19

Author(s):

Felix Behling ◽

Christina Fodi ◽

Mirjam Renovanz ◽

Frank Paulsen ◽

Marco Skardelly ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tumor Recurrence ◽

Prognostic Markers ◽

Somatostatin Receptors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Potential Candidate ◽

Primary Tumors ◽

Free Survival ◽

Immunohistochemical Markers ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common primary tumors of the nervous system. These slow growing tumors arise from the meninges. Most patients can be cured by surgical excision. Yet, approximately 20% of patients suffer tumor recurrence. Prognostic markers are warranted to facilitate the identification of patients with an increased risk of tumor recurrence. Immunohistochemical markers are very interesting candidates in this regard and could be integrated into the routine clinical workflow as an inexpensive tool for prognostication and risk stratification. We analyzed the prognostic impact of the immunohistochemical expression of H3K27me3, somatostatin receptors 1-5 and BAP1 in the Tübingen meningioma cohort including > 1200 meningiomas. We identified an independent negative prognostic impact of the loss of H3K27me3. An increased expression score for SSTR2A was associated with a shorter progression-free survival. Higher expression of SSTR5 indicated a more favorable prognosis. The loss of BAP1 expression in meningioma cells was a negative prognostic factor with a shorter progression-free survival. Taken together, we present potential candidate prognostic markers that could be further investigated in prospective cohorts to determine their clinical utility.

Download Full-text

Treatment exceeds expectations with vemurafenib monotherapy in a patient with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/1078155220906011 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 26 (7) ◽

pp. 1754-1758

Author(s):

Mesut Yilmaz ◽

Şermin Güven Meşe

Keyword(s):

Metastatic Melanoma ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Braf Inhibitors ◽

Free Survival ◽

Therapy Options ◽

Modern Era ◽

Braf Mutant

Introduction Patients with distant metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis, with a reported median survival time of six to eight months. In modern era, survival has prolonged with the immunotherapy and targeted therapy options. Potent and selective BRAF inhibitors have been developed that specifically inhibit mutated BRAF over other RAF kinases. Vemurafenib was the first selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed to target the V600E allele of BRAF-mutant melanoma. Case Report In this report, we present a case of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma, which is being treated with vemurafenib monotherapy with complete response for about seven years. Management and Outcome The patient is still being treated with vemurafenib and radiologic complete response is ongoing for about seven years. Discussion Patients treated with BRAF inhibitors monotherapy had promising response rates and improvement in the progression-free survival and overall survival, but melanoma cells became resistant very quickly, affecting the progression. In this case, we present a case that has permanent response to vemurafenib monotherapy.

Download Full-text

Application of Circulating Cell-Free Tumor DNA Profiles for Therapeutic Monitoring and Outcome Prediction in Genetically Heterogeneous Metastatic Melanoma

JCO Precision Oncology ◽

10.1200/po.18.00229 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 1-10 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Renáta Váraljai ◽

Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht ◽

Teofila Seremet ◽

Joey Mark S. Diaz ◽

Jérémie Nsengimana ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Protein Kinase ◽

Metastatic Melanoma ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽

Quantitative Detection ◽

Early Assessment ◽

Free Survival ◽

Mitogen Activated Protein ◽

Tumor Dna

PURPOSE Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) reflects the heterogeneous spectrum of tumor-specific mutations, especially in systemic disease. We validated plasma-based assays that allow the dynamic quantitative detection of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker for tumor load and prediction of therapy response in melanoma. MATERIALS and METHODS We analyzed plasma-derived ctDNA from a large training cohort (n = 96) of patients with advanced-stage melanoma, with assays for the BRAFV600E and NRASQ61 driver mutations as well as TERTC250T and TERTC228T promoter mutations. An independent patient cohort (n = 35) was used to validate the utility of ctDNA monitoring under mitogen-activated protein kinase–targeted or immune checkpoint therapies. RESULTS Elevated plasma ctDNA level at baseline was an independent prognostic factor of disease progression when compared with serum S100 and lactate dehydrogenase levels in multivariable analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 7.43; 95% CI, 1.01 to 55.19; P = .05). The change in ctDNA levels during therapy correlated with treatment response, where increasing ctDNA was predictive for shorter progression-free survival (eg, for BRAFV600E ctDNA, HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.86 to 7.34; P < .001). Increasing ctDNA levels predicted disease progression significantly earlier than did routine radiologic scans ( P < .05), with a mean lead time of 3.5 months. NRAS-mutant ctDNA was detected in a significant proportion of patients with BRAF-mutant tumors under therapy, but unexpectedly also at baseline. In vitro sensitivity studies suggested that this represents higher-than-expected intratumoral heterogeneity. The detection of NRASQ61 ctDNA in baseline samples of patients with BRAFV600E mutation who were treated with mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.31 to 7.68; P = .03) and shorter overall survival (HR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.57 to 10.58; P = .01). CONCLUSION Our results show the potential role of ctDNA measurement as a sensitive monitoring and prediction tool for the early assessment of disease progression and therapeutic response in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Download Full-text

Time-Related Interpretation of Molecular Response Levels According to Long Term Overall and Progression-Free Survival of CML Patients on First-Line Imatinib Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1681.1681 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1681-1681

Author(s):

Martin C. Müller ◽

Benjamin Hanfstein ◽

Michael Lauseker ◽

Philipp Erben ◽

Ulrike Proetel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Published Data ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Imatinib Treatment ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Treatment Change ◽

Free Survival ◽

Time Points

Abstract Abstract 1681 Introduction: The prognostic impact of different levels of molecular remission (BCR-ABL transcript expression according to International Scale, IS) at various time points on survival under imatinib treatment is still unclear. Whereas recently published data from the IRIS trial described relevant milestones at 6, 12, and 18 months for event-free and progression-free survival (PFS; Hughes et al., Blood 2010), little is known about an association of molecular response with overall survival (OS). The aim of this evaluation of the German CML Study IV was to elucidate the risk of disease progression and death as a function of the depth of molecular response in order to provide guidance in the interpretation of BCR-ABL levels in the clinical setting. Methods: 1,340 patients (median age 52 years, range 16–88, 60% male) were recruited into the randomized German CML Study IV and treated with an imatinib-based therapy as follows: imatinib 400 mg/d, n=381; imatinib 800 mg/d, n=399; imatinib 400 mg/d + interferon alpha, n=402; imatinib 400 mg/d + low-dose cytarabine, n=158. A total of 1,262 patients with typical b2a2 and b3a2 BCR-ABL transcripts were evaluable. Molecular responses were assessed in 811, 764, 671, and 619 patients at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Disease progression was defined as accelerated phase or blastic phase, or death from any reason. Landmark analyses and log-rank tests for OS and PFS were performed according to the achievement of different BCR-ABL response levels at different time points. Results: Patients were grouped according to the degree of molecular response (<0.1%, 0.1%-1%, 1%-10%, >10% BCR-ABL IS) at each of the 4 time points and evaluated for 5-year OS and PFS. Estimated 5-year OS for the different molecular response categories was: 97% vs 96% vs 90% vs 88% (6 months, p=0.009); 96% vs 95% vs 89% vs 69% (12 months, p<0.001); 98% vs 97% vs 92% vs 66% (18 months, p<0.001); 97% vs 96% vs 96% vs 68% (24 months, p<0.001). Applying the 4 response categories revealed estimated 5-year PFS of 97% vs 96% vs 91% vs 86% (p=0.004) at 6 months, 97% vs 92% vs 89% vs 72% (p<0.001) at 12 months, 99% vs 95% vs 90% vs 77% (p<0.001) at 18 months, and 97% vs 97% vs 93% vs 65% (p<0.001) at 24 months (s. Table). Conclusions: Faster and deeper response to imatinib-based treatment revealed to be associated with improved overall and progression-free survival. Inferior OS and PFS can be deducted from the synopsis of BCR-ABL expression and treatment duration, e.g. >1% BCR-ABL IS at 6 months or 12 months might be, and >10% BCR-ABL IS should be a trigger for a treatment change. Thereby this analysis might provide decision guidance for alteration or continuation of primary imatinib treatment. Disclosures: Schnittger: Münchner Leukämie Labor: Equity Ownership. German CML Study Group:EU: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A phase III multi-institutional randomized study of immunization with the gp100: 209–217(210M) peptide followed by high-dose IL-2 compared with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with metastatic melanoma

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.18_suppl.cra9011 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. CRA9011-CRA9011 ◽

Cited By ~ 33

Author(s):

D. J. Schwartzentruber ◽

D. Lawson ◽

J. Richards ◽

R. M. Conry ◽

D. Miller ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Metastatic Melanoma ◽

Nature Medicine ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Peptide Vaccine ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hla Typing ◽

Phase Iii ◽

High Dose ◽

Free Survival

CRA9011 Background: In a phase II study, 13 (42%) of 31 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose (HD) IL-2 plus gp100:209–217(210M) peptide experienced objective responses (S.A. Rosenberg, et al, Nature Medicine 4: 321–327, 1998). Other studies showed a lower response rate (RR) but no randomized studies have been done. Methods: A prospective randomized phase III trial was conducted at 21 centers with 185 patients. Eligibility: stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, HLA A0201, no brain metastases, eligible for HD IL-2, and no previous HD IL-2 or gp100:209–217(210M). Arm 1 received HD IL-2 alone (720,000 IU/kg/dose) and Arm 2 gp100:209–217(210M) peptide + Montanide ISA followed by HD IL-2. The primary objective was clinical response. Secondary objectives were toxicity, disease free/progression free survival, immunologic response and quality of life. Central HLA typing, pathology review, and blinded response assessment were done at the NIH. Central data monitoring was done by The EMMES Corp. and a Data Safety Monitoring Board. Results: Numbers of patients enrolled, treated, and evaluable for response in Arm 1 were 94, 93, and 93 respectively; in Arm 2 91, 86, and 86. Toxicities were consistent with HD IL-2 ± vaccine. Investigator assessed RR showed significant improvement in overall RR for Arm 2=22.1% vs 9.7% (P=0.0223, Chi-Square) and progression free survival (PFS) in favor of Arm 2=2.9 months (1.7–4.5) vs 1.6 (1.5–1.8) (P=0.0101). Median overall survival favors Arm 2=17.6 months (11.8–26.6) vs 12.8 (8.7–16.3) (P=0.0964). Blinded response review is ongoing. Conclusions: RR and PFS were superior with peptide vaccine and HD IL-2 compared to HD IL-2 alone. This represents the first evidence of clinical benefit of vaccination in patients with melanoma. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

RAS mutations and their correlation with survival of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.325 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 325-325

Author(s):

Thiago Lins Almeida ◽

Jessica Ribeiro Gomes ◽

Marcel Cerqueira Cesar Machado ◽

Antonio C. Buzaid ◽

Fernando C. Maluf

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽

Predictive Factor ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Free Survival ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Ras Status ◽

Epidermal Growth

325 Background: The prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) remains poor despite FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine based chemotherapy. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has a major role in pancreatic cancer carcinogenesis.The RAS status showed to be a predictive factor for response to anti-EGFR therapy in colon cancer. We aim to analyze the K-RAS and N-RAS status in PA and its prognostic impact. Methods: Retrospective analysis included 24 patients with metastatic (67%) or locally advanced (29%) PA at diagnosis (AEMOC, Brazil). K-RAS and N-RAS profile were performed by polymerase chain reaction and bidirectional sequencing (codons 12, 13, 61, 117, 146). The results were then analyzed in regards to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in PA. Results: The sample showed: median age of 63 years (28-86), 62.5% male, 45.8% smoker, head site (67%), ductal (68%), and mild differentiation features (45%). The first-line therapy was FOLFIRINOX (62.5%) and gemcitabine (33.3%). The median PFS and OS were 6.5 and 13 months (mo), respectively. Nineteen patients (79.1%) presented mutation in K-RAS: four c.35G>A (G12D), four c.34G>C (G12R), four c.35G>T (G12V), three c.35G>C (G12A), one c.437C>T (A146V), and one c.34G>T (G12C). Mutation in N-RAS (c.38G>A (G13D) was detected in only one patient (4%). The only independent factor for survival was K-RAS status: the c.35G>A (G12D) polymorphism yielded worse PFS and OS when compared to non-c.35G>A (G12D) mutation: 3 vs 7 mo [HR 0.25, 95% CI, (0.04–1.63)] for PFS (p<0,0043) and 3.5 vs13 mo [HR 0.17, 95% CI, 0.01-1.58)] for OS (p<0,0001), respectively. Conclusions: K-RAS was the only prognostic factor for PFS and OS, with the polymorphism c.35G>A (G12D) being related to a worse prognostic. Further studies are necessary to better evaluate whether K-RAS and N-RAS status is prognostic and/or predictive factor.

Download Full-text